Republicans Spend $3 Million Fighting Gay Marriage Instead Of..

Jan 28, 2013 Full story: Gay.com 37

In case you didn't know, the U.S. House Republicans recently approved up to $3 million to continue defending the so-called Defense of Marriage Act in federal court.

Full Story
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Since: Mar 07

Woodford, VA

#1 Jan 28, 2013
Amazing isn't it?

They believe it is MORE important to harm American taxpayers than it is to actually do anything about the deficit, or cut spending.

They argue every minute detail of ANY plan the Obama comes up with, but have NO problem throwing money away to preserve a law that harms Citizens, their families, and results in MORE people needing those entitlements they whine about.

Priceless.

This is today's Republican party.

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#2 Jan 28, 2013
How many underwater families could have been saved from rent-serfdom with that money?

Since: Dec 08

Toronto, ON, Canada

#3 Jan 28, 2013
Just think, they could have given all that money to the oil industry instead!
Schultz

United States

#4 Jan 28, 2013
They need to spend a lot more!
Chance

Grove City, PA

#5 Jan 28, 2013
So you all think the money should have been spent to promote socialism rather than defending the most time-honored, God-given basic building block of society, which is also as immutable as gravity? No surprises there.
Troll-Lover

Greensboro, NC

#6 Jan 28, 2013
"Immutable as gravity" One, single word response, which is the EXCEPTIONAL majority to your "immutable" straight marriage:

D I V O R C E

You're full of lies and silliness.
Chance wrote:
So you all think the money should have been spent to promote socialism rather than defending the most time-honored, God-given basic building block of society, which is also as immutable as gravity? No surprises there.

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#7 Jan 28, 2013
AMEN Brother!
Troll-Lover wrote:
"Immutable as gravity" One, single word response, which is the EXCEPTIONAL majority to your "immutable" straight marriage:
D I V O R C E
You're full of lies and silliness.
<quoted text>

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

#8 Jan 28, 2013
Quest wrote:
Amazing isn't it?
They believe it is MORE important to harm American taxpayers than it is to actually do anything about the deficit, or cut spending.
They argue every minute detail of ANY plan the Obama comes up with, but have NO problem throwing money away to preserve a law that harms Citizens, their families, and results in MORE people needing those entitlements they whine about.
Priceless.
This is today's Republican party.
Yup.'Business as usual'

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

#9 Jan 28, 2013
Schultz wrote:
They need to spend a lot more!
That money could have been used to neuter your old skank whore mother, keep her from getting pregnant after mating with stray dogs and coyotes. Any women who could produce an abomination like you should NOT be reproducing.

Too bad they can't legalize retroactive abortion and use it on you...you might look cute with a coat hanger in your head.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#10 Jan 28, 2013
And that 3 million is in addition to the money already spent. At least they can keep their rich friends rich on taxpayer dollars, as usual. Harming others needlessly pays well.

“Some people are gay - get over”

Since: Apr 08

Reading PA

#11 Jan 28, 2013
Schultz wrote:
They need to spend a lot more!
You mean they need to WASTE a lot more.

Since: Oct 10

San Francisco

#12 Jan 28, 2013
Chance wrote:
So you all think the money should have been spent to promote socialism rather than defending the most time-honored, God-given basic building block of society, which is also as immutable as gravity? No surprises there.
Another absurdly inaccurate comment, which demonstrates there is nothing quite as immutable as your stupidity. No surprises there.
David Traversa

Argentina

#13 Jan 28, 2013
Money that could well have gone to feed millions of starving children around the world.. These people are really unspeakably vicious and thoughtless..
David Traversa

Argentina

#14 Jan 28, 2013
Curteese wrote:
<quoted text>That money could have been used to neuter your old skank whore mother, keep her from getting pregnant after mating with stray dogs and coyotes. Any women who could produce an abomination like you should NOT be reproducing.
Too bad they can't legalize retroactive abortion and use it on you...you might look cute with a coat hanger in your head.
Crushing!!

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

#15 Jan 28, 2013
David Traversa wrote:
Money that could well have gone to feed millions of starving children around the world.. These people are really unspeakably vicious and thoughtless..
WOW. Not much different then the Catholic church!

“THERE IS NO GOD”

Since: Feb 09

Northern California

#16 Jan 28, 2013
David Traversa wrote:
Money that could well have gone to feed millions of starving children around the world.. These people are really unspeakably vicious and thoughtless..
They are Christians.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#18 Jan 28, 2013
The Boy Scout wrote:
<quoted text>
Pot meet kettle! I believe it is mainly the presidents job to reduce the deficit. After all, he said before his first term he'd cut it in half. In 2006 he said we shouldn't raise the debt ceiling for it would burden our childrens future. Now he raised the debt ceiling, again! A better question would be how much did DEMOCRATS waste on defending such a preposterous cause such as ss anything? Someone has had there priorities list upside down and it is going to be an ugly year. See what happens when one supports much time on querty? The brain turns to mush.
Fails to provide any justification for wasting tax dollars defending an unconstitutional, harmful, and needless law.

“What Goes Around, Comes Around”

Since: Mar 07

Kansas City, MO.

#20 Jan 28, 2013
The Boy Scout wrote:
<quoted text>
Pot meet kettle! I believe it is mainly the presidents job to reduce the deficit. After all, he said before his first term he'd cut it in half. In 2006 he said we shouldn't raise the debt ceiling for it would burden our childrens future. Now he raised the debt ceiling, again! A better question would be how much did DEMOCRATS waste on defending such a preposterous cause such as ss anything? Someone has had there priorities list upside down and it is going to be an ugly year. See what happens when one supports much time on querty? The brain turns to mush.
and the Republicans waste more time trying to stop ssm then they do on the economy. Talk about upside down list and mushy brain.=)

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#25 Jan 28, 2013
Irrational fear mongering which relies on pejorative terminology fails to provide any legitimate governmental interest sufficient for harming others by refusing to treat them as you would yourself, under the law.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

#27 Jan 28, 2013
The Boy Scout wrote:
Homosexuality has proven way more dangerous to heterosexuals for decades physically, morally, socially, and spiritually.
LOL. Do gay people emit "gay rays" that break down the flesh of straight people and cause them to rob banks?
The Boy Scout wrote:
Homosexuality does not champion the natural order of the family structure only to choose and pick up the pieces of other peoples failures or frailties.
Was that an assignment were you were told to use the words "failures" and "frailties" in a sentence? Well, your teacher should have let you know the sentence should make some kind of sense.
The Boy Scout wrote:
Taking the mommy out of mother and daddy out of father.
The deconstruction of marriage and the family structure thanks to a party that promotes and condones failure and subversive behavior only then to throw up their arms in disbelief when someone goes 'ballistic'
The laws, taxes, regulations, central bank, and policies set forth by these infidels are more dangerous than any weapon held by any citizen of this land.
Not even you are THAT stupid.
Your homophobia is caused by your inability to deal with your own same sex attractions.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jindal defends January prayer rally at LSU campus 3 min Le Duped 7
Is Polygamy the Next Gay Marriage? 31 min Reverend Alan 4,275
Anti-gay Tenn. billboard stirs religion debate 51 min Cowobunga 2,794
The Thursday Morning NE Jade Thread 55 min Rentboy Robbie 2
Alaska's 1st known gay marriage in Arctic town 1 hr Cletus 18
Why (R1) Righteous One is a POS (Dec '12) 1 hr Cletus 76
Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 3 hr Static Charge 26,601
Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 6 hr KiMerde 5,267
Next gay marriage fight: religious exemptions 8 hr Mikey 4,941
More from around the web