Sorry charlie, why don't we dispense with the kindergarten logic and speak about the topic like adults. The law requires that in order for the government to infringe upon rights, like constitutionally guaranteed equal protection of the laws, the state must have a compelling interest served by the restrictions proposed.Its part of the same sex marriage Orwellian orthodoxy. SSM is good, and any who opposes it is a "bigot", other consenting adult relationships are bad and its okay to be a "bigot" and oppose them.
Can you articulate any such interest served by denying same sex couples equal protection of the law to marry?
I don't think you can, and your regular return to arguments of what is "good" or "bad" clearly illustrates that you can't offer a rational, factually supported, adult argument.