Wisconsin Gov. Discusses Marriage Equ...

Wisconsin Gov. Discusses Marriage Equality

There are 30 comments on the EDGE story from Nov 26, 2013, titled Wisconsin Gov. Discusses Marriage Equality. In it, EDGE reports that:

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker often avoids discussing marriage equality, but the Republican opened up about the topic to Bloomberg TV's Al Hunt last weekend.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at EDGE.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#1 Nov 26, 2013
Right Scotchy.

Don't be mean to 'em. Just don't let them be equal.

“Equality First”

Since: Jan 09

St. Louis, MO

#2 Nov 27, 2013
Gee, is somebody setting himself up to run in the Iowa primary?

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#3 Nov 27, 2013
RalphB wrote:
Gee, is somebody setting himself up to run in the Iowa primary?
If that's what it takes to get him out of the Gov's mansion in Wisconsin, more power to him!

“Equality First”

Since: Jan 09

St. Louis, MO

#4 Nov 27, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
If that's what it takes to get him out of the Gov's mansion in Wisconsin, more power to him!
Would he have to resign to run? I don't for a moment think he would win.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#5 Nov 27, 2013
Let him run for president. The media, and his own hubris, will kill him. The men isn't qualified to be a dog catcher. Sarah Palin has a better chance getting into the White House.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#6 Nov 27, 2013
RalphB wrote:
<quoted text>
Would he have to resign to run? I don't for a moment think he would win.
Not sure, but assuming he wins reelection in '14, he's be a lame duck Gov anyways, so he might just choose to resign to be able to focus solely on a presidential run.

“Equality First”

Since: Jan 09

St. Louis, MO

#7 Nov 27, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Not sure, but assuming he wins reelection in '14, he's be a lame duck Gov anyways, so he might just choose to resign to be able to focus solely on a presidential run.
I take it from this post that Wis. has term limits. We have that in Missouri, also. I was never convinced that term limits were a good idea, and from the shenanigans that go on in our state capital I am now sure of it. Of course being a state with no campaign finance laws doesn't help either. Now we have people that know they can't serve more than a specific number of years, and they are grabbing at every dollar floating through the state. At least the old way they weren't so obvious about being crooked. Now it is so blatant it isn't funny.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#8 Nov 27, 2013
RalphB wrote:
<quoted text>
I take it from this post that Wis. has term limits. We have that in Missouri, also. I was never convinced that term limits were a good idea, and from the shenanigans that go on in our state capital I am now sure of it. Of course being a state with no campaign finance laws doesn't help either. Now we have people that know they can't serve more than a specific number of years, and they are grabbing at every dollar floating through the state. At least the old way they weren't so obvious about being crooked. Now it is so blatant it isn't funny.
It's not term limits. It's the cultural environment. Big contributors now abound, wanting to harness the power of government to do their bidding. Since Citizen's United, they can spend unlimited amounts of money anonymously. Big contributors no longer focus on their own states.

Senatorships used to be valuable, although there was some amount of timidity about interfering in other states' elections. No more. Even your local school board can attract out-of-state financing.(Since the budget of a typical candidate is somewhere between on tank of gas and a few hundred dollars, and since few people can name the members of their local school board, it takes very little to promote your puppets.

Is it any wonder that candidates want a piece of the money sloshing back and forth in political races? For one thing, if they don't reach for it, they will be opposed for someone else who did get it. For another, campaign finance laws that prevent candidates from enriching themselves from campaign donations have leaks as wide and as well-travelled as the Panama Canal.(Simple idea: Search the world for the best campaign manager, and find that he or she already lives right under your own roof! Campaign managers are quite well-paid. Also, when you retire from office, you can roll the money into a PAC controlled by--guess who--YOU!)

Then there are the rich jobs waiting for people after their couple of years in office. For instance, take Jim DeMint's million dollar salary at Heritage Foundation. These financially rewarding exits may be more effective than term limits. Some politicians don't even serve out a full term before money lures them away from office.

Stronger sunlight is the only hope for disinfecting our government.

“Equality First”

Since: Jan 09

St. Louis, MO

#10 Nov 27, 2013
nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not term limits. It's the cultural environment. Big contributors now abound, wanting to harness the power of government to do their bidding. Since Citizen's United, they can spend unlimited amounts of money anonymously. Big contributors no longer focus on their own states.
Senatorships used to be valuable, although there was some amount of timidity about interfering in other states' elections. No more. Even your local school board can attract out-of-state financing.(Since the budget of a typical candidate is somewhere between on tank of gas and a few hundred dollars, and since few people can name the members of their local school board, it takes very little to promote your puppets.
Is it any wonder that candidates want a piece of the money sloshing back and forth in political races? For one thing, if they don't reach for it, they will be opposed for someone else who did get it. For another, campaign finance laws that prevent candidates from enriching themselves from campaign donations have leaks as wide and as well-travelled as the Panama Canal.(Simple idea: Search the world for the best campaign manager, and find that he or she already lives right under your own roof! Campaign managers are quite well-paid. Also, when you retire from office, you can roll the money into a PAC controlled by--guess who--YOU!)
Then there are the rich jobs waiting for people after their couple of years in office. For instance, take Jim DeMint's million dollar salary at Heritage Foundation. These financially rewarding exits may be more effective than term limits. Some politicians don't even serve out a full term before money lures them away from office.
Stronger sunlight is the only hope for disinfecting our government.
Last sentence......true, but an interested electorate would be even more helpful.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#11 Nov 27, 2013
RalphB wrote:
<quoted text>
Last sentence......true, but an interested electorate would be even more helpful.
Even for those interested, government operations are all but inscrutable. And the politicians want to keep it that way.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#12 Nov 27, 2013
RalphB wrote:
<quoted text>
Would he have to resign to run? I don't for a moment think he would win.
He could chop up the field, though. On the other hand, he might be able to bring his State's like-mindeds to the table.

2014 is going to be ugly.

2016 is going to be HIDEOUS.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#13 Nov 27, 2013
nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
Even for those interested, government operations are all but inscrutable. And the politicians want to keep it that way.
Actually, they're pretty inscrutable to most politicians.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#14 Nov 27, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, they're pretty inscrutable to most politicians.
It leaves legislators just as dependent as the voters upon lobbying organizations to tell them what to do. And they like it that way.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#15 Nov 27, 2013
nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
It leaves legislators just as dependent as the voters upon lobbying organizations to tell them what to do. And they like it that way.
Explains so much, doesn't it?

“=”

Since: Oct 07

Appleton WI

#16 Nov 29, 2013
Hopefully Walker will soon be as irrelevant to Wisconsin as he is to the rest of the world. Just another well-funded crook/moron who ought to be in prison.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#17 Nov 29, 2013
Tre H wrote:
Hopefully Walker will soon be as irrelevant to Wisconsin as he is to the rest of the world. Just another well-funded crook/moron who ought to be in prison.
I think that he is bidding for higher office than that which he now holds.

“=”

Since: Oct 07

Appleton WI

#18 Nov 29, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
I think that he is bidding for higher office than that which he now holds.
I'm aware that he has aspirations that match his ego, but... never gonna happen.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#19 Dec 7, 2013
Tre H wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm aware that he has aspirations that match his ego, but... never gonna happen.
I think you're right. But I am more hopeful than confident. He did win a recall, you know.

“=”

Since: Oct 07

Appleton WI

#20 Dec 10, 2013
nhjeff wrote:
<quoted text>
I think you're right. But I am more hopeful than confident. He did win a recall, you know.
Yes, I live here. More people vote in presidential elections than gubernatorial elections, especially ones held at odd times. The majority of Wisconsinites voted for Obama twice. I think it's reasonable to assume most of THOSE voters would not vote FOR Walker... ever.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#21 Dec 10, 2013
Tre H wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I live here. More people vote in presidential elections than gubernatorial elections, especially ones held at odd times. The majority of Wisconsinites voted for Obama twice. I think it's reasonable to assume most of THOSE voters would not vote FOR Walker... ever.
Well then, SOMEBODY in the WDP sure dropped the ball.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Oregon issues final order in gay wedding cake case 2 min Sneaky Pete 18
News Mormon church backs Utah LGBT anti-discriminati... 3 min MORMON HUMANRIGHT... 6,628
News Same-sex marriage fight turns to clerk who refu... 4 min Dr Hotfinger 1,803
News Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 5 min Rosa_Winkel 34,557
News Gay wedding cake at center of Colorado Appeals ... 10 min WeTheSheeple 844
Poll Will Jade Ever Post Again? 10 min elh 5
News Why Atheism Will Replace Religion (Aug '12) 12 min ChristineW 14,662
News Is Polygamy the Next Gay Marriage? (Sep '14) 13 min MormonThirdReichAge 8,164
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 40 min Abe 24,122
News Supreme Court extends gay marriage nationwide 1 hr NorCal Native 1,211
More from around the web