Maryland Gay Marriage Could Hinge on ...

Maryland Gay Marriage Could Hinge on Black Churches

There are 9653 comments on the The Skanner story from Mar 1, 2012, titled Maryland Gay Marriage Could Hinge on Black Churches. In it, The Skanner reports that:

With Maryland poised to legalize gay marriage, some conservative opponents and religious leaders are counting on members of their congregations, especially in black churches, to upend the legislation at the polls this fall.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Skanner.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#8222 Nov 18, 2012
If what a holy book or relgion says about a certain behavior is unnacceptable to us, it makes far more sense for us to rejecct to

1. write our own holy book,

2. join another religion,

3. or invent our own

than to strive might and main to change it by trying to force our moral preferences on it.

IMHO

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#8223 Nov 18, 2012
If what a holy book or relgion says about a certain behavior is unnacceptable to us, it makes far more sense for us to reject it by

1. writing our own holy book,

2. joining another religion,

3. or inventing our own religion

than to fanatically strive might and main to change it by trying to force our moral preferences on it.

IMHO

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#8224 Nov 18, 2012
Brainiac2 wrote:
If what a holy book or relgion says about a certain behavior is unnacceptable to us, it makes far more sense for us to reject it by
1. writing our own holy book,
2. joining another religion,
3. or inventing our own religion
than to fanatically strive might and main to change it by trying to force our moral preferences on it.
IMHO
While some take those options, others have changed the translations and interpretations of the bible from early on and throughout history. The modern English translation includes the prejudices of the translators:

"The primarily sexual meaning of the word sodomia for Christians did not evolve before the 6th century AD. Roman Emperor Justinian I, in his novels no. 77 (dating 538) and no. 141 (dating 559) amended to his Corpus iuris civilis, and declared that Sodom's sin had been specifically same-sex activities and desire for them. He also linked "famines, earthquakes, and pestilences" upon cities as being due to "such crimes", during a time of recent earthquakes and other disasters." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodomy

"Jesus and five Old Testament prophets all speak of the sins that led to the destruction of Sodom -- and not one of them mentions homosexuality.

Alleged references to homosexuality in I Corinthians and I Timothy are the inventions of anti-gay translators. They are not in the original Greek texts." (Rev. Dr. Mel White)

"Several books already exist attempting to demonstrate that the Christian Bible does not, in fact, condemn consenting-adult homosexuality. But God is Not a Homophobe has a unique perspective in that the author has a lifetime of experience in pastoring hard-core fundamentalist churches. His former bitter opposition to all forms of homosexuality has given way to a rational, unbiased acceptance that the Bible says hardly anything about homosexuality, and what it does say cannot honestly be used to condemn consenting same-sex unions." "God is not a Homophobe: An unbiased look at Homosexuality in the Bible" by Philo Thelos
http://www.trafford.com/4dcgi/view-item...

"What the Bible Really Says About Homosexuality" by Daniel Helminiask, PH.D., was ordained as a Catholic priest in 1967 and is incardinated in the Diocese of Pittsburgh. From 1981-1985 was Assoc Prof for Systematic Theology at Oblate School of Theology and earlier completed his Ph.D. in systematic theology at Boston College and Andover Newton Theological School. He concludes the Bible says absolutely nothing about homosexuality being sinful when you examine the actual Hebrew/Greek texts."

“Trolls are Clueless”

Since: Dec 07

Aptos, California

#8225 Nov 18, 2012
Not Yet Equal wrote:
<quoted text>
While some take those options, others have changed the translations and interpretations of the bible from early on and throughout history. The modern English translation includes the prejudices of the translators:
"The primarily sexual meaning of the word sodomia for Christians did not evolve before the 6th century AD. Roman Emperor Justinian I, in his novels no. 77 (dating 538) and no. 141 (dating 559) amended to his Corpus iuris civilis, and declared that Sodom's sin had been specifically same-sex activities and desire for them. He also linked "famines, earthquakes, and pestilences" upon cities as being due to "such crimes", during a time of recent earthquakes and other disasters." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodomy
"Jesus and five Old Testament prophets all speak of the sins that led to the destruction of Sodom -- and not one of them mentions homosexuality.
Alleged references to homosexuality in I Corinthians and I Timothy are the inventions of anti-gay translators. They are not in the original Greek texts." (Rev. Dr. Mel White)
"Several books already exist attempting to demonstrate that the Christian Bible does not, in fact, condemn consenting-adult homosexuality. But God is Not a Homophobe has a unique perspective in that the author has a lifetime of experience in pastoring hard-core fundamentalist churches. His former bitter opposition to all forms of homosexuality has given way to a rational, unbiased acceptance that the Bible says hardly anything about homosexuality, and what it does say cannot honestly be used to condemn consenting same-sex unions." "God is not a Homophobe: An unbiased look at Homosexuality in the Bible" by Philo Thelos
http://www.trafford.com/4dcgi/view-item...
"What the Bible Really Says About Homosexuality" by Daniel Helminiask, PH.D., was ordained as a Catholic priest in 1967 and is incardinated in the Diocese of Pittsburgh. From 1981-1985 was Assoc Prof for Systematic Theology at Oblate School of Theology and earlier completed his Ph.D. in systematic theology at Boston College and Andover Newton Theological School. He concludes the Bible says absolutely nothing about homosexuality being sinful when you examine the actual Hebrew/Greek texts."
Others leave the church where they find rejection and marginalization and go toward something more fulfilling.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#8226 Nov 18, 2012
Quest wrote:
And yet, you have NEVER been able to show a single adverse affect....That's not a sign of a sane mind.
^^^Defamation is adverse affect.

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#8227 Nov 18, 2012
Dr. Chris Beyrer, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Public Health: "We know for certain that lesbian and gay individuals suffer harm to their physical and psychological health, and to their relationships and quality of life, as result of the shame, isolation and stigma accrued from their social and legal disenfranchisement."

Since: Jun 11

AOL

#8228 Nov 18, 2012
While equal rights should never depend on any vote, Maryland has now approved equality through the legislative process, with aproval of the voters, ending the official defamation of its gay residents.

“Trolls are Clueless”

Since: Dec 07

Aptos, California

#8229 Nov 18, 2012
Not Yet Equal wrote:
While equal rights should never depend on any vote, Maryland has now approved equality through the legislative process, with aproval of the voters, ending the official defamation of its gay residents.
about time

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#8230 Nov 18, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>^^^Defamation is adverse affect.
So why do you come here defaming gays and lesbians Brian? That isn't very nice.

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#8231 Nov 18, 2012
Brainiac2 wrote:
If what a holy book or relgion says about a certain behavior is unnacceptable to us, it makes far more sense for us to reject it by
1. writing our own holy book,
2. joining another religion,
3. or inventing our own religion
than to fanatically strive might and main to change it by trying to force our moral preferences on it.
IMHO
simply because nobody is attempting to change either religion or any 'holy' book. they are striving to change civil law which, in the u.s, has nothing to do with any religion or any holy book.

“You wish you were here!!”

Since: May 09

The OC

#8232 Nov 18, 2012
Not Yet Equal wrote:
Dr. Chris Beyrer, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Public Health: "We know for certain that lesbian and gay individuals suffer harm to their physical and psychological health, and to their relationships and quality of life, as result of the shame, isolation and stigma accrued from their social and legal disenfranchisement."
Which is why your real goal is full social acceptance...not simply "equal rights". And hey...if that means using the public schools to indoctrinate other people's kids against the wishes of their parents so be it.

http://www.healthiersf.org/LGBTQ/InTheClassro...

Its nice to cut through the crap every now and then and just put the truth out there...huh?

“You wish you were here!!”

Since: May 09

The OC

#8233 Nov 18, 2012
dances with weebles wrote:
<quoted text>
simply because nobody is attempting to change either religion or any 'holy' book. they are striving to change civil law which, in the u.s, has nothing to do with any religion or any holy book.
Not true. They are striving to change civil law, public perception, AND religious doctrine. Its an "all of the above" strategy.

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#8234 Nov 18, 2012
WaterBoarder wrote:
<quoted text>
Not true. They are striving to change civil law, public perception, AND religious doctrine. Its an "all of the above" strategy.
and you still have that label stuck over your eyes, i see.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#8235 Nov 19, 2012
WaterBoarder wrote:
<quoted text>
Not true. They are striving to change civil law, public perception, AND religious doctrine. Its an "all of the above" strategy.
No, not so. Civil laws, YES, public perception, YEP.

Religious doctrine, not one bit, unless so-called religious people try to change that religious doctrine into civil laws that apply to the rest of the population.

NO ONE should have to live the the religious doctrines of a religion they do not follow.

It's just that simple.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#8236 Nov 19, 2012
WaterBoarder wrote:
<quoted text>
Not true. They are striving to change civil law, public perception, AND religious doctrine. Its an "all of the above" strategy.
Did you skip your paranoia meds again?
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#8237 Nov 19, 2012
WaterBoarder wrote:
<quoted text>
Which is why your real goal is full social acceptance...not simply "equal rights". And hey...if that means using the public schools to indoctrinate other people's kids against the wishes of their parents so be it.
http://www.healthiersf.org/LGBTQ/InTheClassro...
Its nice to cut through the crap every now and then and just put the truth out there...huh?
Since facts don't seem to enter into your thought process, your best course of action would be to homskool your spawn. Then YOU can teach them whatever nonsense you like. Don't expect public schools to further your wacky religious agenda.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#8238 Nov 19, 2012
Brian_G wrote:
<quoted text>^^^Defamation is adverse affect.
Then take your proof of defamation, and your receipts for repair, and head to the courthouse. File suit. Go ahead. Put your money where your mouth is.

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#8239 Nov 19, 2012
WasteWater wrote:
So why do you come here defaming gays and lesbians Brian? That isn't very nice.
I've always written, there is nothing wrong with homosexuals or homosexuality. I've never defamed gays or lesbians on any forum.

Why does W.W. write defamations?

“I Luv Carbon Dioxide”

Since: Dec 08

Home, sweet home.

#8240 Nov 19, 2012
http://www.france24.com/en/20121118-anti-gay-...

Anti-same sex marriage protest in Paris

“Yes WE Can! Yes we Will!”

Since: Jul 07

Baltimore, Md.

#8241 Nov 19, 2012
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
Why Brian? The bill passed at the ballot box with flying colors:-)
The voters voted FOR it. Didn't Brian keep up with the news?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Same-sex marriage fight turns to clerk who refu... 3 min Wondering 3,345
News Kentucky clerk defies order, refuses to issue s... 4 min Wondering 567
News Court: Baker who refused gay wedding cake can't... 6 min WeTheSheeple 1,289
News The Latest: Husband: Kentucky clerk is 'standin... 8 min National Whistleb... 9
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 30 min Respect71 25,968
News Will clerk issue gay marriage licenses after co... 43 min Thorpmeyer 47
News Judge, clerk in marriage case dealt with nepoti... 46 min WasteWater 1
News Supreme Court rules against clerk in gay marria... 3 hr WeTheSheeple 92
More from around the web