Utah May Seek Supreme Court Help in Marriage Suit

There are 5 comments on the Jun 9, 2014, EDGE story titled Utah May Seek Supreme Court Help in Marriage Suit. In it, EDGE reports that:

Utah officials are threatening to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene in a lawsuit filed by same-sex couples demanding to have their marriages recognized.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at EDGE.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#23 Jun 10, 2014
Sir Andrew wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, I'm certain. Hawai'i has a huge conclave of these idiots. I like to think of his name as Moron, I?
email me.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#24 Jun 10, 2014
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, what's up with "threatening to ask"? Do they expect gay people to start shaking in their boots?
Wow.

For once I agree with you wholeheartedly. Brilliant funny and a big red heart.

(I was going to say the same thing when I saw that part)

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#25 Jun 10, 2014
Fa-Foxy wrote:
<quoted text>
Democrats don't go away (unfortunately). I ignore them.
liar

you don't ignore me

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#26 Jun 10, 2014
eJohn wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep! It's got to be all political grandstanding and trying to look good in front of the hate-based donor base. The "you can't get married because our religion forbids it" train has LONG left the station.
saw this today and wanted to pass it along. It's about a website that sprung up (and since disappeared)

Traditional marriage's last stand
http://theweek.com/article/index/262890/tradi...

about halfway in they discus:
Take the most fundamental argument found there the "Argument from Crucial Distinction," which is meant to show that the concept of "marriage" can't apply to same-sex couples. Claiming to ground their argument "in our moral intuitions about what the critical features and norms of marriage are," the authors make a series of assertions: first, a marriage must be "meaningfully different" from other kinds of relationships (like friendships, tennis partners, business partners, and so forth); second, the crucial difference lies in the relationship's orientation to raising children and its devotion to norms of "exclusivity, permanence, and monogamy." The authors call this the "conjugal" view of marriage and claim it can only apply to "a comprehensive union between a man and a woman (with the unifying good of the relationship being procreation)"

The authors are well aware that another view of marriage which they dub the "revisionist" view prevails among many people today. According to the revisionist view, marriage is a relationship based on romantic love and oriented toward the emotional and sexual fulfillment of both partners. Children may be a part of this union, but they need not be. Same-sex marriage has come to be widely accepted because this revisionist view has widely supplanted the conjugal view in our culture.

I urge readers to spend time at the website for themselves, reading and watching the slick YouTube videos (here's one) that purport to show that what "we" really mean by a marriage is the conjugal view that excludes same-sex couples. I predict that not a single person will persuaded by the question-begging, circular argument."

As we've been trying to explain to people like Kimare, SSM is a reality now and will be coming to every state that still refuses to recognize them..

“ WOOF ! ”

Since: Nov 12

Coolidge, AZ

#27 Jun 10, 2014
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>liar
you don't ignore me
I meant Democratic politicians. I should have made that clear.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Judge proposes Oregon bakery pay $135,000 to le... 2 min Rainbow Kid 22
News Mormon church backs Utah LGBT anti-discriminati... 4 min LDS RULES 2,755
News Chief Justice John Roberts faces another big mo... 5 min Belle Sexton 73
News Why I'll be voting 'No' to same-sex marriage, e... 9 min Pietro Armando 2,038
News Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 12 min Rosa_Winkel 31,979
News Cincinnati mayor: As same-sex marriage cases ad... 17 min Ted Haggard s Gos... 3
News Gay marriage (Mar '13) 18 min Rosa_Winkel 59,309
News State warns Boy Scouts about discriminating aga... 22 min Ted Haggard s Gos... 109
News Gay marriage a difficult issue for GOP White Ho... 46 min And behold a Pale... 84
Are the mods fair and balanced? 54 min NorCal Native 647
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr Reverend Alan 19,618
More from around the web