Gore, U.N. Body Win Nobel Peace Prize

Full story: CBS13/CW31

Former U.S. Vice President Al Gore and the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change have won the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize for their efforts to spread awareness of man-made climate change, and to lay the ...

Comments (Page 72)

Showing posts 1,421 - 1,440 of2,284
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
AntiFlag

Cincinnati, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1507
Oct 16, 2007
 
sdmiller wrote:
<quoted text>
Everyone has....
It has been posted to the point of absurdity
He isn't he is a fraud milking millions from dupes
Simply because you refuse to see what is SO incredibly obvious does not make it any less truthful
Just because you have delusions doesn't mean anyone else can see them.
here is a joke

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1508
Oct 16, 2007
 
Q: what are the 2 most worthless bodies on the Earth?
A: The UN and Al Gore.
Too bad the Joke's on us :(
warpig

Mishawaka, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1509
Oct 16, 2007
 
notasitseems wrote:
<quoted text>Sounds like John {in a boat into North Vietnam) Kerry and Al (I did my time in the bush) Gore.
Sorry....the real soldiers "Swift Boat Boys" called kerry out on his lies.(After he threw his "Bogus" medals over the fence.) Typical coward....

Gore worked for Stars and Stripes and got outed by the guys he worked with too. They said the only "bush" he got into was at 17 Thong Street in Saigon. Typical coward....
here is a joke

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1510
Oct 16, 2007
 
football dad wrote:
we all lnow that global warming is indeed a fact, we all know that mankind is the reason for it. we all know that the normal weather patterns and historical weather formations are changing faster that we can document and predict them.
we know that we are changing the ocean currents, we know that the ice caps are melting, we know that some areas are getting hotter and others are cooling off, we know that some areas of the world are receiving far more rain and others are getting hit by droughts.
this is what gloabl warming is and what climate change is.
it causes drastic changes because of pollution in the atmosphere
this is Gore's message, this is what all scientists agree on, this message still is not sinking in on some people
Don't we ALSO know that the molton core of the earth is moving? The magnetic North pole is almost in Canada now. And don't we ALSO know that Mars is experiencing global warming also? Couldn't the cause be cosmic rather than ants like us? Hundreds of years ago Greenland WAS green. Now it is ice. The Norse hads to leave their farms when that occured, but I guess global weather changes didn't occur that rapidly back then. Too bad you have spent your time being a football dad instead of learning and growing after your graduation from high school.(you DID graduate, didn't you?)BTW "ALL" scientists hardly agree that we are the cause of Global Warming. Only the sheeple who can't look at all the evidence believe that, thanks to fear-mongers like Al Gore{Polluter and hypocrit in the extreme}
lisw

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1511
Oct 16, 2007
 
WTH wrote:
<quoted text>
"We" all know no such thing. Do NOT speak for me please.
Yes, I agree. Some of us also know that the Saudi desert used to be forest and grassland, and that glaciers formed the great lakes and that there wasn't any man made pollution at the time. It's also pretty much known that in the sixties there was a global cooling scare and we were told that eventually we'd all have to move to Venus. Please the world changes all of the time. I want us to go green, it just won't change the fact that there will be horrible storms and weather changes and sea level changes. We are not that much in control.
Telmark

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1512
Oct 16, 2007
 
Aging Hippy wrote;
"You are already paying a "global tax" and have been for years. That you are only figuring that out now is kinda slow on the uptake, isn't it?"

I've been against taxes, welfare, and socialism from the the day I received my first paycheck at age 12. How about you Hippy?
AntiFlag

Cincinnati, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1513
Oct 16, 2007
 
warpig wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry....the real soldiers "Swift Boat Boys" called kerry out on his lies.(After he threw his "Bogus" medals over the fence.) Typical coward....
Gore worked for Stars and Stripes and got outed by the guys he worked with too. They said the only "bush" he got into was at 17 Thong Street in Saigon. Typical coward....
Those were actors Bush hired to smear a real soldier.

Gore spent 100% more time in Vietnam that boy George did.

Facts. Deal with 'em!
mememine69

Hagerstown, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1514
Oct 16, 2007
 
Aging Hippy wrote:
I challenge anyone to show where any of this fails to make sense.
For every skeptic site it's probably possible to pull a corresponding site that refutes the skeptic. Or for every site I list touting GW, you could conversely find contradicting sites. Science is like that so no surprise there. So we could play "sitewars" for oh, probably the next ten years because of how vast this topic is. What makes that whole dragged out deal unnecessary is a concept called consensus. Please allow me explain what I mean by the creation and function of consensus without any condescension intended.
for thirty years, paying close attention the whole way NOT because I started out with a belief in GW (it wasn't called that initially) but because I am just plain interested in the environment.
This consensus process convinced me and continues to convince people even though you and others remain unconvinced, which is TOTALLY your perogative.
If you don't want to trust the consensus process, that's cool. But I do and I know why I do and unless you have some pretty relevant light to shed on the consensus process that proves it's inherently flawed, I will continue to trust it. It is working in all other areas of science and medecine still so there is evidence to trust it here too. And site after site from you does not qualify as significant enough "light shed on the consensus process." The consensus has thousands of science research projects reviewed by thousand more scientists forming a consensus. So a few skeptical sites and my refuting sites are what? Very little in the face of that.
I know there are conspiracy theorists who claim that this consensus process has been highjacked specifically in relation to GW and manipulated by either corrupt scientists (in numbers too great to believe, frankly) or lay people (even more unlikely). But frankly, that cannot be done without evidence showing up. When I have examined these claims closely, they fold at some point into nonsense without proof. Sorry but conspiracy people fail to prove it along the same lines as the moon landings were faked. And I believe we landed on the moon.
Like it or not, you're gonna have to live with the fact that we are convinced by this consensus and growing in numbers whether you like it or not because THAT IS WHAT IS OCCURING IN REALITY.
http://www.worldpublicopinion.org/pipa/articl...
If anyone is going to respond to this, I would appreciate no ad hominems. And be specific about what it is you diagree with and why. Those both will go along way to further productive discussion. Thanks
I am a member in good standing of the Union of Concerned Scientists. Global warming is not the result of humans. It is still unknown like it always was.
Musings

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1515
Oct 16, 2007
 
Oh, I almost forgot. Our air is CLEANER now than it was in the 60s, yet in THAT era we were told to perpare for an ice age. When will you understand that our "scientists" are very good guessers for most things, but they haven't got a clue about the weather. So, my question is...why do you want to get us even WARMER? It seems the cleaner the air, the warmer we get. If dirtier air makes it colder, and cleaner air makes it warmer, Maybe everything will die from overheating if we clean it up more! We KNOW that in the 60s our air was dirtier, and we KNOW that it is warmer now (with cleaner air) How do your "scientists" explain that? Leave the weather alone. It will do as it does in it's cycles REGARDLESS of what we do. We are ants on this planet, and have little to no effect.

“Joseph Mazzotti”

Since: Oct 07

Humboldt

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1516
Oct 16, 2007
 
To all of you whom dont believe in Gore or enviromental change, you may want to withen your own political affiliation, For i believe that is the global meltdown that you cant deny. Lets call it Politcal party warming! The party has been hi-jacked, the scandals are mounting and the right-wing fanatics are tearing America apart. Yes the party of Hannity, Limbaugh, Cultra, Cheney, Rumsfield, Delay, orielly and not to mention Foley, Craig and a host of stars in the most recent scandals that have rocked the republican boat!

Things are coming full circle and whom do you vote for? Giuliani, a man who has hacked the basic and sacred conservative family value of marriage three times... his kids have endorsed Obama!
Or do you vote for Fred, the guy who waits till last minute to assure America Hes for real, Maybe he is spending a little to much time with that Trophy Wife of his... guess his other wife was too old!
That leaves Mitt Romney... The Mormon, yes Mormon! Can the Republican Party truly look at the man and not the religion he has found to guide him? Democrats would!

So what is the party of disarray to do?? My guess is the attack machine is revving up; the Murdock media mandate is in dark rooms across America planning the demise of the opposition!

How can regular republicans whom have been lead down the path of self-destruction survive?
They can do what their hearts tell them, Not what their leaders are lying to them about.

Here is some advice, and with strong conviction I say... I am your friend and your neighbor, I appreciate our freedom to disagree and debate. Can we work to solve the problems together and not be enemies in our own states? Please help us to make America better because we can, not because it serves a political purpose. and Donít let these TV personalities destroy Your party or our reputations to gain wealth at all of our expense!
AntiFlag

Cincinnati, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1517
Oct 16, 2007
 
Musings wrote:
Oh, I almost forgot. Our air is CLEANER now than it was in the 60s, yet in THAT era we were told to perpare for an ice age. When will you understand that our "scientists" are very good guessers for most things, but they haven't got a clue about the weather. So, my question is...why do you want to get us even WARMER? It seems the cleaner the air, the warmer we get. If dirtier air makes it colder, and cleaner air makes it warmer, Maybe everything will die from overheating if we clean it up more! We KNOW that in the 60s our air was dirtier, and we KNOW that it is warmer now (with cleaner air) How do your "scientists" explain that? Leave the weather alone. It will do as it does in it's cycles REGARDLESS of what we do. We are ants on this planet, and have little to no effect.
Who told you the air is getting cleaner? Lush Dirtbag or Faux news?

“Joseph Mazzotti”

Since: Oct 07

Humboldt

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1518
Oct 16, 2007
 
mememine69 wrote:
<quoted text>
I am a member in good standing of the Union of Concerned Scientists. Global warming is not the result of humans. It is still unknown like it always was.
Laughing Out Loud, Concerned Scientists?? BS man... tell me this, can you say with CLEAR truth and CONCERN that the mississippi river has not changed one bit since mankind started their 1st trip upstream? and Has that changed the ecosystem of the river and its surroundings? Concerned scientists?? LOL!!! I bet haliburtin Paid you modestly for that Oppinion!

“Joseph Mazzotti”

Since: Oct 07

Humboldt

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1519
Oct 16, 2007
 
mememine69 wrote:
<quoted text>
I am a member in good standing of the Union of Concerned Scientists. Global warming is not the result of humans. It is still unknown like it always was.
You should be ashamed, Member of WHAT??? lies inc. I cant even find a crawfish in the streams i played in when i was a kid... Who did that?? I guess ole mother nature, that mysterious women we are all lead to believe controls the weatherman. I am astonished at people, I know my wife cuts the plastic can holders that you get on a six-pack of soda so it doesnt strangle animals if for some reason it makes it down stream! is that little thing making an impact?? yes and maybe 1 little animal doesnt mean anything to Goodstanding Members of Science, but it does to us! had too reply 2 times to this Hack!
mememine69

Hagerstown, MD

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1520
Oct 16, 2007
 
Why We Kill wrote:
<quoted text>
Laughing Out Loud, Concerned Scientists?? BS man... tell me this, can you say with CLEAR truth and CONCERN that the mississippi river has not changed one bit since mankind started their 1st trip upstream? and Has that changed the ecosystem of the river and its surroundings? Concerned scientists?? LOL!!! I bet haliburtin Paid you modestly for that Oppinion!
No, I just sent them $30.00 and BINGO, I"m a scientist. I joined to prove what consensus really is. Bull$hit and you fall for it.
Jacques

Rancho Cordova, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1521
Oct 16, 2007
 
AntiFlag wrote:
<quoted text>
Who told you the air is getting cleaner? Lush Dirtbag or Faux news?
Observation. That is if you were around in the sixties. 70% of air pollution has been addressed.(EPA).
Answers

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1522
Oct 16, 2007
 
AntiFlag wrote:
<quoted text>
Who told you the air is getting cleaner? Lush Dirtbag or Faux news?
For over 40 years we have put stricter and stricter laws into enforcement concerning air quality. NON-LEAD gas and catalitic converters on our cars reduce emmissions. Factories are required to have reburners on their stacks to burn and not expel polluting gasses. Our air quality is definately better than it was. Who told you it isn't? Hillary of Al? Just more fearmongering from the leftist lie brigade to keep you from really thinking. Just listen to NPR, CBS, NBC, ABC and you will get the same leftist view, and the same lie. Check ANY scientific air quality site on the web for the truth. I'd give you a few dozen addresses, but maybe it would be better if you actually did some research yourself instead of following the leftist rhetoric so closely. God gave you a brain...Please use it.

“Climate change + politics”

Since: Oct 07

Basel Switzerland

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1523
Oct 16, 2007
 
Aging Hippy wrote:
<quoted text>While there can be errors, contradictions and even lies in the global warming debate, I scanned the personal blog you listed from an architect in switzerland who calls himself the "statistics guy" -- is that you?-- and if so, I have a question: why is 6% percent being treated as a significant number?
"It then appeared in the Dailytech blog as a new study that attempted to reveil that a growing number of scientists (6%) now explicitly doubt the consensus position as portraited by the UN panel on climate change.."
6%, a significant number? Excuse me, are you trying to pull me a leg? Could you be a bit more precise in your question? What are you up to?
lisw

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1524
Oct 16, 2007
 
AntiFlag wrote:
<quoted text>
Those were actors Bush hired to smear a real soldier.
Gore spent 100% more time in Vietnam that boy George did.
Facts. Deal with 'em!
Real Vietnam war Veterans and heroes are not fond of Kerry and Gore. I wonder why?
lisw

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1525
Oct 16, 2007
 
Why is it that the libs talk so much, ad nauseum?
notasitseems

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1526
Oct 16, 2007
 
warpig wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry....the real soldiers "Swift Boat Boys" called kerry out on his lies.(After he threw his "Bogus" medals over the fence.) Typical coward....
Gore worked for Stars and Stripes and got outed by the guys he worked with too. They said the only "bush" he got into was at 17 Thong Street in Saigon. Typical coward....
And the rest of the story concerning hero kerry is that he threw someone else's metals over the fence and claimed they were his. The libs could not win with phony soldiers, so now they are hoping to win with a phony woman.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1,421 - 1,440 of2,284
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

9 Users are viewing the Global Warming Forum right now

Search the Global Warming Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 28 min Professor Emeritus Fellow 42,921
Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 1 hr frontporchreactionary 29,840
Warmer nights, cereal output may fall (Apr '10) 2 hr Jim the Hoax Denier 59
Odds that global warming is due to natural fact... 4 hr Fun Facts 2
World Reaches Global Warming Crossroads 4 hr dont drink the koolaid 1
Carbon destroys ocean life as well as our climate 4 hr dont drink the koolaid 1
Will it, won't it? Part 3 (Aug '12) 14 hr litesong 1,278
•••
•••
•••
•••