Ben Carson- GOP Darling, Homophobe- C...

Ben Carson- GOP Darling, Homophobe- Claims Liberals “Racist”

There are 12 comments on the lezgetreal.com story from Apr 2, 2013, titled Ben Carson- GOP Darling, Homophobe- Claims Liberals “Racist” . In it, lezgetreal.com reports that:

Johns Hopkins neurosurgeon Ben Carson is upset that he has been criticized for being homophobic claiming that 'racist' Liberals want to silence him

Join the discussion below, or Read more at lezgetreal.com.

Since: Aug 08

Location hidden

#1 Apr 2, 2013
Conservatives seem to be the first to use childish name calling.

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

#2 Apr 2, 2013
The same racist Liberals who elected Obama? Twice? THOSE racist Liberals?
Owen

Pekin, IL

#3 Apr 2, 2013
Do you hateful radical homosexual nincumpoops really not know what 'homophobe' means? This guy certainly is not afraid of your hate and antagonism.

You can make no logical case for your horrible hate based cause, so all you can do is call others names.

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

#4 Apr 2, 2013
Owen wrote:
Do you hateful radical homosexual nincumpoops really not know what 'homophobe' means? This guy certainly is not afraid of your hate and antagonism.
You can make no logical case for your horrible hate based cause, so all you can do is call others names.
Yes, yes, all that we "hateful radical homosexual nincumpoops" can do is only call names.

Are you demonstrating by example?

Or does your religion teach you to talk to others like that?

The "logical case" for the "cause" is that human beings should be free to find the path that is best for each of us. No religion gets to say that we're breaking religious rules, and then ostracize us from society. That's not what religion is for, and that's not the kind of power that religion should have.

Since: Dec 08

Toronto, ON, Canada

#5 Apr 2, 2013
Owen wrote:
Do you hateful radical homosexual nincumpoops really not know what 'homophobe' means? This guy certainly is not afraid of your hate and antagonism.
You can make no logical case for your horrible hate based cause, so all you can do is call others names.
Talking about names, how about using a consistent one, David!

Since: Dec 08

Toronto, ON, Canada

#6 Apr 2, 2013
By the way, does anyone else notice how the GOP just loves their token "negrah's." Especially the homophobic ones. They seem to forget that most African-Americans voted Democratic, vote Democratic and will vote Democratic for the forseeable future.

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

#8 Apr 2, 2013
Brown Lipstick wrote:
It is pretty pathetic to watch these sexual retards draw a blank on a black man telling them how wrong they actually are.
Priceless
We're "wrong" to want to live our lives in the way that suits us best? Is it my turn yet to tell you how "wrong" YOU actually are in how you live YOUR life? Do we all get a turn at that on each other?

I just draw a blank on a black man telling people that they should accept oppression and mob rule. He should know better. I have no idea what your excuse is.
The Troll Stopper

Roanoke, VA

#9 Apr 2, 2013
Owen aka David Moore the Closet Case Pekin Troll wrote:
Look David Moore, just because you're still bitter that your ex-wife won't let you anywhere near your own kids anymore doesn't mean you should take it out on the rest of us.

No wonder you're divorced. Enjoy the closet! LOLAY!
Tea Bag Residue Cleanup

Philadelphia, PA

#10 Apr 2, 2013
JohnInToronto wrote:
<quoted text>
Talking about names, how about using a consistent one, David!
One moniker for each personality seems reasonable enough to me.
Tea Bag Residue Cleanup

Philadelphia, PA

#11 Apr 2, 2013
The Troll Stopper wrote:
<quoted text>
Look David Moore, just because you're still bitter that your ex-wife won't let you anywhere near your own kids anymore doesn't mean you should take it out on the rest of us.
No wonder you're divorced. Enjoy the closet! LOLAY!
BTW, there is apparently a "David Moore" who is an openly gay high school teacher in PA...assuming he is using his real name on social media.

Just thought everyone would like a bit of irony today.
Tea Bag Residue Cleanup

Philadelphia, PA

#12 Apr 2, 2013
Uncle Thomas Clarence pointed this fact out when he was accused of sexually harassing subordinate Anita Hill, and he sure turned out to be correct in the end...none of those corroborating witnesses of hers who have come to light since had any credibility, after all.

The only question really is how long it's been since BC's last down low foray.

“Unconvinced”

Since: Nov 09

Seattle, WA

#15 Apr 3, 2013
The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
How's the pregnancy comin along Edmond?
One of these days.
Leave the children alone
I have no interest in ever having children. No one gets married to children, they get married to the grown-up that they want to spend the rest of their lives with, and pool all their resources with, and stand as each other's legal representative in all matters. No children are required for any of that. No children's names are on the marriage license.

You people sound like cartoon characters when you can't stop squealing "Somebody please think about the children!".

This has nothing to do with children. This is about the right to appoint another person as one's "other half" and legal representative in life. That doesn't change with or without children.
The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
You're one to talk about mob rule seeing how many millions has been wasted in taxdollars on such a 'small' group of people that never one could conceive a child on their own as to offer continuance of a life championing process.
I'm sure you're very proud of your ability to squirt DNA at your partner and churn out yet another mouth to feed. Meanwhile, the REAL work is in RAISING a child, which is often done for a child who's already born, through adoption or fostering (just like straight people who could never conceive a child of their own).

ZERO dollars could have been wasted, if some people weren't so obsessed with finding someone to mark as an outsider. You don't have one damn reason to hold legal rights and resources out of the reach of gay people, but doing so is exactly what wastes money.

Keep on denying the REALITY that gay couples ARE RAISING CHILDREN RIGHT NOW. I'm sure those kids really appreciate your efforts to keep their families at a disadvantage.
The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
The destroyer.
Is that a sentence? How do I reply? You sunk my battleship?
The Worlds Biggest Lie wrote:
Denial is a terrible thing, just continue to spread your illness it's been working wonders in our governing process for decades.
No idea what "illness" you're talking about. I just had a physical last month, my triglycerides are high but that's it. I can't have "denial" about something that doesn't make sense, so start making some.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News 4 GOP candidates sign anti-gay marriage pledge 2 min Imprtnrd 172
News Venice mayor says no gay pride parade in my cit... 3 min Rainbow Kid 1
News Duke freshman says Jesus forbids him from readi... 4 min nhjeff 55
News Same-sex marriage fight turns to clerk who refu... 10 min Old Kentuckin 2,833
News Court: Baker who refused gay wedding cake can't... 12 min Prep-for-Dep 990
Poll When will Hillary Clinton Be Indicted ? 15 min Imprtnrd 70
News Portland, Oregon, Catholic school changes gay h... 15 min Rainbow Kid 1
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr Wondering 25,597
More from around the web