Church Leaders Vow Political Backlash if Gay Marriage Passes

There are 17562 comments on the NBC Chicago story from Jan 7, 2013, titled Church Leaders Vow Political Backlash if Gay Marriage Passes. In it, NBC Chicago reports that:

Leaders of several Chicago-area African American churches on Monday urged state lawmakers to vote against pending legislation that would allow same-sex marriage in Illinois.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at NBC Chicago.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#18095 Mar 18, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Why the obsession with race? Race has nothing to do with gender; race differences are unimportant and small but gender differences are so important they mean the survival of the human race and so great that in many languages even words have gender.
.
Back to this bullshyt I see. Hey Brian, you're on record saying you support civil unions for gay people. Explain to the room how a civil union of gay people doesn't affect the survival of the human race, yet the marriage of a gay couple does somehow magically affect the survival of the human race.

Come on village idiot. Using cause and effect, demonstrate the differences.

Waiting....

Waiting.....

Waiting....

Brian_G = moron

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#18096 Mar 18, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>X.B. continues to misunderstand the words she uses; same sex marriage means sex segregation marriage.
It means no such thing. Sex segregation marriage is nothing more that a talking point you have created. It means nothing. it's as stupid as all your other talking points.
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>
Before Y2K, all marriage law defined marriage as sex integrated, we have the perfect affirmative action and diversity of one man and one woman marriage.
There is no legislation ANYWHERE that defines marriages as "sex integrated". You lie.
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>
X.B. stands for segregation, prejudice, disunity and separatism; that's why most Americans want to keep marriage male/female.
You lie again. Most Americans support marriage equality.

Why do you lie so much Village Idiot? Your god detests liars.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#18097 Mar 18, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
Separate is not equal; segregation is always voluntary for the group in power. Choosing segregation doesn't make it right. Perfect integration, diversity and affirmative action as one man and one woman marriage beats segregation no matter how you run and hide....
so many words to say absolutely nothing.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#18098 Mar 18, 2014
Liberals R Defective wrote:
<quoted text>Radical queer activists like you, have the right to spout your warped, sick propaganda. But that's where it ends,
No princess, it ends with our full and equal representation. That's a guarantee to us from our Constitution. The Constitution trumps your imagined authority.
Liberals R Defective wrote:
<quoted text>
No matter what your bought and paid for black robed tyrants say.
And your proof of this buying and paying can be found where Sally?
Liberals R Defective wrote:
<quoted text>
Nature's law trumps man's law every time.
Nature doesn't have anything to do with marriage moron. Marriage is a man made institution, it has nothing to do with Nature. Do you attend a lot of rabbit marriages in your trailer park princess?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#18099 Mar 18, 2014
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear dumb person, are homosexuals people, yes or no?
Are homosexuals men and women, yes or no?

If yes, then they should be treated like any other man or woman as it relates to marriage, the legally recognized union of husband and wife, valid in all fifty states and recognized by all fifty states.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#18100 Mar 18, 2014
Pietro Armando wrote:
Are homosexuals men and women, yes or no?
Absolutely.
Pietro Armando wrote:
If yes, then they should be treated like any other man or woman as it relates to marriage, the legally recognized union of husband and wife, valid in all fifty states and recognized by all fifty states.
Pietro, you still seem to be lacking in the ability to articulate a compelling governmental interest served by limiting marriage to opposite sex couples that would render such a restriction constitutional, and render your argument relevant.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#18102 Mar 18, 2014
Jonah1 wrote:
Back to this bullshyt I see. Hey Brian, you're on record saying you support civil unions for gay people. Explain to the room how a civil union of gay people doesn't affect the survival of the human race, yet the marriage of a gay couple does somehow magically affect the survival of the human race.
I wrote: "[G]ender differences are so important they mean the survival of the human race and so great that in many languages even words have gender." Same sex marriage doesn't "magically affect the survival of the human race", gender differences do.

I've explained this before, gender differences are essential to survival, same sex marriage not.

.
Jonah1 wrote:
Come on village idiot. Using cause and effect, demonstrate the differences. Waiting.... Waiting..... Waiting.... Brian_G = moron
Try reading, if you were as good at insulting.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#18103 Mar 18, 2014
Jonah1 wrote:
...
Nature doesn't have anything to do with marriage moron. Marriage is a man made institution, it has nothing to do with Nature. Do you attend a lot of rabbit marriages in your trailer park princess?
Natural law, or the law of nature (Latin: lex naturalis), is a system of law that is determined by nature, and so is universal. Classically, natural law refers to the use of reason to analyze human nature both social and personal and deduce binding rules of moral behavior from it. Natural law is often contrasted with the positive law of a given political community, society, or state. In legal theory, on the other hand, the interpretation of positive law requires some reference to natural law. On this understanding of natural law, natural law can be invoked to criticize judicial decisions about what the law says but not to criticize the best interpretation of the law itself. Some scholars use natural law synonymously with natural justice or natural right (Latin ius naturale), while others distinguish between natural law and natural right.

“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#18104 Mar 18, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Natural law, or the law of nature ...
Actually, natural law was created by apologists for religion to cloak their moral beliefs in pseudo-scientific rhetoric.

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#18105 Mar 18, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
Natural law, or the law of nature (Latin: lex naturalis), is a system of law that is determined by nature, and so is universal. Classically, natural law refers to the use of reason to analyze human nature both social and personal and deduce binding rules of moral behavior from it. Natural law is often contrasted with the positive law of a given political community, society, or state. In legal theory, on the other hand, the interpretation of positive law requires some reference to natural law. On this understanding of natural law, natural law can be invoked to criticize judicial decisions about what the law says but not to criticize the best interpretation of the law itself. Some scholars use natural law synonymously with natural justice or natural right (Latin ius naturale), while others distinguish between natural law and natural right.
Brian, idiots with no valid argument cite natural law. Were the world as you assert, there would be no need of man made law, nor would there be any need for distinct countries and towns with separate jurisdiction and different laws.

Some of us live in the real world, in stead of whatever lala-land exists inside your head. In the real world, we have laws written by man, enacted by legislatures, and signed into law by executives. In the United States, the US Constitution is the highest law of the land, and it demands that states provide all persons within their jurisdiction equal protection of the laws. Marriage is one such protection of the law in every state in the union, and you have long proven too dumb to offer any reason why same sex couples should be denied equal protection of the law to marry.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#18106 Mar 18, 2014
lides wrote:
Some of us live in the real world,
When are you going to? I doubt you will.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#18107 Mar 18, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>I wrote: "[G]ender differences are so important they mean the survival of the human race and so great that in many languages even words have gender."
LOL!!! Words are feminine and masculine in some languages because it's important to the survival of the human race. Got it!!

What a moron you are.
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>
Same sex marriage doesn't "magically affect the survival of the human race", gender differences do.
Same sex marriage has no affect on the survival of the human race moron.
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>
I've explained this before, gender differences are essential to survival, same sex marriage not.
Gender differences have nothing to do with marriage, same sex or otherwise moron. The marriages of straights and the marriages of gays have no affect on the survival of the human race moron. The institution of marriage could be wiped off the planet tomorrow, and the human race would carry on just fine.

Trying to establish any link whatsoever between marriage (same sex or otherwise) and the survival of the human race is what demonstrates your idiocy Brian_G. Well, that and just about everything else you post.
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>Try reading, if you were as good at insulting.
Try writing something that's actually worth reading moron. Your sex segregation bullshit doesn't qualify, since it's nothing but stupidity.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#18108 Mar 18, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>Natural law, or the law of nature (Latin: lex naturalis), is a system of law that is determined by nature, and so is universal. Classically, natural law refers to the use of reason to analyze human nature both social and personal and deduce binding rules of moral behavior from it. Natural law is often contrasted with the positive law of a given political community, society, or state. In legal theory, on the other hand, the interpretation of positive law requires some reference to natural law. On this understanding of natural law, natural law can be invoked to criticize judicial decisions about what the law says but not to criticize the best interpretation of the law itself. Some scholars use natural law synonymously with natural justice or natural right (Latin ius naturale), while others distinguish between natural law and natural right.
Everyone knows what natural law is Brian, the difference is that the rest of us could explain it without cut and paste. You on the other hand, being a moron don't even comprehend what it is you cut and pasted.

And Natural law still has nothing to do with marriage. it never will. Thanks for demonstrating yet again why you're the village idiot.
Xavier Breath

Brooklyn, NY

#18109 Mar 18, 2014
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
Are homosexuals men and women, yes or no?
If yes, then they should be treated like any other man or woman as it relates to marriage, the legally recognized union of husband and wife, valid in all fifty states and recognized by all fifty states.
Husband and husband
wife and wife

these combinations are recognized, too. As long as it is recognized by the federal government (and they ARE) that's all that matters.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#18110 Mar 18, 2014
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Husband and husband
wife and wife
these combinations are recognized, too. As long as it is recognized by the federal government (and they ARE) that's all that matters.
But what about conjunctivitis and polyanna?
Xavier Breath

Brooklyn, NY

#18111 Mar 18, 2014
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
But what about conjunctivitis and polyanna?
hair-lip?

“abstractions of thought...”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#18112 Mar 18, 2014
Pietro Armando wrote:
Are homosexuals men and women, yes or no?
If yes, then they should be treated like any other man or woman as it relates to marriage, the legally recognized union of husband and wife, valid in all fifty states and recognized by all fifty states.
Except all rights, including marriage, are subject to the equal protection and due process clauses of the constitution. That means other characteristics besides sex, including race and sexual orientation, can be the subject of an equal protection and due process claims. So just because gays are men and women doesn't prelude them from asserting discrimination based on sexual orientation. Sorry to burst your bigoted and constitutionally ignorant bubble once again, stupid Peter.

“abstractions of thought...”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#18113 Mar 18, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
I wrote: "[G]ender differences are so important they mean the survival of the human race and so great that in many languages even words have gender." Same sex marriage doesn't "magically affect the survival of the human race", gender differences do.
I've explained this before, gender differences are essential to survival, same sex marriage not.
Neither is opposite sex marriage essential to survival, Brian. The human species survived long before marriage or modern language were created. Opposite sex couples prove to this day marriage isn't necessary for procreation given the 40% out of wedlock birth rate.

Another epic fail on your part, Brian.
Brian_G wrote:
Try reading, if you were as good at insulting.
Too bad the rationality and logic of your writing comes nowhere close to matching the level of bigotry you've achieved, Brian.

“abstractions of thought...”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#18114 Mar 18, 2014
Brian_G wrote:
Natural law, or the law of nature (Latin: lex naturalis), is a system of law that is determined by nature, and so is universal. Classically, natural law refers to the use of reason to analyze human nature both social and personal and deduce binding rules of moral behavior from it. Natural law is often contrasted with the positive law of a given political community, society, or state. In legal theory, on the other hand, the interpretation of positive law requires some reference to natural law. On this understanding of natural law, natural law can be invoked to criticize judicial decisions about what the law says but not to criticize the best interpretation of the law itself. Some scholars use natural law synonymously with natural justice or natural right (Latin ius naturale), while others distinguish between natural law and natural right.
Natural law may be universal but it suffers from the same limitation as religious holy texts: interpretation by humans with different views, abilities, education, biases, etc. So there is no universally accepted view of what comprises natural law. And while some aspects of aural law may find their way into our civil law, it by no means controls or dictates our civil law.

And by the way, your plagiarism of Wikipedia without attribution is noted.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#18115 Mar 18, 2014
Jonah1 wrote:
LOL!!! Words are feminine and masculine in some languages because it's important to the survival of the human race. Got it!! What a moron you are.
No, Jo doesn't get it. Gender differences are both important and large. By important, gender differences mean the survival of the human race. By large, gender differences are reflected in language, dress and custom.

Now, do you get it?

.
Jonah1 wrote:
Same sex marriage has no affect on the survival of the human race moron.
That remains to be seen; I recommend waiting a half dozen generations just to be sure.

.
Jonah1 wrote:
Gender differences have nothing to do with marriage, same sex or otherwise moron.
Without gender differences, gays would be bisexual.

.
Jonah1 wrote:
The marriages of straights and the marriages of gays have no affect on the survival of the human race moron. The institution of marriage could be wiped off the planet tomorrow, and the human race would carry on just fine.
I believe the ideal social organization is one man and one woman marriage, you're entitled to your opinions.

One thing for sure, we can't depend on same sex marriage for the survival of our species. That's one benefit opposite sex couples give, not same sex couples.

Hey, whatever floats your boat but don't fool yourself.

.
Jonah1 wrote:
Trying to establish any link whatsoever between marriage (same sex or otherwise) and the survival of the human race is what demonstrates your idiocy Brian_G. Well, that and just about everything else you post. Try writing something that's actually worth reading moron. Your sex segregation bullshit doesn't qualify, since it's nothing but stupidity.
I blame our school system and the teacher unions, Jo's trying her best.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Boy Scouts' leader speaks out on gay adults ban 2 min WeTheSheeple 17
News SoCal Rep Wants to Outlaw Gay-to-Straight "Conv... 8 min Quest 80
News 60 Percent: Record Number Of Americans Support ... 12 min WeTheSheeple 62
News Judge: Gay couples across Alabama have right to... 26 min WeTheSheeple 19
News Lawmakers Consider Gay Discrimination Policies 32 min Quest 4,297
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 46 min GayleWood 21,411
News Mom: Outed pastor told gay son he's going to hell 1 hr david traversa 1
News Is Polygamy the Next Gay Marriage? (Sep '14) 3 hr Brian_G 5,521
News Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 6 hr Blackburn 32,977
Are the mods fair and balanced? 15 hr NorCal Native 835
More from around the web