Biggest Gay Lies
Mikey

Chatsworth, CA

#2443 Sep 9, 2014
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
So anyway, before we got so rudely interrupted by Mikey's trolling about going to heaven I was saying Mr Cathy was very gay friendly. What with the "toss my salad" gay salad alone he broke new ground in gay friendliness. Not to mention the chicken reach around wrap or the fudge packin' brownie.
You weren't interrupted and you don't have readership or a following. You just like 'Mr Cathy' is/was, just an old arrogant piece of bigoted sh*t who deserves exactly the kind of comments you get. So troll on asstroll.

Judged:

16

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Mom

San Jose, CA

#2444 Sep 9, 2014
Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh Really?! And you know this how? Jeezus tell you? Was he wearing a white robe or a blue one? Well,'Mom' since you seem to deem who goes to where, I guess I'll see you in hell...B*tch.
No way gay troll you will burn in hell for eternity. I will not!

btw beaitch eternity is a long long time teehee

Judged:

15

15

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#2445 Sep 9, 2014
Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
You weren't interrupted and you don't have readership or a following. You just like 'Mr Cathy' is/was, just an old arrogant piece of bigoted sh*t who deserves exactly the kind of comments you get. So troll on asstroll.
~smootch~

Judged:

16

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#2446 Sep 9, 2014
NE Jade wrote:
Wow, could you be more obvious, Rocco? Talk about a thin closet door!! Take a ramp to a raft and sail away!!
Jade. So obvious.

Judged:

16

15

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#2447 Sep 9, 2014
Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh Really?! And you know this how? Jeezus tell you? Was he wearing a white robe or a blue one? Well,'Mom' since you seem to deem who goes to where, I guess I'll see you in hell...B*tch.

No robe, just a neon orange jockstrap.

Judged:

16

16

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Mikey

Chatsworth, CA

#2448 Sep 9, 2014
Mom wrote:
<quoted text>
No way gay troll you will burn in hell for eternity. I will not!
btw beaitch eternity is a long long time teehee
I'll tell you what Princess, you hurry up and tell me all about it when you get there, Kay? BTW We know you're not a woman, stupid Asstroll,...

Judged:

31

31

30

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Mom

Pacific, MO

#2450 Sep 10, 2014
Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
I'll tell you what Princess, you hurry up and tell me all about it when you get there, Kay? BTW We know you're not a woman, stupid Asstroll,...
We know you are not a man tinker bell

Judged:

16

15

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Buford

New York, NY

#2451 Sep 10, 2014
Great thread!

Thanks Harvey!

Judged:

16

15

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Buckaroo

Torrance, CA

#2452 Sep 10, 2014
Hey what happen to that asshat he/she WastedWater did he finally dry up?

Judged:

16

15

15

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#2453 Sep 10, 2014
Interesting thread. Thanks Harvey. Great idea! Popular.

Judged:

25

24

24

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Buford

New York, NY

#2458 Sep 11, 2014
Move Towards U.S. Takeover Begins

In the 1960s, the agitation in America was over the Vietnam War; no one paid any attention to the gays, who were “in the closet.” Dennis Altman, a confirmed gay, explains what it was like back then:
“During my first stay in the United States (1964-1966),.. homosexuality was both hidden and stigmatized .. Until the end of the sixties, to be a homosexual in most Western countries, and especially in the United States, was to experience a life that was largely furtive, shameful, and guilt-ridden.”—Dennis Altman, Homosexualization of America, p. 2.

Oddly enough, homosexuals declare that a police raid on a bar in the northeast started them on the path, which they now call the “gay rights movement.” Police had been called in to stop trouble at a gay bar in an Eastern city. In response, the gays started fighting with the police and a small riot ensued. Dubbed the “Stonewall Incident,” this event, which occurred on the night of June 24-25, 1969, is hallowed by gays as their “coming out party.”

As we have observed, it was in 1970-1973 that the gays began railroading their ideas into America’s leading mental health organizations. They began declaring that Americans were bigoted, unjust, and repressive. Gays said they would stand for it no longer, and they wanted their “civil rights!”

“The seventies saw the beginning of the large-scale transition in the status of homosexuality from a deviance or perversion—to an alternate life style or minority. This was as remarkable a change in the characterization of ‘the homosexual’ as was the original invention of that category in the nineteenth century. Along with this change, homosexuals were being cast increasingly in the role of the vanguard of social and sexual change, worthy of considerable media attention.”—Ibid.
What many people did not realize then—or now—is that, in asking for their “rights,” homosexuals were really asking for a basic restructuring of American culture and values! Our idea a stable civilization is built on the family as the basic unit. But
people did not recognize the profound changes that were being required. But gays understand it:
“Any affirmation of homosexuality is an attack on the prevalent values. Hence, to declare the validity of homosexuality, to reject the judgment that it is sick, evil, a maladjustment, a deviance, or a perversion, is a political statement.”—Op cit., pp. 3-4.

By the late 1970s, gays were demanding that they be accepted as they are. They were demanding that sodomy laws throughout the nation be abolished, and that people quit characterizing them as morally lax or mentally ill. They wanted their lifestyle recognized as a permissible, even worthwhile, alternative.

It was then that the “gay rights” parades began and homosexuals started publicly proclaiming their pride in deviant behavior. They organized clubs in the large cities, on college campuses, and later in high schools. They began publishing books for the bookstore trade.

At first, liberals were not sure what to do with them, yet they were against “gay bashing.” But soon they began joining the ranks of those out to make America a gay-friendly society. Such major newspapers as the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times got involved. Reporters and producers of major network news programs did also. The leading academic minds of the Left joined the cause.
Something that helped was the Kinsey book.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Buford

New York, NY

#2459 Sep 11, 2014
In 1948, Alfred Kinsey (who was an insect specialist) released his Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. Although he claimed that he had interviewed a cross section of the American public, his research was keyed to heavily slanted interviews with prisoners, sex offenders, and child molesters.
In that book, Kinsey declared that 10 percent of the American population was homosexual. Gays later used Kinsey’s book as ammunition to support their campaign for “civil rights.”“If so many people are gay, it cannot be wrong,” they said.
But, in 1993, a major Seattle-based study revealed what many had maintained all along: only 1 percent of the population is homosexual.

Another item, which the gays have used to their advantage, was the 1964 Civil Rights Act. That legislation was enacted to protect the rights of blacks and other disadvantaged people. The homosexuals claimed that they ought to be included—and receive social protection in its provisions.

In March 1987, they held the National March on Washington, D.C., for Gay and Lesbian Rights, with 150,000 in attendance. In April 1993, 300,000 arrived for a second march with the same name. Many of the quotations in this present study were gleaned from speakers and marchers at one or the other of those two large rallies on the mall between the Lincoln Memorial and Congress.

On August 28, 1963, Martin Luther King gave his “I have a dream” speech at the nation’s capital. On April 25, 1993, Larry Dramer, founder of Act-up, said he also had a dream. His was that one day all America would be very favorable to homosexuality. He repeated the myth that it was a “civil rights” issue.
Addressing the crowds at that same march, Torie Osborn (a lesbian), executive director of the National Gay Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) said:“We are the emerging great civil rights movement of the 1990s!”

However, according to the Supreme Court, in order to satisfy minority status for “civil rights” help, a group must establish some criteria:(1) unchangeable characteristics,(2) financial discrimination,(3) and political weakness.
But homosexuals can change, they have more money than those who must support a family, and they are definitely not politically weak!(More on the last two points in the next two sections.)

According to the Wall Street Journal, the average yearly income of blacks is $12,166, while for gays it is $55,430. In addition, the Supreme Court has already ruled that gays do not have a fundamental civil right, above that of any other group:“There is no such thing as a fundamental right to commit homosexual sodomy.”—Justice Burger, U.S. Supreme Court, ruling in Bowers vs. Hartwick, 1986.“Elevated civil rights status should not be granted to homosexuals, more than it is granted to any other group in our society.”— Edwin Meese, former Attorney General.

“There is no reason to codify civil rights protection for what you do in the privacy of your own bedroom.”—Ralph Reed, Director, Christian Coalition. But, just now, let us return to the late 1970s. Something else changed back then also. Previously, because of the need for secrecy, homosexuals had less opportunity to maintain frequent contacts with many different partners. But, when they could establish public bath houses and gay bars, the situation rapidly changed. Whereas, earlier, a homosexual might have contacts with one or two in a night; he could now have 10 to 30 contacts, night after night. As soon as the opportunity was given them to greatly multiply contacts, they took it—and trouble resulted.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Buford

New York, NY

#2460 Sep 11, 2014
It is known that the primary cause of antibiotic-resistant strains of disease originated in the brothels of the great cities of the world. Prostitutes, who have so many relationships each day routinely take antibiotics to ward off disease. This causes drugresistant strains to develop. Research studies of prostitutes in the Philippines, while U.S. military bases were there, confirmed this. In a similar manner, freed by their newly gained “civil rights,” homosexuals carried on so wildly in gay bars and bath houses — that, by the early 1980s, a new disease appeared: human immuno-deficient virus (HIV), which eventually resulted in a variety of terrible diseases, collectively known as auto-immune disease syndrome (AIDS).

One researcher, in the early 1990s, said that it was inevitable that HIV appeared among gays; and that, if gays continued to have so many frequent partners, more terrible diseases would develop. He, a confirmed gay, maintained that it was the homosexuals who started the disease; and that, eventually, they will initiate still more.

Unfortunately, when AIDS first appeared, the blood industry feared to properly deal with it. In 1981, they knew of contamination in the blood, but they did not start a testing program and did not stop indiscriminate blood donations (by gays and IV drug users), for three reasons:(1) Pressure from homosexual groups.(2) Health officials did not want to alarm the public about the contaminated blood supply.(3) The blood industry did not want to pay to test the blood.

“I want to assure the American people that the blood supply is 100 percent safe!”—Margaret Heckler, Secretary, Health and Human Services.
Yet it was not until 1985 that testing procedures were started. As a result of the delay in starting to test the blood supply, 50,000 hemophiliacs (half of those in the nation) became HIV-positive.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Buford

New York, NY

#2461 Sep 11, 2014
The Political Takeover

On October 11, 1987, 150,000 homosexuals gathered in Washington, D.C.; paraded down Pennsylvania Avenue; and then convened for speeches, songs, and “marriage” ceremonies on the steps of the U.S. Supreme Court building while others were dancing, kissing, or laying on top of one another on the grass. Some women had no upper garments on.
All this recalls to mind the kind of “liberation” they had in the 1790s in France, before the mass killings started, in order to weed out political dissidents.
But there was also another hurdle that the homosexuals had to surmount. These were the sodomy laws.

In earlier times, homosexuals were able to practice their activities, as long as they remained hidden. But sodomy laws prohibited them from doing those things openly or publicizing their activities. Why were there such laws?

First, civil law until recently has been the highest expression of community morality, not just in matters of life and property but in matters of sexual conduct as well. Sexual behavior has always been included in both Western and Eastern societies. This situation goes back into ancient times. Ancient Sodom was apparently one of the few cultures to permit open sexual perversion.

Second, the young needed to be protected. We always believed that sexual abuse of children was a terrible crime. For it was the deliberate corruption of innocence. Statutory rape laws were also in force to protect girls below the age of consent. Similar laws were in force to protect boys.

Third, such laws existed to protect society against public effrontery; that is, the flaunting of clearly immoral conduct. It should not be seen in public, where it can set a bad example for other people.

But, under homosexual pressure, changes were gradually made. Throughout the 1980s, the gays increased in strength.For example, through lobbying and coercion, gays were able to get the city of Berkeley to pass the first domestic partners law in 1984. The next year, Disneyland allowed same-sex dancing.(In 1995 it supported a live-in arrangement with lovers, and its Hyperion Books published Growing Up Gay. It is known that gays are influential in Disney leadership.) In 1986, gays won a $5 million lawsuit against Pacific Bell for “discrimination.” On and on it went.

Here are some statements which were made by leaders at the 1993 March on Washington:
“We’re a powerful voting force now. We’ve a pretty solid role in the Democratic Party. We’ve powerful friends in Congress.”—Tacy Dejonkas, Director, Human Rights Campaign Fund (a gay front political lobby).

“We’ve got more support in Congress than non-supporters. There are many people who have come out in support of us. All the people in the D.C. city government have come out repeatedly for Gay Rights.”— John Stein, representative, Queer Nation.

“We’ve had over 100 co-sponsors of the federal gay and lesbian bills in the last [1992] Session of Congress. We have some powerful friends. Senator Kennedy is one of our most powerful friends.”—Joan Ladner, representative, Human Rights Campaign Fund.
“We’ve got to keep moving people into office on every level. We cannot step back. We’ve got to convince our constituents that this is not the time to lay back. We’ve got to move our agenda while we’ve got the window of opportunity.”—Rosemary Dempsey, Vice President, National Organization for Women.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Buford

New York, NY

#2462 Sep 11, 2014
“We’ve had some good success in the past five years, including the Hate Crimes Statistics Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act; and we believe it is time to pass the Gay Lesbian Civil Rights Act.”—Joan Ladner, representative, Human Rights Campaign Fund.

“These guys are on the move. They’re not only working in the House and Senate, but they’re also coming into the states. And they’re trying to put in laws on the country and state level.”— David Noebel, Ph.D., President Summit Ministries.

Bill Clinton is considered by gays to be the best thing that ever came along. He has worked openly, brazenly, and repeatedly to issue presidential executive orders to force America into the circle of gay influence.

During the 1992 election, homosexuals claim they donated $3.4 million to Clinton’s presidential campaign. They also provided volunteer campaign workers. Then, when he won, for the first time in history, a gay-lesbian ball was held in honor of a president’s election. Bill Clinton, via videotape, thanked the gay-lesbian community for their financial support. In return, they celebrated his election to the presidency.“I just want to thank the gay and lesbian community for their commitment. I have an agenda and they are a part of it.”— Bill Clinton.

In the presidential inaugural parade, President Clinton included a float that redefined the American family. Entitled “Families of America,” this float included two lesbians standing together, waving and holding the homosexual flag (of several colors).

At the 1993 March, these comments were heard:
“It is the single most momentous event in the struggle for gaylesbian civil rights!”
“It’s our government now!”

An ominous part of this is that the gays had been told by presidential aids that Clinton would ram many of the pro-gay agenda items through—by presidential executive orders. In this way, he could totally sidestep Congress!
“What you see [the homosexual agenda on the board behind where she stood] is a plan for Mr. Bill Clinton; for, all of this, Mr. Bill Clinton, through his executive offices, can do without Congress! Of course, Congress has to follow in other things—and we
have a whole agenda for them.”—Rosemary Dempsey.

Clinton quickly appointed Roberta Achenberg, of San Francisco, as the first openly declared lesbian to serve in a high federal office. The appointment was approved by the Senate, 58-31. She is the head of the Federal Housing Administration.
The man, acting as White House laison for the Gay Movement, made this statement:
“We all know we’re going to see an executive order; we’re going to see a Gay Lesbian Civil Rights Bill.”—David Mixner, senior adviser to President Clinton.
Just this morning (January 1996), as he was writing on this book, the present writer heard George Stephenopolous on radio news, telling a gay assembly that Clinton had done many things and written many executive orders to help gays in 1995, and that he would do even more in 1996.

What is coming next on the gay agenda? One item is to obtain legalization of same-sex marriages. This will enable homosexuals to collect social security, medical benefits, and one another’s insurance. It will also enable them to adopt children. Another objective, soon after that, is to obtain passage of a full-scale Gay Lesbian Civil Rights Law, forcing every employer to hire them, rent to them, etc. The massive outlay of lobbying money, which has been shelled out to lawmakers through gay lobbying organizations, has influenced legislation in cities, counties, states, and, especially, on the federal level.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Buford

New York, NY

#2463 Sep 11, 2014
By 1989, the Human Rights Campaign Fund (HRCF), which is the homosexual political action committee (PAC), had becomethe ninth-largest independent PAC in the nation, having moved up from sixteenth in just one year. For example, in 1987, not an
election year, they were one of only nine PACs out of over 4,000 that spent over $1 million to push their political agenda. In 1986, they openly boasted that they supported more than 100 candidates for the Senate and House, and had three full-time lobbyists in Washington, D.C. The HRCF collects and distributes funds for the election of specific candidates who cooperate with gay objectives.

Another key lobbying group is the National Gay Task Force, more recently called the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGTF). Founded in 1973, it has never numbered more than a few thousand members, but nevertheless has been remarkably successful. This is due to the immense amounts of money channeled through it to politicians.(The name change came because men and women homosexuals never get along well; but, since the late 1970s, they have tried to cooperate in order to obtain mutually valued objectives.)“The NGTF was instrumental in making the White House accessible and willing to lend a favorable ear to the leadership of the homosexual movement during the Carter Administration. This and the introduction of several prohomosexual statutes in the U.S. Congress—to a great extent also the work of the NGTF—exemplify the high degree of acceptance of homosexuality by the U.S. government .. The NGTF has been influential in causing a number of U.S. agencies (e.g., Internal Revenue Service, Bureau of Prisons, Federal Communications Commission) to make regulatory decisions which favor the acceptance of homosexuality as a legitimate lifestyle. Another area in which the NGTF has been active is the promotion of the homosexual ideology in corporations by the adoption of ‘homosexual rights’ policies.”—Enrique T. Rueda, The Homosexual Network, 1982, p. 157.

Without looking for it, it has become obvious throughout the research required to develop this present report that Democratic presidents and Democratically controlled congresses have consistently been the most willing to provide favors to the gays. Bill Clinton was not the first, even though he has been the most blatant. In a fund-raising appeal, sent out early in February 1987, Jeff Levi announced that the NGTF had sent out questionnaires to all of the declared nominees for president in both the Democratic and Republican parties. This was the question:“As president, would you sign the gay/lesbian civil rights bill now pending in Congress that would prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation?” Levi reported outstanding success with the Democratic candidates:

“For the first time in American political history—every Democratic candidate for the presidency has pledged to sign that bill into law.”—Jeff Levi, in Action Alert newsletter, February 5, 1988.

He then went on to say this:
“None of the Republican candidates has yet agreed to support civil rights protection for lesbians and gays. In fact, only one Republican candidate even bothered to return our survey in time for the results to be announced publicly. Their silence can only be viewed as approval of the Reagan Administration’s policy of discrimination and disregard.”—Ibid [emphasis his]. Levi’s letter did not mention that the lone Republican who replied was George Bush, who wrote:“No group should have special privileges granted by government.” That was a very fair answer.

Judged:

12

12

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Mikey

Chatsworth, CA

#2469 Sep 11, 2014
[QUOTE who="
[/QUOTE]
Too bad you're so occupied by hating gays, says a lot about you Princess. I could have wished that your hate consumes you, but obviously that has already happened. Too bad, what a wasted life you have..

Judged:

16

15

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#2472 Sep 11, 2014
Mikey wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad you're so occupied by hating gays, says a lot about you Princess. I could have wished that your hate consumes you, but obviously that has already happened. Too bad, what a wasted life you have..
Wow. Bet that got him Mikey.

Judged:

15

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Brother Buford

New York, NY

#2473 Sep 11, 2014
The Business Takeover

Through their well-heeled lobbyists, the gays are hard at work trying to get legislation enacted which will require businesses to hire people they do not want.
“People against their own religious and business principles would have to hire such people.”—Edwin Meese, former Attorney General.

“You are going to see the government using the force of law to coerce business. You are going to hire this person because he is a homosexual.”—Don Wildmon, American Family Association. Two men will apply for a job, and one is a homosexual. You will have to hire the homosexual, even though he may be less experienced. To do otherwise, is to risk an expensive lawsuit by a gay rights law firm.

“Special privileges for homosexuals will be one more reason to file a lawsuit. A small business can find itself put out of business.”— Grover Norquist, former economist, U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

The gays also intend to take down the insurance companies. Throughout U.S. business history, insurance companies have had the right to refuse insurance coverage for certain high-risk activities (such as working in dangerously high places). But, in
the last 15 years, the National Gay Rights Association (NGRA) has repeatedly been filing suits against insurance companies which make such rulings.

For example, Texas Bankers Life and Loan Insurance said it would no longer pay for AIDS. Immediately, NGRA sued to stop them from doing this. American Service Life Insurance Company filed papers with the California Department of Insurance, saying that they would no longer cover expenses for “any disease which was sexually transmitted.” NGRA promptly took it to court. Lambda Defense League, another legal gay organization, also files suits on behalf of homosexuals.

Other businesses have been harassed also. Firms which discharge workers with AIDS are regularly sued. In New Jersey, Judge B.I. Humphreys ruled that a landlord could not refuse to rent an apartment to three homosexuals whom he suspected of having AIDS. The judge ruled that AIDS is a “handicap” and therefore falls under the protection of that state’s antidiscrimination laws.

Northwest Airlines issued a ruling that AIDS patients were denied passage. But NGRA threatened to sue, and Northwest withdrew the directive. The number of legal actions now being pursued by NGRA and Lambda is staggering. They are among the most litigious
people in the nation, and they will go back to court time and time again when they suffer setbacks. In addition, the American Civil Liberties Union frequently helps them in their lawsuits. No other pressure group in the U.S. has a legal phalanx to
match that of the homosexuals. The gay objective is that every business, manufacturing plant, shop, and service vendor will be put on notice that homosexuals
must be hired regardless of the moral or religious convictions of
the employer. For further information on the activities of these legal gay
organizations and their lawsuits, see current issues of these gay
periodicals: NGRA Newsletter, Lambda Update, and Advocate.

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Brother Buford

New York, NY

#2474 Sep 11, 2014
The Youth/Educational Takeover

The National Man Boy Love Association (Nambla) is urging that the age of consent (for legal sexual relations with another) be abolished (it is now 18). It lists several reasons. The underlying objective is to widen the number of converts to homosexuality.
Homosexuals do not bear children, so they must continually win over other people’s children. Another reason is to provide a fresh, new source of relatively undiseased people for gays to have relations with! Of course, in the process, the age of infection will rapidly move downward.

But homosexuals are not concerned about such things. Their motives and actions indicate a level of selfishness which is remarkable. Ruining the morale of children and infecting them with disease matters not to such people. The possibility of adult gays acquiring AIDS would be greatly reduced, if not eliminated. We should not fear the AIDS issue.Isn’t it about time we fought for our youth! The time to go on the offensive has come!”—Edgar Richards, Nambla member, shouting through a microphone to those assembled at the 1987 March.

Nambla was formed in 1978, with the express objective of getting laws enacted to enable adult homosexuals to have legal sex with children of all ages, and to encourage gays to do it more often. One of the signs held aloft by Nambla members at the Washington
March was this one:“Sex before Eight, or It’s Too Late”[to avoid AIDS].

Here is an example of the thinking of these sick minds:
“Nambla affirms that sexual intimacy can be an appropriate expression of the loving relationship between parent and child; between siblings, and between adult friends and young children.”— Renalto Corrazza, Nambla representative.

“We find that local boys will become friends with you, if you express an interest in them. Treat them as friends, individuals, as people. Gain their respect and there’s more chance of establishing a relationship that has a sexual element to it.”—Nambla
representative.

Nambla has proposed changing the age of consent to 13, and then eliminating the age-of-consent law altogether. It is a two step agenda. The gays are intent on taking over the schools of America. They join Parent Teacher Associations, and try to take them over. They try to politically control local school boards. They infiltrate gays into the ranks of teachers. They use local, state, and federal money to start homosexually directed educational programs. They get gay-oriented text and library books published and placed in schools. New types of books are being printed and placed in bookstores
and school libraries for children: Heather Has Two Mommies, Daddy’s Roommate, and A Kid’s First Book about Sex.

In addition, there are other books which also teach the normalcy of homosexuality, the fun of it, and a variety of ways to do it. The Playbook for Kids about Sex is currently used in many private and public school libraries, without parents’ knowledge. Made available to children by the teachers, it shows various methods of masturbation and how to keep the practice secret.

“We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, and in your youth groups.”— Michael Swift, in Gay Community News.

Judged:

14

14

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Police flag and arrest Grindr user who turned o... 18 min Orlando 1
Maybe god is gay! (Dec '09) 19 min June VanDerMark 10,983
News Doritos makes rainbow chips in support of gay r... (Sep '15) 28 min guest 180
The gay cafe for GLBT, friends and family (Oct '09) 37 min Frankie Rizzo 68,799
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 41 min Frankie Rizzo 14,919
News Most Canadians believe a gay prime minister is ... 55 min Orlando 2
News N.C. Hit With Lawsuit Over Anti-LGBT Law 56 min lides 19
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 2 hr Frankie Rizzo 38,641
More from around the web