Economist: 'Mismatch' Between CO2 & 'Not-Rising Temperatures'
The Economist has been fairly consistent in its stand that carbon dioxide emissions from man-made sources are the chief cause of global warming.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at New Media Journal.
#1 Apr 5, 2013
Buried deep in the highly technical piece, the magazine admits that evidence suggests something that global warming skeptics have long maintained: Natural variations in the earth's climate likely play a bigger role than scientific models have said.
At he end of the day they just don't know. Got more scientific science fiction?
Since: Apr 08
"the green troll"
#2 Apr 5, 2013
Temperatures are within the range of model predictions, therefore the role of natural variation is captured by the models.
Add your comments below
|In climate bid, Obama stares down melting Alask...||12 min||Cordwainer Trout||203|
|What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14)||1 hr||P_Smith||6,978|
|On Arctic voyage, Obama banks on power of his c...||3 hr||serfs up||10|
|Global Cooling||5 hr||Into The Night||209|
|Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08)||5 hr||Into The Night||54,626|
|COP21 Paris 2015 (Feb '15)||15 hr||Earthling-1||12|
|The Science of GHG||15 hr||Earthling-1||133|
Find what you want!
Search Global Warming Forum Now
Copyright © 2015 Topix LLC