dude, this is not up for debate, the FACT is that it say your side argued that procreation must be required of all straights if gays are going to be denied on that basis and the court said, nope, that is the exception swallowing the rule...<quoted text>
It says heteros can't be REQUIRED to prove an ability or willingness to procreate.
It say NOTHING about gays not being ALLOWED the same exception.
The language simply IS NOT THERE.
You are denying the central holding...that's not arguing, its being ill prepared!