Obama Announces Full Support for Gay ...

Obama Announces Full Support for Gay Marriage

There are 26143 comments on the politix.topix.com story from May 9, 2012, titled Obama Announces Full Support for Gay Marriage. In it, politix.topix.com reports that:

It's a historic day for gay rights activists: Obama has just announced his support for gay marriage.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at politix.topix.com.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#24904 Dec 31, 2012
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
On the contrary, I support marriage equality, because I recognize that "equality" refers to such things as treating people the same regardless of race or gender.
I don't pretend that "equality" relates to some red herring.
Really?
You SURE about that son?

In my "race" it was ALWAYS customary to have more than one wife. Your bullshit discriminates on the basis of race sir.

You are correct on one point though.
Red herrings are not equal. The big ones eat the little ones. So do the blue ones sir.
<smile>

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#24905 Dec 31, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
The old "They don't deserve equal rights because they are a fish" argument against equal rights. Heard it. It's silly.
<chuckle>
Yeah, but herrings sure do taste good eh.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#24906 Dec 31, 2012
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
What is "silly" is pretending that a red herring, in this context, refers to a fish.
Incorrect.
It is not silly sir. It is funny.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24907 Dec 31, 2012
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
Asked and answered.
MULTIPLE times.
You missed them?
Damnation !
Oh this is all about you winning I see.
Nice.
Gee, I thought it was an open forum DISCUSSION, not a pissing contest that will ultimately declare a winner and a loser sir.
Which way to the pisser?
So you won't answer but claimed to have answered.

Got it.

Did ya figure out this wasn't a private line and a public forum yet?

Pretty easy shit senor. If you have a position you make it known.

Myself I'm for gays marrying given it represents a basic American liberty.

BAM!

LOL!!!

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#24908 Dec 31, 2012
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
Let us know when you take a case of polygamy to court.
But it's not as if you really care one way or the other.
Actually I DO care about that one sir, unlike your cause, which I support but do not care one way or the other, which equates to my "OK" vote either way.
I figure that when poligamy comes to pass legal muster, there may be a few fillies out there that wish to give it a go. For research and the betterment of humanity and all doncha know. EVOLUTION man that's what it's all about. RIGHT?
Becoming what one wishes to be and what one can adapt to be. When poly passes, I'll adapt.
K?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24909 Dec 31, 2012
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
Choosing not to do a thing should never be confused to mean that the one making the decision to avoid doing something, with an inability to do that same thing sir.
You failed before, and fail yet again to listen to what I have already posted here MANY times about my reasons for fcuking with you comedians sir.
Here he goes again Drew.

He's got supposed posts buried a thousand deep in this thread and his answer to us is to get a heavy duty shovel, take a cmonth off work and find them.

LOL!!!

Talk about lame. If this scrotum sack "Aquarius was able to formulate an answer you'd think he could spit it out in easy fashion. Instead he's into playing weak games.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24910 Dec 31, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
What's this "we" sh!t Dan, you got a mouse in your pocket? Sure we were discussing polygamy. Relax. Join us!
There are many homosexuals wishing to enter into a polygamist marriage. Just look at the cover of the Advocate a gay magazine on my little picture there.
Three men wishing to marry. You should read their story maybe you wouldn't be such a hard ass bigot and would agree, their marriage would not harm you or anyone else. Maybe not. Who cares what you think you're a hypocrite!
Dan. What a jerk! YUK!YUK!YUK!
P.S. Is it your belief that if not many people want a type of marriage then that type of marriage should not be allowed? Explain please.
Many homosexuals wanting to enter into a polygamous marriage.....LOL!!!

Yeah....thousands I'm sure.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#24911 Dec 31, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
I never had a position on polygamous marriages
...
As far as my personal view there are so few polygamists out there I could care less.
Interesting.

Looks like your first claim is a lie.
<shrugs shoulders>

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24912 Dec 31, 2012
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
So.
Big deal.
It is STILL an individual states rights issue as it is up to the states to ratify any such legislation by a two thirds margin.
Correct?
The states have NO obligation whatsoever to bow to the SCOTUS on the matter. Correct?
Given gays marrying exhibits the same elements of a basic right, to marry the adult of one's choice, could you not see it as a potential Amendment one day to to protect that basic liberty from dickheads like you whose only opposition to it is disdain?

LOL!!!

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#24913 Dec 31, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
Many homosexuals wanting to enter into a polygamous marriage.....LOL!!!
Yeah....thousands I'm sure.
Lookit Dan's loser ass on topix on New Years Eve!

Too funny!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24914 Dec 31, 2012
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
Humans form far more than "pair" bonds sir.
Your claim as to that being the basis for legal marriage to exist is ridiculous.
But the bonding is part of a couple...dumbass.

Legal marriage is constructed of a legal union between two adults whom find love, attraction and a willingness to enter into a legal contract together based on this.

Gays can do that and should be able to.

Simple stuff here genius. If you can't figure that out I'll bet it might take you 3 tries each morning to get the left shoe on the left foot.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24915 Dec 31, 2012
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting.
Looks like your first claim is a lie.
<shrugs shoulders>
Prove it. Go find some post where I was against polygamy you goofy bullshitter.

Polygamists are a non-issue in the debate on gay marriages as far as I'm concerned.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#24916 Dec 31, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
State by state. It's happening now. More and more states are allowing gay marriage. And it's not far fetched that in the futurte this may be looked at like a basic civil right given iut has all the inherent traits of being one.
I never had a position on polygamous marriages you stupid lying sack of shit let alone dodge questions about it.
Lie much?
LOL!!!
If you were to ask rather than lie like the little bitch you are I'd tell you each form of marriage has to lie on it's own merits. Polygamous marriages and gays marriages are distincly different. As far as my personal view there are so few polygamists out there I could care less.
Too funny!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24917 Dec 31, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Lookit Dan's loser ass on topix on New Years Eve!
Too funny!
Err....the festivities don't begin until 10:00 at the party.

Whaaa??? You've been drinking since 3:00???

LOL!!!

You're gonna miss me.

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#24918 Dec 31, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
Given gays marrying exhibits the same elements of a basic right, to marry the adult of one's choice, could you not see it as a potential Amendment one day to to protect that basic liberty from dickheads like you whose only opposition to it is disdain?
LOL!!!
Wha?

Funny stuff!

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#24919 Dec 31, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove it. Go find some post where I was against polygamy you goofy bullshitter.
Polygamists are a non-issue in the debate on gay marriages as far as I'm concerned.
Sure seems like you're against it. Calm down! Relax. Take a deep breath.

YUK!YUK!YUK!

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#24920 Dec 31, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
So you won't answer but claimed to have answered.
Got it.
Did ya figure out this wasn't a private line and a public forum yet?
Pretty easy shit senor. If you have a position you make it known.
Myself I'm for gays marrying given it represents a basic American liberty.
BAM!
LOL!!!
Uh, numbnuts, I SUPPORT the right of any gay to marry whoever they wish. I support gay marriage. It does NOT effect me or my own rights in ANY negative way sir, therefore marry away.

CLEAR enough for your delicate receptors yet sir?

That being said, I enjoy finding out how much the SAME you gays are when it comes to how the nature of man ie. prejudice, hate, emotions, and the like is when it comes to marriuage and the internal squabbles that arise in ANY marriage sir.
It just cracks me up to see you folks fighting like cats and dogs sometimes with each other, over the SAME things that hetero couples fight and argue over.
Things like;
money
infidelity
jealousy
appearance and self image
monogamy
talking to another man or woman other than your spouse

ya know, the day to day shit that happens in hetero relationships.

What REALLY cracks me up is to see many of you deny it. You deny it because it takes away your DIFFERENCE which most of you here seem to relish in, and have no other identiy of your own besides being gay. It seems to take up your entire person.

You WANT that "different" status, and "equality" at the same time. If you give up your "difference" through "equality", you lose your identity, and become just another shmo on the street. You are NO LONGER "gay", you are "equal".

Why is it that gays HAVE to make and retain a point of their sexual orientation, but heteros do not?
Fascinating I tell you.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24921 Dec 31, 2012
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually I DO care about that one sir, unlike your cause, which I support but do not care one way or the other, which equates to my "OK" vote either way.
I figure that when poligamy comes to pass legal muster, there may be a few fillies out there that wish to give it a go. For research and the betterment of humanity and all doncha know. EVOLUTION man that's what it's all about. RIGHT?
Becoming what one wishes to be and what one can adapt to be. When poly passes, I'll adapt.
K?
I love how you punks bring in polygamy into the discussion of gay marriage.

For one polygamy is completely different from traditional heterosexual marriage or gays marrying with it's own set of merits.

Two - you'd likely fight polygamy as well so I take your position here as insincere if not an outright lie.

Three - This is the clincher. How many polygamists do you see out there nationwide? Eighty nine? LOL!!! No one cases moron...it's a non-issue given I don't think anyone cares if they marry.
You utilize it as a pathetic effort to derail the topic at hand. You sad little bitch. No wonder you feel the need to call everyone 'sir'.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#24922 Dec 31, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove it. Go find some post where I was against polygamy you goofy bullshitter.
Polygamists are a non-issue in the debate on gay marriages as far as I'm concerned.
Prove what? Prove that I said something I did not? Are you daft?
Are you and Drew related or something?

YOU said you did NOT have a "position" on poly.
THEN
You state your position is you do not care.

NOWHERE did I say nor imply that you were FIRST against it strawman. YOU said YOU had NO position, and then stated your position that you said did not exist.

<rolls eyes>

Mike DiRucci

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#24923 Dec 31, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
Err....the festivities don't begin until 10:00 at the party.
Whaaa??? You've been drinking since 3:00???
LOL!!!
You're gonna miss me.
I always miss your silly ass when you get humiliated and go and sulk for a few days!

Take a close count of everyone's posts for tomorrow! So you can tell us what losers we are. We're counting on you.

I'm sure you'll have some tall tales about your New Years Eve tomorrow! Can't wait.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Spectrum Cafe (Dec '07) 4 min NE Jade 27,994
News Kansas teacher moves after receiving threats fo... 9 min NE Jade 28
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr Wondering 60,837
News School textbook with gay maths problem go viral 1 hr Wondering 10
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 5 hr dollarsbill 19,229
News California Lawmakers Move to Limit Gay Conversi... 7 hr Frankie Rizzo 7
News Lesbian mum told baby won't be legally register... 11 hr Murphy 1
News 'Roseanne' Star Recalls Fight to Air Controvers... Apr 20 Frankie Rizzo 103