Dr. James Dobson: "Shame On Schools" For Teaching Homosexuality Is OK

Aug 31, 2013 Full story: lezgetreal.com 3,012
James Dobson is upset- schools and churches are not teaching that homosexuality is wrong, so please send him a donation so that he can continue to say that Full Story

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#725 Oct 5, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Many successful people have been raised by those other than biological parents. Your argument holds no weight.
Statistically natural parents are best. By far.

Since: Jan 10

Westerville, OH

#726 Oct 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Statistically natural parents are best. By far.
No valid statistics support your claptrap. Give it a rest you arrogant windbag.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#727 Oct 5, 2013
At its most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Ss couples are a defective and absolute failure of mating behavior. Ss marriage is an oxymoron.

Ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile duplicate gendered half of marriage. And there is not one damn thing you can do about it.

Since: Aug 11

Scotts Valley, CA

#728 Oct 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Statistically natural parents are best. By far.
There are a huge number of unfit biological parents. What's more 50% of all marriages end in divorce which means at least 50% of children are either raised by at least one step parent or by a single parent. This statistic also shows that a high percentage of families are dysfunctional.

Since: Aug 11

Scotts Valley, CA

#729 Oct 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Statistically natural parents are best. By far.
Now let me ask you this. How is a successful family defined?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#730 Oct 6, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Now let me ask you this. How is a successful family defined?
By child welfare outcome.

Look up studies comparing birth parent families with default families.

In the latest, largest and most scientific study to date, lesbian couples rated LAST out of seven family types. AFTER single parents. Gay couples didn't even register!
Tool Regnerus

Burlington, WI

#731 Oct 6, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
By child welfare outcome.
Look up studies comparing birth parent families with default families.
In the latest, largest and most scientific study to date, lesbian couples rated LAST out of seven family types. AFTER single parents. Gay couples didn't even register!
Oh, you mean the widely debunked Regnerus study? You're always willing to reference it, and yet you never name the author.

Troll on, KiMare.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#732 Oct 6, 2013
Tool Regnerus wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, you mean the widely debunked Regnerus study? You're always willing to reference it, and yet you never name the author.
Troll on, KiMare.
Look up defense of Regnerus study.

I've posted his name and links to the study.

You are never willing to post a lesbian study with methods (there are NO gay couple studies).

Slate Magazine did a series of articles I've also noted.

Idiot.

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#733 Oct 6, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
By child welfare outcome.
Look up studies comparing birth parent families with default families.
In the latest, largest and most scientific study to date, lesbian couples rated LAST out of seven family types. AFTER single parents. Gay couples didn't even register!
Tell YOUR precious hetero couples to STOP getting divorced at the drop of a hat and we'll talk. I've been to a lot of weddings and I have seen the blushing brides vowing to God to stay married to death us do part, yet in five years she and hubby are OUT of there the kids being torn both ways, NOT raised in your PERFECT family unit you are so worried about it. As was stated to you above, more than FIFTY percent of marriages fail.

Why are you IGNORING those people? Why do you pick and choose your facts like a buffet?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#734 Oct 6, 2013
Curteese wrote:
<quoted text>Tell YOUR precious hetero couples to STOP getting divorced at the drop of a hat and we'll talk. I've been to a lot of weddings and I have seen the blushing brides vowing tuo God to stay married to death us do part, yet in five years she and hubby are OUT of there the kids being torn both ways, NOT raised in your PERFECT family unit you are so worried about it. As was stated to you above, more than FIFTY percent of marriages fail.
Why are you IGNORING those people? Why do you pick and choose your facts like a buffet?
Did you know that the largest study of family types to date could not find enough stable gay couples to rate them?

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#735 Oct 6, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you know that the largest study of family types to date could not find enough stable gay couples to rate them?
Fifty percent hetero divorce rate. Stop the divorces and we can talk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#736 Oct 6, 2013
Curteese wrote:
<quoted text>Fifty percent hetero divorce rate. Stop the divorces and we can talk.
About what?

Ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage.

DNF

“Judge more and you love less”

Since: Apr 07

Newark OH-Baltimore MD-S.Fla

#738 Oct 10, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.
And that is good and right?
The only one making that demand is you. Marriage for heterosexuals would remain unaffected by gays and lesbians marrying.

If I marry the man I fall in love with it will not affect the parentage of my nieces and nephews. It will not affect the marriage or parent status of my brother or my sisters.

DNF

“Judge more and you love less”

Since: Apr 07

Newark OH-Baltimore MD-S.Fla

#739 Oct 10, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.
What's my point?
1. The last two times the Court legally removed consideration of children, divorce and abortion, the effects were devastating for children. Now gays are attempting to deny children as a fundamental element of children.
2. Legally, naturally and morally birth parents have a favored place for children. For ss couples to equate, you are attempting to deny and break those bonds.
You again throw children under the bus, and then add your own parents.
Like I said, reprobate idiots.
When did SCOTUS remove divorce from the marriage equation? I missed that.

As for point #2 please explain ho my marriage would change the family relationship of my nieces and nephews to their parents, grand parents, and other blood relatives.

You keep making outrageous claims based on absolutely nothing but your wild imaginings. Give us examples any of your claims actually happening anywhere outside your head.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#740 Oct 10, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.
And that is good and right?
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>The only one making that demand is you. Marriage for heterosexuals would remain unaffected by gays and lesbians marrying.
If I marry the man I fall in love with it will not affect the parentage of my nieces and nephews. It will not affect the marriage or parent status of my brother or my sisters.
First you lie.

Gays are the ones asserting that children are not 'required' for marriage. Yet social scientists say marriage would not exist were it not for children.

Moreover the very idea that such a monumental change would have no affect on the very people it represents in every single culture in all of human history is absurd beyond description. How do you even have the basis to MAKE such a judgment???

Additionally, you totally ignore the desecration of your own mother and father by equating a duplicate gendered half to them. Shameful.

You have disqualified yourself from a reasoned discussion by such idiotic comments.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#741 Oct 10, 2013
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>When did SCOTUS remove divorce from the marriage equation? I missed that.
As for point #2 please explain ho my marriage would change the family relationship of my nieces and nephews to their parents, grand parents, and other blood relatives.
You keep making outrageous claims based on absolutely nothing but your wild imaginings. Give us examples any of your claims actually happening anywhere outside your head.
1. I didn't say they removed divorce from the marriage equation. I said they removed children from consideration to justify no-fault divorce and abortion.

2. Equating any relationship to birth parents denigrates the honored and natural place of parents.

Nazi Germany elevated the state relationship with children over parents. Your parents are no different than Tom & Dick?

Not my 'wild imaginations', but the diabolically evil and foolish attempt to desperately make your denial work. A imposter marriage with a fake family.

Since: Aug 11

Scotts Valley, CA

#742 Oct 10, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
By child welfare outcome.
Look up studies comparing birth parent families with default families.
In the latest, largest and most scientific study to date, lesbian couples rated LAST out of seven family types. AFTER single parents. Gay couples didn't even register!
Sampling error.

NEXT
Betty M

Colorado Springs, CO

#743 Oct 11, 2013
KiMare wrote:
At its most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Ss couples are a defective and absolute failure of mating behavior. Ss marriage is an oxymoron.
Ss couples will only ever be a mutually sterile duplicate gendered half of marriage. And there is not one damn thing you can do about it.
The Earth is overpopulated. Same sex couples -- who do not plop out a kid every year 'cause their religion or whatever says they should "begat" -- are helping that issue, most usually by adopting the kids that so-called Straight People like yourself (who seemingly never heard of condoms) see as surplus (or 'coupling waste') and dump on the system to take care of.

As for same sex marriage being an oxymoron -- Well, at least our relationships have better track records. For hetero's it's all "marry, divorce, repeat". Same sex partners are more willing to stay together through adversity -- the good and the bad, i.e. we don't just Say the words, we Live them. I seriously doubt your hinky, mythical, free-love 'marriage' could last even if it did exist.
Betty M

Colorado Springs, CO

#744 Oct 11, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
By child welfare outcome.
Look up studies comparing birth parent families with default families.
In the latest, largest and most scientific study to date, lesbian couples rated LAST out of seven family types. AFTER single parents. Gay couples didn't even register!
"As this summary will show, the results of existing research comparing lesbian and gay parents to heterosexual parents and children of lesbian and gay parents to children of heterosexual parents are quite clear: Common stereotypes are not supported by the data."

from the following (pretty legitimate!) source:
http://www.apa.org/pi/lgbt/resources/parentin...
Betty M

Colorado Springs, CO

#745 Oct 11, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
First you lie.
Gays are the ones asserting that children are not 'required' for marriage. Yet social scientists say marriage would not exist were it not for children.
You have disqualified yourself from a reasoned discussion by such idiotic comments.
Yeah, marriage was invented to make sure that the legitimate spawn of a lord or king or simple landowner got the goods when the parents passed on. It also made sure that the kids made on the servants and such got nothing. Which brings up the reverse argument:

Marriage is not required to get children. Just ask all the teen moms & guys *not* paying child support on the 4 kids they sired on 4 different women.

Are you all for the polygamist sister-wives situation? Okay with you because they're in a het-relationship? Did you know that as early as 1874, those s-wives frequently suggested new wives for their "lord and master" to marry because they wanted new partners for themselves? Chew on that...

As I said before, you are really not equipped for an intelligent discussion and should therefore depart this arena. Further, your increasingly rambling arguments have begun to bore. You have no concrete evidence to reference in your statements, you prefer to simply insult everyone -- obviously you've forgotten your medication...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Anti-gay Tenn. billboard stirs religion debate 2 min KiMerde 2,795
Alaska's 1st known gay marriage in Arctic town 3 min Sneaky Pete 19
Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 3 min Reverend Alan 5,281
Pat Robertson: Televangelist claims gays will '... 9 min Observation 1
Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 11 min chris toal 26,604
Next gay marriage fight: religious exemptions 33 min KiMare 4,945
Is Polygamy the Next Gay Marriage? 1 hr Reverend Alan 4,276
Why (R1) Righteous One is a POS (Dec '12) 2 hr Cletus 76
More from around the web