Economist: 'Mismatch' Between CO2 & 'Not-Rising Temperatures'
The Economist has been fairly consistent in its stand that carbon dioxide emissions from man-made sources are the chief cause of global warming.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at New Media Journal.
#1 Apr 5, 2013
Buried deep in the highly technical piece, the magazine admits that evidence suggests something that global warming skeptics have long maintained: Natural variations in the earth's climate likely play a bigger role than scientific models have said.
At he end of the day they just don't know. Got more scientific science fiction?
Since: Apr 08
"the green troll"
#2 Apr 5, 2013
Temperatures are within the range of model predictions, therefore the role of natural variation is captured by the models.
Add your comments below
|Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08)||20 min||jenny||64,455|
|Global warming 'undeniable,' scientists say (Jul '10)||43 min||Into The Night||38,322|
|White House will override Obama's climate plan||2 hr||Into The Night||3,259|
|What role do you think humans play in global wa... (Sep '14)||8 hr||Into The Night||12,187|
|Sea ice cover at both poles at lowest point of ... (Mar '17)||12 hr||Real Science||60|
|What is the most STUPID post made by an AGW'er.... (Sep '09)||20 hr||Fugooo||1,386|
|Scott Pruitt asks whether global warming 'neces...||Sat||hojo||2|
Find what you want!
Search Global Warming Forum Now
Copyright © 2018 Topix LLC