Will it, won't it? Part 3

Created by Fair Game on Aug 28, 2012

85 votes

Click on an option to vote

Possibly

Maybe

Probably

Maybe not

litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#592 Feb 11, 2013
phud fetid feces face fiend wrote:
..... you think.......
..... that you don't think.
PHD

Overton, TX

#593 Feb 12, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
..... that you don't think.
In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#594 Feb 12, 2013
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
...... you think......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
PHD

Overton, TX

#595 Feb 12, 2013
litesong wrote:
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
...... you think......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#596 Feb 12, 2013
litesong wrote:
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
...... you think......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
.......that 'phud fetid feces face fiend' doesn't think.
Thanks for reminding me to call you,''phud fetid feces face fiend".
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#597 Feb 12, 2013
'phud fetid feces face fiend' is so in love with its name, 'phud fetid feces face fiend' wants to be called such all the time.
PHD

Overton, TX

#598 Feb 12, 2013
litesong wrote:
'phud fetid feces face fiend' is so in love with its name,'phud fetid feces face fiend' wants to be called such all the time.
In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#599 Feb 12, 2013
Topix doesn't care what the Troll PennyHD thinks.

You'd think she'd figure that out by now. LOL.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#600 Feb 12, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
Topix doesn't care what the Troll PennyHD thinks........
even when 'phud fetid feces face fiend' doesn't think.........see!
//////////
litesong wrote:
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
...... you think......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
.......that 'phud fetid feces face fiend' doesn't think.
Thanks for reminding me to call you,''phud fetid feces face fiend".
PHD

Overton, TX

#601 Feb 13, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
even when 'phud fetid feces face fiend' doesn't think.........see!
//////////
litesong wrote:
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
...... you think......
//////////
litesong wrote:
..... that you don't think.
//////////
'phud fetid feces face fiend' fluffed:
..... you think.......
//////////
litesong wrote:
.......that 'phud fetid feces face fiend' doesn't think.
Thanks for reminding me to call you,''phud fetid feces face fiend".
In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#602 Feb 13, 2013
Arctic sea ice extent is 13,762,344 km2 (February 10, 2013), the day's gain, W. Virginia-sized. Present temperatures on Arctic Canadian islands, mainland, & Siberia are commonly to minus mid-thirties degC. Temperature above the 80th parallel raised to -24degC. At the time of the coldest average Arctic temperatures of the year, numerous land regions are in the mid to deep minus 30's degC, with one Siberian temperature dropping to -40degC.

The sun has been unseen from the North Pole for not quite 5 months. Arctic Ocean warmth is & will continue to keep Arctic sea ice thinner through the coming winter & even spring. Arctic sea ice VOLUME loss is a better measure of overall Arctic biosphere warming, than sea ice area loss, tho it's data is harder to determine. Since the 1980's, the loss of Arctic sea ice VOLUME could only be seen in decadal periods of time. However, the rate of Arctic sea ice VOLUME loss has so greatly increased, VOLUME loss, now can be seen YEARLY! As of February 2013, Arctic VOLUME is ~5% lower than that of February 2012, continuing the steady VOLUME decline since the 80's, but now, at an astoundingly greater rate. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for February 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~26,300 cubic kilometers. Present February 1, 2013 sea ice VOLUME is 16,800 cubic kilometers. Tho both Arctic sea ice Volume quantities for February 1st changed, the difference between the two quantities is the same as for January 1st, between average 1980's & 2013. The Arctic sea ice loss has been an uncontrolled plummet, desired by unscientific AGW deniers, who mostly have no or little mathematical or science background.
//////////
litesong continues:
Presently, Arctic sea ice extent is 13,784,063 km2 (February 11(?), 2013), the day's gain, New Jersey-sized. At this point, the Arctic sea ice has recovered a bit more than the area of the entire United States, since its sea ice area low in September, 2012, roughly normal. Arctic temperature above the 80th parallel, dropped to -29degC, at this time of the coldest average Arctic temperatures of the year, numerous land regions are in the mid to deep minus 30's degC, with two Siberian temperature dropping to -40degC & -47degC(-53degF).

A detail noted ~5(?) months ago, was a raggy taggy developing edge along a part of the semi-circle Ice Pack, possibly NOT coincidental with the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS (plus?) OF SQUARE KILOMETERS, of waters north of Alaska & Siberia that are VASTLY CLEAR. Might the raggy taggy edge indicate huge turbulence & currents in this largest(ever recorded?) ice-free Arctic ocean, & resulting southerly-directed heat stratified Arctic waters? I wonder if there might develop more raggy taggy edging, enough to form a swirl pattern?
Days later, near the raggy taggy Ice Pack, 3 tiny pixel ice floes(arced?) developed, separated from the Arctic ice pack toward southerly directions. A day later, the number of ice floes increased to 8 & indeed they formed an ARC. Pretty sure they represent a large scale vortex in open Arctic water!
Further data, showed that the vortex was true!

The sun has been unseen from the North Pole for almost 5 months & presently anywhere above the 78th deg. parallel, shrouding the Arctic with darkness for a good portion of the year! The sun shows motion to the north, now higher in the noon-time sky by almost 10 arcdeg(20 sun diameters AND PRESENTLY INCREASING AT 2/3rds of A SUN DIAMETER PER DAY) from its farthest yearly position to the south, due to the tilt of the Earth & present orbital position!
PHD

Overton, TX

#603 Feb 13, 2013
litesong wrote:
The sun has been unseen from the North Pole for not quite 5 months. Arctic Ocean warmth is & will continue to keep Arctic sea ice thinner through the coming winter & even spring. Arctic sea ice VOLUME loss is a better measure of overall Arctic biosphere warming, than sea ice area loss, tho it's data is harder to determine. Since the 1980's, the loss of Arctic sea ice VOLUME could only be seen in decadal periods of time. However, the rate of Arctic sea ice VOLUME loss has so greatly increased, VOLUME loss, now can be seen YEARLY! As of February 2013, Arctic VOLUME is ~5% lower than that of February 2012, continuing the steady VOLUME decline since the 80's, but now, at an astoundingly greater rate. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for February 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~26,300 cubic kilometers. Present February 1, 2013 sea ice VOLUME is 16,800 cubic kilometers. Tho both Arctic sea ice Volume quantities for February 1st changed, the difference between the two quantities is the same as for January 1st, between average 1980's & 2013. The Arctic sea ice loss has been an uncontrolled plummet, desired by unscientific AGW deniers, who mostly have no or little mathematical or science background.
//////////
litesong continues:
Presently, Arctic sea ice extent is 13,784,063 km2 (February 11(?), 2013), the day's gain, New Jersey-sized. At this point, the Arctic sea ice has recovered a bit more than the area of the entire United States, since its sea ice area low in September, 2012, roughly normal. Arctic temperature above the 80th parallel, dropped to -29degC, at this time of the coldest average Arctic temperatures of the year, numerous land regions are in the mid to deep minus 30's degC, with two Siberian temperature dropping to -40degC & -47degC(-53degF).
A detail noted ~5(?) months ago, was a raggy taggy developing edge along a part of the semi-circle Ice Pack, possibly NOT coincidental with the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS (plus?) OF SQUARE KILOMETERS, of waters north of Alaska & Siberia that are VASTLY CLEAR. Might the raggy taggy edge indicate huge turbulence & currents in this largest(ever recorded?) ice-free Arctic ocean, & resulting southerly-directed heat stratified Arctic waters? I wonder if there might develop more raggy taggy edging, enough to form a swirl pattern?
Days later, near the raggy taggy Ice Pack, 3 tiny pixel ice floes(arced?) developed, separated from the Arctic ice pack toward southerly directions. A day later, the number of ice floes increased to 8 & indeed they formed an ARC. Pretty sure they represent a large scale vortex in open Arctic water!
Further data, showed that the vortex was true!
The sun has been unseen from the North Pole for almost 5 months & presently anywhere above the 78th deg. parallel, shrouding the Arctic with darkness for a good portion of the year! The sun shows motion to the north, now higher in the noon-time sky by almost 10 arcdeg(20 sun diameters AND PRESENTLY INCREASING AT 2/3rds of A SUN DIAMETER PER DAY) from its farthest yearly position to the south, due to the tilt of the Earth & present orbital position!
In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#604 Feb 13, 2013
phud fetid feces face fiend wrote:
Attacks on me .......
I never attack "phud fetid feces face fiend". It thinks I do because I describe "phud fetid feces face fiend" so accurately.
PHD

Overton, TX

#605 Feb 14, 2013
litesong wrote:
<quoted text>
I never attack "phud fetid feces face fiend". It thinks I do because I describe "phud fetid feces face fiend" so accurately.
In addition, you think topix does not know what you publish. Attacks on me will not delete or erase what you are and what you do. You should stop making an ASSumption of your---self before you know the facts. Do contact topix to satisfy your accusations of the reprint BS your posting of what I said. You are a dumbASSumption of your---self again.

Since: Jan 13

Fairfax, VA

#606 Feb 14, 2013
Topix cares nothing about you, Troll.

and pay attention to your low low ratings. conservatives must be voting you down too -- you're too crazy for most of them too.
PHD

Overton, TX

#607 Feb 15, 2013
Wallop10 wrote:
Topix cares nothing about you, Troll.
and pay attention to your low low ratings. conservatives must be voting you down too -- you're too crazy for most of them too.
More BS from the commander TROLL!!!
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#609 Feb 15, 2013
phud fetid feces face fiend wrote:
More BS from the commander......
Yes, when Wallop10 talks about "phud fetid feces face fiend", Wallop10 has to lower himself to talk about BS.

"phud fetid feces face fiend" is such an easy mark!
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#610 Feb 15, 2013
I remind AGW advocates the following:

'phud fetid feces face fiend' is so in love with its name,'phud fetid feces face fiend', that it helped construct,'phud fetid feces face fiend' wants to be called such all the time. I love to accommodate 'phud fetid feces face fiend', because it is so descriptive....... & accurate.
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#611 Feb 15, 2013
phud fetid feces face fiend wrote:
you think.....
....... that 'phud fetid feces face fiend' doesn't think.......
litesong

Lynnwood, WA

#612 Feb 15, 2013
Arctic sea ice extent is 13,784,063 km2 (February 11(?), 2013), the day's gain, New Jersey-sized. Present temperatures on Arctic Canadian islands, mainland, & Siberia are commonly to minus mid-thirties degC. Temperature above the 80th parallel raised to -24degC. At the time of the coldest average Arctic temperatures of the year, numerous land regions are in the mid to deep minus 30's degC, with two Siberian temperatures dropping to -40degC & -47degC(-53degF)!

The sun has been unseen from the North Pole for not quite 5 months. Arctic Ocean warmth is & will continue to keep Arctic sea ice thinner through the coming winter & even spring. Arctic sea ice VOLUME loss is a better measure of overall Arctic biosphere warming, than sea ice area loss, tho it's data is harder to determine. Since the 1980's, the loss of Arctic sea ice VOLUME could only be seen in decadal periods of time. However, the rate of Arctic sea ice VOLUME loss has so greatly increased, VOLUME loss, now can be seen YEARLY! As of February 2013, Arctic VOLUME is ~5% lower than that of February 2012, continuing the steady VOLUME decline since the 80's, but now, at an astoundingly greater rate. Average Arctic sea ice VOLUME for February 1, for the period 1980-89, was ~26,300 cubic kilometers. Present February 1, 2013 sea ice VOLUME is 16,800 cubic kilometers. Tho both Arctic sea ice Volume quantities for February 1st changed, the difference between the two quantities is the same as for January 1st, between average 1980's & 2013. The Arctic sea ice loss has been an uncontrolled plummet, desired by unscientific AGW deniers, who mostly have no or little mathematical or science background.
//////////
litesong continues:
Presently, Arctic sea ice extent is 13,947,500 km2(February 14, 2013), the daily gain over 3 days, Maryland plus Connecticut-sized. At this point, the Arctic sea ice has recovered more than the area of the entire United States, since its sea ice area low in September, 2012, roughly normal. Arctic temperature above the 80th parallel, dropped close to -30degC, the coldest average Arctic temperatures of the past 2+ years, with numerous land regions in the mid to deep minus 30's degC, & two Siberian temperatures dropping to -47degC(-53degF) AND -48degC(-55degF)!

A detail noted ~5(?) months ago, was a raggy taggy developing edge along a part of the semi-circle Ice Pack, possibly NOT coincidental with the HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS (plus?) OF SQUARE KILOMETERS, of waters north of Alaska & Siberia that are VASTLY CLEAR. Might the raggy taggy edge indicate huge turbulence & currents in this largest(ever recorded?) ice-free Arctic ocean, & resulting southerly-directed heat stratified Arctic waters? I wonder if there might develop more raggy taggy edging, enough to form a swirl pattern?
Days later, near the raggy taggy Ice Pack, 3 tiny pixel ice floes(arced?) developed, separated from the Arctic ice pack toward southerly directions. A day later, the number of ice floes increased to 8 & indeed they formed an ARC. Pretty sure they represent a large scale vortex in open Arctic water!

Further data, showed that the vortex was true!

The sun has been unseen from the North Pole for almost 5 months & presently anywhere above the 78th deg. parallel, shrouding the Arctic with darkness for a good portion of the year! The sun shows motion to the north, now higher in the noon-time sky by 10.5 arcdeg(21 sun diameters AND PRESENTLY INCREASING AT 2/3rds of A SUN DIAMETER PER DAY) from its farthest yearly position to the south, due to the tilt of the Earth & present orbital position!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Global Warming Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Congressman: Global Warming Is A 'Religion' 9 min Cat74 58
There Are Essentially Two Greenhouse Gases 52 min Earthling-1 36
News Obama turns up heat on climate change debate in... 53 min Earthling-1 191
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 56 min Earthling-1 53,006
Global Warming Standup Comedy (Apr '07) 4 hr Earthling-1 3,811
News Is It Time to End Ethanol Vehicle Fuel Mandates? (Apr '13) 13 hr litesong 6
'Talkin Science Game': a game in which the firs... 14 hr IBdaMann 101
More from around the web