Bill Maher: Climate Change Deniers Are "So Stupid They Make ME Question Evolution"

[I Am DigitaP]

LoL U.N. i should have said U.K.

[I Am DigitaP]

See ya at Church, Choirboy!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/64...

[mememine69]

Michael Allred wrote:

<quoted text>
It always amazes me when those on the right go on to prove my statement.
It shouldn't, because they always do so, but it still just drops the jaw to see how fast the right wingers rush to prove me correct.

Proving once again that global warming is politics, not science. Thanks for that. Thanks for showing your hate for humanity and your wish for misery like some rubber necker at a car accident.
You modern day witch burners will be cursed in history for this mess you have created.
Preserve, protect and respect Nature, not save it with needless fear from a non existent enemy of "climate Change".

[NobodyYouKnow]

Florida wrote:

<quoted text>1980's PC hardware that ran "DOS" version 1.0 thru version 3.0 had the truncated time/date routines in the "BIOS," because they were limited in memory to 640K.

Repeating fecal matter doesn't change it from being bull cr@p.

[Florida]

NobodyYouKnow wrote:

<quoted text>
Repeating fecal matter doesn't change it from being bull cr@p.

You should know... Moose Head

Thanks for the tell all link

The Poison of Liberalism

[ObamaRules]

Maher is 100% correct! You Republican fools need to wake up before it is too late.

[dnew]

In Bill Maher’s defence, I do believe that it would be silly for anyone to claim that there hasn’t been some climate change on earth in the past century. But, this is natural. The earth goes through natural phenomenons that occur in global warming and cooling. It is proven that even with the end of harmful emissions global warming will continue on well after 2100. It has been said that the Earth has warm periods called “interglacials” that happen for 12,000 years in-between ice ages. This fact, and the time frames make sense when looking at our global warming, and the last ice age. It is scary to think that humans could potentially be trying to cool are planet when in reality an ice age could be coming. Another issue that makes me questions people motives are how people are replacing global warming with religion. Global warming is becoming something that people are so passionate about and they make it their every day goal to help the environment and reduce the use of fossil fuels. What about all the other extremely important issues that are happening globally such as AIDS, war, economic hardships, etc. The extreme media on global warming has distracted people from what is really going on, and things that need immediate attention.

[CTEd]

mememine69 wrote:

<quoted text>
If you are saying that all bad weather now is caused by my SUV I can respect that. At least I understand where you are coming from, climate coward. Climate pu$$ie! Stop scaring my kids, freak.
You think you are so important that you can make the planet Earth mortal?

You think six BILLION people have no effect on the planetary ecosystem?(Which by the way has increased 400% in the last one hundred years)

[CTEd]

Florida wrote:

<quoted text>CTEd... I am convinced this explanation is beyond you and the Moose Heads scope to comprehend, however anything that confuses a liberal, they will either deny, lie or have some delusional attack because they are always confused.
If you can count in "Base 8 hexidecimal" you shoud have No problem... Lets begin...
1.)MS DOS 1.0 thru MS DOS 3.0 is limited to 640K <-- interrupt 1AH BCD (binary coded decimal) in the register stack that details the implementation causing the limitation in memory that affects the date going back to 1901...
2.)Each byte (BTW: there are 8 bits to a byte and I will stop there) can have a value ranging from 0 to 9. The numbers returned are absolute values, not offsets from 1980. Thus, the maximum value for the (decade) year is 99.
3.)The Fix... DOS 3.1 (Released 1987 about the time Apple lost their lawsuit, because Bill gates stole the Windows operating system from Apple) extend the memory beyond 640K to 1 Mega Byte.
The century will then return 19 or 20, and the maximum year (century-year) is now 2099.
Thanks to your Moose Head buddy he provided the Tell all link...
MS-DOS System Date Cannot Have a Year Past 2099... if you have DOS 3.1 or later!!!!
Meaning there will now be a Y2K bug again in year 2099...
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/58495
Clinton/Gore were the masterminds of Fearmogering tactics, taking advantage of a 1980 thru 1987 IBM PC "MS DOS BUG" and using the bug as a Doomsday promotion for end to the world...
Skeptically, again Global warming is the accelerated warming of the atmosphere due to human activities, the Gore Skeptics rant...
To sell over-priced solutions, create imaginary green jobs, and lies to stimulate the economy and put more money in Gore's and General Electrics pockets...
One crazy imaginary "Y2K AL GORE" phantom in a lifetime is bad enough, but two imaginary Gore phantoms in a lifetime, "Global warming," is two too much...
The inebriated Foolish Ignorance and Poison of Scare Tactics Liberalism

This post is meaningless. Who cares about your explanation - the point is simple. Al Gore never touted Y2K as an issue, and Clinton/Gore ignored it until 1998. If you weren't so lazy you could go look it up yourself, it's not that hard.
Simply repeating that nonsense doesn't make it true, although you try to hide it in a long post that sounds intelligent, you have said nothing other than "Gore hyped Y2K" which is false.
I know you have at least enough brain cells to google it for yoruself.

[mdbuilder]

CTEd wrote:

<quoted text>
You think six BILLION people have no effect on the planetary ecosystem?(Which by the way has increased 400% in the last one hundred years)

How are you going to regulate volcanism? One major eruption, let alone multiple ones, releases more CO2 than anything man has caused since we crawled out of the sea, and they have for 4.5 billion years.

[Brian_G]

More people means more doctors, scientists, teachers... I like population growth. When I was a kid they said there would be nine billion people by now (another failed forecast), two billion people are unaccounted for. Maybe aliens got them.

[ObamaRules]

Do you conservative fools really want to see what the human effect has been on our Earth's climate?? Just three simple words... "Ice Core Samples"!!!

[Brian_G]

Ice core samples are the ice thermometers warmists use to prove unprecedented warming. They can't find previous warm period, does it ever occur to them that ice melts when it's warm?

[mdbuilder]

ObamaRules wrote:

Do you conservative fools really want to see what the human effect has been on our Earth's climate?? Just three simple words... "Ice Core Samples"!!!

Are you suggesting the only warming trend indicated in these samples happened in the last 100 years? If not, who caused the others?

[Northie]

mdbuilder wrote:

<quoted text>
Are you suggesting the only warming trend indicated in these samples happened in the last 100 years? If not, who caused the others?

Get a clue:

http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/milankovitch.h...

http://www.physorg.com/news146755017.html

[The Fungus Among Us]

Bill Maher is a congenital dimwit who could't find his own ass-cheeks with a full-length mirror and a[solar] flashlight.

Mr. Maher - this weekend I will be burning copious piles of leaves in my backyard, taking long hot showers, eating top-of-the-foodchain slabs of beef, racing my car engine at all traffic stops , and allowing my gas leaf-blowers to race at full-throttle all day long.. just so that I can piss on your Moonbat, hysterical Freak-Show, fraudulent hoax, and engineered public shakedown known as "Global Warming" .

Blow me, Mr. Maher. THAT is global warming we can use.

[CTEd]

mdbuilder wrote:

<quoted text>
How are you going to regulate volcanism? One major eruption, let alone multiple ones, releases more CO2 than anything man has caused since we crawled out of the sea, and they have for 4.5 billion years.

Wow. How can you be so wrong and not know it? The USGS puts the output of ALL vocanoes WORLD WIDE at 200 million tonnes a year. According to the DOE, tthe global fossile fuel emmissions are 26 BILLION tonnes.

http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/volcanowatch/2007/07_0...

Some of that is made up in a mount sain't helen's type eruption - but not more than humans have ever produced. I've never seen a source for that claim. According to the USGS volcanoes account for only 3 percent of the total (if you combine human and volcanic sources)- humans the other 97%.

Considering the amount accrued DAILY - I doubt one eruption even makes up the yearly difference - Kiluaea has been constantly erupting for years - producing far more lava than mount saint helen's ever did and it's still less than 3%.

As an aside - the earth was in balance with volcanic eruptions and lots of plant life to soak it up for billions of years. Now that we are burning fossile fuels we are throwing that out of balance - the only want to sponge it up would be to allow the plant life to increase - but are simultaneously DECREASING the plant life at the same time.

[JRS]

CTEd wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow. How can you be so wrong and not know it? The USGS puts the output of ALL vocanoes WORLD WIDE at 200 million tonnes a year. According to the DOE, tthe global fossile fuel emmissions are 26 BILLION tonnes.
http://hvo.wr.usgs.gov/volcanowatch/2007/07_0...
Some of that is made up in a mount sain't helen's type eruption - but not more than humans have ever produced. I've never seen a source for that claim. According to the USGS volcanoes account for only 3 percent of the total (if you combine human and volcanic sources)- humans the other 97%.
Considering the amount accrued DAILY - I doubt one eruption even makes up the yearly difference - Kiluaea has been constantly erupting for years - producing far more lava than mount saint helen's ever did and it's still less than 3%.
As an aside - the earth was in balance with volcanic eruptions and lots of plant life to soak it up for billions of years. Now that we are burning fossile fuels we are throwing that out of balance - the only want to sponge it up would be to allow the plant life to increase - but are simultaneously DECREASING the plant life at the same time.

The only place CO2 is out of balance is in the AGW crisis peddler dreams. Or in the dark closets with other children playing - scared yet?


==

“The quantity of CO2 we produce is insignificant in terms of the natural circulation between air, water and soil...

I am doing a detailed assessment of the UN IPCC reports and the Summaries for Policy Makers, identifying the way in which the Summaries have distorted the science.”-

South Afican Nuclear Physicist
and Chemical Engineer
Dr. Philip Lloyd,
a UN IPCC co-coordinating lead author
who has authored over 150 refereed publications.

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...


==

MIT Climate Scientist Calls Fears of Global Warming 'Silly'- Equates Concerns to ‘Little Kids’ Attempting to "Scare Each Other"

Lindzen mocked fears of global warming by comparing them to children’s imaginations. "I think it's mainly just like little kids locking themselves in dark closets to see how much they can scare each other and themselves," Lindzen said.

Lindzen, a past UN IPCC contributor, also explained how only a dozen scientists were involved in writing the 2001(Third Assessment Report) IPCC media hyped Summary For Policymakers that purported to speak for thousands of scientists.

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...

==

As to you decreasing plant life nonsense:

NASA

A NASA-Department of Energy jointly funded study concludes the Earth has been greening over the past 20 years. As climate changed, plants found it easier to grow.

Climatic changes, over approximately the past 20 years, tended to be in the direction of easing climatic limits to plant growth.

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/tops...

But in a way you are correct about decreases in plant life, read on:

A famous tree in the Maldives shows no evidence of having been swept away by rising sea levels, as would be predicted by the global warming swindlers. A group of Australian global-warming advocates came along and pulled the tree down, destroy-ing the evidence that their “theory” was false.

http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Calen7/MornerEng...

Yeah, the earth is losing plants because the AGW crisis peddlers are killing it if it reveals their fraud!

[JRS]

CTEd wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow. How can you be so wrong and not know it? The USGS puts the output of ALL vocanoes WORLD WIDE at 200 million tonnes a year. According to the DOE,.........p for billions of years. Now that we are burning fossile fuels we are throwing that out of balance - the only want to sponge it up would be to allow the plant life to increase - but are simultaneously DECREASING the plant life at the same time.

The only place CO2 is out of balance is in the AGW crisis peddler dreams. Or in the dark closets with other children playing - scared yet?


==

“The quantity of CO2 we produce is insignificant in terms of the natural circulation between air, water and soil...

I am doing a detailed assessment of the UN IPCC reports and the Summaries for Policy Makers, identifying the way in which the Summaries have distorted the science.”-

South Afican Nuclear Physicist
and Chemical Engineer
Dr. Philip Lloyd,
a UN IPCC co-coordinating lead author
who has authored over 150 refereed publications.

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...


==

MIT Climate Scientist Calls Fears of Global Warming 'Silly'- Equates Concerns to ‘Little Kids’ Attempting to "Scare Each Other"

Lindzen mocked fears of global warming by comparing them to children’s imaginations. "I think it's mainly just like little kids locking themselves in dark closets to see how much they can scare each other and themselves," Lindzen said.

Lindzen, a past UN IPCC contributor, also explained how only a dozen scientists were involved in writing the 2001(Third Assessment Report) IPCC media hyped Summary For Policymakers that purported to speak for thousands of scientists.

http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm...

==

As to you decreasing plant life nonsense:

NASA

A NASA-Department of Energy jointly funded study concludes the Earth has been greening over the past 20 years. As climate changed, plants found it easier to grow.

Climatic changes, over approximately the past 20 years, tended to be in the direction of easing climatic limits to plant growth.

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/tops...

But in a way you are correct about decreases in plant life, read on:

A famous tree in the Maldives shows no evidence of having been swept away by rising sea levels, as would be predicted by the global warming swindlers. A group of Australian global-warming advocates came along and pulled the tree down, destroy-ing the evidence that their “theory” was false.

http://www.mitosyfraudes.org/Calen7/MornerEng...

Yeah, the earth is losing plants because the AGW crisis peddlers are killing it if it reveals their fraud!

[Michael Allred]

mememine69 wrote:

<quoted text>
Proving once again that global warming is politics, not science. Thanks for that. Thanks for showing your hate for humanity and your wish for misery like some rubber necker at a car accident.
You modern day witch burners will be cursed in history for this mess you have created.
Preserve, protect and respect Nature, not save it with needless fear from a non existent enemy of "climate Change".

Actually it does no such thing.

Your statement is sort of like trying to insist that bananas prove the existence of G-d.