Pseudoscience of global warming and

Pseudoscience of global warming and

Posted in the Global Warming Forum

hojo

Rock Island, IL

#1 Apr 13, 2018
Global cooling in the 20th century. Global warming in the 21st century! Both are driven by "science fiction, both are implemented by science data manipulation and both are predicated upon phony. fake and ,'the sky is falling" pseudoscience scare tactics. Paul Ehrlich 's fraudulent ice age prediction of England would freeze over and be unihabitable by the year 2000 is a perfect example of (political science doomsday brainwashing propaganda) which no relation what-so-ever to factually true and authenticated science research study!
hojo

Rock Island, IL

#2 Apr 25, 2018
hojo wrote:
Global cooling in the 20th century. Global warming in the 21st century! Both are driven by "science fiction, both are implemented by science data manipulation and both are predicated upon phony. fake and ,'the sky is falling" pseudoscience scare tactics. Paul Ehrlich 's fraudulent ice age prediction of England would freeze over and be unihabitable by the year 2000 is a perfect example of (political science doomsday brainwashing propaganda) which no relation what-so-ever to factually true and authenticated science research study!
Global Warming + Global Cooling+ political Democratic Propaganda (equals) Pseudoscience
Here s The Difference

Minneapolis, MN

#5 Jul 16, 2018
https://science.house.gov/news/press-releases...

Real data and methodology called into question
hojo

Minneapolis, MN

#6 Jul 16, 2018
Here s The Difference wrote:
https://science.house.gov/news /press-releases/former-noaa-sc ientist-confirms-colleagues-ma nipulated-climate-records

Real data and methodology called into question
The Intentional Manipulation of Global Warming Science Data

The "peer reviewed" papers that claim "global warming-Overheating of the Planet-(man-made) climate change to be scientifically (computer modeled) and factually true, have been audited, critiqued, examined and investigated by over 455 of the leading Atmospheric, climatologists, Earth, Physicists, and Engineering Scientists!(who have been silenced by the Government and the liberal mainstream media are now "speaking out"!!

Their conclusions are as follows:

quote::The UNIPCC, NASA, CRU, NOAA, and The National Academy of Science have been given the license and the freedom to use what-ever methods necessary to provide evidence that CO2 increases were harming the climate, even if it involves manipulation, omission and the altering of dubious climate data, using peoples opinions, instead of science, to prove their case for the Overheating of the Planet"!!!!

further: "This is how their science research works! In order to promote the CO2 global warming overheating of the planet frenzy, the UNIPCC, NASA, CRU, NOAA, and the National Academy of Science ----(start at the end point of climate science---drawing conclusions--picking numbers and then work backwards to justify the results! They previously decide that there will be a 0.6 degree of global warming at this time, even though satellite and ground measurements show cooling due to increase precipitation and clouds which reflect away solar energy....There is no way to trace down the logic of this type because (there is none) Computer models are used and they have no relation to objective reality. The closest thing to logic is a (scheme) called an "energy budget"! These budgets schemes show arrows pointing to the sky and then back to the ground, tracing a "supposed flow of energy of myriad of origin! These estimates show that there is no real mechanism for carbon dioxide in creating this man-made global warming hoax!!

The questions are scientific, but the so-called ( science research answers are "political"! The global warming-man-made climate change is not about climate science, but a "whipped up" global frenzy about political science"!!!!!!!
Here s The Difference

Minneapolis, MN

#7 Jul 16, 2018
Yes. Over the months ...a narrative has been well established by a systematic effort to cut n paste your above post.

Unfortunately, this approach lacks basic facts of support.

So this begs the question, Mr. hojo;

would you be receptive to actual data to support your perspective?

Let me know.
Here s The Difference

Minneapolis, MN

#8 Jul 16, 2018
Yes, Mr. hojo, over the months ...a narrative has been well established by a systematic effort to cut n paste your above post.

Unfortunately, this approach lacks basic facts of support.

So this begs the question, Mr. hojo;

would you be receptive to actual data to support your perspective?

Let me know.
hojo

United States

#9 Jul 18, 2018
Here s The Difference wrote:
Yes, Mr. hojo, over the months ...a narrative has been well established by a systematic effort to cut n paste your above post.

Unfortunately, this approach lacks basic facts of support.

So this begs the question, Mr. hojo;

would you be receptive to actual data to support your perspective?

Let me know.
There IS no actual TRUE data. It has all been manipulated., doctored, distorted and exaggerated in order to fit the Global Warming Pseudoscience narrative that is required by the Democratic Socialist Communist Government in order to (falsely prove) that Global Warming exists when ,( in fact) it DOES NOT!!!

Here s The Difference

Minneapolis, MN

#10 Jul 19, 2018
No "TRUE data"?
That's a queer comment.
Are you suggesting there are no weather stations that record a true temperature?
hojo

Des Moines, IA

#11 Jul 19, 2018
Here s The Difference wrote:
No "TRUE data"?
That's a queer comment.
Are you suggesting there are no weather stations that record a true temperature?
What " is a true temperature' in one confined small geographical area of (let's say) Podunk, Iowa, is always different 3 miles (east-west-north and south) of that (1st temperature reported area) which is the one that the "fake weather" is reporting on television . There is "no way" to acurratly measure the true temperature in any town, city, county, state, country or world wide due to countless climate and weather variables!!!!
The 365 day predictions in the Farmers Almanac has just as much (inaccurate-accuracy)!!!! It is all a (crap-shoot prediction) just like the Pseidosciemce of Global warming
Here s The Difference

Minneapolis, MN

#12 Jul 19, 2018
Dear Mr. hojo.

The idea that "There is "no way" to acurratly(sic) measure the true temperature in any town, city, county, state, country or world wide" seems myopic... to say the least.,

I am compelled to respectfully disagree that the little town 250 miles to our Southwest called Carroll, Iowa as well as every other city and town across this country offer no scientific value by recording their weather station data. The verbiage which includes "fake weather" and "and no way" appears extreme when discussing the benefits of a national weather almanac.

Besides, such data has the potential to highlight the erroneous assurtions which claim the science of global warming is an indisputable fact.....and that's just one reason to endeavour to ensure an accurate recount of weather data -don't ya think so?

For example;
Would not exposing the absurdly ridiculous 'heat index' registed on Saturday July 6, in Carroll help illustrate the need to not sceptical of the idea that the science is beyond repute? I would say....such facts are not merely of value but are indeed vital to educating the devout believers of A/OACDDCGCD.
Here s The Difference

Minneapolis, MN

#13 Jul 19, 2018
Dear Mr. hojo.

EDIT:

The idea that "There is "no way" to acurratly(sic) measure the true temperature in any town, city, county, state, country or world wide" seems myopic... to say the least.,

I am compelled to respectfully disagree with the notion that the little town 250 miles to our Southwest called Carroll, Iowa as well as every other city and town across this country offer no scientific value by recording their weather station data. The verbiage which includes "fake weather" and "and no way" appears extreme when discussing the benefits of a national weather almanac.

Besides, such data has the potential to highlight the erroneous assurtions which claim the science of global warming is an indisputable fact ...and that's just one reason to endeavour to ensure an accurate recount of weather data -don't ya think so?

For example;
Would not exposing the absurdly ridiculous 'heat index' registed on Saturday July 7, in Carroll help illustrate the need to be skeptical of the idea that science is beyond repute? I would say ...such historic facts are not merely of value but are indeed vital to educating the devout believers of A/OACDDCGCD.
hojo

Minneapolis, MN

#15 Jul 20, 2018
Here s The Difference wrote:
Dear Mr. hojo.

EDIT:

The idea that "There is "no way" to acurratly(sic) measure the true temperature in any town, city, county, state, country or world wide" seems myopic... to say the least.,

I am compelled to respectfully disagree with the notion that the little town 250 miles to our Southwest called Carroll, Iowa as well as every other city and town across this country offer no scientific value by recording their weather station data. The verbiage which includes "fake weather" and "and no way" appears extreme when discussing the benefits of a national weather almanac.
For example;
Would not exposing the absurdly ridiculous 'heat index' registed on Saturday July 7, in Carroll help illustrate the need to be skeptical of the idea that science is beyond repute? I would say ...such historic facts are not merely of value but are indeed vital to educating the devout believers of A/OACDDCGCD.
the "heat index" is NOT an accurate temperature...in fact it is NOT a temperature at all! What the temperature "feels like" are overstated, Governmental exaggerated weather media (buzz words)!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Global Warming Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10) 22 min Patriot AKA Bozo 41,320
Poll What is the most STUPID post made by an AGW'er.... (Sep '09) 2 hr hojo 1,734
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr Willycfarty 64,982
Ever Notice? 16 hr don t drink the k... 3
News Gov. 'Moonbeam' says California to launch clima... Mon Police Chief Edd 7
News This solar farm is built on oil industry money,... Sep 22 Solarman 1
News Extreme weather like Hurricane Florence shows w... Sep 22 Mothra 2