Dr. James Dobson: "Shame On Schools" ...

Dr. James Dobson: "Shame On Schools" For Teaching Homosexuality Is OK

There are 3012 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 31, 2013, titled Dr. James Dobson: "Shame On Schools" For Teaching Homosexuality Is OK. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

James Dobson is upset- schools and churches are not teaching that homosexuality is wrong, so please send him a donation so that he can continue to say that

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#704 Oct 3, 2013
Betty M wrote:
<quoted text>
"specific post"?? All of them, chippie.
And, although I am most definitely not blonde -- neither mentally nor physically -- I'm beginning to wonder what you issue IS with the fair haired ones? It's a stereotype that's gone dusty and is 'not P.C', thus requiring you to pay a fine each time you use it. You now owe me around $500. Be warned, I take cash not "trade".
'all of them' is a classic blonde bail.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#705 Oct 3, 2013
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.

And that is good and right?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#706 Oct 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.
And that is good and right?
I've never made any such demand. You're such a liar.

Since: Jan 10

Westerville, OH

#707 Oct 3, 2013
KiMare wrote:
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.
And that is good and right?
What’s bad and wrong is that you could arrogantly write (and post) this comment. If this is what you think the fight for Gay Marriage Equality is about you have not been paying attention or you’re a babbling fool or both. Here’s a little clue for you; married non-gay couples (whether they have children or not) don’t have any significance to the fight for Gay Marriage Equality. Your post represents exactly the type of attitude that has fueled the fight for Gay Rights. I’m sure the logic in that statement will elude you. Your arrogance clouds your ability to realize that your sexual orientation and lifestyle don’t make you special, superior or more deserving.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#708 Oct 4, 2013
Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
What’s bad and wrong is that you could arrogantly write (and post) this comment. If this is what you think the fight for Gay Marriage Equality is about you have not been paying attention or you’re a babbling fool or both. Here’s a little clue for you; married non-gay couples (whether they have children or not) don’t have any significance to the fight for Gay Marriage Equality. Your post represents exactly the type of attitude that has fueled the fight for Gay Rights. I’m sure the logic in that statement will elude you. Your arrogance clouds your ability to realize that your sexual orientation and lifestyle don’t make you special, superior or more deserving.
You both are idiots.

1. "Marriage does not require children."

2. "The gender or relation of a caretaker does not matter."

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#709 Oct 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
You both are idiots.
You certainly would be an authority on the topic, being one yourself.
Wondering

Tyngsboro, MA

#710 Oct 4, 2013
lides wrote:
<quoted text>
You certainly would be an authority on the topic, being one yourself.
Seems that insults are all you have left. Correction. Seems like insults are all you've ever had.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#712 Oct 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You both are idiots.
1. "Marriage does not require children."
2. "The gender or relation of a caretaker does not matter."
You finally got ONE right!

Now about #2. The relation of a caretaker does matter legally. And you are trying to insure that the gender also matters legally, even though it does not really affect the role of being a caretaker. Gender should also not be a consideration ion the legality of the relationship of a care giver.

This applies in the areas of parenting as well as medical care for your spouse.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#713 Oct 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
You both are idiots.
1. "Marriage does not require children."
2. "The gender or relation of a caretaker does not matter."
You are idiot to take exception. They are both correct.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#714 Oct 4, 2013
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>You finally got ONE right!
Now about #2. The relation of a caretaker does matter legally. And you are trying to insure that the gender also matters legally, even though it does not really affect the role of being a caretaker. Gender should also not be a consideration ion the legality of the relationship of a care giver.
This applies in the areas of parenting as well as medical care for your spouse.
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.

And that is good and right?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#715 Oct 4, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.
And that is good and right?
Same sex couples do have children. What is your point here? Single parents often raise children who grow up and become successful. A mother and father are not required.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#716 Oct 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.
And that is good and right?
That's YOUR claim, but certainly not reality. No married couple is ever required to raise children, but something around 30% of gay folks so.

And no gay couple has ever tried to prevent a man and woman from having children or raising them succeully.

What you need to do, to make sense here, is to either prove that gay folks marrying will harm unrelated children, or that the millions of kids with gay parents are better off if their parents can never marry.

So far, you have been unable to do this. Care to try again?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#717 Oct 5, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Same sex couples do have children. What is your point here? Single parents often raise children who grow up and become successful. A mother and father are not required.
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.

What's my point?

1. The last two times the Court legally removed consideration of children, divorce and abortion, the effects were devastating for children. Now gays are attempting to deny children as a fundamental element of children.

2. Legally, naturally and morally birth parents have a favored place for children. For ss couples to equate, you are attempting to deny and break those bonds.

You again throw children under the bus, and then add your own parents.

Like I said, reprobate idiots.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#718 Oct 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

1. "Marriage does not require children."
Finally! You are exactly right.

But it IS a good place to raise them.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#719 Oct 5, 2013
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
Finally! You are exactly right.
But it IS a good place to raise them.
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.

What's my point?

1. The last two times the Court legally removed consideration of children, divorce and abortion, the effects were devastating for children. Now gays are attempting to deny children as a fundamental element of marriage.

2. Legally, naturally and morally birth parents have a favored place for children. For ss couples to equate, you are attempting to deny and break those bonds.

You again throw children under the bus, and then add your own parents.

The diabolical act of a reprobate.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#720 Oct 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.
What's my point?
1. The last two times the Court legally removed consideration of children, divorce and abortion, the effects were devastating for children. Now gays are attempting to deny children as a fundamental element of children.
2. Legally, naturally and morally birth parents have a favored place for children. For ss couples to equate, you are attempting to deny and break those bonds.
You again throw children under the bus, and then add your own parents.
Like I said, reprobate idiots.
Nobody other than you makes such a ridiculous demand.

Children require support. Why would it be any different for same sex couples with children?

Your idea of morality is badly skewed. This is just one more of your value judgements disguising your personal insecurities.

You are the one throwing children under the bus with your ridiculous straw man arguments.

Your ad hominem belittlement is noted.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#721 Oct 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.
What's my point?
1. The last two times the Court legally removed consideration of children, divorce and abortion, the effects were devastating for children. Now gays are attempting to deny children as a fundamental element of children.
2. Legally, naturally and morally birth parents have a favored place for children. For ss couples to equate, you are attempting to deny and break those bonds.
You again throw children under the bus, and then add your own parents.
Like I said, reprobate idiots.
Many successful people have been raised by those other than biological parents. Your argument holds no weight.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#722 Oct 5, 2013
Many biological parents are unqualified to raise children.

Since: Jan 10

Westerville, OH

#723 Oct 5, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
For ss couples to be equated to marriage, the demand is that children be removed from consideration to equate ss couples to marriage, and that mother and father be removed to equate ss couples to family.
What's my point?
1. The last two times the Court legally removed consideration of children, divorce and abortion, the effects were devastating for children. Now gays are attempting to deny children as a fundamental element of children.
2. Legally, naturally and morally birth parents have a favored place for children. For ss couples to equate, you are attempting to deny and break those bonds.
You again throw children under the bus, and then add your own parents.
Like I said, reprobate idiots.
You just don’t have a clue. What is wrong with you? Children don’t have any significance in the fight for Gay Marriage Rights. What don’t you get about non-gay couples who marry don’t have to have children? You are one stupid mofo. Additionally, a “shot” in the dark doesn’t make you a good parent regardless of your self-important rants. Siring a child only requires sperm and an egg, there aren’t any other requirements and that doesn’t ensure you’re a good parent. Not to mention, I can’t tell you the number of non-gay folks I know that are terrible parents. Get over yourself, you aren’t special you arrogant a-hole.

Since: Jan 10

Westerville, OH

#724 Oct 5, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Nobody other than you makes such a ridiculous demand.
Children require support. Why would it be any different for same sex couples with children?
Your idea of morality is badly skewed. This is just one more of your value judgements disguising your personal insecurities.
You are the one throwing children under the bus with your ridiculous straw man arguments.
Your ad hominem belittlement is noted.
Exactly !!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Kentucky clerka s defiance on same-sex marriage... 4 min Synque 30
News Same-sex marriage fight turns to clerk who refu... 6 min posie 3,632
News The Latest: Husband: Kentucky clerk is 'standin... 7 min Lbj 63
News Mike Huckabee says Hillary Clinton should go to... 11 min Wondering 48
News Gay couple gets license to wed in Kentucky county 11 min Raviannas Guardia... 10
News Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 12 min Tre H 34,849
News The latest: Ky. county clerk gay marriage dispute 13 min Wondering 22
News Kentucky clerk, citing God, defies courts on ga... 15 min Wondering 111
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 24 min Respect71 26,015
News Kentucky clerk defies order, refuses to issue s... 45 min INFIDEL 702
News Judge jails Kentucky clerk for refusing marriag... 1 hr mjjcpa 250
More from around the web