You can pathetically twist this any way you want to now to cover up your own past statement if that makes you think it makes you sound more correct or whatever.<quoted text>
Did you just burn to point out your own lack of reading comprehension? The post you cite, specifically says that it is your argument, not the institution, that I am calling inept and irrelevant. It wouldn't even make sense to call marriage inept. Thank you, for proving that you are inept.
I never claimed nor said you called 'marriage' inept or irrelevant. You're a liar to insinuate I said that when I didn't.
You called the traditional definition of marriage inept and irrelevant because we have a constitution you claim protects same sex marriage rights today. That was your point and your position.
It was your argument. Not mine concerning the traditional definition of marriage being inept and irrelevant today in face of the laws of the present constitution we have.
Get your own rhetoric straight...sheesh...