Wouldn't it be better if he gave them jobs instead so they could feed thenselves?<quoted text>
... wouldn't it be better if he invited 50 families of 4 to live in his mansion with him and eat at his table with him?
Is a man that is capable of creating a job and paying another's salary going to do so when he feels put upon by outside influence to forcefully take a great chunk of his stash, against his will, and give it to others?
You shoot down the very goal of your own premise.
You advocate continually giving a non-fisherman the tools to continue to drink beer in another's boat, and eat from another's table, and not their own.