Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 20 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41359 Jul 15, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
I delete (you call it "censor") most of your posts because they aren't worth repeating. Why waste perfectly good internet space with your BS?
I CAN know what is it like to be married, because I am. Our family knows that we're married and our government knows that we're married.
You've still got nothing more than opinions regarding SSM.
Troll on, Kuntmary.
You lie. You censor them because the truth exposes your denial.

You don't know what the union of two genders is. You don't know the reality of that union bearing a related child. Your relationship NEVER will.

You have a fake, inferior substitute.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41360 Jul 15, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
Heavens no, and a heterosexual couple is obviously not the same as marriage. Couples and marriage are two entirely different things, Kunty.
However, two non-related consenting adults of any gender in a loving relationship with a civil or Church ceremony DO make a marriage.
Yup, it's just that simple.
Troll on, Kuntymary.
You censored to cover your denial again.

SS couples and marriage are not the same.

Moreover, related couples of the opposite sex can marry.

Couples of the same gender are not even half of a marriage.

Your denial is making you an idiot.
King Samir Shabazz

UK

#41361 Jul 15, 2013
Quest for Trayvon wrote:
<quoted text>
The federal government disagrees with you.
Accept it.
The Government is totally corrupt,(Black Panthers with billy clubs get a pass - operatives are sent to Florida to demonize Zimmerman), which means you're not really accepted at all.

Keep believing the Lie, stainboi.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
laughing man

UK

#41362 Jul 15, 2013
CDC wrote:
AGENDASLAME - Agendists are constantly hating on those with differing opinions.
<quoted text>
It's how mental cripples celebrate Diversity, don'tcha know? You show your superior bigotry by calling others bigots.

Such incredible intellectualism leads to bug chasing and hoarding samples of drapes.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41365 Jul 16, 2013
AGENDADRAPER - When the agendist becomes jealous of another persons drape samples.

Judged:

13

13

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41370 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare'a wrote; The hatred, ignorance and bigotry is all yours.
I simply and accurately point out that ss couples and marriage are not the same.
I simply and accurately point out that a child with their father and mother is nature's design. It is by far, the best setting for a child. No setting, absent at least one natural parent and always absent one gender, is equal.
I simply and accurately point out that marriage with it's benefits and protections, was primarily designed for mothers and their children.
You are not demanding equality, that is impossible. In a vain attempt to satisfy an innate insecurity, ss couples demand we accept their denial.
You can call your relationship anything you want to. But reality clearly calls it a bogus marriage.
<quoted text>
Too funny! Is that why you censored my post?
You can't even KNOW what it is like to be married with your duplicate partner!
LOL
You are hilarious and OBVIOUSLY uneducated. No surprise. Marriage was "designed" to legally keep property in the family. The women were considered part of the property.

Nature didn't "design" anything, you dolt.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41371 Jul 17, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
You are hilarious and OBVIOUSLY uneducated. No surprise. Marriage was "designed" to legally keep property in the family. The women were considered part of the property.
Nature didn't "design" anything, you dolt.
Wrong. Government participation was to secure support for the mother and children.

As to nature, among diverse genders, a mother and father are always required for children. You didn't know that?
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41372 Jul 17, 2013
AGENDOLT - when the agendist has trouble understanding a different opinion then lashes out
with name calling ( example: dolt ).
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41373 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. Government participation was to secure support for the mother and children.
Wrong, but that never stopped you from holding erroneous positions before. Do you really think you can bullshit everybody? I guess being a "pastor" has made you a little immune to facts, eh? Marriage was about property rights. The 'mother' was considered property, as were the children. This isn't a secret or new information. Anyone who has picked up a cultural anthropology textbook knows this.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41374 Jul 17, 2013
CDC wrote:
AGENDOLT - when the agendist has trouble understanding a different opinion then lashes out
with name calling ( example: dolt ).
Example: CDC, the queen dolt.

I understand the opinion. It is factually incorrect.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41375 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
As to nature, among diverse genders, a mother and father are always required for children. You didn't know that?
"Mother" and "Father" ??????????

Really?

Hardly the proper words to use. How about male and female? Do you really think fish have "fathers?" They came to be through sperm donation... hardly the same thing. But then semantics games are all you have.... and your phony, self-serving definitions. You're such a philistine.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41376 Jul 17, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, but that never stopped you from holding erroneous positions before. Do you really think you can bullshit everybody? I guess being a "pastor" has made you a little immune to facts, eh? Marriage was about property rights. The 'mother' was considered property, as were the children. This isn't a secret or new information. Anyone who has picked up a cultural anthropology textbook knows this.
I am aware that property was united under the husbands authority in early American law. I am not aware of wives being considered 'property'. If the husband died first, the wife retained possession of the property. Children were under the guardianship of the parents, and hardly equated to property.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#41377 Jul 17, 2013
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
"Mother" and "Father" ??????????
Really?
Hardly the proper words to use. How about male and female? Do you really think fish have "fathers?" They came to be through sperm donation... hardly the same thing. But then semantics games are all you have.... and your phony, self-serving definitions. You're such a philistine.
Since you aren't quibbling about semantics, nature still requires both genders, a specific design.
LOVe

Las Vegas, NV

#41378 Jul 17, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Since you aren't quibbling about semantics, nature still requires both genders, a specific design.
GOD LOVES YOU..
Irving

UK

#41379 Jul 17, 2013
Like You Care wrote:
<quoted text>
You are hilarious and OBVIOUSLY uneducated. No surprise. Marriage was "designed" to legally keep property in the family. The women were considered part of the property.
Nature didn't "design" anything, you dolt.
Yep, homosexuals are one of Evolution's miserable failures.
progressive coffee table

UK

#41380 Jul 17, 2013
Herr Feratu wrote:
<quoted text> You're such a philistine.
Der Schlie▀muskel werden Sie zur Erleuchtung bringen!!!!

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41381 Jul 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I am aware that property was united under the husbands authority in early American law. I am not aware of wives being considered 'property'. If the husband died first, the wife retained possession of the property. Children were under the guardianship of the parents, and hardly equated to property.
OH, I see.... jumping into the MIDDLE of the marriage evolution, eh? Picking up where it serves YOUR purpose, eh?
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41382 Jul 18, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Since you aren't quibbling about semantics, nature still requires both genders, a specific design.
Not a design... geez, but you are clueless.

By the way,'nature' has NOTHING to do with marriage.
Rose Feratu

Hoboken, NJ

#41383 Jul 18, 2013
Irving wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, homosexuals are one of Evolution's miserable failures.
Really? Then why have there always been about 10% homosexuals across time and all cultures?
CDC

Saint Louis, MO

#41384 Jul 18, 2013
AGENDASTANDING - when the agendist says they understand a different opinion buy actually are so caught up in their own warped world they
have completely lost all comprehension.
Rose Feratu wrote:
<quoted text>
Example: CDC, the queen dolt.
I understand the opinion. It is factually incorrect.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
random stuff 21 min Belle Sexton 14
News Woman Files Federal Suit Against All Gays 24 min Forester 47
News Conservative Columnist Guy Benson Says He's Gay 26 min Forester 10
News Gay marriage foe's argument seems to leave Supr... 26 min Belle Sexton 180
News Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 35 min Belle Sexton 32,410
News Judge proposes Oregon bakery pay $135,000 to le... 50 min Wondering 575
News Mormon church backs Utah LGBT anti-discriminati... 51 min Belle Sexton 3,199
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 55 min Wondering 20,751
News Gay marriage (Mar '13) 4 hr Belle Sexton 59,654
Are the mods fair and balanced? 8 hr Frankie Rizzo 851
More from around the web