Colorado leaders seek gay-marriage re...

Colorado leaders seek gay-marriage resolution

There are 8 comments on the story from Jul 2, 2014, titled Colorado leaders seek gay-marriage resolution. In it, reports that:

Democratic Gov. John Hickenlooper and Republican Attorney General John Suthers asked a federal court Wednesday to issue an injunction declaring Colorado's same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional.

Join the discussion below, or

david traversa

Cordoba, Argentina

#1 Jul 2, 2014
In the bag .. Another terrible day for bigots and Pseudo-Christians ..
Marcavage s Emission

Philadelphia, PA

#2 Jul 2, 2014
Asuthers day, asuthers pro lgbt development in asuthers state.
Belle Sexton

San Francisco, CA

#3 Jul 2, 2014
Will wonders never cease !!!
View of Eternity

Honolulu, HI

#4 Jul 3, 2014
Folks, are you looking at this?
View of Eternity

Honolulu, HI

#5 Jul 3, 2014
Belle Sexton

San Francisco, CA

#6 Jul 3, 2014
Let's remember ...


“Together for 24, legal for 5”

Since: Sep 07

Littleton, NH

#7 Jul 3, 2014
View of Eternity wrote: /12873-after-hobby-lobby-relig ious-groups-are-seeking-the-ri ght-to-not-hire-gay-people
= =Uln3NEVn-M0XX
That's what this was really about all along. The Greens don't actually care about contraception. Their health plan covered it before the Obamacare mandate. They only got upset because their radical religionist friends saw an opportunity.

The company invests in companies that manufacture contraceptives, and they've made no effort to divest. They buy goods from China, which government not only pays for abortion but forces women to undergo abortion under their strict population control doctrine.

This was never anything less than a mechanism to sneak religion into corporate law. The five men who voted for this assured us that it will go no further. These are the same men who chuckled at the idea Citizens United would unleash huge political spending and influence, and political spending immediately multiplied. These are the same men who assured us that voting rights would be secure without important oversight provided in the VRA, then did nothing as half-a-dozen states immediately changed rules to make voting harder for targeted minorities.

And now they want us to trust them that nothing bad will happen when religion and corporate law are mixed?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#8 Jul 3, 2014
One more for the good guys.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The gay cafe for GLBT, friends and family (Oct '09) 5 min NE Jade 69,379
Will Jade get er'm Freak on this weekend? 9 min NE Jade 7
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 18 min TomInElPaso 41,629
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 54 min who cares 20,488
News Group: Terre Haute scores low on LGBT index 1 hr Don hyde 2
News Mormon and gay: Church says that's no contradic... 6 hr Demon Finder 18
News How the 2016 Election Has Exposed Racism in the... 8 hr Roland 10
More from around the web