ASA Amicus Brief Destroys Anti-Marria...

ASA Amicus Brief Destroys Anti-Marriage Equality Filings

There are 47 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Mar 1, 2013, titled ASA Amicus Brief Destroys Anti-Marriage Equality Filings . In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

The American Sociological Association shows how anti-marriage equality groups misuse studies to attack marriage equality in SCOTUS amicus brief

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Tebia

Pekin, IL

#2 Mar 1, 2013
What a joke! Homosexual 'marriage' is a complete fraud.

It has been overwhelmingly rejected by homosexuals as an actual practice in every country that allows it, and studies have shown that most such 'marriages' aren't even exclusive arrangements.

No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No child is ever born as a direct result and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Homosexual 'marriage,' where legal, isn't even a basic building block of homosexual society, much less of society as a whole. There is no standardized format for homosexual 'marriages,' and no economically unequal genders are involved.

Why not forget about disenfranchising others in order for force your concocted, failed philosophy into law? Why not try a little live and let live?

Give over!
SirAndrew

Honolulu, HI

#3 Mar 1, 2013
The only fraud is Pekin's one and only Internet troll; the boy of a million names and zero personalities. I will not waste any keystrokes on challenging your idiotic statements—enough digital ink has already been spent on that.

I will only say: Go away. Leave this site. And let the grown ups talk.

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

#4 Mar 1, 2013
HOW are you disenfranchised, SPECIFICALLY? If "marriage" is the franchise, how have YOU been kicked out?

HUMANS are the MOST basic building block of society, and gay people ARE HUMANS, whether you like it or not. We are IN families, we HAVE families, and we MAKE families. You do NOT get to tell us that we must sit OUTSIDE society and look in, because it's all intended for you.

"Disenfranchise" indeed. Go tell it to your sectarian denomination. The equal application of the law doesn't want to hear it.
David Traversa

Parana, Argentina

#5 Mar 1, 2013
Tebia wrote:
What a joke! Homosexual 'marriage' is a complete fraud.
It has been overwhelmingly rejected by homosexuals as an actual practice in every country that allows it, and studies have shown that most such 'marriages' aren't even exclusive arrangements.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No child is ever born as a direct result and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Homosexual 'marriage,' where legal, isn't even a basic building block of homosexual society, much less of society as a whole. There is no standardized format for homosexual 'marriages,' and no economically unequal genders are involved.
Why not forget about disenfranchising others in order for force your concocted, failed philosophy into law? Why not try a little live and let live?
Give over!
And why don't YOU apply this last question to yourself ? Or do you think you were born with special privileges that should be denied to others ? Too bad ( for the likes of you ) that nobody's giving over .. The day of doom is neigh for DOMA and all bigotry ridden unspeakables ..

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#8 Mar 1, 2013
Tebia wrote:
What a joke! Homosexual 'marriage' is a complete fraud.
It has been overwhelmingly rejected by homosexuals as an actual practice in every country that allows it, and studies have shown that most such 'marriages' aren't even exclusive arrangements.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No child is ever born as a direct result and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Homosexual 'marriage,' where legal, isn't even a basic building block of homosexual society, much less of society as a whole. There is no standardized format for homosexual 'marriages,' and no economically unequal genders are involved.
Why not forget about disenfranchising others in order for force your concocted, failed philosophy into law? Why not try a little live and let live?
Give over!
Feeling threatened again David? Your moronic religious ideas are on the way out.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#9 Mar 1, 2013
EdmondWA wrote:
HOW are you disenfranchised, SPECIFICALLY? If "marriage" is the franchise, how have YOU been kicked out?
HUMANS are the MOST basic building block of society, and gay people ARE HUMANS, whether you like it or not. We are IN families, we HAVE families, and we MAKE families. You do NOT get to tell us that we must sit OUTSIDE society and look in, because it's all intended for you.
"Disenfranchise" indeed. Go tell it to your sectarian denomination. The equal application of the law doesn't want to hear it.
The is one of David's fallacies isn't it.

“Adam and Steve”

Since: Aug 08

Earth

#13 Mar 1, 2013
Tebia wrote:
What a joke! Homosexual 'marriage' is a complete fraud.
It has been overwhelmingly rejected by homosexuals as an actual practice in every country that allows it, and studies have shown that most such 'marriages' aren't even exclusive arrangements.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No child is ever born as a direct result and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Homosexual 'marriage,' where legal, isn't even a basic building block of homosexual society, much less of society as a whole. There is no standardized format for homosexual 'marriages,' and no economically unequal genders are involved.
Why not forget about disenfranchising others in order for force your concocted, failed philosophy into law? Why not try a little live and let live?
Give over!
I think you'd do well by following the advise of Matthew 10:14. ;-)

Since: May 12

Livonia, MI

#14 Mar 1, 2013
Jake wrote:
<quoted text>
Really, I thought queers were freaks. Actually, I'm quite sure they are.
Says the man born with the genitalia of a Ken doll.

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

#20 Mar 1, 2013
Jake wrote:
Really, I thought queers were freaks. Actually, I'm quite sure they are.
Consistently sounding like someone who's formed a judgment about people they've never even met. Instead of having "thoughts" about total strangers, or being "quite sure" that the prejudices you've formed must be true, why don't you go out into the world and MEET some of the human beings that you so lazily slander?

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

#23 Mar 1, 2013
Jake wrote:
They don't act like human beings. They strut around like a peaco:ck in heat.
You don't really know any, do you? It sounds like all you're familiar with are cartoon stereotypes, fed to you by your pastor.

It sounds like you prefer to focus on the people that you see who cut loose and have some fun ONCE A YEAR at a parade, and not at ALL on the people who work hard at their jobs, pay their mortgages and their taxes, raise children, and contribute in every imaginable way to the society that we all share.

If you want to see people strut around like peacocks in heat, try watching some Mardi Gras, or spring break activities. Watch some of the gems on reality TV, like the Real Housewives, or the Bachelor/Bachelorette, or the Bad Girl's Club.

You have poor excuses for hating gay people, when the behaviors you describe are present in ALL humans.

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

#27 Mar 1, 2013
Obama The Drama Queen wrote:
Edmond Loves Peacock. A lil bit too much.
If THAT represents the height of intellect and reason that's present in your position, then then SCOTUS trials are going to be a breeze.
david traversa

Parana, Argentina

#31 Mar 1, 2013
David Traversa wrote:
<quoted text>And why don't YOU apply this last question to yourself ? Or do you think you were born with special privileges that should be denied to others ? Too bad ( for the likes of you ) that nobody's giving over .. The day of doom is neigh for DOMA and all bigotry ridden unspeakables ..
" The day of doom is NIGH " , sorry ..

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#32 Mar 1, 2013
This analysis of the Regnerus survey procedures is very educational, and can benefit anyone who bothers to read it closely.
TheTroll Stopper

Salem, VA

#35 Mar 1, 2013
Obama The Drama Queen wrote:
Like I give a shit about what some zionist owned yap yap yap blah blah blah...
Sieg Heil, neo-N*zi.
AzAdam

Charlottesville, VA

#39 Mar 2, 2013
TheTroll Stopper wrote:
<quoted text>
Sieg Heil, neo-N*zi.
It's really amazing to me that once you get an anti gay poster a little riled, they start spewing anti Jewish bile too.

How pathetic and desperate you must be to blame all your problems in the gays and the Jews.
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#40 Mar 2, 2013
Tebia wrote:
What a joke! Homosexual 'marriage' is a complete fraud.
It has been overwhelmingly rejected by homosexuals as an actual practice in every country that allows it, and studies have shown that most such 'marriages' aren't even exclusive arrangements.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No child is ever born as a direct result and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Homosexual 'marriage,' where legal, isn't even a basic building block of homosexual society, much less of society as a whole. There is no standardized format for homosexual 'marriages,' and no economically unequal genders are involved.
Why not forget about disenfranchising others in order for force your concocted, failed philosophy into law? Why not try a little live and let live?
Give over!
Never!
Rainbow Kid

Alpharetta, GA

#41 Mar 2, 2013
Jake wrote:
<quoted text>
Really, I thought queers were freaks. Actually, I'm quite sure they are.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder

“Sara for Fun (( M 2 F ))”

Since: Aug 10

Bahrain

#42 Mar 2, 2013
Tebia wrote:
What a joke! Homosexual 'marriage' is a complete fraud.
It has been overwhelmingly rejected by homosexuals as an actual practice in every country that allows it, and studies have shown that most such 'marriages' aren't even exclusive arrangements.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No child is ever born as a direct result and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Homosexual 'marriage,' where legal, isn't even a basic building block of homosexual society, much less of society as a whole. There is no standardized format for homosexual 'marriages,' and no economically unequal genders are involved.
Why not forget about disenfranchising others in order for force your concocted, failed philosophy into law? Why not try a little live and let live?
Give over!
wisest as you want, because you did not try this life, and THE way of life in femininity as spousal of overwhelming sense among us, at the end we are each to others

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

#43 Mar 2, 2013
Tebia wrote:
What a joke! Homosexual 'marriage' is a complete fraud.
It has been overwhelmingly rejected by homosexuals as an actual practice in every country that allows it, and studies have shown that most such 'marriages' aren't even exclusive arrangements.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No child is ever born as a direct result and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Homosexual 'marriage,' where legal, isn't even a basic building block of homosexual society, much less of society as a whole. There is no standardized format for homosexual 'marriages,' and no economically unequal genders are involved.
Why not forget about disenfranchising others in order for force your concocted, failed philosophy into law? Why not try a little live and let live?
Give over!
You are soooo right. WHY DON'T YOU TRY A LITTLE LIVE AND LET LIVE? Get over it!

“Equality First”

Since: Jan 09

Location hidden

#45 Mar 2, 2013
snyper wrote:
This analysis of the Regnerus survey procedures is very educational, and can benefit anyone who bothers to read it closely.
You are asking an awful lot of the people against us. They don't want their preconceived notions dispelled.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 52 min Brian_G 15,987
News Man charged after lubricant dispenser filled wi... 1 hr Fa-Foxy 1
News Gay Sex Ed: A Guide to Fun and Worry-Free Anal Sex (Nov '15) 1 hr Craig 4
News Study: Children Of Same-Sex Parents More Likely... 3 hr Frankie Rizzo 72
News Gay Republican Iowa Senate Hopeful: I'm Not the... 3 hr Skippy 4
News After gay couple's home is egged, a community r... 3 hr Frankie Rizzo 22
News Why culture war issues like same-sex marriage a... 4 hr Skippy 10
News Transgender Ken doll cake triggers outrage afte... 4 hr Skippy 23
Maybe god is gay! (Dec '09) 5 hr June VanDerMark 11,314
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 7 hr lake bay boy 38,791
More from around the web