Letter: When discussing nuclear energy, consider greenhouse effect of alternatives
There are 2 comments on the Tri-cityherald.com story from May 7, 2013, titled Letter: When discussing nuclear energy, consider greenhouse effect of alternatives. In it, Tri-cityherald.com reports that:
Isn't there something missing in the April 25th front page article about closing the Columbia Generating Station? There is lots of talk about nuclear power cost, replacement power costs, vent modification and fuel costs? But I thought the big issue of the day for all those pushing for social responsibility was the impending disaster of global ... (more)
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Tri-cityherald.com.
#1 May 7, 2013
No. One stupid fearmongering whopper does not excuse another fearmongering whopper.
#2 May 8, 2013
Add your comments below
|Global Cooling (Apr '15)||1 hr||Science Is A Method||2,394|
|The Paradox of Contemporary Neo-Orthodox Climat...||1 hr||don t drink the k...||2|
|Hundreds Of Scientists Urge Trump To Pull Out O...||12 hr||Patriot AKA Bozo||169|
|global warming keeps on keeping on||17 hr||Cabbage||3|
|Battery Power Gives Boost to Renewables||21 hr||uIDIOTRACEMAKEWOR...||142|
|Global Warming Standup Comedy (Apr '07)||Thu||Into The Night||5,088|
|Prof at The Nation: CO2 'A Far More Deadly Gas'...||Apr 25||okimar||3|
Find what you want!
Search Global Warming Forum Now
Copyright © 2017 Topix LLC