Sen. Rand Paul mocks Obama, says his views couldn't 'get any gayer’

May 13, 2012 Full story: thehill.com 186

GOP Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.) on Saturday blasted President Obama's decision to endorse same-sex marriage, mocking the president's claim that the announcement was the result of years of personal reflection.

“Call me cynical, but I wasn’t sure his views on marriage could get any gayer,” said Paul, in remarks to the Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition dinner, first reported by the Des Moines Register.

"It did kind of bother me though that he used the justification for it in a biblical reference," Paul continued. "He said the biblical golden rule caused him to be for gay marriage. And I'm like what version of the Bible is he reading… I don't know what version he's getting it from." Full Story
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#157 May 16, 2012
WelbyMD wrote:
<quoted text>THE original anti-christ who rules for 42mos.
Illegal-alien Obama was indeed born a Brit in Kenya before being adopted in Indonesia.
He went to Occidental & Columbia as a foreign student & travelled to Pakistan in 1981 on a foreign passport. He married Michelle to avoid deportation. He is using a stolen Social Security number & forged hawaiian Birth Certificate. ONLY the worldwide secret society Freemasons could have pulled this off.
hahahaha
ahahahahah
ahhahahah
ahahahhaha

Whack-a-doodle-do!

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#158 May 16, 2012
Your tinfoil hat really becomes you.
StellarKnight wrote:
Yah! I want to see it.''
Seeing is believing.
The White Houses own little dweebs frolicing about with their 'girlfriends' all snuggly buggly prancing about the Rose Garden.
DO YOU Realize how far DOWN this evolution spoken of descends?

“THERE IS NO GOD”

Since: Feb 09

Northern California

#160 May 16, 2012
Pagan and Proud: That discussion takes place before you actually have sex without a condom or birth control.

ALAN: Perhaps in a perfect world, but we do not live in a perfect world, maybe you live in a perfect world, do you?

P&P: So, you were willing to wrangle a child regardless of her feelings?

ALAN: I was willing to do what it takes to save my childs life.

P&P: If she's not willing to carry it, she certainly isn't willing to be a mother, but you were going to force that on her? What a Piece of work.

ALAN: If you knew what was going on here you would not be grasping for straws to try to make me look like a fascist instead of a Libertarian. I was very clear that my sister would have accepted the fertilized egg which would have been an almost identical medical proceedure as the abortion she wanted someone else to pay for.

P&P: AH you mean the THEORETICAL one that hasn't actually been done?

ALAN: What are you talking about? Fertilized eggs have been inplanted inside females who have carried them to term. Did I mention that my sister had already done that? My brother and his wife have children that are biologically theirs even though his wife has never given birth or been pregnate. Now my sister has given birth to 3 babies none of which were hers or her husbands.

This might be a good way for gay people to have babies. It really is not all that complicated at all. Well, except for the legal stuff.

P&P: Actually the Issue has already been handled. It's called Roe V Wade.

ALAN: Roe vs Wade can be over turned.

“I will not go quietly.”

Since: Feb 07

Indianapolis Indiana

#161 May 16, 2012
Reverend Alan wrote:
Pagan and Proud: That discussion takes place before you actually have sex without a condom or birth control.
ALAN: Perhaps in a perfect world, but we do not live in a perfect world, maybe you live in a perfect world, do you?
Actually, considering that with MY sexual partners, if you don't ask the pertinent questions you get a long, lingering death or expensive meds for the rest of your life, I ask questions.
Reverend Alan wrote:
P&P: So, you were willing to wrangle a child regardless of her feelings?
ALAN: I was willing to do what it takes to save my childs life.
Except remember to ask if the mother wanted to be a mother...
Reverend Alan wrote:
P&P: If she's not willing to carry it, she certainly isn't willing to be a mother, but you were going to force that on her? What a Piece of work.
ALAN: If you knew what was going on here you would not be grasping for straws to try to make me look like a fascist instead of a Libertarian. I was very clear that my sister would have accepted the fertilized egg which would have been an almost identical medical proceedure as the abortion she wanted someone else to pay for.
All determined AFTER the fact, And NO after the egg has implanted there is NOT a way to move it to another womb.
Reverend Alan wrote:
ALAN: What are you talking about? Fertilized eggs have been inplanted inside females who have carried them to term. Did I mention that my sister had already done that? My brother and his wife have children that are biologically theirs even though his wife has never given birth or been pregnate. Now my sister has given birth to 3 babies none of which were hers or her husbands.
This might be a good way for gay people to have babies.
With so many THOUSANDS of children needing loving families why should anyone wish to produce more?
Reverend Alan wrote:
It really is not all that complicated at all. Well, except for the legal stuff.
And you forget one very major detail, once the egg is implanted it cannot be removed, which was the case with your wife. Without implantation there is no abortion.
Reverend Alan wrote:
P&P: Actually the Issue has already been handled. It's called Roe V Wade.
ALAN: Roe vs Wade can be over turned.
That is very difficult to do and such efforts can be and should be fought at every level. Overturning Roe V Wade will NOT decrease the number of abortions, it WILL increase the number of abortions done in Back-alleys killing the mother in the process.

“THERE IS NO GOD”

Since: Feb 09

Northern California

#162 May 16, 2012
Truthseeker998 wrote:... but I don't get being gay either.

ALAN: I am not convinced you would like to understand how it happens that a gay person wakes up one day, has an epiphaney that he is gay and always have been, followed by the panic; what if someone finds out. Every child in the world knows what its society thinks about members of the same sex enjoying each others time together and now they realize they are a part of that dispised minority. Most of the gays I know have successfully said,'suck the world, I am gonna be me.''No stupid bronze aged book is going to tell me to lay down and be murdered.' Others kill themselves rather than experience the hate they expect they will receive from their parents, friends and relatives.

But what you are missing, and you pew warmers always miss, is the fact that when two men want to have sex with one another it is a peaceful and mutually agreeable contract between two consenting adults; it is voluntary and freely entered into.

Now look at your examples below and ask if both parties freely engage and are volunteers in the activity.

TruthSeeker998: If I were a pedophile would you give me equal rights too? They can't help it, they were born that way.

ALAN: Why do you think anyone has a right to use force, or the threat of force against another human being and that that is the same thing as two mutually consenting volunteers entering into an agreement?

Why can't you see the difference between the force of the rapist and the consent of two adults? Why do you mix them together as if they were not opposites; force vs coeerion?

You probably don't think there is any difference between raping your wife and the two of you wanting to have sex with one another. In the first case your wife is the victim and in the second there is no victim, just like if it were two men.

You intentionally want to keep this cloudy so that other pew warmers can not understand the huge difference.

TruthSeeker: What about a bisexual polygamist? Should they be able to marry several men and women and should all of them have equal rights?

ALAN: If all parties involved consent to being married to one another it is none of your pew warming bible reading business.

The problem is NOT with people having cosentual sex with one another the problem is with reading the Bible.

TruthSeeker: Should they all be on the head of the households insurance? Should they all be dependents on their taxes? Or is there by some chance you think that behavior is abnormal?

ALAN: If you think it is abnormal then explain what is abnormal about it. Everyone is doing it already [or wanting to] only behind the back of the one person they are allowed to marry legally. Our government forces people to be dishonest with their spouce.

In church a marriage is most likely between a man and a woman, but in the eyes of the law a marriage should be between those who wish to be married to one another. No force is being used and none of the parties invovled are complaining. Therefor it is none of the church's business if two men want to get married under the law.

“THERE IS NO GOD”

Since: Feb 09

Northern California

#163 May 16, 2012
Typo's, but you know what I meant.

“THERE IS NO GOD”

Since: Feb 09

Northern California

#164 May 16, 2012
Pagan and Proud wrote:
<quoted text>Actually, considering that with MY sexual partners, if you don't ask the pertinent questions you get a long, lingering death or expensive meds for the rest of your life, I ask questions.
ALAN: And then the problem arises, do you believe the answers.

“I will not go quietly.”

Since: Feb 07

Indianapolis Indiana

#165 May 16, 2012
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
ALAN: And then the problem arises, do you believe the answers.
Which is really off the topic and irrelevant. The topic is the relevant, responsible discussion, which apparently you didn't have and now wish to blame someone else for your mistake.

“THERE IS NO GOD”

Since: Feb 09

Northern California

#166 May 16, 2012
Pagan and Proud wrote:
<quoted text>With so many THOUSANDS of children needing loving families why should anyone wish to produce more?
Not every one believes as you do, obviously.

“THERE IS NO GOD”

Since: Feb 09

Northern California

#167 May 16, 2012
Pagan and Proud wrote:
<quoted text>That is very difficult to do and such efforts can be and should be fought at every level. Overturning Roe V Wade will NOT decrease the number of abortions, it WILL increase the number of abortions done in Back-alleys killing the mother in the process.
Those bible reading pew warming cretins do not care about the results or the consequences, of the laws they pass. They only care about appearences; does it look like they are doing what God would be pleased with, do their fellow believers see them as perfect little angels; Facts can go screw themself.

Facts have never mattered to the pew warmer who's only concern is how they appear in public, and they do not care who's rights they step on to get the spot light of public approval on them. Facts are just little irritations that get in the way. Which is why when facts are called for, they just make something up.

I wasn't born yesterday P&P, as your replies seem to indicate you believe.

“I will not go quietly.”

Since: Feb 07

Indianapolis Indiana

#168 May 16, 2012
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
Not every one believes as you do, obviously.
And that still has no bearing on the facts.

“I will not go quietly.”

Since: Feb 07

Indianapolis Indiana

#169 May 16, 2012
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
Those bible reading pew warming cretins do not care about the results or the consequences, of the laws they pass. They only care about appearences; does it look like they are doing what God would be pleased with, do their fellow believers see them as perfect little angels; Facts can go screw themself.
Facts get things overturned, emotional outbursts simply make people seem like jackasses.
Reverend Alan wrote:
Facts have never mattered to the pew warmer who's only concern is how they appear in public, and they do not care who's rights they step on to get the spot light of public approval on them. Facts are just little irritations that get in the way. Which is why when facts are called for, they just make something up.
I wasn't born yesterday P&P, as your replies seem to indicate you believe.
If you weren't then you would realize facts matter.

Since: Feb 10

Location hidden

#171 May 16, 2012
Pagan and Proud wrote:
<quoted text>Slanderous insinuations show that your Homophobia and hate runs deep.
wow...those are some pretty big words there...are you =certain you have the intellect to back them up?

so now my freedom of opinion and speach known as a morally repugnant reaction is deemed hate by you and your ilk?

Since: Feb 10

Location hidden

#172 May 16, 2012
Proud are you?

what is the source of your self absorbed pride?

Got any merits you wish to share?

Since: Feb 10

Location hidden

#173 May 16, 2012
Here is Obama's new Campain Bumper Sticker...

FORWARD....(_!_)

Since: Feb 10

Location hidden

#174 May 16, 2012
you don't want to mess with me or my opine sweetheart.

I will reach through the computer screen and pinch your pseudo intellectual head off.
Wade

United States

#175 May 16, 2012
Pagan and Proud wrote:
<quoted text>Obviously not, they aren't being fooled by conservative claptrap and aren't believing for an instant the Propaganda people like yourself are selling. The "Hope and Change" are working out quite a bit better than the B!tch and Whine you people keep offering in your attempt to swerve everything back to your corporate masters commands.
So, looking at unemployment rates, crime rates, tax rates, National Debt, and morality, you think Hope and Change is working out well?
Vote for the Antichrist again . You'll get just what the Jewish people got when they fell for Hitler's Hope and Change platform.

“I will not go quietly.”

Since: Feb 07

Indianapolis Indiana

#176 May 17, 2012
StellarKnight wrote:
<quoted text>
wow...those are some pretty big words there...are you =certain you have the intellect to back them up?
so now my freedom of opinion and speach known as a morally repugnant reaction is deemed hate by you and your ilk?
Freedom of opinion works both ways and freedom of speech also allows for morally repugnant and possibly libelous comments to not only be pointed out but to be shown as the hateful material that it is.

“I will not go quietly.”

Since: Feb 07

Indianapolis Indiana

#177 May 17, 2012
StellarKnight wrote:
Proud are you?
what is the source of your self absorbed pride?
Got any merits you wish to share?
Pride in oneself is a positive aspect of ones own self-image. The self-absorption would be your projection of your own issues onto others.

“I will not go quietly.”

Since: Feb 07

Indianapolis Indiana

#178 May 17, 2012
StellarKnight wrote:
Here is Obama's new Campain Bumper Sticker...
FORWARD....(_!_)
No actually it isn't, but juvenile (and misspelled) trolling from you is expected.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
SF gay pride event celebrates 40th anniversary (Jun '10) 6 min Anonymous 97
What if high court rejects gay marriage cases? 7 min Fa-Foxy 6
Anti-gay Tenn. billboard stirs religion debate 37 min WelbyMD 684
The Worst Mass Murder Of Gay People In US History 42 min NE Jade 2
Allowing Blood Donations From Gay Men Could Hel... 46 min WelbyMD 296
Questions linger on gay Boy Scout leaders as Ga... 47 min NE Jade 3
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr KiMare 50,060
Board member opposes teaching definition of gay 1 hr NorCal Native 129
State of Alaska defends gay-marriage ban 2 hr eJohn 164
Is Polygamy the Next Gay Marriage? 2 hr Reverend Alan 2,270
Gay Marriage and the Limits of Tradition 3 hr WeTheSheeple 1,030
What if high court rejects gay marriage cases? 8 hr Fundies R Mentall... 12

Gay/Lesbian People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE