Gay Marriages Begin in Wisconsin Afte...

Gay Marriages Begin in Wisconsin After Ruling

There are 500 comments on the EDGE story from Jun 6, 2014, titled Gay Marriages Begin in Wisconsin After Ruling. In it, EDGE reports that:

Rich Gillard, left, and Andrew Petroll kiss after their marriage ceremony at the Milwaukee County Courthouse.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at EDGE.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#43 Jun 12, 2014
NOM s Waffle House wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you claiming you are not that pastor or that the things claimed about that pastor - who sounds like a vile pos - are untruthful?
You vermin.
lol
Neither, I don't bother.

I'm accurately noting that ss marrage is inferior at every level of comparison to marriage.

That comparing the collision of Uranus and Uranus to the union of Mars and Venus is utter idiocy.

That anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning. That equating sodomy to natural, normal intercourse is perversion.

You don't have a rational defense for these and other facts. That is why you resort to gay troll hate and ad homoan slander.

Smile.
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#44 Jun 12, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Reality determines validity. Words have substance only when they have integrity with reality.
Here is something a law can never change;
A duplicate gender marrage is not the same as marriage.
A duplicate gender couple is NEVER mutually fruitful. A ss couple normally is.
They are clearly not the same. If you claim they are, a ss couple will always be inferior.
In this context, the law defines marriage. That definition can be changed just as any law can be changed.

You continue to evade the most important question: how does two homoans getting married affect your rights?

The prohibition on them getting married certainly affects theirs.

Nevermind that your procreation argument is a non-starter for the obvious reasons.

"Inferior" is a subjective term.

So, do you have any actual argument justifying the disparate treatment of homoans under the law?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#45 Jun 12, 2014
Strel wrote:
<quoted text>
In this context, the law defines marriage. That definition can be changed just as any law can be changed.
You continue to evade the most important question: how does two homoans getting married affect your rights?
The prohibition on them getting married certainly affects theirs.
Nevermind that your procreation argument is a non-starter for the obvious reasons.
"Inferior" is a subjective term.
So, do you have any actual argument justifying the disparate treatment of homoans under the law?
I simply and accurately note that because of the reasons I listed and more, in spite of any legal manipulations, SS marrage is clearly inferior to marriage. So much so, that they clearly are not the same relationships. Even a child can see this. In fact, so can you.
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#46 Jun 12, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I simply and accurately note that because of the reasons I listed and more, in spite of any legal manipulations, SS marrage is clearly inferior to marriage. So much so, that they clearly are not the same relationships. Even a child can see this. In fact, so can you.
Again, "inferior" is a subjective term. By what standard? Procreation is not required for marriage, so that argument fails.

They may not be identical to heterosexual marrriages. So what. There is no requirement that they have to be.

There is, however, a requirement to treat people equally under the law. How do you justify doing that? Calling gay marriage "inferior" is not a valid argument. You have to show some kind of legitimate state interest in banning the activity - and you have to do so in a context where the activity does not impact anyone else's rights.

This is why gay marriage bans are and will continue to be overturned in court. Legal gay marriage nationwide is inevitable, so either get used to it, or pack your bags and move to Iran.

Either way, you've already lost the argument.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#47 Jun 12, 2014
Strel wrote:
<quoted text>
In this context, the law defines marriage. That definition can be changed just as any law can be changed.
You continue to evade the most important question: how does two homoans getting married affect your rights?
The prohibition on them getting married certainly affects theirs.
Nevermind that your procreation argument is a non-starter for the obvious reasons.
"Inferior" is a subjective term.
So, do you have any actual argument justifying the disparate treatment of homoans under the law?
Welcome to KiMare's irrational world. He has a plethora of previous posts saved so he can copy and paste them as responses to anything you post. You'll get the same old, same old, same old, every time.

KiMare knows he's impotent over our lives and marriages. KiMare knows that his bloviations have no impact on marriage equality. KiMare knows that, no matter his level of disdain for marriage equality, he's lost the battle.

1, KiMare was CERTAIN that Obama was not going to be re-elected.
2. KiMare was CERTAIN that Prop 8 would be upheld.
3. KiMare honestly believes that we can never have marriage equality because SS couples are inferior to str couples.
4. KiMare has NEVER had a valid argument against marriage equality, so he drags reproduction and children into the mix.
5. In his previous posts (and using an alternate moniker) he even went so far as to imply that SS couples would abuse children, mentally and sexually.
6. He's a former UCC pastor who claims to have 3 nipples, two sets of genitilia (m/f), and a lesbian twin sister living within his body.

Yeah, bat-shit crazy.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#48 Jun 12, 2014
Strel wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, "inferior" is a subjective term. By what standard? Procreation is not required for marriage, so that argument fails.
They may not be identical to heterosexual marrriages. So what. There is no requirement that they have to be.
There is, however, a requirement to treat people equally under the law. How do you justify doing that? Calling gay marriage "inferior" is not a valid argument. You have to show some kind of legitimate state interest in banning the activity - and you have to do so in a context where the activity does not impact anyone else's rights.
This is why gay marriage bans are and will continue to be overturned in court. Legal gay marriage nationwide is inevitable, so either get used to it, or pack your bags and move to Iran.
Either way, you've already lost the argument.
Each and every one of your well-made points has already been made to KiMare THOUSANDS of times. Just Google KiMare and Topix and you'll see all of the LGBT related threads that he haunts (and lots of his standard copy and paste posts).

Best of luck to you, but you're dealing with a very sick puppy. Of course, and man who has a Sandy vagina is likely to be a little off kilter.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#49 Jun 12, 2014
any*, not "and".....

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#50 Jun 12, 2014
Strel wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, "inferior" is a subjective term. By what standard? Procreation is not required for marriage, so that argument fails.
They may not be identical to heterosexual marrriages. So what. There is no requirement that they have to be.
There is, however, a requirement to treat people equally under the law. How do you justify doing that? Calling gay marriage "inferior" is not a valid argument. You have to show some kind of legitimate state interest in banning the activity - and you have to do so in a context where the activity does not impact anyone else's rights.
This is why gay marriage bans are and will continue to be overturned in court. Legal gay marriage nationwide is inevitable, so either get used to it, or pack your bags and move to Iran.
Either way, you've already lost the argument.
Inferiority is not a subjective term. What an idiotic assertion.

Nor do I 'have' to do any such thing.

You wave that fraudulent piece of paper all you want. SS couples will only ever be a mutually barren, pointless duplicate gender half of marriage. An oxymoron.

Smile.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#51 Jun 12, 2014
I rest my case.
Strel

Tallahassee, FL

#52 Jun 12, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Inferiority is not a subjective term. What an idiotic assertion.
Nor do I 'have' to do any such thing.
You wave that fraudulent piece of paper all you want. SS couples will only ever be a mutually barren, pointless duplicate gender half of marriage. An oxymoron.
Smile.
Inferior implies a lesser position in relation to something else. It is inherently a subjective term when you apply it to something like a marriage - the success or failure of which depends entirely on how the people involved "feel" about it.

You can keep repeating yourself, but it doesn't make your bad argument any more credible.

You are of course free to make your arguments sans logic or reason, but those are the standards by which your arguments will be judged.

I don't need a fraudulent piece of paper, I got a marriage license 14 years ago and I'm still married, so...sad attempt at an ad hominem. You probably should have asked if I were gay first.

There is a reason your arguments not only fail in court, they aren't even being made by gay marriage ban defenders. Yes, they really are THAT stupid.

Try learning something about the law before you hoist yourself by your own petard again.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#53 Jun 12, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Inferiority is not a subjective term. What an idiotic assertion.
Nor do I 'have' to do any such thing.
You wave that fraudulent piece of paper all you want. SS couples will only ever be a mutually barren, pointless duplicate gender half of marriage. An oxymoron.
Smile.
How's KiMary, the lesbian twin zygote that your body enveloped who now lives inside you and tries to look at your wife when she's naked?

Greg, you've never told us which medical test determined that your alternate DNA set was lesbian. It seems to me that if you've had a medical test to determine the sexual identity of your internal twin's DNA, that should be some pretty scientifically heavy stuff. C'mon, Hunty, don't hold back on us.

HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa HaHaHaHaHaHa

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#54 Jun 12, 2014
Strel wrote:
<quoted text>
Inferior implies a lesser position in relation to something else. It is inherently a subjective term when you apply it to something like a marriage - the success or failure of which depends entirely on how the people involved "feel" about it.
You can keep repeating yourself, but it doesn't make your bad argument any more credible.
You are of course free to make your arguments sans logic or reason, but those are the standards by which your arguments will be judged.
I don't need a fraudulent piece of paper, I got a marriage license 14 years ago and I'm still married, so...sad attempt at an ad hominem. You probably should have asked if I were gay first.
There is a reason your arguments not only fail in court, they aren't even being made by gay marriage ban defenders. Yes, they really are THAT stupid.
Try learning something about the law before you hoist yourself by your own petard again.
If you attempt to equate them, a duplicate gendered couple is vastly inferior to a diverse gendered couple. Completely objective.

Even more pertinent, one is normally a fruitful relationship, the other is absolutely barren. Again, completely objective.

I don't care what kind of relationship you claim on here, your position is clearly gay.

Nor do I care what a court rules, these are simple and clear facts of reality that even a child sees. And you do too. That is why you reacted to them.

SMile.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#55 Jun 12, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
If you attempt to equate them, a duplicate gendered couple is vastly inferior to a diverse gendered couple. Completely objective.
Because you're a hermaphrodite, you need to build your self-esteem on the backs of others. Nobody else even feels the need to compare marriages.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

Even more pertinent, one is normally a fruitful relationship, the other is absolutely barren. Again, completely objective.
Again, completely irrelevant. There is no requirement of procreation as a means to validate a marriage.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

I don't care what kind of relationship you claim on here, your position is clearly gay.
Kunty, and bitchy.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

Nor do I care what a court rules...
SMile.
Ahh, but we do. The court rulings, and (more importantly) the fact that everyone in our lives recognizes our marriages is what matter. What you care to think isn't the least bit relevant to anyone but yourself.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
...these are simple and clear facts of reality that even a child sees. And you do too. That is why you reacted to them.
SMile.
Jesus tap-dancing Christ on a pogo stick, Greg! Can't you have ONE argument without schlepping kids into the mix?

Moron.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#56 Jun 12, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody else even feels the need to compare marriages.
Then why is it in the courts?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#57 Jun 12, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why is it in the courts?
Because there were public referendums that illegally trampled our rights.

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#58 Jun 12, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text> Because there were public referendums that illegally trampled our rights.
Apparently, out of more than 30 million LGBT Americans, you and I have been the only one on this forum the past 50 minutes.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#59 Jun 13, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text> Because there were public referendums that illegally trampled our rights.
They just rightly noted that a duplicate gender relationship is inferior to the complexity of a diverse gender union.

And that a union that produces fruit is distinct from one that is barren and desolate.

Your ss marrage didn't change any of that, did it?

Smirk.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#60 Jun 13, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
They just rightly noted that a duplicate gender relationship is inferior to the complexity of a diverse gender union.
And that a union that produces fruit is distinct from one that is barren and desolate.
Your ss marrage didn't change any of that, did it?
Smirk.
Get back to me when that position has any effect on my marriage.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#61 Jun 13, 2014
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Get back to me when that position has any effect on my marrage.
I'm baaaaccckk.

Snicker.

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#62 Jun 13, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm baaaaccckk.
Snicker.
So now you're living with delusion that somehow affect my marriage?

Take your meds, Hunty.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Trans woman in Halifax questions if prejudice i... 35 min Imprtnrd 4
News Doritos makes rainbow chips in support of gay r... (Sep '15) 36 min guest 1,088
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 41 min Truth 45,135
News Franklin Graham Condemns Gay-Inclusive Kiss Cam... 57 min Imprtnrd 9
News LGBT issues present Trump with loyalty test 5 hr Dr Reker s Bellhop 1
News Scientists reveal lesbians are MUCH more likely... 5 hr Dr Reker s Bellhop 4
News Gay-basher gets 2 months in jail for on-camera ... 5 hr Dr Reker s Bellhop 1
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 17 hr Carter county res... 24,770
More from around the web