Supreme Court has room to maneuver in same-sex marriage cases

The Supreme Court gave itself plenty of room to maneuver when it agreed Friday to review the issue of same-sex marriage .

[Le Jimbo]

Police Called When Crowd Signing Up For Housing List Gets 'Out Of Control', mostly all blacks (Dressed in Arab Garb)in Columbus, Ohio

Saturday December 8, 2012 10:12 AM
UPDATED: Saturday December 8, 2012 7:58 PM

My, they kill us and now we give them section 8 housing.

mo candy mo candy

[Mykro]

Le Jimbo wrote:

Police Called When Crowd Signing Up For Housing List Gets 'Out Of Control', mostly all blacks (Dressed in Arab Garb)in Columbus, Ohio
Saturday December 8, 2012 10:12 AM
UPDATED: Saturday December 8, 2012 7:58 PM
My, they kill us and now we give them section 8 housing.
mo candy mo candy

First post on a new thread, and you're already off topic. DUMBOSPAMBOT moron.

[Quest]

Le Jimbo wrote:

Police Called When Crowd Signing Up For Housing List Gets 'Out Of Control', mostly all blacks (Dressed in Arab Garb)in Columbus, Ohio
Saturday December 8, 2012 10:12 AM
UPDATED: Saturday December 8, 2012 7:58 PM
My, they kill us and now we give them section 8 housing.
mo candy mo candy

Black muslim Americans kill us?

If there is going to be an "out of control" mob, at least it was for something as vital as housing, and not a hoard of hyped up shoppers trampling people at an early Walmart opening, or a heard of disappointed sports fans looting the public square.

[Quest]

Should be "herd"

[tha Professor]

Who knows what this Court will come up with. You'd think it'd be simple - equal protection under the law for gay and straight Americans.

But we might see almost anything from them.

[tha Professor]

Le Jimbo wrote:

Police Called When Crowd Signing Up For Housing List Gets 'Out Of Control', mostly all blacks (Dressed in Arab Garb)in Columbus, Ohio
Saturday December 8, 2012 10:12 AM
UPDATED: Saturday December 8, 2012 7:58 PM
My, they kill us and now we give them section 8 housing.
mo candy mo candy

Racist, irrelevant, and off-topic. Get lost if you can't do better than this, clown.

[Lawrence Wolf]

tha Professor wrote:

Who knows what this Court will come up with. You'd think it'd be simple - equal protection under the law for gay and straight Americans.
But we might see almost anything from them.

I think if SCOTUS upholds DOMA, the Court itself is unconstitutional. However, though I believe the likes of Antonin Scalia is an impenetrable oaf, I think Justice Kennedy will cast the deciding vote with the side of freedom.

[au contraire]

tha Professor wrote:

Who knows what this Court will come up with. You'd think it'd be simple - equal protection under the law for gay and straight Americans.
But we might see almost anything from them.

They have equal protection under the law. Actually more than straights. Just like blacks have more protection than whites........except from themselves.

[au contraire]

Lawrence Wolf wrote:

<quoted text>I think if SCOTUS upholds DOMA, the Court itself is unconstitutional. However, though I believe the likes of Antonin Scalia is an impenetrable oaf, I think Justice Kennedy will cast the deciding vote with the side of freedom.

SEBELIUS AWARDS OBAMACARE EXCHANGE CONTRACT TO 'FRIEND'...More

• Crony capitalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crony_capi talism
o Crony capitalism in ...•
Crony capitalism is a term describing an economy in which success in business depends on close relationships between business people and government officials. It may ...

[Don Joe]

Lawrence Wolf wrote:

<quoted text>I think if SCOTUS upholds DOMA, the Court itself is unconstitutional. However, though I believe the likes of Antonin Scalia is an impenetrable oaf, I think Justice Kennedy will cast the deciding vote with the side of freedom.

I have zero confidence the USSC considers the constitution after the 2000 ruling where they appointed bush to be the president. They are strictly partisan politicians who rule for the GOP no matter what happens to the nation.

[tha Professor]

au contraire wrote:

<quoted text>They have equal protection under the law. Actually more than straights. Just like blacks have more protection than whites........except from themselves.

Obviously false, since one gay person cannot marry another.

The rest of your post was just racist gibberish, undeserving of an answer.

[Lawrence Wolf]

au contraire wrote:

<quoted text>
SEBELIUS AWARDS OBAMACARE EXCHANGE CONTRACT TO 'FRIEND'...More
• Crony capitalism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crony_capi talism
o Crony capitalism in ...•
Crony capitalism is a term describing an economy in which success in business depends on close relationships between business people and government officials. It may ...

Thanks. This thread needed some comedy relief. Perhaps you would care to explain what your comments have to do with anything related to the topic under discussion?

[Lawrence Wolf]

Don Joe wrote:

<quoted text>
I have zero confidence the USSC considers the constitution after the 2000 ruling where they appointed bush to be the president. They are strictly partisan politicians who rule for the GOP no matter what happens to the nation.

You have reason to be pessimistic. However, I'm hoping that some of the judges consider their legacies, and prefer being remembered as being on the side of freedom.

[Don Joe]

Lawrence Wolf wrote:

<quoted text>You have reason to be pessimistic. However, I'm hoping that some of the judges consider their legacies, and prefer being remembered as being on the side of freedom.

I hope you are correct, hope springs eternal. However, those judges have already cast their legacy of being partisan politicians with no regard for the constitution, nor the rule of law, nor even human decency.

[Lawrence Wolf]

Don Joe wrote:

<quoted text>
I hope you are correct, hope springs eternal. However, those judges have already cast their legacy of being partisan politicians with no regard for the constitution, nor the rule of law, nor even human decency.

I hang my hopes on Justice Kennedy being the swing vote in favor of rationality.

[lolol]

Nice to see the highest court in the country has the spare time to peruse special interest groups numbering about 3% of the population. I guess no other pressing legal issues are on the docket concerning the other 97% of the country that need to be addressed.

[SLIF]

lolol wrote:

Nice to see the highest court in the country has the spare time to peruse special interest groups numbering about 3% of the population. I guess no other pressing legal issues are on the docket concerning the other 97% of the country that need to be addressed.

If you don't like it,and think that you can do better,then go to law school and get a law degree.If you can't do that,then protest in the streeets.

[Cat74]

The court will rule according to the Constitution. It is not rocket science.

[Lawrence Wolf]

lolol wrote:

Nice to see the highest court in the country has the spare time to peruse special interest groups numbering about 3% of the population. I guess no other pressing legal issues are on the docket concerning the other 97% of the country that need to be addressed.

It's usually minority groups whose rights are being denied.

[tha Professor]

lolol wrote:

Nice to see the highest court in the country has the spare time to peruse special interest groups numbering about 3% of the population. I guess no other pressing legal issues are on the docket concerning the other 97% of the country that need to be addressed.

They address laws that have been passed and then ruled on by other, lower courts. Don't want gay rights to come before them? Then stop banning gay marriage and appealing cases to the USSC, genius.