About 1000 Protest Move To Equality i...

About 1000 Protest Move To Equality in Rhode Island

There are 19 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Jan 16, 2013, titled About 1000 Protest Move To Equality in Rhode Island . In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

Roughly one thousand people flooded to Providence, Rhode Island and the Statehouse in order to attack any progress on same-sex marriage that the state may make in the near future.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

Since: Apr 08

Chagrin Falls, OH

#1 Jan 16, 2013
The anti-gay are getting frantic. They know their days are numbered.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#2 Jan 16, 2013
What awful reporting. You don't find out until the end that the report is about a Judiciary Committee meeting. There's no estimate of the number of supporters of equality. You'd think this was Brian Brown's propaganda piece.

It's not good if opponents vastly outnumbered supporters. Other reports suggest that the committee attendance was much more equal between sides.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#3 Jan 16, 2013
Who knows where those kooks protesting in Providence came from. Providence is an easy drive from Boston, Worcester, Springfield, Hartford, or New London.

Look at some of the videos of people exhibiting charismatic gestures: Looking up and flailing arms; dropping to knees and sobbing; speaking in tongues.

Rhode Island is a ROMAN CATHOLIC state. I do not think you can find 1000 charismatics. These people flew in from elsewhere.

The anti-equality crowd has just experienced their on "prop 8." I remember watching the GLBT reaction to Prop 8, and I knew the defeat would be short-lived. But I wondered why some of the determination hadn't been apparent BEFORE we lost. And I worried that our community would again grow complacent.

Maine, Maryland, and Washington were the same kind of shock to the anti-gay. The are now expressing their shock and outrage in tiny Rhode Island. But I've been on the front-lines of the marriage battles in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maine. Their demonstrations will quickly weaken. The opponents just don't have the determination and stamina. If it hadn't been so close to the NOM's November massacre, I doubt their rally would have amounted to much at all.
Qwerty26

Lewes, DE

#4 Jan 16, 2013
nhjeff wrote:
.... The are now expressing their shock and outrage in tiny Rhode Island. But I've been on the front-lines of the marriage battles in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maine. Their demonstrations will quickly weaken. The opponents just don't have the determination and stamina. If it hadn't been so close to the NOM's November massacre, I doubt their rally would have amounted to much at all.
I suspect that the vast majority of people who are opposed to marriage equality don't really share the passion and fervor of their very vocal leaders. "Meh, gay marriage, so what? But Brian Brown and the Mags and Bryan Fischer tell me it's wrong, so I guess I'll go with that."

As they see that attitudes are changing, their less-than-ardent support grows weaker, possibly influenced by the realization that in a few years, they will look like the new Archie Bunkers of our society.

And I have no problem with that.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#5 Jan 16, 2013
To sum up the opposition in a nutshell- "it's against bible".

I thought maybe they'd at least come up with a new argument.

Have they set a date for the judiciary committee to vote yet?

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#6 Jan 16, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
To sum up the opposition in a nutshell- "it's against bible".
I thought maybe they'd at least come up with a new argument.
Have they set a date for the judiciary committee to vote yet?
Usually, they go into executive session a week later and vote the week after that. If the votes to pass are not there, however,[or, more generally, if the votes are not there for the result that the committe chair desires), the vote will be held.

I can't find the overall legislative calendar for Rhode Island, but I think they are part-time, adjourning in June. There is probably a cross-over date in March, by which time legislation must be approved in the House to be considered by the senate (and vice versa). So we'll know how the committee votes in 2-8 weeks.

From what I've read, there's not much question how this vote will go in the House. So I anticipate a committee vote by the end of January and a floor vote before President's Day.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#7 Jan 16, 2013
Qwerty26 wrote:
<quoted text>
I suspect that the vast majority of people who are opposed to marriage equality don't really share the passion and fervor of their very vocal leaders. "Meh, gay marriage, so what? But Brian Brown and the Mags and Bryan Fischer tell me it's wrong, so I guess I'll go with that."
As they see that attitudes are changing, their less-than-ardent support grows weaker, possibly influenced by the realization that in a few years, they will look like the new Archie Bunkers of our society.
And I have no problem with that.
Exactly. They get fired up and go to an event at the urging of their pastor. But when he asks again, they figure they've already done their part. And since protests are actually rather boring, time-consuming, and uncomfortable, they don't show up again.

Strength steadily increases on the pro-equality side.

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#8 Jan 16, 2013
damn... where are the islamic terrorist bombers when you need them
david traversa

Argentina

#9 Jan 16, 2013
Only a thousand..? that's poor indeed..

Since: May 12

Bellevue, WA

#10 Jan 16, 2013
why can't we get a crazy like the nut who shot up a school to go here instead and spare the innocent kids
david traversa

Argentina

#11 Jan 16, 2013
Lililth_Satans_Bore wrote:
why can't we get a crazy like the nut who shot up a school to go here instead and spare the innocent kids
Why not indeed..

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#12 Jan 17, 2013
nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Usually, they go into executive session a week later and vote the week after that. If the votes to pass are not there, however,[or, more generally, if the votes are not there for the result that the committe chair desires), the vote will be held.
I can't find the overall legislative calendar for Rhode Island, but I think they are part-time, adjourning in June. There is probably a cross-over date in March, by which time legislation must be approved in the House to be considered by the senate (and vice versa). So we'll know how the committee votes in 2-8 weeks.
From what I've read, there's not much question how this vote will go in the House. So I anticipate a committee vote by the end of January and a floor vote before President's Day.
Found the dates; they're voting in committee next week on Tues, with a full House vote on Thursday.

I agree the House appears to be a slam dunk, with 41 co-sponsors of the bill; they only need 38 to pass it.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#13 Jan 17, 2013
FYI- the Senate judiciary committee is essentially evenly divided 5-5 with one of those opposed "wavering". I think the pressure is on Sen President Weed to allow a full Senate vote, but you never know.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#14 Jan 17, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
FYI- the Senate judiciary committee is essentially evenly divided 5-5 with one of those opposed "wavering". I think the pressure is on Sen President Weed to allow a full Senate vote, but you never know.
I thought Weed had already committed not to stand in the way of a vote. She didn't exactly promise to bring it to the floor, but she indicated that she would not use the power of her office to single-handedly block it.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#15 Jan 17, 2013
nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought Weed had already committed not to stand in the way of a vote. She didn't exactly promise to bring it to the floor, but she indicated that she would not use the power of her office to single-handedly block it.
She may have found a way around that commitment by appointing people to the judiciary committee which ensured it was evenly split. Presumably a 5-5 vote would just kill the bill in committee.

That said, I think a likely scenario is attaching an amendment to the bill requiring a popular vote to get the 6th vote needed to get the bill out of committee, and then the full Senate stripping that amendment on the floor.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#16 Jan 17, 2013
Are you sure there'd be enough support on the floor to strip the amendment and pass? If it passed the Senate with the amendment, the House would never agree.

I suppose that might open an opportunity for a conference committee to reconcile. But I think that scenario is far-fetched. We learned in New Hampshire how adamantly legislators feel that they are qualified to make decisions without the benefit of popular votes.

To states that don't already have an initiative process, it looks like a circus in states that do. If we introduce the popular vote for this one issue, how long will it be before the next interest group insists on riding their hobby horse to the ballot box?

It's a slippery slope, I tell you...

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#17 Jan 17, 2013
nhjeff wrote:
Are you sure there'd be enough support on the floor to strip the amendment and pass? If it passed the Senate with the amendment, the House would never agree.
I suppose that might open an opportunity for a conference committee to reconcile. But I think that scenario is far-fetched. We learned in New Hampshire how adamantly legislators feel that they are qualified to make decisions without the benefit of popular votes.
To states that don't already have an initiative process, it looks like a circus in states that do. If we introduce the popular vote for this one issue, how long will it be before the next interest group insists on riding their hobby horse to the ballot box?
It's a slippery slope, I tell you...
I'm just saying having the amendment may be the ONLY way it gets out of committee. If that doesn't happen, it won't matter what the House would or wouldn't agree to.

Obviously I'd rather they all vote unanimously in favor and then we could all go for a ride on my unicorn........

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#18 Jan 17, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm just saying having the amendment may be the ONLY way it gets out of committee. If that doesn't happen, it won't matter what the House would or wouldn't agree to.
Obviously I'd rather they all vote unanimously in favor and then we could all go for a ride on my unicorn........
Too bad more states don't have New Hampshire's rules. Every bill gets a floor vote.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#19 Jan 17, 2013
nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad more states don't have New Hampshire's rules. Every bill gets a floor vote.
Well that would take away their power & cronyism.......

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Ex member of US navy files complaint against CI... 6 min RustyS 4
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 14 min lides 24,050
News Gay wedding cake at center of Colorado Appeals ... 19 min Reverend Alan 756
News Mormon church backs Utah LGBT anti-discriminati... 28 min PAGAN WOODEN WHEE... 6,537
News Dismantling military's transgender ban to begin... 29 min WeTheSheeple 2
News Boy Scouts of America ends ban on gay adults 34 min Peterwad 50
News CO lawmaker: Gay Scout leaders will molest kids 37 min WeTheSheeple 5
News Is Polygamy the Next Gay Marriage? (Sep '14) 38 min Reverend Alan 8,071
News Same-sex marriage fight turns to clerk who refu... 1 hr EdmondWA 1,640
News Supreme Court extends gay marriage nationwide 11 hr Wondering 1,159
More from around the web