The Pseudoscience of Global Warming

The Pseudoscience of Global Warming

Posted in the Global Warming Forum

First Prev
of 20
Next Last
hojo

Minneapolis, MN

#1 Mar 30, 2018
NASA and NOAA Manipulating Data

Doctoring real-world temperature data is as much a part of the alarmist playbook as is calling skeptical scientists at Harvard, Princeton,Columbia, MIT, NASA, NOAA, etc.,“anti-science.” Faced with the embarrassing fact that real-world temperature readings don’t show any U.S. warming during the past 80 years, the alarmists who oversee the collection and reporting of the data simply erase the actual readings and substitute their own desired readings in their place. If this shocks you, you are not alone.

The bureaucracy at NOAA and NASA who report the U.S. temperature data undertake what they term “correcting” the raw data. These corrections are not just one-time affairs, either. As time goes by, older temperature readings are systematically and repeatedly made cooler, and then cooler still, and then cooler still, while more recent temperature readings are made warmer, and then warmer still, and then warmer still.

Science blogger Steven Goddard at Real Science has posted temperature comparison charts (available here, and here) showing just how dramatically the NOAA and NASA bureaucrats have doctored the U.S. temperature data during the past several decades. As the before-and-after temperature charts show, government bureaucrats with power and funding at stake have turned a striking long-term temperature decline (as revealed by the real-world data), into a striking long-term temperature increase.

It is all part of the basic global warming propaganda "formula" claiming that (anyone who is everyone) believes the fraudulent claim of "scientific consensus" and "settled science", all fueled by the Federal Government "lining the financial pockets" of a selected number of prominent NASA and NOAA promoters of the political (climate) science agenda!

"If at first they don't succeed (as what happened in the 1970's and 80's) with Global Cooling, then deny and lie again" ...and that goes for the "second time" the third time, the fourth........you get it......as never ending as the Florida election recounts: it goes on and on until responsible, rational' people, finally are putting a stop to the counterfeit sham of (man-made climate change)...which is the biggest governmental hoax, scam and fraud that has ever been perpetrated in the history of the United States!
Fuggleton

Manassas, VA

#8 Mar 31, 2018
This was of course 2012, the warmest year in the US. Apparently just by leaving this year off the graph the climate change clowns can forget about the heat waves and record temperatures of that year and convince themselves that the US is cooling!

Compensating for a well documented change in time of day of observation in temperature data is not fiddling or fabricating data. Would anybody argue seriously that ignoring this factor gives a more accurate picture of how temperatures have changed?

Take away message:

The adjustments were done to remove known errors.

Adjusted and unadjusted data to the present show a warming trend.

Steve Goddard is a crackpot crank conspiracy theorist, just like hojo.
hojo

Rock Island, IL

#10 Apr 1, 2018
Fuggleton wrote:
This was of course 2012, the warmest year in the US. Apparently just by leaving this year off the graph the climate change clowns can forget about the heat waves and record temperatures of that year and convince themselves that the US is cooling!

Compensating for a well documented change in time of day of observation in temperature data is not fiddling or fabricating data. Would anybody argue seriously that ignoring this factor gives a more accurate picture of how temperatures have changed?

Take away message:

The adjustments were done to remove known errors.

Adjusted and unadjusted data to the present show a warming trend.

Steve Goddard is a crackpot crank conspiracy theorist, just like hojo.
The NOAA and NASA have systematically investigated. audited and exposed for having altered, inflated and omitted pertinent climate data in order for them to arrive at the "needed and required conclusion" (for and by the Government) in order to prove that Global warming exists! The entire global warming - man made climate change crisis is nothing but a perpetrated Government scam, hoax and fraud initiated in 2007 by Obama and Democratically controlled (at that time) liberal- leftist - Communist one world Government (agenda)

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#11 Apr 1, 2018
Fuggleton wrote:
This was of course 2012, the warmest year in the US. Apparently just by leaving this year off the graph the climate change clowns can forget about the heat waves and record temperatures of that year and convince themselves that the US is cooling!

Compensating for a well documented change in time of day of observation in temperature data is not fiddling or fabricating data. Would anybody argue seriously that ignoring this factor gives a more accurate picture of how temperatures have changed?

Take away message:

The adjustments were done to remove known errors.

Adjusted and unadjusted data to the present show a warming trend.

Steve Goddard is a crackpot crank conspiracy theorist, just like hojo.
Old HoHo has no clue. He just posts the talking points of FOX and the other Nazi RW sources.
hojo

Minneapolis, MN

#12 Apr 3, 2018
Fuggleton wrote:
This was of course 2012, the warmest year in the US. Apparently just by leaving this year off the graph the climate change clowns can forget about the heat waves and record temperatures of that year and convince themselves that the US is cooling!

Compensating for a well documented change in time of day of observation in temperature data is not fiddling or fabricating data. Would anybody argue seriously that ignoring this factor gives a more accurate picture of how temperatures have changed?

Take away message:

The adjustments were done to remove known errors.

Adjusted and unadjusted data to the present show a warming trend.

Steve Goddard is a crackpot crank conspiracy theorist, just like hojo.
The pseudoscience of global warming begins with the average global surface temperatures calculated by NASA, claiming to most people, were the hottest temperatures ever “recorded”! That would imply that quality controlled thermometers registered higher readings during the past year than had ever occurred before. If you believe that this is what NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) means by hottest temperatures ever “recorded,” then you are wrong.

Raw temperature data show that U.S. temperatures were significantly warmer during the 1930s than they are today. In fact, raw temperature data show an 80-year cooling trend. NOAA and NASA are only able to claim that we are experiencing the hottest temperatures on record by doctoring the raw temperature data.

Doctoring real-world temperature data is as much a part of the alarmist playbook as is calling skeptical scientists at Harvard, Princeton,Columbia, MIT, NASA, NOAA, etc.,“anti-science.” Faced with the embarrassing fact that real-world temperature readings don’t show any U.S. warming during the past 80 years, the alarmists who oversee the collection and reporting of the data simply erase the actual readings and substitute their own desired readings in their place. If this shocks you, you are not alone.

The bureaucracy at NOAA and NASA who report the U.S. temperature data undertake what they term “correcting” the raw data. These corrections are not just one-time affairs, either. As time goes by, older temperature readings are systematically and repeatedly made cooler, and then cooler still, and then cooler still, while more recent temperature readings are made warmer, and then warmer still, and then warmer still.

Science blogger Steven Goddard at Real Science has posted temperature comparison charts (available here, and here) showing just how dramatically the NOAA and NASA bureaucrats have doctored the U.S. temperature data during the past several decades. As the before-and-after temperature charts show, government bureaucrats with power and funding at stake have turned a striking long-term temperature decline (as revealed by the real-world data), into a striking long-term temperature increase.
hojo

Minneapolis, MN

#13 Apr 3, 2018
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>

Old HoHo has no clue. He just posts the talking points of FOX and the other Nazi RW sources.
Wrong again! I "never" follow or listen to Fox, nor do I ever investigate your own global warming Nazi Leftist sources that parallel the Liberal Leftist Socialist Communist agenda of "control-control-control by (theirs and your own) one World Government objectives, suppressing by population control!!!
President Spanky

Manassas, VA

#14 Apr 3, 2018
hojo wrote:
Raw temperature data show that U.S. temperatures were significantly warmer during the 1930s than they are today.
No, they don't.

Recent temperatures broke 1930s records by a wide margin.
hojo

Minneapolis, MN

#16 Apr 4, 2018
President Spanky wrote:
<quoted text>

No, they don't.

Recent temperatures broke 1930s records by a wide margin.
The National Climatic Data Center (confirmed by both NASA and the NOAA reported in mid-January that 2006 was the hottest year on record. Then, in May, it revised the numbers, concluding that 1998, in fact, was the hottest on record. NASA’s old numbers echoed that last contention. But last week, it emerged that NASA had quietly restated its numbers, without fanfare or so much as a press release, after a blogger pointed out faulty methodology. Now, per NASA: 1934 is hottest, followed by 1998, 1921, 2006 and 1931.
President Spanky

Manassas, VA

#17 Apr 4, 2018
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>

The National Climatic Data Center (confirmed by both NASA and the NOAA reported in mid-January that 2006 was the hottest year on record. Then, in May, it revised the numbers, concluding that 1998, in fact, was the hottest on record. NASA’s old numbers echoed that last contention. But last week, it emerged that NASA had quietly restated its numbers, without fanfare or so much as a press release, after a blogger pointed out faulty methodology. Now, per NASA: 1934 is hottest, followed by 1998, 1921, 2006 and 1931.
"Then in May"?

Your quote is from 2007.

2012 surpassed 1998, then 2017 surpassed 2012 by a huge margin.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#18 Apr 4, 2018
President Spanky wrote:
<quoted text>

"Then in May"?

Your quote is from 2007.

2012 surpassed 1998, then 2017 surpassed 2012 by a huge margin.
Old HoHo does not know what century we live in let alone what year.

Since: Aug 15

Seattle, WA

#19 Apr 4, 2018
Fuggleton wrote:
This was of course 2012, the warmest year in the US.
It's not possible to measure the temperature of the United States.
Fuggleton wrote:
Apparently just by leaving this year off the graph the climate change clowns can forget about the heat waves and record temperatures of that year and convince themselves that the US is cooling!
Who cares? It's not possible to measure the temperature of the United States.
Fuggleton wrote:
Compensating for a well documented change in time of day of observation in temperature data is not fiddling or fabricating data.
Yes it is. Selection MUST be by randN. You can only choose an element from the population ONCE. Not twice, not 0.8 times, ONCE. That means no compensating. Raw data and only raw data must be used.
Fuggleton wrote:
Would anybody argue seriously that ignoring this factor gives a more accurate picture of how temperatures have changed?
Yes. You are denying the mathematics again. Go learn statistical mathematics.
Fuggleton wrote:
Take away message:

The adjustments were done to remove known errors.
Not possible. You don't know what an 'error' is. Raw data and only raw data must be used. Selection MUST be by randN.
Fuggleton wrote:
Adjusted and unadjusted data to the present show a warming trend.
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the United States.
Fuggleton wrote:
Steve Goddard is a crackpot crank conspiracy theorist, just like hojo.
You LIKE conspiracy theories. You believe in the Church of Global Warming.

Since: Aug 15

Seattle, WA

#20 Apr 4, 2018
Patriot AKA Bozo wrote:
<quoted text>

Old HoHo has no clue. He just posts the talking points of FOX and the other Nazi RW sources.
Ah. Another conspiracy theorist.

When are you gonna give it up, Bozo?

Since: Aug 15

Seattle, WA

#21 Apr 4, 2018
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>

The pseudoscience of global warming begins with the average global surface temperatures calculated by NASA, claiming to most people, were the hottest temperatures ever “recorded”! That would imply that quality controlled thermometers registered higher readings during the past year than had ever occurred before. If you believe that this is what NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) means by hottest temperatures ever “recorded,” then you are wrong.

Raw temperature data show that U.S. temperatures were significantly warmer during the 1930s than they are today. In fact, raw temperature data show an 80-year cooling trend. NOAA and NASA are only able to claim that we are experiencing the hottest temperatures on record by doctoring the raw temperature data.

Doctoring real-world temperature data is as much a part of the alarmist playbook as is calling skeptical scientists at Harvard, Princeton,Columbia, MIT, NASA, NOAA, etc.,“anti-science.” Faced with the embarrassing fact that real-world temperature readings don’t show any U.S. warming during the past 80 years, the alarmists who oversee the collection and reporting of the data simply erase the actual readings and substitute their own desired readings in their place. If this shocks you, you are not alone.

The bureaucracy at NOAA and NASA who report the U.S. temperature data undertake what they term “correcting” the raw data. These corrections are not just one-time affairs, either. As time goes by, older temperature readings are systematically and repeatedly made cooler, and then cooler still, and then cooler still, while more recent temperature readings are made warmer, and then warmer still, and then warmer still.

Science blogger Steven Goddard at Real Science has posted temperature comparison charts (available here, and here) showing just how dramatically the NOAA and NASA bureaucrats have doctored the U.S. temperature data during the past several decades. As the before-and-after temperature charts show, government bureaucrats with power and funding at stake have turned a striking long-term temperature decline (as revealed by the real-world data), into a striking long-term temperature increase.
Since it's not possible to measure the temperature of the United States, it makes no difference who 'doctored' what.

Since: Aug 15

Seattle, WA

#22 Apr 4, 2018
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>

The National Climatic Data Center (confirmed by both NASA and the NOAA reported in mid-January that 2006 was the hottest year on record. Then, in May, it revised the numbers, concluding that 1998, in fact, was the hottest on record. NASA’s old numbers echoed that last contention. But last week, it emerged that NASA had quietly restated its numbers, without fanfare or so much as a press release, after a blogger pointed out faulty methodology. Now, per NASA: 1934 is hottest, followed by 1998, 1921, 2006 and 1931.
There is no 'hottest year on record'. There is no record. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the United States.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#23 Apr 5, 2018
Into The Night wrote:
<quoted text>

There is no 'hottest year on record'. There is no record. It is not possible to measure the temperature of the United States.
More from the doofus.
Deniers Just Denyin

Minneapolis, MN

#24 Apr 5, 2018
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/global-warmin...
Fuggleton wrote:
Compensating for a well documented change in time of day of observation in temperature data is not fiddling or fabricating data. Would anybody argue seriously that ignoring this factor gives a more accurate picture of how temperatures have changed?...
-DJD
hojo

Minneapolis, MN

#25 Apr 6, 2018
Into The Night wrote:
<quoted text>

Since it's not possible to measure the temperature of the United States, it makes no difference who 'doctored' what.
Warming overheaters...(deny both) temperature doctoring and the fact that the measuring the temperatures is impossible

Since: Aug 15

Seattle, WA

#26 Apr 6, 2018
hojo wrote:
<quoted text>

Warming overheaters...(deny both) temperature doctoring and the fact that the measuring the temperatures is impossible
Quite true. I might point out, however, that your use of 'actual' temperature records is likewise an argument from randU.

There are no 'actual' temperature records of the temperature of the United States or of Earth.
hojo

Rock Island, IL

#27 Apr 8, 2018
Into The Night wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not possible to measure the temperature of the United States.
<quoted text>
Who cares? It's not possible to measure the temperature of the United States.
<quoted text>
Yes it is. Selection MUST be by randN. You can only choose an element from the population ONCE. Not twice, not 0.8 times, ONCE. That means no compensating. Raw data and only raw data must be used.
<quoted text>
Yes. You are denying the mathematics again. Go learn statistical mathematics.
<quoted text>
Not possible. You don't know what an 'error' is. Raw data and only raw data must be used. Selection MUST be by randN.
<quoted text>
It is not possible to measure the temperature of the United States.
<quoted text>
You LIKE conspiracy theories. You believe in the Church of Global Warming.
......just like the global cooling (coolaid)drinkers did in the 1970's when Paul Ehrlich (Earth Day) claimed that England would freeze over and be "non- existent by the year 2000!...,and that the world would be 4 degrees colder by 1990 and 11 degrees colder by the year 2000., putting us in an ice age......Kenneth E.F. Watt (population control and global cooling) 19768.....oh yes, and what about Lowell Ponte " The cooling"' 1976 claiming " we must act now," ..."Global cooling will kill hundreds of thousands of people, world wide famine and world war by the year 2000. Pseudoscience THEN with global cooling. Pseudoscience NOW with global warming. Global cooling (coolaid drinkers) THEN in the 1970 's , Global Warming (hot air inhalers) in 2018
hojo

Rock Island, IL

#28 Apr 14, 2018
Fuggleton wrote:
This was of course 2012, the warmest year in the US. Apparently just by leaving this year off the graph the climate change clowns can forget about the heat waves and record temperatures of that year and convince themselves that the US is cooling!

Take away message:

In the 20th century (the 1970's to be exact) it was Paul Ehrlich, Peter Gwynne, Lowell Ponte, Kenneth E.F. Watt, and other pseudoscience (so called climate experts) who were given us "THE (global cooling) that the MESSAGE that the " freezing of the planet was inevitable" and that by the year 2000 the average temperature of the earth would be 11++ degrees colder! England would be inhabitable and be non- existant! All important sea life would be extinct with the stench of dead fish on thousands and thousands of coastlines! Now, in the 21st century the global warming "heated up ( coolaid) MESSAGE has replaced the 20th century global cooling (frozen popsica)l coolaid! The (fake and fraudulent " the sky is falling" government hoax MESSAGE remains unchanged!
Into the night, myself and others are here to (expose) the "constant MESSAGE" of global cooling-global warming counterfeit ies that warmists like you big AL, and bozo have been propandized and duped into believing!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 20
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Global Warming Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 1 hr Into The Night 41,274
Global Warming Standup Comedy (Apr '07) 1 hr Into The Night 5,666
News Extreme weather like Hurricane Florence shows w... 4 hr Solarman 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 6 hr Hillareyfartssnow 64,970
Global Cooling (Apr '15) 17 hr hojov 2,645
News White House will override Obama's climate plan (Oct '17) Mon hojo 5,888
News Obama paints doomsday scene of global warming i... (Sep '15) Mon Ala Tucky Puck 16