Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

There are 14655 comments on the News24 story from Aug 27, 2012, titled Why Atheism Will Replace Religion. In it, News24 reports that:

Please note that for this article "Atheism" also includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans... in other words non-religious.

You will notice this is a statement of fact. And to be fact it is supported by evidence (see references below). Now you can have "faith" that this is not true, but by the very definition of faith, that is just wishful thinking.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at News24.

“There are other issues.”

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#5829 Feb 19, 2013
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>When you are right, you're right, and this time you are right. When it comes to excrement, I defer to your elite education which has provided you with an unsurpassed submersion in all things fecal. What I recognise the smell of, you are literally slathered in. What I step around, you wade off into. What I flush away, forgotten, you roll and frolic in. I don't know shit, but you sure do.
Lol! But Reason Petrified needs adult diapers because at her age she can't control her poop. Problem is, it comes from her back side and her mouth. Lol! Her nickname is Fecal.

“There are other issues.”

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#5830 Feb 19, 2013
Thinking wrote:
<quoted text>I'm not going to be able to sit down for a week, am I?
Wow, I see Bob got you. Well to each their own.
EdSed

Hamilton, UK

#5831 Feb 19, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
...It is Muslims who have divided themselves into these sects and fighting with each other ...
True
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
... Non Muslims are watching and feeling happy ..
Nonsense.
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
..and first show their concern for one group and then for another group.
It is natural to feel concerned when people are suffering.
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
While the reality is that they do not like ANY Muslim, be him a Shia, or a Sunni or a Wahabi, or of any so called sects!!...
It is the sort of Islamist, sectarian dogma such as you express that is objectionable. It is religiously motivated sectarianism, ingnorance, and contempt for education and democracy that need to be challenged.

Relgion = superstition
https://www.google.co.uk/search...
Jumper The Wise

Owensboro, KY

#5832 Feb 19, 2013
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text> Your post >>> Jumper The Wise wrote:
<quoted text>Yea! Just like the 'grade' of horse-meat you guys have been eating. <<<
Did you notice the words "you guys", how about "'grade' of horse-meat", that looks to me like the words stupid and liar are top of the list when it comes to describing you.
Well I do not know your racial background.
Only that idiots come in all colors.
Jumper The Wise

Owensboro, KY

#5833 Feb 19, 2013
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>Hint? You offer a hint and then completely ditch any point you might have been attempting to make? Ok, so you are back to the vapid hole, and you have managed to get back in without ever getting out.
Hint: A hint would be a clue leading to possibly solving a obscure point. No point, so no need for a hint.
Ah...but I'm still here.And that must tell you that no matter how much you dislike me,that I think you are peachy-king!

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#5834 Feb 19, 2013
albtraum wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahhh, you DO know that he is an agnostic now.....don't you?
Yes...I've read several of his books. I was pointing out his credentials, and the fact he believes Jesus was a real person.
Thinking

Hounslow, UK

#5835 Feb 19, 2013
Have you coloured them all in yet?
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes...I've read several of his books. I was pointing out his credentials, and the fact he believes Jesus was a real person.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#5836 Feb 19, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Have you coloured them all in yet?
<quoted text>
Jolly good response mate. Let's head down to the pub and share that with the lads, pints are on you.



Till Death Us Do Part?

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#5837 Feb 19, 2013
EdSed wrote:
<quoted text>True
<quoted text>Nonsense.
<quoted text>It is natural to feel concerned when people are suffering.
<quoted text>It is the sort of Islamist, sectarian dogma such as you express that is objectionable. It is religiously motivated sectarianism, ingnorance, and contempt for education and democracy that need to be challenged.
Relgion = superstition
https://www.google.co.uk/search...

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#5838 Feb 19, 2013
A lifelong evangelical only recently self proclaimed agnostic who believes but can't prove and he even admits that. His argument states you have to believe Paul to believe Jesus existed yet that is a horrible argument because Paul never met Jesus!
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes...I've read several of his books. I was pointing out his credentials, and the fact he believes Jesus was a real person.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#5839 Feb 19, 2013
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
Which one?
Enlighten us of Wise Wizard.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#5840 Feb 19, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:

Enlighten us of Wise Wizard.
First, tell me what difference the degrees I have make.

If an idea and the truth stand on their own merit, they should make no difference at all.

I'll wait for your answer ......

any one have an emery board I can borrow?

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#5841 Feb 19, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
A lifelong evangelical only recently self proclaimed agnostic who believes but can't prove and he even admits that. His argument states you have to believe Paul to believe Jesus existed yet that is a horrible argument because Paul never met Jesus!
<quoted text>
It is an interesting "twist" on the usual Christian scam of claiming to be a "former atheist", but equally ineffective and silly.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#5842 Feb 19, 2013
Their claims mean nothing it is their proof that is the sum of their argument. And for being a smart dude I can only contend that Bart Ehrman is retreating to his old evangelical roots with his argument that Jesus existed.

Lee Strobel is sad because he admits he converted because his wife gave him an ultimatum, convert or she would leave him!
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
It is an interesting "twist" on the usual Christian scam of claiming to be a "former atheist", but equally ineffective and silly.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#5843 Feb 19, 2013
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
First, tell me what difference the degrees I have make.
If an idea and the truth stand on their own merit, they should make no difference at all.
I'll wait for your answer ......
any one have an emery board I can borrow?
Let's look at this from an academic standpoint as Professor Ehrman does. Now you can argue he is "biased" to beleive, perhaps he is...but the flip side of that is a "bias" not to beleive. He has spent a great deal of his adult life studying, teaching, and writing about early Christianity. It's accurate to say he is an expert in his field. If he, which he has, expresses the belief that Jesus existed, why should anyone not consider the possiblity that he is right? We're not talking about some guy that has a velvet Jesus on the wall of his trailer.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#5844 Feb 19, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Their claims mean nothing it is their proof that is the sum of their argument. And for being a smart dude I can only contend that Bart Ehrman is retreating to his old evangelical roots with his argument that Jesus existed.
Lee Strobel is sad because he admits he converted because his wife gave him an ultimatum, convert or she would leave him!
<quoted text>
Then Lee made a very poor choice. Probably has never had any say in his own home since then.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#5845 Feb 19, 2013
Ooogah Boogah wrote:
<quoted text>
First, tell me what difference the degrees I have make.
If an idea and the truth stand on their own merit, they should make no difference at all.
I'll wait for your answer ......
any one have an emery board I can borrow?
One other point, will a person who doesn't believe Jesus existed, be convinced by someone like Professor Ehrman? Will someone who does believe Jesus existed find validation of his/her belief in Bart Ehrman's work/books?

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#5846 Feb 19, 2013
You keep avoiding this but it doesn't matter who said Jesus existed, it's the proof they are able to present. Bart's proof is because Paul said so yet he admits Paul never met Jesus.

Is it sinking through yet?
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
One other point, will a person who doesn't believe Jesus existed, be convinced by someone like Professor Ehrman? Will someone who does believe Jesus existed find validation of his/her belief in Bart Ehrman's work/books?

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#5847 Feb 19, 2013
Argument from authority logical fallacy. Sorry you either have secular proof or you don't.
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's look at this from an academic standpoint as Professor Ehrman does. Now you can argue he is "biased" to beleive, perhaps he is...but the flip side of that is a "bias" not to beleive. He has spent a great deal of his adult life studying, teaching, and writing about early Christianity. It's accurate to say he is an expert in his field. If he, which he has, expresses the belief that Jesus existed, why should anyone not consider the possiblity that he is right? We're not talking about some guy that has a velvet Jesus on the wall of his trailer.

“There is no Truth in Faith”

Since: Dec 08

nowhere near a pound of $100's

#5848 Feb 19, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
One other point, will a person who doesn't believe Jesus existed, be convinced by someone like Professor Ehrman?


That is indeed possible, if he presents verifiable evidence, which he hasn't.
Pietro Armando wrote:
Will someone who does believe Jesus existed find validation of his/her belief in Bart Ehrman's work/books?
Not any kind of real validation as in verifiable evidence. More like "validation" as in "emotional support for believing in silly crap".

"Those who can convince us of absurdity can lead us to commit atrocity." ~Voltaire

Christianity has proven Voltaire correct in this statement many, many, many times.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Lawmakers Consider Gay Discrimination Policies 4 min Reverend Alan 5,819
News Supreme Court extends gay marriage nationwide 10 min Reverend Alan 513
News Gay marriage opponents propose 2 Colorado ballo... 10 min jcofe 23
News Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 13 min assassin235 33,956
News Governors vow to fight SCOTUS ruling on gay mar... 23 min LeDuped 703
News Gay marriage (Mar '13) 25 min Reverend Alan 60,551
News Conservative Republicans question what's next a... 26 min Le Jimbo 159
News Is Polygamy the Next Gay Marriage? (Sep '14) 58 min Reverend Alan 7,040
News Same-sex marriage fight turns to clerk who refu... 3 hr trump 294
More from around the web