Obama Announces Full Support for Gay ...

Obama Announces Full Support for Gay Marriage

There are 26163 comments on the politix.topix.com story from May 9, 2012, titled Obama Announces Full Support for Gay Marriage. In it, politix.topix.com reports that:

It's a historic day for gay rights activists: Obama has just announced his support for gay marriage.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at politix.topix.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#26188 Jan 22, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>If I never answer, then how can my answer be flawed? Focus.
To pull Jane Dodo sh!t on Jane Dodo- When did I say it was? Focus yourself jackass!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#26189 Jan 22, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>If I never answer, then how can my answer be flawed? Focus.
There's a big difference between an answer and a response dufus! Just look at your posts. You respond, but you don't answer.

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#26190 Jan 22, 2013
When you replace something, you must remove one thing and put another in its place. You cannot do that in marriage; you can only dissolve the contract. If a marriage is between two men, there is no replacement; the spouse is original to the contract. No woman was ever involved.

It's hard for a child to be conceived by anyone BUT their biological parents, isn't it?
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not disputing that, just the notion that elevation of the wife in the marital relationship, somehow means that she is not required for the marital relationship. Gee...we progressed from the "wife is equal to the husband" to the "wife can be replaced with another husband". Just think she only had a few decades of equality before she is shown the door. Oh well....all in the name of progress.
<quoted text>
Hmmmmmm......oooh so close...actually its about what that "two" becomes...three or four or five....sex between men and women still makes babies....I would think that Mr. & Mrs. Munster's baby boy CPeter who resides at 1313 Mockingbird lane would understand this concept. Yes I know one does not need to be married in order to procreate, and out of wedlock births have risen considerably over the past 10 to 20 years. That still doesn't change the orientation of marriage...get it?...toward the procreative sexual aspect of the male female relationship. There's really not much dispute that children do best when conceived and raised by their OWN biological mother and father in a low conflict stable marriage. My parents did, I did, my children are. Even gay kids I would imagine would prefer their own married mother and father in a stable marriage and home life.
Why does it matter to society at large that two men/women marry? Are there legions of unwed pregnant men out there? If two men/women don't marry, what will happen? If marriage is such a hot item within the gay community, why is there such indifference to the idea? Why aren't more couples, that can, legally marrying, other than the lack of nationwide recognition, which I don't think is the primary reason? Why do more female couples marry than male?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#26191 Jan 22, 2013
LuLu Ford wrote:
<quoted text>
That's what the court is debating Jackass.
In Italian American lingo it would be, and this is the phonetic spelling, "chooch". Capeesh?!

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#26192 Jan 22, 2013
cpeter1313 wrote:
When you replace something, you must remove one thing and put another in its place. You cannot do that in marriage; you can only dissolve the contract. If a marriage is between two men, there is no replacement; the spouse is original to the contract. No woman was ever involved.
There was at one point, or neither man would have been there in the first place.:)
It's hard for a child to be conceived by anyone BUT their biological parents, isn't it?
There's hope for you yet. "1313"? Mockingbird Lane?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#26193 Jan 22, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Aw c'mon toots. Let's be honest. Jane Dodo is a much bigger jackass than Pietro. Pietro is a gentleman! Jane Dodo is, er, ah, not.
Thanks paisan.
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#26194 Jan 22, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Every state recognizes "marriage" as a legally protected relationship, distinct from all others. Each state defines marriage differently. Some states have removed the opposite sex requirenment, while others have constitutionalized it. The question is: What is the state's interest in recognizing a specific group if said group's pairings, same sex, do not share the same foundation as the larger group's pairing, opposite sex. Why does a same sex relationship need recognizing at all, and/or in the same way an opposite sex relationship is recognized?
The State acts on the behalf of ALL its citizens, not just the majority.
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#26195 Jan 22, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
To pull Jane Dodo sh!t on Jane Dodo- When did I say it was? Focus yourself jackass!
Post #26177

You really are quite the dullard.
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#26196 Jan 22, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
There's a big difference between an answer and a response dufus! Just look at your posts. You respond, but you don't answer.
Let's try this again.... If I don't answer, then how can my answer be flawed?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#26197 Jan 22, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text> The State acts on the behalf of ALL its citizens, not just the majority.
Exactly...you're catching on! That's why its in the best interest of ALL of its citizens, particularly its younger citizens, not to tamper with one of its fundamental institutions, if not the institution, crucial to its stability, conjugal marriage.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#26198 Jan 22, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>Post #26177
You really are quite the dullard.
I said your response (singular) was "one big flaw" not your answer was flawed since you didn't answer, you only responded with an insult. Then I said you never answer you just respond and there is a difference. Remember dullard? Sure you do!

So I'll ask again- When did I say your answer was flawed? Before or after I said you never answer?

What a DULLARD!
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#26199 Jan 22, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's try this again.... If I don't answer, then how can my answer be flawed?
Let's try this again- I will only give your straw man arguments mild amusement. They get so silly. I don't want to go on and on with them. So stop them for now and let's get back on topic.

Do you think Obama should announce full support for poly marriage too? Why or why not?

Thank you.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#26200 Jan 22, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's try this again.... If I don't answer, then how can my answer be flawed?
I said your response was flawed. I did not say your answer was flawed.

I said you never answer. And you don't so let's try once again!

Do you think Obama should announce full support for poly marriage?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#26201 Jan 22, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Your whole response was one big flaw!
YUK!YUK!YUK!
Post 26177.

When did I say your answers were all flawed Jane Dodo? Never.

Your stupid response to that one post was just an insult, not an answer. Since you never answer.

Glad I could straighten this all out for you!
Jane Dodo

West New York, NJ

#26202 Jan 22, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Post 26177.
When did I say your answers were all flawed Jane Dodo? Never.
Your stupid response to that one post was just an insult, not an answer. Since you never answer.
Glad I could straighten this all out for you!
Since I never answer, how was my response flawed?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#26203 Jan 22, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's try this again- I will only give your straw man arguments mild amusement. They get so silly. I don't want to go on and on with them. So stop them for now and let's get back on topic.
Do you think Obama should announce full support for poly marriage too? Why or why not?
Thank you.
After all his Dad was a polygamist.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#26204 Jan 22, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Since I never answer, how was my response flawed?
In that it was not a answer dummy.

But that's all your silly straw man bullsh!t you use to avoid trying to justify your hypocrisy in supporting equal rights for only groups you approve of and no others.

Why are you a hypocrite?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#26205 Jan 22, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
After all his Dad was a polygamist.
Yes. There was a lot more poly in Obama's family than in Mormon Romney's.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#26206 Jan 22, 2013
Jane Dodo wrote:
<quoted text>
Since I never answer, how was my response flawed?
Because it's always a straw man.

Let me try to get you somewhere near the topic once again.

Do you support equal protection for polyamorists? Why? Why not?

Thank you.
Straight Sh00ter

United States

#26207 Jan 22, 2013
Apparently Wahabi islam supports gay rights, I mean why else would Lil' Bam-Bam support it so forcefully?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Fascinating gay penis facts (Jul '11) 1 min Sfp777 102
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 25 min carter county res... 25,203
News Gorsuch explains his stance on gay rights 1 hr Little Johnny 6
News First openly gay Texas A&M student president ho... 1 hr Little Johnny 3
News Man Beat 2 Transgender Women Who Tried to Enter... 1 hr Little Johnny 27
News Who Does This Tennessee Lesbian Couple Think Bu... (Feb '11) 1 hr Long Legged Mack ... 25
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 2 hr Respect71 46,218
News Malaysia Clears Release of 'Beauty and the Beas... 11 hr NE Jade 11
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 14 hr pearl 5,376
More from around the web