#FreeKate Insanity Intensifies: Is Teen Lesbian the Rosa Parks of Jailbait?

Kaitlyn Ashley Hunt's prosecution for having sex with a 14-year-old girl has, as I reported last week, made the Florida teenager a cause cA©lA bre of the gay-rights movemen t. Since the 18-year-old ex-cheerleader rejected a plea bargain on charges of lewd and lascivious conduct - it is a felony under Florida law for an adult to have sex with ... (more) Full Story
First Prev
of 13
Next Last

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#1 May 30, 2013
Free Kate!

“=”

Since: Oct 07

Appleton WI

#2 May 30, 2013
It's ridiculous. Teenagers playing with teenagers is not child molesting or pedophilia, and should not be considered a crime. And being of the same sex they have no chance of getting pregnant. There's no rational reason to ruin either girls life just because some people are ignorant and bigoted. This country and its laws need to grow up.

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

33.00, -111.51

#5 May 31, 2013
Tre H wrote:
It's ridiculous. Teenagers playing with teenagers is not child molesting or pedophilia, and should not be considered a crime. And being of the same sex they have no chance of getting pregnant. There's no rational reason to ruin either girls life just because some people are ignorant and bigoted. This country and its laws need to grow up.
An 18 year old, an ADULT, is having sex with a 14 year old in a public bathroom, and you find that acceptable ???!!!

THROW THE BOOK AT HER ! 60 YEARS IN THE SLAMMER !

“=”

Since: Oct 07

Appleton WI

#7 May 31, 2013
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
An 18 year old, an ADULT, is having sex with a 14 year old in a public bathroom, and you find that acceptable ???!!!
THROW THE BOOK AT HER ! 60 YEARS IN THE SLAMMER !
Where they have sex is irrelevant, but that they are both high school students whose relationship began prior to Kate turning 18 should be.

I didn't comment on whether it was "acceptable" or not... I said it shouldn't be considered a CRIME for teenagers to fool around. What good does throwing her in prison do? She didn't harm anyone. Were you ever a teenager? 60 years? Even if an 18 year old MAN had RAPED the younger girl at knifepoint, he would not get 60 years. You are friggin nuts.
Ronald

Anonymous Proxy

#8 May 31, 2013
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
An 18 year old, an ADULT, is having sex with a 14 year old in a public bathroom, and you find that acceptable ???!!!
THROW THE BOOK AT HER ! 60 YEARS IN THE SLAMMER !
I truly believe you are the only sane homosexual on this board.

“=”

Since: Oct 07

Appleton WI

#9 May 31, 2013
Ronald wrote:
<quoted text>
I truly believe you are the only sane homosexual on this board.
That certainly doesn't say much for your own sanity.

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

33.00, -111.51

#10 May 31, 2013
Tre H wrote:
<quoted text>
Where they have sex is irrelevant, but that they are both high school students whose relationship began prior to Kate turning 18 should be.
I didn't comment on whether it was "acceptable" or not... I said it shouldn't be considered a CRIME for teenagers to fool around. What good does throwing her in prison do? She didn't harm anyone. Were you ever a teenager? 60 years? Even if an 18 year old MAN had RAPED the younger girl at knifepoint, he would not get 60 years. You are friggin nuts.
She violated the law. You apparently do not believe that people should follow the law if "they don't like the law".(In the legal profession that's called "The David Berkowitz Theory Of Law" or "The Obama Theory Of Law").

“Building Better Worlds”

Since: May 13

Europa

#13 Jun 2, 2013
equalityboy81 wrote:
Free Kate!
I think she should be prosecuted.

“=”

Since: Oct 07

Appleton WI

#15 Jun 3, 2013
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
She violated the law. You apparently do not believe that people should follow the law if "they don't like the law".(In the legal profession that's called "The David Berkowitz Theory Of Law" or "The Obama Theory Of Law").
Rather than you telling me what I believe, how about I tell YOU? I believe that there are some laws that are STUPID and serve no rational purpose that need to be thrown out or changed to make sense. Believe it or not, it happens all the time. Putting that girl in prison would serve no purpose other than to make the other girl's parents temporarily feel better.

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

33.00, -111.51

#16 Jun 3, 2013
Tre H wrote:
<quoted text>
Rather than you telling me what I believe, how about I tell YOU? I believe that there are some laws that are STUPID and serve no rational purpose that need to be thrown out or changed to make sense. Believe it or not, it happens all the time. Putting that girl in prison would serve no purpose other than to make the other girl's parents temporarily feel better.
YOU don't get to decide which laws are "STUPID" and thus need not be followed. THAT is for the criminal just ice system to decide.

And until the lw is found unconstitutional, or defective and inoperable in some other way, I say: "PROSECUTE HER !"

“Building Better Worlds”

Since: May 13

Europa

#17 Jun 3, 2013
Our enemies, the homophobes of all different subgroups, often claim that LGBT people are child molesters, and we are constantly battling that idea.

NOW, when you have an adult LGBT person who CLEARLY violated the law by having sex with a minor, you IDIOTS are rushing to defend her, playing right into the homophobes hands !

There's a CLEAR LINE ! Once you are an adult, you CANNOT legally have sex with a child ! Why can;t you IDIOTS accept that CLEAR line of demarcation ?! We live everyday drawing lines and respecting lines. Why are you so insistent on disregarding this one ?!
Floyd

Oklahoma City, OK

#18 Jun 3, 2013
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU don't get to decide which laws are "STUPID" and thus need not be followed. THAT is for the criminal just ice system to decide.
And until the lw is found unconstitutional, or defective and inoperable in some other way, I say: "PROSECUTE HER !"
I hope that child molesting dyke is found guilty and sent to the electric chair!!!

“Building Better Worlds”

Since: May 13

Europa

#19 Jun 3, 2013
Floyd wrote:
<quoted text>I hope that child molesting dyke is found guilty and sent to the electric chair!!!
I don't think she should get any jail time. Just be ordered not to see the girl until she becomes of legal age.
Keith

Russellville, AR

#20 Jun 5, 2013
Coed locker rooms. Give 18 year old men equal access to 14 year old girls.

“=”

Since: Oct 07

Appleton WI

#21 Jun 7, 2013
Europa Report wrote:
Our enemies, the homophobes of all different subgroups, often claim that LGBT people are child molesters, and we are constantly battling that idea.
NOW, when you have an adult LGBT person who CLEARLY violated the law by having sex with a minor, you IDIOTS are rushing to defend her, playing right into the homophobes hands !
There's a CLEAR LINE ! Once you are an adult, you CANNOT legally have sex with a child ! Why can;t you IDIOTS accept that CLEAR line of demarcation ?! We live everyday drawing lines and respecting lines. Why are you so insistent on disregarding this one ?!
I'm only one person with my own opinion. Obviously I don't represent the entire LGBT community on this one. I do understand that there must be lines, but I don't believe justice should be that harsh or arbitrary. You can disagree with me all you want, I have no obligation to agree with you, and that doesn't make me an idiot.

I'm of the opinion that a person is the same on the day before they turn 18 as they are the day after, and that difference does not logically make the older person a criminal. This is not a case of an unwanted sexual assault, it is 2 high school students, 2 teenagers, both under 18 when their relationship began. Punishing this as a serious crime serves no purpose in my opinion. I'm NOT saying my opinion trumps the law, I'm just saying it's my opinion, like it or not.

“=”

Since: Oct 07

Appleton WI

#23 Jun 7, 2013
The Troll Stopper wrote:
<quoted text>
You keep forgetting, one of those teenagers is only 14. It was a crime if they had sex a day before she turned 18, but under the law, she can't be prosecuted until she actually turns 18. Kaitlyn actually turns 19 in August. She was an adult, that knew better but didn't care, that had sex with a 14 yr old child. She gambled and lost. Now she has to pay the price. No one is above the law, even if you are gay.
No, I didn't forget anything. But it does seem as though the older one keeps aging while the younger one stays perpetually 14. You try to create the illusion that the age gap keeps getting wider, when in fact it stays exactly the same as it always was. They were both minor teenage high school students when their relationship began, PERIOD. I never said anyone was above the law, I said I think the law is stupid, arbitrary and unjust... and treating this like it's a serious crime serves no rational purpose and has no benefit to society.
citizen

Kennett, MO

#27 Jul 22, 2013
Europa Report wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think she should get any jail time. Just be ordered not to see the girl until she becomes of legal age.
I suspect if it was a man or a teenage male who did this,everyone would have a different opinion.I'm not going to say one way or the other what I think should happen because it's very tricky.on one hand this started when they were both underage.On the other hand one of them became legal age and it continued.So,it's a catch-22 situation.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#29 Jul 22, 2013
I think the angry reactions by some of the supporters of Kaitlyn is the reality that if these trysts had involved any sort of heterosexual configuration in similar circumstances, the likelihood of prosecution is slim to none. If you're going to put hormonally driven 14 year-olds in a school with hormonally driven 18 year-olds and be absolutely shocked and appalled when they drive into each other, sigh.

Technically speaking, she broke the heck out of the law and while being 23 or under is a legal defense to doing it with someone 16 years-old under it, 18 can't do 14. She is at the mercy of the Prosecutors and whatever the Court decide at this point.

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#31 Jul 23, 2013
Rick in Kansas wrote:
I think the angry reactions by some of the supporters of Kaitlyn is the reality that if these trysts had involved any sort of heterosexual configuration in similar circumstances, the likelihood of prosecution is slim to none. If you're going to put hormonally driven 14 year-olds in a school with hormonally driven 18 year-olds and be absolutely shocked and appalled when they drive into each other, sigh.
Technically speaking, she broke the heck out of the law and while being 23 or under is a legal defense to doing it with someone 16 years-old under it, 18 can't do 14. She is at the mercy of the Prosecutors and whatever the Court decide at this point.
I totally agree with you Rick. The other side for some reason thinks Kaitlyn is getting special attention, treatment, and sympathy because she is gay/female and think that if she were a heterosexual man it wouldn't have gotten any media attention and that he would have been nailed to the cross. I agree more with your theory though that they are being harder on her because it IS a female-female alleged incident. While we should all always obey the law, because of bias toward gays in this society, gay people need to be extra careful to follow all of the laws to the T, and to KNOW all the laws. Despite what conservatives say there is selective enforcement and bias from the law/law enforcement.

“ reality, what a concept”

Since: Nov 07

this one

#32 Jul 23, 2013
The sole reason this case is getting any attention whatsoever is because of the young lesbians in lust angle to it. If either of them had been male, you'd hear crickets chirping. If either of them had been male, it would unlikely have led to a prosecution, even with the younger child's parent's calling for the other kid's head on a platter. Unless there was some sort of coercion involved, even though the law says they can't consent, when your 14 year-old consents that willingly to an 18 year-old, selling a technical violation of the law is usually harder to get past a jury. That's where the young lesbians in lust angle is coming back to haunt the 18 year-old in this case.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 13
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Supreme Court won't stop gay marriages in Florida 17 min Rick in Kansas 9
Seoul's Mayor Apologizes for Nixing Gay Rights ... 43 min Ainu 23
Supreme Court allows gay marriage to proceed in... 1 hr Otter in the Ozarks 1
Comedian Margaret Cho to headline at San Jose I... 1 hr Fa-Foxy 19
With gay marriage on the horizon, Visit Tampa B... 1 hr ishbu 18
Gay couples exchange vows in Montana after ruling 1 hr jinxysscrew 124
Transgender Woman Featured in New Television Ca... 1 hr Pope Bennie s Closet 20
Next gay marriage fight: religious exemptions 1 hr Pope Bennie s Closet 4,999
Anti-gay Tenn. billboard stirs religion debate 2 hr KiMerde 2,836
Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 4 hr Static Charge 26,690
Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 4 hr Rick in Kansas 5,455
TOWIE boys say Balls to Cancer by stripping NAK... 11 hr EdmondWA 12
More from around the web