Kentucky Prosecutors Wants Woman To T...

Kentucky Prosecutors Wants Woman To Testify Against Her Wife In Court

There are 16 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Jun 16, 2013, titled Kentucky Prosecutors Wants Woman To Testify Against Her Wife In Court. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

Prosecutors in a murder trial in Kentucky are trying to force a woman to testify against her wife. The two married in Vermont nearly a decade ago.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#1 Jun 16, 2013
Interesting case. ANd notice that the author of teh article cites the "Full Faith and Credit" clause as I have s often done here countless times.....

Sei

Since: Nov 08

Rutland, VT

#2 Jun 16, 2013
Fa-Foxy wrote:
Interesting case. ANd notice that the author of teh article cites the "Full Faith and Credit" clause as I have s often done here countless times.....
I've been pointing out the Full Faith and Credit Clause since I started writing for LGR back in 2008 ;-)

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#3 Jun 16, 2013
Sei wrote:
<quoted text>
I've been pointing out the Full Faith and Credit Clause since I started writing for LGR back in 2008 ;-)
Well, 99% of tehn people whopost here constantly insist I am wrong for citing that clause, when I argue that once a single state granted us equal marriage rights, ALL states must legally recognize that. About 99% of teh peopel here insist I am WRONG on that. I say they are WRONG.

“TO HATE SOMEONE SIMPLY FOR WHO”

Since: Aug 08

THEY ARE IS WRONG!!!

#4 Jun 16, 2013
The Prosecutor can not compel the spouse to testify against her spouse.....communication is protected between them!!!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#5 Jun 16, 2013
NorCal Native wrote:
The Prosecutor can not compel the spouse to testify against her spouse.....communication is protected between them!!!
Well Honeychile ... he sure be tryin' sumpin' feeerce!

“TO HATE SOMEONE SIMPLY FOR WHO”

Since: Aug 08

THEY ARE IS WRONG!!!

#7 Jun 16, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Well Honeychile ... he sure be tryin' sumpin' feeerce!
That may be true.......but I doubt he'll succeed!!!

“Building Better Worlds”

Since: May 13

Europa

#8 Jun 16, 2013
Let me mention an analogy to this case.

About 1/2 the states allow the marriage of first cousins. About 1/2 half the states do NOT allow the marriage of first cousins. But ALL states legally recognize the marriages of first cousins performed in other states where it is legal, EVEN THOUGH their law forbids it.

Now, KENTUCKY IS ONE OF THOSE STATES THAT DOES NOT ALLOW THE MARRIAGE OF FIRST COUSINS. But Kentucky DOES legally recognize the marriages of first cousins married in another state that allows it.

Now supposing the couple in question here was NOT a lesbian couple, but rather a heterosexual couple that happened to be first cousins (or DOUBLE first cousins), would Kentucky be making the same argument ???

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cousin_marriage_...

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#9 Jun 17, 2013
TrueBlood wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that a racist remark??
Yes, against white Southern hetero bigots. lol

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#10 Jun 17, 2013
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
That may be true.......but I doubt he'll succeed!!!
He'll demand it in Court, the Judge will support him, she will refuse, the Judge will Find her in Contempt of Court and she will be remanded into custody and jailed for a period of time to reconsider.

THAT'S when it will get interesting.

I've been waiting for a case like this since the first Legal samesex Marriages. It's horrible that it's in a murder case, but this one aspect of it will be HUGELY important to our cause, AND will involve the FF&C clause of the U.S. Constitution. It will go Federal in mere minutes after she is Found in Contempt of Court.

I wouldn't be the least surprised if there will be Attorneys adjunct to the Case who will be camped out on the doorstep of the Federal District Court for that Jurisdiction just waiting for the call on their cellies to File a Petition for a Restraining Order pending Appeal.

That Judge's gavel will barely have time to hit the pylon before the countervailing Order is hotboxed over, a copy Filed with the pertinent Court Clerk, and the original Served to the Judge right on the Bench.

“TO HATE SOMEONE SIMPLY FOR WHO”

Since: Aug 08

THEY ARE IS WRONG!!!

#11 Jun 17, 2013
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
He'll demand it in Court, the Judge will support him, she will refuse, the Judge will Find her in Contempt of Court and she will be remanded into custody and jailed for a period of time to reconsider.
THAT'S when it will get interesting.
I've been waiting for a case like this since the first Legal samesex Marriages. It's horrible that it's in a murder case, but this one aspect of it will be HUGELY important to our cause, AND will involve the FF&C clause of the U.S. Constitution. It will go Federal in mere minutes after she is Found in Contempt of Court.
I wouldn't be the least surprised if there will be Attorneys adjunct to the Case who will be camped out on the doorstep of the Federal District Court for that Jurisdiction just waiting for the call on their cellies to File a Petition for a Restraining Order pending Appeal.
That Judge's gavel will barely have time to hit the pylon before the countervailing Order is hotboxed over, a copy Filed with the pertinent Court Clerk, and the original Served to the Judge right on the Bench.
I totally agree with ya.......and it is unfortunate that it is an alleged murder case(from what I read, it could be a self defense case) but either way, it will test the FFC and Equal Protection Amendment as well.......I believe this will help our fight regarding marriages being treated the same regardless of gender make-up across the US!!!
US Supreme Court

Justice, IL

#14 Jun 17, 2013
Correction:

I looked up her quote.

She actually puffs the semen through a straw from across the street at her wife's vagina while her wife is asleep.

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Dec 07

Lakeland, MI

#15 Jun 17, 2013
Here's yet another case that clearly demonstrates the inequality gay couples face--even *married* gay couples face. This will definitely be interesting to watch.
SLIF

Scarborough, Canada

#17 Jun 17, 2013
She said it was self- defense after the straight guy tryed to rape her.
SLIF

Scarborough, Canada

#18 Jun 17, 2013
Hey,I wonder if she can use the heterosexual panic defense?

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#20 Jun 17, 2013
TrueBlood wrote:
<quoted text>
No that's a racist remark towards blacks. You just stereotyped how some blacks talk, and you know it.
Nope. I was doing peckwood ... trueblood peckerwood.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#22 Jun 17, 2013
TrueBlood wrote:
<quoted text>
Just another Queer lie. Anyone who would read that knows that kind of talk comes from blacks not whites or anyone else. You know that, you're a fossil, you've been around. Cut the crap.
You don't know the South, boy!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Same-sex marriage fight turns to clerk who refu... 45 min Rainbow Kid 1,668
News Mormon church backs Utah LGBT anti-discriminati... 1 hr Mormon HUMAN RIGH... 6,566
Is Jade KWEER OR A PERVERT 1 hr Leroy 2
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 2 hr elh 24,062
News Boy Scouts of America ends ban on gay adults 2 hr Quirky 56
News Huge Media Cover-Up of Criminal Charges Against... 3 hr Belle Sexton 70
News Is Polygamy the Next Gay Marriage? (Sep '14) 3 hr elh 8,076
News Gay wedding cake at center of Colorado Appeals ... 3 hr Respect71 773
News Supreme Court extends gay marriage nationwide 4 hr NorCal Native 1,166
More from around the web