Should same-sex marriage become legal?

[Rick in Kansas]

Kom2 wrote:

My friend, I lie not for what have I lied about? Have I said that what I post is my own? I post truth from other Christians and myself. The point is to have it all come from the Truth and Love that Christ taught. To show one of the Bible is not theif, but it is trying to show His Words.

Funny, I've read a number of versions of the Bible and for the life of me, I can't recall anywhere where Jesus taught to steal the work done by others and to pass it off as your own. By not giving the true authors the credit they are do and by not telling us that you are even using the work of others, the implication is that everything you post is your own thoughts on the subject. That makes you both a thief and a liar. The TRUTH is that YOU are not showing us the Bible, someone else is doing that, you're just stealing their words and have no shame in doing so. Your pathetic attempts to deny responsibility for what you have been caught doing is disgusting.

[Rick in Kansas]

Kom2 wrote:

My friend, what is your question? I will try my best to answer.

Okay, you asked for it. My question is, why should I believe anything being said by someone who has proved himself to be nothing more than unrepentant thief and a pathological liar?

(Just in case there is any question in what you are passing off as your mind, I am referring to YOU.)

[Kom2]

Rick in Kansas wrote:

<quoted text>Funny, I've read a number of versions of the Bible and for the life of me, I can't recall anywhere where Jesus taught to steal the work done by others and to pass it off as your own. By not giving the true authors the credit they are do and by not telling us that you are even using the work of others, the implication is that everything you post is your own thoughts on the subject. That makes you both a thief and a liar. The TRUTH is that YOU are not showing us the Bible, someone else is doing that, you're just stealing their words and have no shame in doing so. Your pathetic attempts to deny responsibility for what you have been caught doing is disgusting.

My friend, sometimes the questions many ask are questions that need to be read and focused on. I find the answers and show you them. I never said that they were of my own, but I read all that I post to make sure that it is the answers to your questions.

My friend do not be angered by this, I have found your answers. If you ask of what Jesus said then If I know not of this Verse, then I will look it up and show you of it.

[Kom2]

Rick in Kansas wrote:

<quoted text>Okay, you asked for it. My question is, why should I believe anything being said by someone who has proved himself to be nothing more than unrepentant thief and a pathological liar?
(Just in case there is any question in what you are passing off as your mind, I am referring to YOU.)

My friend, I have not lied of anything. Everything that I have posted is Truth. What did I steal? I post here Truth from other Christians. I quote on the Bible. Forget not that to Love Christ is to be one with Him.

[Rick in Kansas]

Kom2 wrote:

My friend, sometimes the questions many ask are questions that need to be read and focused on. I find the answers and show you them. I never said that they were of my own, but I read all that I post to make sure that it is the answers to your questions.
My friend do not be angered by this, I have found your answers. If you ask of what Jesus said then If I know not of this Verse, then I will look it up and show you of it.

This does nothing to convince me that you are anything other than an unrepentant thief and a pathological liar. Your attempt to rationalize your behavior as being Christlike is insulting. Be gone false prophet, your fraud has been exposed for all to see.

[Rick in Kansas]

Kom2 wrote:

My friend, I have not lied of anything.[ Everything that I have posted is Truth. What did I steal? I post here Truth from other Christians. I quote on the Bible. Forget not that to Love Christ is to be one with Him.

The TRUTH remains that you are nothing more than an unrepentant thief and a pathological liar who can not be believed. To call yourself a Christian is insulting to Christians, be gone false prophet.

[Kom2]

Rick in Kansas wrote:

<quoted text>This does nothing to convince me that you are anything other than an unrepentant thief and a pathological liar. Your attempt to rationalize your behavior as being Christlike is insulting. Be gone false prophet, your fraud has been exposed for all to see.

My friend, I say not to convince you, but to instead show you of His Love. I'am here not to bother, but instead show you of what He said.
Forgive me if I have gotten you mad.

[Rick in Kansas]

Kom2 wrote:

My friend, I say not to convince you, but to instead show you of His Love. I'am here not to bother, but instead show you of what He said.
Forgive me if I have gotten you mad.

You aren't showing me "His Love", you are showing me that you are nothing more than an unrepentant thief and a pathological liar. Be gone false prophet.

[Faker1]

Robsan5 wrote:

<quoted text>
Like I said, dman, I do use other IDs on here. All 11,284 posters that think "your" a fool are really just me. Everyone else thinks "your" a GENIUS.
The NAACP just announced "there" support for same-sex marriage.
Gays do get beaten and killed for being gay.
Should only homosexuals care about civil rights for homosexuals? Should only the mentally disabled (like you) care about civIl rights for the disabled? Should only the elderly care about civil rights for the elderly?
Perhaps you should be wait until Thomas Edison Junior High school teaches a civics class to the disabled kids before you start to think about these complicated issues.
Roberta/Robertita (just for you, OCD/ADHD boy!)

So in a nut shell you and your lover can now have the support of the NAACP? Congrats Robertita. I'm sure if Obama isn't reelected they will back away from that statement. Only a idi@t would think that they won't.

Again call it what they are BUT don't ever mention that to a black person since black civil rights and gay civil rights are apples and oranges. I can tell you don't associate yourself with that many blacks since you don't see or know the difference. It's ok Robertita they don't bite. Lol.

[WasteWater]

Kom2 wrote:

<quoted text>
My friend, why do you call His words stupid? Do you find His death and sacrifice stupid? But my friend, He still Loves you.

What words?

The Bible is NOT God. It is man's words. Much of it is the belief of superstitious fools.

[1st Janitor]

Kom2 wrote:

<quoted text>
My friend, very good post. But I ask, If a Man was ment to lay with Man, why cant they get pregnaunt and reproduce? If Woman were ment to lay with Woman, why cant they get each other pregnaunt? Where does it say that we would murder children?

So, the only reason for marrying is procreation? Is that now your argument? If that is so then any male or female incapable of doing so is guilty of abusing the institution, using that same logic.(By the way pregnant does not have a u in it.) Love does not necessarily include children and in this day and age, with all the children without parents or families adoption would be a greater act of love, regardless of who the parents were. As for your question about the killing of disobedient, are you going to say that you don't know the stoning of disobedient children is recommended, even instructed in the Bible? What about Leviticus 20:9 for starters.

[1st Janitor]

Kom2 wrote:

<quoted text>
My friend, the ones who claim they are Christians but go against what God says are hypocrites. God makes clear of what is right and what is wrong, the ones who pick and choose from the Bible are the wrong.

You freely pick from the book of Leviticus to rationalize your views, while claiming that the Bible doesn't condone the stoning of children which is proclaimed in the same book. You use the work of Paul and his epistles, which are filled with his own prejudiced opinions, particularly concerning women while avoiding the fact that he consistently posts these. And, you made a point of saying man and women should marry only for the purpose of reproduction. That isn't in the scripture, but you make this point as if it were. It appears the truth is relative to what you wish it to be when circumstance fits your desires.

[Rainbow Kid]

Kom2 wrote:

My friend, very good post. But I ask, If a Man was ment to lay with Man, why cant they get pregnaunt and reproduce? If Woman were ment to lay with Woman, why cant they get each other pregnaunt?

Gay people are exempt from the curse of reproduction because we didn't eat the forbidden fruit
.
++++++++++
Genesis 3:16> Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
++++++++++
.

Kom2 wrote:

Where does it say that we would murder children?

.
++++++++++
And ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat.-- Leviticus 26:29

And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters.-- Deuteronomy 28:53
.
And I will cause them to eat the flesh of their sons and the flesh of their daughters, and they shall eat every one the flesh of his friend.-- Jeremiah 19:9
.
Happy shall he be, that taketh and dasheth thy little ones against the stones.-- Psalm 137:9
++++++++++
.
Yum yum
.
So today instead of eating a Big Mac
.
Eat the cashier instead

[Rose_NoHo]

Kom2 wrote:

<quoted text>
My friend, very good post. But I ask, If a Man was ment to lay with Man, why cant they get pregnaunt and reproduce? If Woman were ment to lay with Woman, why cant they get each other pregnaunt?

Does that mean god doesn't want any sterile people to have sex..you know, people who can't get or get someone "pregnaunt".(You're a joke, aren't you...)

Kom2 wrote:

Where does it say that we would murder children?

So kill all the boys and all the women who have had intercourse with a man.(Numbers 31:17)

Whoever strikes his father or mother shall be put to death.(Exodus 21:15 NAB)

[ALICIA BANKS]

marriage is a human right

only inhumane homohaters deny that

http://aliciabanks.xanga.com/732464265/same-s...

http://aliciabanks.xanga.com/758055237/happy-...

[Jonas]

ALICIA BANKS wrote:

marriage is a human right
only inhumane homohaters deny that
http://aliciabanks.xanga.com/732464265/same-s...
http://aliciabanks.xanga.com/758055237/happy-...

You are obviously very misinformed on this issue! Homosexual 'marriage' is a cruel lie with no real basis in how homosexual live!

No significant percent of the homosexual population has 'married' in ANY country that allows it, and studies have shown that few such 'marriages' are even exclusive relationships.

The homosexual 'marriage' movement is a hate based political charade attacking what others hold sacred.

No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No economically or physically unequal genders are involve. No child is ever born as a direct result, and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Having both is one of the most accurate statistical predictions of a child's future success in life.

Homosexual themselves overwhelmingly reject 'marriage' as an actual practice in EVERY country that allows the concocted oxymoron.

[Rose_NoHo]

David wrote:

<quoted text>You are obviously very misinformed on this issue! Homosexual 'marriage' is a cruel lie with no real basis in how homosexual live!
No significant percent of the homosexual population has 'married' in ANY country that allows it, and studies have shown that few such 'marriages' are even exclusive relationships.
The homosexual 'marriage' movement is a hate based political charade attacking what others hold sacred.

You mean people like Rush Limpaugh who is on his 4th sacred marriage?

David wrote:

No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No economically or physically unequal genders are involve. No child is ever born as a direct result, and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother.

Two people who make the same amount of money shouldn't be allowed to marry? What about two people who can lift the same amount of weight?

David wrote:

Having both is one of the most accurate statistical predictions of a child's future success in life.

Rose's Law:
Morons with no real argument scream, "But what about the children!?"

David wrote:

Homosexual themselves overwhelmingly reject 'marriage' as an actual practice in EVERY country that allows the concocted oxymoron.

You just made that up.
Hey, David, how are things in Pekin?

[Rose_NoHo]

And still, not one rational argument against gay marriage!

[TheTroll Stopper]

Jonas aka David Moore the Closeted Pekin Troll wrote:

<quoted text>You are obviously very misinformed on this issue! Homosexual 'marriage' is a cruel lie yap yap yap blah blah blah...

So sez the sad, pathetic closet case whose now ex-wife caught him boinking another guy. Still miss your kids, David? LOLAY!

[1st Janitor]

Jonas wrote:

<quoted text>You are obviously very misinformed on this issue! Homosexual 'marriage' is a cruel lie with no real basis in how homosexual live!
No significant percent of the homosexual population has 'married' in ANY country that allows it, and studies have shown that few such 'marriages' are even exclusive relationships.
The homosexual 'marriage' movement is a hate based political charade attacking what others hold sacred.
No homosexual relationship shares the reasons for government involvement in real marriage. No economically or physically unequal genders are involve. No child is ever born as a direct result, and no such relationship can provide a child with a father and mother. Having both is one of the most accurate statistical predictions of a child's future success in life.
Homosexual themselves overwhelmingly reject 'marriage' as an actual practice in EVERY country that allows the concocted oxymoron.

You consistently post the same worn out postulations based on these vague assertions of yours, especially that which quantifies same sex marriage as a cruel lie and that it never works. You have kept this nonsense going for years and no one but you really believes it. Gays have been getting married for a long time, whether the state recognized it or not and sharing lasting relationships as well. I know this from my own personal experience with my gay friends and acquaintances. Honestly David, the most severely bogus thing about you is your ever increasing list of ridiculous splinter personalities. You should seek mental help.