Obama Announces Full Support for Gay Marriage

May 9, 2012 Full story: politix.topix.com 26,178

It's a historic day for gay rights activists: Obama has just announced his support for gay marriage.

Full Story
Under Achievers

Huntington, MA

#24792 Dec 30, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
Gays are going to exchange wedding bling and honeymoon things more so in 2013 than 2012.
Gonna drive the spaghetti shitting homosexual haters so nuts their left eye will twitch.
Isn't it Maryland that was the latest state to wise up and allow gays to marry?
Yeah, wised up and went ater a deaf woman. Subversive and decadent is the narcissist homosexual. Such a fine example.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24793 Dec 30, 2012
LuLu Ford wrote:
<quoted text>
He's more interested in your ass than mine it seems.
Lulu!!!!

Now I know we've had our differences but...OUCH!!!!

-Have a good New Years woman. 2013 will be good I'm thinking.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#24794 Dec 30, 2012
LuLu Ford wrote:
<quoted text>
He's more interested in your ass than mine it seems.
:)

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#24795 Dec 30, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
Lulu!!!!
Now I know we've had our differences but...OUCH!!!!
-Have a good New Years woman. 2013 will be good I'm thinking.
See Dan? Me and toots, we got chemistry. So butt out jackass! As in Get Lost! Scram!

YUK!YUK!YUK!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24796 Dec 30, 2012
Under Achievers wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, wised up and went ater a deaf woman. Subversive and decadent is the narcissist homosexual. Such a fine example.
You went after a deaf woman?

OK.

And there just might be subversive, decedant and narcissist homosexuals. Little weird but it's a big world and I'm sure a few might be out there. Liberace held at least one of those qualities.

But....what is your point there rambling man????

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24797 Dec 30, 2012
Under Achievers wrote:
<quoted text>
Ernst Roehm had 3 million men under his orders. Some of which were gay, viscious, and most loyal to both Hitler and Roehm. After it was discovered that Roehm may have been plotting to kill Hitler he took care of them before they could take care of Hitler. That is a historical fact that many wish the world to conveniently forget. Dishonoring your own father and mother is bad enough, so why should we be surprised you'd turn your back on anyone else. That's what narcissists do and that is exactly what is going on here. The rhetoric here somedays is very telling.
Damn breeders!
Whaaaa???

Nazis killed Jews, Catholics and gays in droves amongst others. Soooooo.....WTF are you talking about or is it payote night at the reservation??

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24798 Dec 30, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
See Dan? Me and toots, we got chemistry. So butt out jackass! As in Get Lost! Scram!
YUK!YUK!YUK!
Man...I'm sorry.

Didn't know.

Always me to have bad timing you know.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#24799 Dec 30, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
Hell...I'd be there but I doubt you're in Sacramento and my old jalopy is only good for 12 miles at a time.
Have a good New Years! 2013 will be a good year for anyone worth a shit and I'm sure that includes you and yours brother!
Ahh Dan in Sacramento. Dude! You are one of my favs. Yea, it's looking up. You gonna get a new ride this year?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#24800 Dec 30, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
Hell...I'd be there but I doubt you're in Sacramento and my old jalopy is only good for 12 miles at a time.
Have a good New Years! 2013 will be a good year for anyone worth a shit and I'm sure that includes you and yours brother!
Bet it don't include me huh Dan?

Beat it! Me and toots got chemistry. Butt out.

YUK!YUK!YUK!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24801 Dec 30, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahh Dan in Sacramento. Dude! You are one of my favs. Yea, it's looking up. You gonna get a new ride this year?
Emailing you now.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#24802 Dec 30, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
Bet it don't include me huh Dan?
Beat it! Me and toots got chemistry. Butt out.
YUK!YUK!YUK!
You and "toots" have fun.

Has to be better than your left hand so I'm all for it.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#24803 Dec 30, 2012
Wakanatabi wrote:
<quoted text>
You and "toots" have fun.
Has to be better than your left hand so I'm all for it.
That's not what your wife says!

Toots is emailing you now you old dog!

I won't tell your ole lady the poor dear needs the rest! She'll be secretly glad toots is taking care of that unsavory chore!

WOOHOOO!

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#24804 Dec 30, 2012
YUK!YUK!YUK! Dan. What a jackass!

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#24805 Dec 31, 2012
Rick in Kansas wrote:
<quoted text>I know you weren't asking me, but this looked like fun.
The natural right, sure, EVERYONE has a natural right to protect themselves from harm, but as an inalienable right, not so much. I imagine that we can all agree that such a right would not include the private ownership of nuclear and chemical weapons, but just how less inalienable that right gets from there is pretty much open to debate. When it comes to the weapons of lesser mass destruction, to assert that the government has absolutely no interest in their place among the public is nothing short of wishful thinking. I'm a gun owner myself, but we need to take a serious look at just what kind of firepower we are making readily available and who we are making it available to.
You do realize, do you not, that "natural right", and "inalienable right" are the exact same thing and they are synonyms for each other?

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#24806 Dec 31, 2012
Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree, let's not exclude on the basis of gender who can marry a man, and let's not exclude on the basis of gender who can marry a woman.
Let's not exclude on the basis of freedom and equality for all how many wives or husbands one can have.

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#24807 Dec 31, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Nit picking huh? You damn well the point was that there are two types of acts associated with mores if you will. Some have victims while others do not. Legislating morality to include so called crimes without victims is an infringement on freedom and a huge waste of money.
Nit pickin"? If you wish to call it that, go ahead. It is a nit that needs picked however, You are incorrect sir.
You want proof? Answer the following honestly.

Is it "moral" for me to own a gun?
Is it a crime, a victimless crime, for me to own a gun?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#24808 Dec 31, 2012
Mike DiRucci wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what your wife says!
Toots is emailing you now you old dog!
I won't tell your ole lady the poor dear needs the rest! She'll be secretly glad toots is taking care of that unsavory chore!
WOOHOOO!
OMG you have such a wicked sense of humor.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#24809 Dec 31, 2012
Is that "Wakanatabi" jackass (Dan) gonna obsessively count everyone's posts again today?

That's psycho! Why do you suppose he does that?

Anyone know?

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

#24810 Dec 31, 2012
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
You do realize, do you not, that "natural right", and "inalienable right" are the exact same thing and they are synonyms for each other?
Probably not, "Rick in Kansas" is a dope.

And a "buttercup"! And a "cupcake"!

Funny!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#24811 Dec 31, 2012
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
Nit pickin"? If you wish to call it that, go ahead. It is a nit that needs picked however, You are incorrect sir.
You want proof? Answer the following honestly.
Is it "moral" for me to own a gun?
Is it a crime, a victimless crime, for me to own a gun?
Dirty Harry would disagree with you.

Is it moral to defend yourself with a gun or to turn the other cheek?

Depends upon your set of ethics doesn't it?

Owning a gun? Depends if it is against the law and on the type of weapon. Suppose it is? It is a victimless crime.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Is Vladimir Putin Another Adolf Hitler? 54 min Pro-Ukraine 1,449
Once more on fascism knocking on the Balkan doo... (Aug '09) 1 hr Tubal Cain 1,936
Man alleges sexual abuse as anti-gay 'conversion' 3 hr The Rogue 33
Op-ed: Gay Voice Is Ruining Lives 4 hr Fa-Foxy 8
Gay marriage (Mar '13) 5 hr Jobias3890 55,946
Gay marriage cases await early Supreme Court de... 5 hr Frankie Rizzo 459
Online sleuths aid police in gay-beating case 5 hr Frankie Rizzo 23
Is Polygamy the Next Gay Marriage? 5 hr Frankie Rizzo 1,120
Anti-gay Tenn. billboard stirs religion debate 6 hr woodtick57 71
US judge upholds state same-sex marriage ban, r... 7 hr Frankie Rizzo 834
•••

Gay/Lesbian People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••