MI Grinches Want To Ruin Christmas By...

MI Grinches Want To Ruin Christmas By Letting Adoption Agencies Reject Gay Couples

There are 41 comments on the Queerty story from Dec 4, 2012, titled MI Grinches Want To Ruin Christmas By Letting Adoption Agencies Reject Gay Couples. In it, Queerty reports that:

It could be a blue Christmas for the nearly 14,000 children in Michigan's foster-care system: The House Committee on Families, Children, and Seniors is expected to vote today on whether an adoption agency can discriminate against applicants based on its religious or moral grounds.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Queerty.

“A JOURNEY OF A THOUSAND MILES”

Since: Aug 08

MUST BEGIN WITH A SINGLE STEP!

#24 Dec 5, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
That folks, is how homosexual rationalization works.
Sorry, but I DON'T rationalize harming children in ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM!!!
JrEsq

United States

#25 Dec 5, 2012
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, but I DON'T rationalize harming children in ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM!!!
So then, why do you promote homosexual parenting, which harms a child by confusing them on Mothers Day or Fathers Day?

“A JOURNEY OF A THOUSAND MILES”

Since: Aug 08

MUST BEGIN WITH A SINGLE STEP!

#26 Dec 5, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
So then, why do you promote homosexual parenting, which harms a child by confusing them on Mothers Day or Fathers Day?
There is NOTHING wrong with Gay or Lesbian Parents and the children are NOT confused when it comes to Father's day or Mother's day......that's just crap and stereotypical BS coming from HATERS like yourself!!!

Regardless of what you believe, CHILD MOLESTATION occurs in all sorts of families and IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SEXUAL ORIENTATION OF THE PARENTS!!!

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Dec 07

Lakeland, MI

#27 Dec 5, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
"Why think about children in need of loving homes"
You are making a very broad assumption: that every homosexual home is a "loving home". Sounds like a copy-paste right out of the gay propaganda manual.
Are you not doing the same in the opposite direction?

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Dec 07

Lakeland, MI

#28 Dec 5, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
So then, why do you promote homosexual parenting, which harms a child by confusing them on Mothers Day or Fathers Day?
Here's a hint--you sound a lot less like an idiot when it's clear you have some clue what you're talking about.

You obviously have no idea what you're talking about, have never met a child being raised by a gay couple, or ever even met ANY child, for that matter. Children aren't confused by same-sex parenting. It's adults that get confused about it, but that's a chosen reaction, not reality.
JrEsq

United States

#29 Dec 5, 2012
eJohn wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's a hint--you sound a lot less like an idiot when it's clear you have some clue what you're talking about.
You obviously have no idea what you're talking about, have never met a child being raised by a gay couple, or ever even met ANY child, for that matter. Children aren't confused by same-sex parenting. It's adults that get confused about it, but that's a chosen reaction, not reality.
"Children aren't confused by same-sex parenting."
Gay propaganda bullshit.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#30 Dec 5, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Better to SHOW that they are liars, than to merely call them such. That way, the JUDGE calls them liars.
Right. That's what I am saying.

Logically, to say these things in court would be to invite a burden of proof. You'd *prove* it, like you do anything in court. That's *why* I keep saying that; you'd have to. That's what you do in courts of law. That's why you'd do it in front of a judge.

You could bring these issues into every current gay rights case and the worst the judge will do -- we all know this -- is pronounce them NOT PERTINENT and strike them from the record -- which, in case anyone isn't paying attention, COULD MAKE THAT JUDGE and his verdict look bad to a review court at a higher level.

It's such a win-win that I am almost *frightened* that the pro-gay are not using this method more publicly and doggedly.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

#31 Dec 5, 2012
The California prop 8 case, of course, famously used this method; that's what that trial was all about. The whole point of that trial was a dogged confrontation, relentless day for day, in which an explanation was demanded of the antigay on the stand for their various contentions and assertions.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#32 Dec 5, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
So then, why do you promote homosexual parenting, which harms a child by confusing them on Mothers Day or Fathers Day?
Why would a child raised by same-sex parents be confused on Mother's Day or Father's Day? My daughter sends her mother a card on Mother's Day and give her 2 dads a card on Father's day.

Maybe you should ask an 8 y/o to explain it to you if you're still confused.
JrEsq

United States

#33 Dec 5, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would a child raised by same-sex parents be confused on Mother's Day or Father's Day? My daughter sends her mother a card on Mother's Day and give her 2 dads a card on Father's day.
Maybe you should ask an 8 y/o to explain it to you if you're still confused.
About the only thing your reply proves is how queer parenting is good for the greeting card industry.

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#34 Dec 5, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
So then, why do you promote homosexual parenting, which harms a child by confusing them on Mothers Day or Fathers Day?
There's always drag.

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#35 Dec 5, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
About the only thing your reply proves is how queer parenting is good for the greeting card industry.
Any 'queer' parent would be great compared to you and your bigoted Christian crazy!

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#36 Dec 5, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
About the only thing your reply proves is how queer parenting is good for the greeting card industry.
Yep, we're more beneficial to the economy than heteros.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#37 Dec 5, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
"there is no logical or rational explanation"
That is the standard diversionary homosexual preamble to every statement or claim that they make that in itself is illogical, irrational, or baseless.
In this case, every heterosexual child has a right to be brought up in a heterosexual family. Somehow the queers feel their right to complete their fantasy exceeds the rights of the child.
LOL! Ever hear of "logic"?
Seems not.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#38 Dec 5, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
The case in Connecticut of the two homosexuals who were sexually abusing two of their adopted children cannot be rationalized away.
The children must be protected.
Spend a lot of time looking for stories about adopted children being molested? Do you write stories about them?

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#39 Dec 5, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
So then, why do you promote homosexual parenting, which harms a child by confusing them on Mothers Day or Fathers Day?
Hey, most kids are smarter than you are, and can figure these things out.

Since: Apr 11

Santa Monica, CA

#40 Dec 5, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
"Children aren't confused by same-sex parenting."
Gay propaganda bullshit.
Jesus had two dads. Was he confused?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#41 Dec 6, 2012
Guys! Wake up! He's got you conceding that there's such a thing as "homosexual parenting".

(Sheesh! Take a nap for a day and come back to find the place needs a good flood!)

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Dec 07

Lakeland, MI

#42 Dec 6, 2012
JrEsq wrote:
<quoted text>
"Children aren't confused by same-sex parenting."
Gay propaganda bullshit.
Support?? Can you cite an example of a child that's "confused by same-sex parenting" that wasn't purposely "confused" by some adult giving them inaccurate information?

Since: Apr 08

Cleveland, OH

#44 Dec 6, 2012
Dirty White Schleppers wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes,
Thomas (now Tammy) Lobel of SF, CA.
You're welcome, bitch!
And for every kid you say was "messed up" by an LGBT parent, there are dozens who were harmed by their heterosexual biological parents.

It's not hard to find those kids either -- they often end up living in foster homes and need to be adopted by parents who actually want them and are prepared to raise them.

Here's a website that features just a few of the thousands and thousands of kids in the USA who need to be adopted: http://adoptuskids.org/

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 2 min Frankie Rizzo 16,058
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 3 min Terra Firma 38,864
News Parade kicks off Erie's pride festival 7 min Gremlin 16
News Kentucky Has a Gay Senate Candidate - Does Anyb... 19 min Religion is insanity 5
Maybe god is gay! (Dec '09) 20 min June VanDerMark 11,328
News Study: Children Of Same-Sex Parents More Likely... 41 min Lawrence Wolf 116
News Transgender Ken doll cake triggers outrage afte... 1 hr Sneaky Pete 29
News Man charged after lubricant dispenser filled wi... 14 hr Wholly Silicon Wafer 16
More from around the web