Will it, won't it? Part 3

[PHD]

litesong wrote:

The sun has been unseen from the North Pole for not quite 5 months. Arctic Ocean warmth is & will continue to keep Arctic sea ice thinner through the coming winter & even spring. Arctic sea ice VOLUME loss is a better measure of overall Arctic biosphere warming, than sea ice area loss, tho it's data is harder to determine. Since the 1980's, the loss of Arctic sea ice VOLUME could only be seen in decadal periods of time. However, the rate of Arctic sea ice VOLUME loss has so greatly increased, sea ice VOLUME loss, now can be seen YEARLY! As of January 2013, Arctic sea ice VOLUME is ~11% lower than that of January 2012, continuing the steady VOLUME decline since the 80's, but now, at an astoundingly greater rate. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME during January for the period 1980-89, was ~23+ thousand cubic kilometers. Present January 2013 sea ice VOLUME is 13,200 cubic kilometers. The Arctic sea ice loss has been an uncontrolled plummet, desired by unscientific AGW deniers, who mostly have no or little mathematical or science background.
//////////
litesong continues:
Presently, Arctic sea ice extent is 13,710,313 km2 (February 8, 2013), the day's gain, W. Virginia plus Delaware-sized. At this point, the Arctic sea ice has recovered a bit more than the area of the entire United States, since its sea ice area low in September, 2012, roughly normal. However, indications are that Arctic sea ice THICKNESS is as little as 11% LESS or as great as 9-10% LESS than any previous recorded year,. Arctic temperature above the 80th parallel, raised to -24degC. At the time of the coldest average Arctic temperatures of the year, numerous land regions are in the mid to deep minus 30's degC, with one Siberian temperature dropping to -42degC.
Past details of Arctic Ice Pack near Chief Joseph Land: widely encircled by Arctic Ice Pack, due to 24/7 hours of darkness & a shifting but long enduring vortex, that moved cold Arctic sea water southward to the islands. Lately, there has been a long enduring very large vortex under the Arctic Ice Pack for 2(?) months, rotating clock-wise.
A detail noted ~5(?) months ago, was a raggy taggy developing edge along a part of the semi-circle Ice Pack, possibly NOT coincidental with the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS (plus?) OF SQUARE KILOMETERS, of waters north of Alaska & Siberia that are VASTLY CLEAR. Might the raggy taggy edge indicate huge turbulence & currents in this largest(ever recorded?) ice-free Arctic ocean, & resulting southerly-directed heat stratified Arctic waters? I wonder if there might develop more raggy taggy edging, enough to form a swirl pattern?
Days later, near the raggy taggy Ice Pack, 3 tiny pixel ice floes(arced?) developed, separated from the Arctic ice pack toward southerly directions. A day later, the number of ice floes increased to 8 & indeed they formed an ARC. Pretty sure they represent a large scale vortex in open Arctic water!
Further data, showed that the vortex was true!
The sun has been unseen from the North Pole for almost 5 months & presently anywhere above the 76th deg. parallel, shrouding the Arctic with darkness for a good portion of the year! The sun shows motion to the north, now higher in the noon-time sky by almost 9 arcdeg(18 sun diameters AND PRESENTLY INCREASING AT MORE THAN HALF A SUN DIAMETER PER DAY) from its farthest yearly position to the south, due to the tilt of the Earth & present orbital position!

In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.

[litesong]

phud fetid feces face fiend wrote:

..... you think.......

..... that you don't think.

[PHD]

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
..... that you don't think.

In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.

[litesong]

'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
...... you think......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.

[PHD]

litesong wrote:

'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
...... you think......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.

In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.

[litesong]

litesong wrote:
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
...... you think......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
.......that 'phud fetid feces face fiend' doesn't think.
Thanks for reminding me to call you,''phud fetid feces face fiend".

[litesong]

'phud fetid feces face fiend' is so in love with its name, 'phud fetid feces face fiend' wants to be called such all the time.

[PHD]

litesong wrote:

'phud fetid feces face fiend' is so in love with its name,'phud fetid feces face fiend' wants to be called such all the time.

In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.

[Wallop10]

Topix doesn't care what the Troll PennyHD thinks.

You'd think she'd figure that out by now. LOL.

[litesong]

Wallop10 wrote:

Topix doesn't care what the Troll PennyHD thinks........

even when 'phud fetid feces face fiend' doesn't think.........see!
//////////
litesong wrote:
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
...... you think......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
.......that 'phud fetid feces face fiend' doesn't think.
Thanks for reminding me to call you,''phud fetid feces face fiend".

[PHD]

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
even when 'phud fetid feces face fiend' doesn't think.........see!
//////////
litesong wrote:
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
...... you think......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
.......that 'phud fetid feces face fiend' doesn't think.
Thanks for reminding me to call you,''phud fetid feces face fiend".

In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.

[litesong]

Arctic sea ice extent is 13,762,344 km2 (February 10, 2013), the day's gain, W. Virginia-sized. Present temperatures on Arctic Canadian islands, mainland, & Siberia are commonly to minus mid-thirties degC. Temperature above the 80th parallel raised to -24degC. At the time of the coldest average Arctic temperatures of the year, numerous land regions are in the mid to deep minus 30's degC, with one Siberian temperature dropping to -40degC.

The sun has been unseen from the North Pole for not quite 5 months. Arctic Ocean warmth is & will continue to keep Arctic sea ice thinner through the coming winter & even spring. Arctic sea ice VOLUME loss is a better measure of overall Arctic biosphere warming, than sea ice area loss, tho it's data is harder to determine. Since the 1980's, the loss of Arctic sea ice VOLUME could only be seen in decadal periods of time. However, the rate of Arctic sea ice VOLUME loss has so greatly increased, VOLUME loss, now can be seen YEARLY! As of February 2013, Arctic VOLUME is ~5% lower than that of February 2012, continuing the steady VOLUME decline since the 80's, but now, at an astoundingly greater rate. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for February 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~26,300 cubic kilometers. Present February 1, 2013 sea ice VOLUME is 16,800 cubic kilometers. Tho both Arctic sea ice Volume quantities for February 1st changed, the difference between the two quantities is the same as for January 1st, between average 1980's & 2013. The Arctic sea ice loss has been an uncontrolled plummet, desired by unscientific AGW deniers, who mostly have no or little mathematical or science background.
//////////
litesong continues:
Presently, Arctic sea ice extent is 13,784,063 km2 (February 11(?), 2013), the day's gain, New Jersey-sized. At this point, the Arctic sea ice has recovered a bit more than the area of the entire United States, since its sea ice area low in September, 2012, roughly normal. Arctic temperature above the 80th parallel, dropped to -29degC, at this time of the coldest average Arctic temperatures of the year, numerous land regions are in the mid to deep minus 30's degC, with two Siberian temperature dropping to -40degC & -47degC(-53degF).

A detail noted ~5(?) months ago, was a raggy taggy developing edge along a part of the semi-circle Ice Pack, possibly NOT coincidental with the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS (plus?) OF SQUARE KILOMETERS, of waters north of Alaska & Siberia that are VASTLY CLEAR. Might the raggy taggy edge indicate huge turbulence & currents in this largest(ever recorded?) ice-free Arctic ocean, & resulting southerly-directed heat stratified Arctic waters? I wonder if there might develop more raggy taggy edging, enough to form a swirl pattern?
Days later, near the raggy taggy Ice Pack, 3 tiny pixel ice floes(arced?) developed, separated from the Arctic ice pack toward southerly directions. A day later, the number of ice floes increased to 8 & indeed they formed an ARC. Pretty sure they represent a large scale vortex in open Arctic water!
Further data, showed that the vortex was true!

The sun has been unseen from the North Pole for almost 5 months & presently anywhere above the 78th deg. parallel, shrouding the Arctic with darkness for a good portion of the year! The sun shows motion to the north, now higher in the noon-time sky by almost 10 arcdeg(20 sun diameters AND PRESENTLY INCREASING AT 2/3rds of A SUN DIAMETER PER DAY) from its farthest yearly position to the south, due to the tilt of the Earth & present orbital position!

[PHD]

litesong wrote:

The sun has been unseen from the North Pole for not quite 5 months. Arctic Ocean warmth is & will continue to keep Arctic sea ice thinner through the coming winter & even spring. Arctic sea ice VOLUME loss is a better measure of overall Arctic biosphere warming, than sea ice area loss, tho it's data is harder to determine. Since the 1980's, the loss of Arctic sea ice VOLUME could only be seen in decadal periods of time. However, the rate of Arctic sea ice VOLUME loss has so greatly increased, VOLUME loss, now can be seen YEARLY! As of February 2013, Arctic VOLUME is ~5% lower than that of February 2012, continuing the steady VOLUME decline since the 80's, but now, at an astoundingly greater rate. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for February 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~26,300 cubic kilometers. Present February 1, 2013 sea ice VOLUME is 16,800 cubic kilometers. Tho both Arctic sea ice Volume quantities for February 1st changed, the difference between the two quantities is the same as for January 1st, between average 1980's & 2013. The Arctic sea ice loss has been an uncontrolled plummet, desired by unscientific AGW deniers, who mostly have no or little mathematical or science background.
//////////
litesong continues:
Presently, Arctic sea ice extent is 13,784,063 km2 (February 11(?), 2013), the day's gain, New Jersey-sized. At this point, the Arctic sea ice has recovered a bit more than the area of the entire United States, since its sea ice area low in September, 2012, roughly normal. Arctic temperature above the 80th parallel, dropped to -29degC, at this time of the coldest average Arctic temperatures of the year, numerous land regions are in the mid to deep minus 30's degC, with two Siberian temperature dropping to -40degC & -47degC(-53degF).
A detail noted ~5(?) months ago, was a raggy taggy developing edge along a part of the semi-circle Ice Pack, possibly NOT coincidental with the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS (plus?) OF SQUARE KILOMETERS, of waters north of Alaska & Siberia that are VASTLY CLEAR. Might the raggy taggy edge indicate huge turbulence & currents in this largest(ever recorded?) ice-free Arctic ocean, & resulting southerly-directed heat stratified Arctic waters? I wonder if there might develop more raggy taggy edging, enough to form a swirl pattern?
Days later, near the raggy taggy Ice Pack, 3 tiny pixel ice floes(arced?) developed, separated from the Arctic ice pack toward southerly directions. A day later, the number of ice floes increased to 8 & indeed they formed an ARC. Pretty sure they represent a large scale vortex in open Arctic water!
Further data, showed that the vortex was true!
The sun has been unseen from the North Pole for almost 5 months & presently anywhere above the 78th deg. parallel, shrouding the Arctic with darkness for a good portion of the year! The sun shows motion to the north, now higher in the noon-time sky by almost 10 arcdeg(20 sun diameters AND PRESENTLY INCREASING AT 2/3rds of A SUN DIAMETER PER DAY) from its farthest yearly position to the south, due to the tilt of the Earth & present orbital position!

In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.

[litesong]

phud fetid feces face fiend wrote:

Attacks on me .......

I never attack "phud fetid feces face fiend". It thinks I do because I describe "phud fetid feces face fiend" so accurately.

[PHD]

litesong wrote:

<quoted text>
I never attack "phud fetid feces face fiend". It thinks I do because I describe "phud fetid feces face fiend" so accurately.

In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.

[Wallop10]

Topix cares nothing about you, Troll.

and pay attention to your low low ratings. conservatives must be voting you down too -- you're too crazy for most of them too.

[PHD]

Wallop10 wrote:

Topix cares nothing about you, Troll.
and pay attention to your low low ratings. conservatives must be voting you down too -- you're too crazy for most of them too.

More BS from the commander TROLL!!!

[litesong]

Wallop10 wrote:

Topix cares nothing about you, Troll.
and pay attention to your low low ratings. conservatives must be voting you down too -- you're too crazy for most of them too.

Agree with you except for your last phrase.'phud fetid feces face fiend' is as crazy as all toxic topix AGW deniers. However, the vacuous thoughts of 'phud fetid feces face fiend' reflect the few faceted looks of James Holmes:
http://www.inquisitr.com/283815/james-holmes-...

[litesong]

phud fetid feces face fiend wrote:

More BS from the commander......

Yes, when Wallop10 talks about "phud fetid feces face fiend", Wallop10 has to lower himself to talk about BS.

"phud fetid feces face fiend" is such an easy mark!

[litesong]

I remind AGW advocates the following:

'phud fetid feces face fiend' is so in love with its name,'phud fetid feces face fiend', that it helped construct,'phud fetid feces face fiend' wants to be called such all the time. I love to accommodate 'phud fetid feces face fiend', because it is so descriptive....... & accurate.