Report: No Statistical Global Warming...

Report: No Statistical Global Warming In 17 Years

There are 18 comments on the rightwingnews.com story from Mar 17, 2013, titled Report: No Statistical Global Warming In 17 Years. In it, rightwingnews.com reports that:

London, 15 March: A new report written by Dr David Whitehouse and published today by the Global Warming Policy Foundation concludes that there has been no statistically significant increase in annual global temperatures since 1997.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at rightwingnews.com.

SpaceBlues

United States

#1 Mar 17, 2013
As a denierfest brings a rambling pack of lies, ignore them.

If people with science degrees and PhDs tell you you're making naive and foolish mistakes, misrepresenting what the science says or deliberately distorting it, it must be because they have what?
Gore Blimey

Madrid, Spain

#2 Mar 17, 2013
but it isnīt getting hotter.
The Facts of Truth

Eden Prairie, MN

#3 Mar 17, 2013
Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from Agw, for many false prophets have gone out into the world.
The Facts of Truth

Eden Prairie, MN

#4 Mar 17, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
As a denierfest brings a rambling pack of lies, ignore them.
If people with science degrees and PhDs tell you you're making naive and foolish mistakes, misrepresenting what the science says or deliberately distorting it, it must be because they have what?
Then I saw thrones, and seated on them were those to whom the authority to judge was committed.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#5 Mar 17, 2013
Gore Blimey wrote:
but it isnīt getting hotter.
Yes it is.

http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from...

No statistical warming does not mean it's not warming.

http://www.fool-me-once.com/2010/07/global-wa...
SpaceBlues

United States

#6 Mar 17, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it is.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/gistemp/from...
No statistical warming does not mean it's not warming.
http://www.fool-me-once.com/2010/07/global-wa...
Hi, Fair Game. The second link shows a blank rectangle on the page but I clicked on its youtube reference below:



Until the blank is filled again, this is good to go. It is a very good vid presentation any way.
SpaceBlues

United States

#7 Mar 17, 2013
The Facts of Truth wrote:
<quoted text>
Then I saw thrones, and seated on them were those to whom the authority to judge was committed.
Nice picture. I see the new Pope on his throne.

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#8 Mar 17, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>Hi, Fair Game. The second link shows a blank rectangle on the page but I clicked on its youtube reference below:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =23iGJbkbzzEXX
Until the blank is filled again, this is good to go. It is a very good vid presentation any way.
Hi, Flash content seems to be not working at the moment.
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#9 Mar 18, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
As a denierfest brings a rambling pack of lies, ignore them.
If people with science degrees and PhDs tell you you're making naive and foolish mistakes, misrepresenting what the science says or deliberately distorting it, it must be because they have what?
So why don't you stop the argument and show all your peer reviewed published work? The answer would be you have zero so you count on scientific science fiction cut and paste useless babble.
SpaceBlues

United States

#10 Mar 18, 2013
Got science? Phil Plait says it like it is: The rate at which the temperature is rising took a huge leap starting a century ago, and it’s due to human activity. We’re seeing the effects now, from the ice caps melting to changes in vegetation growth rates. There is no scientific controversy here, just a manufactured political and ideological one.
Fun Facts

Huntsville, AL

#11 Mar 18, 2013
Nope, no statistical warming. In fact if it weren't for the US, there wouldn't be much warming at all.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/nma...

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#12 Mar 18, 2013
Fun Facts wrote:
Nope, no statistical warming. In fact if it weren't for the US, there wouldn't be much warming at all.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/nma...
Usual denier cherry pick: compare a cool year to a recent warm decade.

Try comparing the same year to a 30 year baseline:

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/nma...
SpaceBlues

United States

#13 Mar 18, 2013
Fun Facts wrote:
.. In fact if it weren't for the US, there wouldn't be much warming at all.
That's correct.

The biggest polluters in history:

1. USA.

2. UK.
Fun Facts

Huntsville, AL

#14 Mar 18, 2013
Fair Game wrote:
<quoted text>
Usual denier cherry pick: compare a cool year to a recent warm decade.
Try comparing the same year to a 30 year baseline:
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/nma...
I thought 2012 was a warm year. Well here it is compared to the last 30 years.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/nma...

2010 was the warmest year on record. Here's how it looks in comparison to the last 30 years.

http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/nma...

Since: Apr 08

"the green troll"

#15 Mar 18, 2013
Fun Facts wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought 2012 was a warm year.
Clueless as usual.
Well here it is compared to the last 30 years.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/nma...
Cherry picking combined with another denier tactic: ignore information you don't want to see if you can.
SpaceBlues

United States

#16 Mar 18, 2013
Fun Facts wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought 2012 was a warm year. Well here it is compared to the last 30 years.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/nma...
2010 was the warmest year on record. Here's how it looks in comparison to the last 30 years.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/nma...
You are FIRED!

Is it your perfidy or utter ignorance?
PHD

Cibolo, TX

#17 Mar 18, 2013
SpaceBlues wrote:
<quoted text>You are FIRED!
Is it your perfidy or utter ignorance?
So submit your scientific science fiction nonsense to Hollywood and make another scientific science fiction movie. You have spammed to world more than 900,000times with your nonsense. Go compete with the proper scientific science fiction movie arena.
litesong

Everett, WA

#18 Mar 18, 2013
fun farts wrote:
I thought 2012 was a warm year. Well here it is compared to the last 30 years.
All CO2 enhanced AGW years. Why don't you compare it to early 20th century years? I'll give you a break. Compare it to the average 20th century year.

Even tho you're always saying the sun controls the temperatures of the Earth & when the sun had a 100 year record TSI low, you didn't compare temperatures to early 20th century years. You always said the future would have ever colder years.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Global Warming Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Hundreds Of Scientists Urge Trump To Pull Out O... 44 min Patriot AKA Bozo 143
News Prof at The Nation: CO2 'A Far More Deadly Gas'... 1 hr Cordwainer Trout 2
News Arctic climate warming higher and faster than e... 2 hr Truth Is Victim 1
Global Warming Standup Comedy (Apr '07) Sun Into The Night 5,073
When only synthetic food is available ... Apr 22 tina anne 2
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) Apr 22 Patty Myers 8,138
News Sea ice cover at both poles at lowest point of ... Apr 21 Patriot AKA Bozo 47
More from around the web