I never said that procreation has no relevance in marriage.<quoted text>
And it's the exact same for polygamy and incest marriage too.
No it's not. Sex is not the exact same as number or close relation.
[QUOTE who="Frankie Rizzo"]If procreation has no relevance in marriage why are you against incest marriage?
I don't imagine that it would personally harm me. But it could harm other married people or marriages because there wouldn't be a legal limit on the number of people in a marriage, and it would certainly require a great deal of change in civil and family law. A state legislature could rationally decide that an unlimited number of partners in marriage would lead to a legal and social tangle that it would not want to create.What harm would a loving marriage of three men cause you? Why do you wish to deny it?
Personally, the evidence suggests that polygamous marriages in this country create imbalances and a class of men who can't find wives, negatively and economically disadvantage women involved, and subordinate women and prey on minors in religious cults.
But that's just my view. I'm not married to it.
Want to make the argument in favor of polygamy? Knock yourself out.
No. Just superior to bigots like you.You say you are a bigot. As such do you consider yourself superior to other bigots like those opposed to same sex marriage? Why?