VA decision on burial rights departs ...

VA decision on burial rights departs from past

There are 12 comments on the MilitaryCity.com story from Feb 15, 2013, titled VA decision on burial rights departs from past. In it, MilitaryCity.com reports that:

The government has cleared the first burial of a same-sex spouse of a veteran in a national cemetery , but it's far from certain how easy it will be for other gay military couples to win the same benefit.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at MilitaryCity.com.

Since: Apr 08

Cleveland, OH

#1 Feb 16, 2013
The simple question is: are spouses of heterosexual veterans allowed to be buried in the cemetery? If they are then there should be no reason to bar the spouses of gay veterans.
The Mad Man

Glendale, CA

#2 Feb 16, 2013
Interesting choice of words here...
'Shinseki has the authority to deem others eligible for burial at a VA cemetery as he believes necessary, regardless of the wording of the Defense of Marriage Act. The VA said in a statement he did not base his decision to grant burial rights based on the couple's marital status but on evidence of a "committed relationship between the individual and the veteran." Also, the department made clear the decision was not intended to create any right or benefit for anyone other than Lynchild.'
So in other words, he gets to play god. What is his definition of a 'committed relationship? I would like to see him justify this to his superiors...ha ha...Is this man looking for a law suit?

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#3 Feb 16, 2013
The Mad Man wrote:
Interesting choice of words here...
'Shinseki has the authority to deem others eligible for burial at a VA cemetery as he believes necessary, regardless of the wording of the Defense of Marriage Act. The VA said in a statement he did not base his decision to grant burial rights based on the couple's marital status but on evidence of a "committed relationship between the individual and the veteran." Also, the department made clear the decision was not intended to create any right or benefit for anyone other than Lynchild.'
So in other words, he gets to play god. What is his definition of a 'committed relationship? I would like to see him justify this to his superiors...ha ha...Is this man looking for a law suit?
Sue all you want; the VA gets to decide who gets buried in national cemeteries. While DOMA prevents him from recognizing a married same-sex couple, he can decide to approve the burial of anyone for any other reason.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#4 Feb 16, 2013
Gay And Proud wrote:
The simple question is: are spouses of heterosexual veterans allowed to be buried in the cemetery? If they are then there should be no reason to bar the spouses of gay veterans.
DOMA bars him from recognizing them as a spouse.

That said, the VA Secretary can approve burials of any "partners" or "friends" or "pals" or "buddies" or even a total stranger for that matter.
The Mad Man

Glendale, CA

#5 Feb 17, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
Sue all you want; the VA gets to decide who gets buried in national cemeteries. While DOMA prevents him from recognizing a married same-sex couple, he can decide to approve the burial of anyone for any other reason.
And that is the right thing to do? Really? After the governments most recent action, and the choice of who (or whom) is allowed to be buried, could set the road of what is to come. It's one rule or another. I am for gay couples being buried next to their spouse but not by picking and choosing according to the govt's choice.
The Mad Man

Glendale, CA

#6 Feb 17, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
DOMA bars him from recognizing them as a spouse.
That said, the VA Secretary can approve burials of any "partners" or "friends" or "pals" or "buddies" or even a total stranger for that matter.
Jacqueline Kennedy required special permission to be buried next to her former husband. Remarried wives lose the right to be buried next to their former husbands.'According to the govt.' rule book.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#7 Feb 17, 2013
The Mad Man wrote:
<quoted text>
And that is the right thing to do? Really? After the governments most recent action, and the choice of who (or whom) is allowed to be buried, could set the road of what is to come. It's one rule or another. I am for gay couples being buried next to their spouse but not by picking and choosing according to the govt's choice.
Until DOMA is overtuned, the VA has no choice but to go case by case. The only other option is to open up the national cemeteries to everyone.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#8 Feb 17, 2013
The Mad Man wrote:
<quoted text>
Jacqueline Kennedy required special permission to be buried next to her former husband. Remarried wives lose the right to be buried next to their former husbands.'According to the govt.' rule book.
The Army controls Arlington National Cemetery, and they have their own rules. But that was yet another example of a case-by-case exemption from the rules.
The Mad Man

Glendale, CA

#9 Feb 17, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
The Army controls Arlington National Cemetery, and they have their own rules. But that was yet another example of a case-by-case exemption from the rules.
And why should there be an 'exemption' of the rules on a case by case history of what the govt can and can not do? J. Edgar Hoover history was known but never revealed until later years and he was buried with full military honors in spite of 'the files that were never found'. Another fine example of 'exception to the rule'. How many others will have to be 'subjected' this exception to the rule for glory and honor?

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#10 Feb 17, 2013
The Mad Man wrote:
<quoted text>
And why should there be an 'exemption' of the rules on a case by case history of what the govt can and can not do? J. Edgar Hoover history was known but never revealed until later years and he was buried with full military honors in spite of 'the files that were never found'. Another fine example of 'exception to the rule'. How many others will have to be 'subjected' this exception to the rule for glory and honor?
If you have a problem with it, then go whine to the VA Secretary.
The Mad Man

Glendale, CA

#11 Feb 18, 2013
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
If you have a problem with it, then go whine to the VA Secretary.
Nice to see the attitude. Sounds like I am chatting with the VA Secretary.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#12 Feb 18, 2013
The Mad Man wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice to see the attitude. Sounds like I am chatting with the VA Secretary.
Yep, you uncovered by secret identity- I'm actually General Shinseki.......

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 6 min cpeter1313 17,399
News Gay Cakes Are Not a Constitutional Right 11 min American Independent 834
News Anthony Rapp, Wilson Cruz On Star Trek's First ... 56 min Wondering 75
News New Trump office would protect conscience right... 1 hr Wondering 4
News Connecticut sees - gay baby boom' 1 hr Wondering 35
Our HALS, in the middle of our street! 1 hr Raquel Africa 1
News a Will & Gracea return promises laughs, and a t... 2 hr Will 14
News UKIP councillor links drug and anti-social beha... 2 hr Wondering 12
The Spectrum Cafe (Dec '07) Wed GodSmacked 27,290
More from around the web