Dr. James Dobson: "Shame On Schools" ...

Dr. James Dobson: "Shame On Schools" For Teaching Homosexuality Is OK

There are 3011 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Aug 31, 2013, titled Dr. James Dobson: "Shame On Schools" For Teaching Homosexuality Is OK. In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

James Dobson is upset- schools and churches are not teaching that homosexuality is wrong, so please send him a donation so that he can continue to say that

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#2608 Nov 23, 2013
TomInElPaso wrote:
<quoted text>
The world is already overpopulated. Your "theories" are just that. Fool.
Um, no, it's not.

Moreover, that idea was debunked a long time ago. Why do I know that and you don't?

Or are you just desperately lying?

SMile.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#2609 Nov 23, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>I live around a bunch of Italians, they call each other wop's dago's so no what?
So eat some spaghetti! Mangia! Italians are warm, fun and generous people. Me, I'm half Italian half Irish (a McWop) and 100% Brooklyn! Occasionally displaced to my houseboat on beautiful SF Bay.

Ah good times! Maybe if you GET A JOB you can have a comfortable retirement too someday. But sitting here on Topix posting dopey stuff to try and get back at an old crippled troll definitely won't get you there.

What does your wife do while you cruise the gay threads 24/7?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#2610 Nov 23, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>I live around a bunch of Italians, they call each other wop's dago's so no what?
Jizzy, you always do this, it's a common problem among the barely literate. There is no apostrophe where you are using it.(Wop's And Dago's.) It should be just Wops and Dagos. Maybe if I've done one positive thing for your sillyass in all this, it's shamed you into learning English.

When you write like that you have zero credibility. You come across like a dummy.

Also it's Now what? Not "no what?"

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#2611 Nov 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Great argument. SSM should be allowed because you don't like Lawrence, Kansas.
You're just a dopey fruitlooped troll with anger management problems.
First off, my posting was NOT aimed at you, but you, like the boy who annoys the girl he likes, to get attention, are unhappy if I communicate with anyone else, but the person I WAS addressing is a mean little snake who never wants to even discuss as "rationally" as you do, but just sits and screams insults, like the drunk at a comedy club. He deserves nothing but scorn and rudeness which is all he seems to understand.

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#2612 Nov 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
So eat some spaghetti! Mangia! Italians are warm, fun and generous people. Me, I'm half Italian half Irish (a McWop) and 100% Brooklyn! Occasionally displaced to my houseboat on beautiful SF Bay.
Ah good times! Maybe if you GET A JOB you can have a comfortable retirement too someday. But sitting here on Topix posting dopey stuff to try and get back at an old crippled troll definitely won't get you there.
What does your wife do while you cruise the gay threads 24/7?
To quote a famous scholar, "no one wants to hear your dopey life story".

I wish I could recall the old master who said that first. Oh,well, it doesn't matter.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#2613 Nov 23, 2013
Curteese wrote:
<quoted text>To quote a famous scholar, "no one wants to hear your dopey life story".
I wish I could recall the old master who said that first. Oh,well, it doesn't matter.
Perhaps it's a Frankie Rizzo-ism? Ah good times.

It's true. Telling us how gay you are and all. When you found out you liked boy assplay when you quit etc.
Rick not in Kansas yet

Salina, KS

#2614 Nov 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
Never say never.
Don't worry, I hear it happens to all men. I've never had the problem, but it really isn't anything to be embarrassed about. But seriously, dude, that was the limpest response I've gotten in a long time. Do they make Viagra for the brain?
Poof

Rock Island, IL

#2615 Nov 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
So eat some spaghetti! Mangia! Italians are warm, fun and generous people. Me, I'm half Italian half Irish (a McWop) and 100% Brooklyn! Occasionally displaced to my houseboat on beautiful SF Bay.
Ah good times! Maybe if you GET A JOB you can have a comfortable retirement too someday. But sitting here on Topix posting dopey stuff to try and get back at an old crippled troll definitely won't get you there.
What does your wife do while you cruise the gay threads 24/7?
I live around a bunch of Italians, they call each other wops dagos so now what?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#2616 Nov 23, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>I live around a bunch of Italians, they call each other wops dagos so now what?
It's good you asked me for advice Jizzy. Remember! You are a dummy. But I can't help you with your problem. If you don't like living around your Italian neighbors, either lighten up and change your attitude or move. It's a simple concept really. Good luck.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#2617 Nov 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
But the same can be said against SSM. Like my example of a gay man marrying a 5 year old boy. Same argument. Own it.
What balls you have calling good people's marriages a "distraction".
Polygamy is marriage it is not a plot against your marriage. Did you know most polygamists support SSM? Of course it's only logical. The only reason you don't support polygamy is your paranoia.
Marriage. There is no one right way.
where did you get the idea I oppose polygamy?

What I oppose is saying that anyone who doesn't endorse polygamy opposes marriage equality.

DNF

“Judge less, Love more”

Since: Apr 07

Born in Newark Ohio

#2618 Nov 23, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
You still don't get it. Poof makes posts he doesn't like go "Poof". It's not for violations of TOS, it's for spite. Just because he can. Today he decided to be a bit honorable and not an icehole like usual.
When he does it it happens to all my posts for the day on all threads. If you see my posts, Poof is not being such a punk that day.
Get an argument. Sure you don't like me. But you have no on topic arguments, you're a troll.
oh please. if anyone here had that kind of power to censor no one would ever see Kimare here +again.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#2619 Nov 23, 2013
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>oh please. if anyone here had that kind of power to censor no one would ever see Kimare here +again.
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/gay/TK0EA9RFQ...
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#2620 Nov 23, 2013
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>where did you get the idea I oppose polygamy?
What I oppose is saying that anyone who doesn't endorse polygamy opposes marriage equality.
Do you oppose someone saying that anyone who doesn't support SSM opposes marriage equality?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#2621 Nov 24, 2013
DNF wrote:
<quoted text>oh please. if anyone here had that kind of power to censor no one would ever see Kimare here +again.
"Continually a kind of 'desperate logic' from you.

When you bring up the instances where some heterosexuals are infertile and use that to rationalize homosexuality you are demonstrating very poor critical thinking skills. Sorry to be so blunt but it's bleeding far too heavy to leave unaddressed.

I've already discussed the two components nature uses to promote itself: ability and willingness. In the example of the infertile heterosexual, there is indeed a biological defect: he does not have ability to reproduce.

It's been long established that nature is not without flaw -this is hardly a surprise. In ALLl members, straight or gay, there are persons who are infertile (and in both sexualities there are members that don't care to date or just end up alone, etc..,)-WE GET THAT.

But the difference that is SHOUTINGLY obvious even considering cases of infertility, is that the heterosexual method may result in reproduction say, 90% of the time. In the homosexual method reproduction has never, let me emphasize: N E V E R occurred.

It's baking with 9 pieces coming out and the 10th a failure versus the method where the tray ALWAYS comes out empty.

Homosexuality cannot produce offspring. In procreation the genes of the parents are passed (naturally or even artificially) to the child. AGAIN this is why there can be NO QUESTION: homosexuality is an evolutionary defect.

Which brings us to another absurd comment of yours; gays can procreate.

Even in an artificial scenario, HOW are the parents of those two gay men or two gay women passed to the child? Maybe gay Rob might use Sara as a surrogate to simulate a sexual reproduction (notice a member of the opposite sex is involved). BUT either way, WHERE IS ROB'S BOYFRIEND'S genes in this equation?!? The child that results will have NO RELATION WHATSOEVER TO ROB'S boyfriend; not even the tiniest twinkle in his eye.

So even in artificially induced conditions, two dads or two moms ARE NOT producing a child together. If the champion to the homosexual's way to obviate reproduction is through artificial means, the best that can come of it is one parent doomed to have no genetic relation to the child whatsoever. This is HARDLY "homosexual procreation" (and I can imagine for the one member who has the genetic relation to the child that is equivalent to a perfect stranger; it must be often be disheartening).

Again, heterosexuality potentially can and usually does result in reproduction -and a reproduction that enjoys having both parents genetic legacy in the child, homosexuality cannot do EITHER.

I can't imagine why you brought up such squalid reasoning?

Finally, I'll address another ridiculous comment you've been echoing: Why is behavior centered around reproduction so important?

For the "little reason" that THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE DEPENDS ON IT.

Every person you see around you came about from the heterosexual method; obviously this includes YOU. For you to be brazen enough to minimize the very process that created you but instead support the behavior that actually bottle caps procreation, is truly a disgrace. Talk about biting the hand that fed you!

Really you can't possibly be this dim...

lides

“No Headline available”

Since: Jan 08

Defiance, Ohio

#2622 Nov 24, 2013
KiMare wrote:
"Continually a kind of 'desperate logic' from you.
When you bring up the instances where some heterosexuals are infertile and use that to rationalize homosexuality you are demonstrating very poor critical thinking skills. Sorry to be so blunt but it's bleeding far too heavy to leave unaddressed.
I've already discussed the two components nature uses to promote itself: ability and willingness. In the example of the infertile heterosexual, there is indeed a biological defect: he does not have ability to reproduce.
It's been long established that nature is not without flaw -this is hardly a surprise. In ALLl members, straight or gay, there are persons who are infertile (and in both sexualities there are members that don't care to date or just end up alone, etc..,)-WE GET THAT.
But the difference that is SHOUTINGLY obvious even considering cases of infertility, is that the heterosexual method may result in reproduction say, 90% of the time. In the homosexual method reproduction has never, let me emphasize: N E V E R occurred.
It's baking with 9 pieces coming out and the 10th a failure versus the method where the tray ALWAYS comes out empty.
Homosexuality cannot produce offspring. In procreation the genes of the parents are passed (naturally or even artificially) to the child. AGAIN this is why there can be NO QUESTION: homosexuality is an evolutionary defect.
Which brings us to another absurd comment of yours; gays can procreate.
Even in an artificial scenario, HOW are the parents of those two gay men or two gay women passed to the child? Maybe gay Rob might use Sara as a surrogate to simulate a sexual reproduction (notice a member of the opposite sex is involved). BUT either way, WHERE IS ROB'S BOYFRIEND'S genes in this equation?!? The child that results will have NO RELATION WHATSOEVER TO ROB'S boyfriend; not even the tiniest twinkle in his eye.
So even in artificially induced conditions, two dads or two moms ARE NOT producing a child together. If the champion to the homosexual's way to obviate reproduction is through artificial means, the best that can come of it is one parent doomed to have no genetic relation to the child whatsoever. This is HARDLY "homosexual procreation" (and I can imagine for the one member who has the genetic relation to the child that is equivalent to a perfect stranger; it must be often be disheartening).
Again, heterosexuality potentially can and usually does result in reproduction -and a reproduction that enjoys having both parents genetic legacy in the child, homosexuality cannot do EITHER.
I can't imagine why you brought up such squalid reasoning?
Finally, I'll address another ridiculous comment you've been echoing: Why is behavior centered around reproduction so important?
For the "little reason" that THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE DEPENDS ON IT.
Every person you see around you came about from the heterosexual method; obviously this includes YOU. For you to be brazen enough to minimize the very process that created you but instead support the behavior that actually bottle caps procreation, is truly a disgrace. Talk about biting the hand that fed you!
Really you can't possibly be this dim...
It is an argument made by an idiot, full of words and rationalizations, signifying nothing.

The reality remains that procreation, or even the ability to procreate, is neither a prerequisite for, nor a requirement of legal marriage.

If same sex couples are allowed to legally marry heterosexuals will still be able to procreate.

What, pray tell, does procreation have to do with education, or schools addressing that homosexuals exist and deserve the same respect and decency as anyone else? No one has proven that anything more dastardly than that is being taught in schools.

Since: Feb 09

Location hidden

#2623 Nov 24, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
you are demonstrating very poor critical thinking skills.
pot/kettle

“Take Topix Back From Trolls”

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#2624 Nov 24, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The reality remains, homosexuality is an evolutionary defect, and ss marriage is an oxymoron.
Neither one is going to stop happening. So what are you going to do about it other than chatter on and make yourself appear the fool?

“Take Topix Back From Trolls”

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#2625 Nov 24, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
"For the "little reason" that THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE DEPENDS ON IT....
Bullshit. Homosexuality has been in existence forever in the worlds human and non human structure. Never has it stopped or even slowed the reproduction of any species. You're simply full of crap and junk science. There are already too many people in the world, some of which we could well do without. Check your mirror.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#2626 Nov 24, 2013
Poof wrote:
<quoted text>wops dagos so now what?
Nice! Who else do you hate?

“Busting Kimare's”

Since: Feb 13

Clitty

#2627 Nov 24, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The reality remains, homosexuality is an evolutionary defect, and ss marriage is an oxymoron.
How's your reality workin' for you, Greg? Have you stopped any SSM's lately, or have you prevented any state legislatures from adopting SSM?
I
M
P
O
T
E
N
T

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Doritos makes rainbow chips in support of gay r... (Sep '15) 13 min guest 1,021
News Washington court rules against florist in gay w... 43 min Retribution 38
News Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 1 hr Just Think 36,044
News Scott Lively Calls On Trump To Ban Gays From In... 4 hr Shirvell s Shrivel 1
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 4 hr River Tam 44,894
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 5 hr Constitution 101 24,709
News Tennessee Lawmakers Filing Anti-Gay Marriage Bi... 6 hr Shirvell s Shrivel 8
More from around the web