In Essence Scalia Says To Perditionís Flame With The Constitution!

Dec 10, 2012 | Posted by: Sei | Full story: lezgetreal.com

US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia proved on Monday why he is not fit to sit on the Supreme Court. The Reagan appointee spoke at Princeton University where he was asked by a gay student why he equates laws banning sodomy with ones banning bestiality and murder. Scalia stated that legislative bodies can ban what they believe to be immoral, and stated that ďI donít think itís necessary, but I think itís effective.Ē

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 13 of13
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Dec 11, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

I appreciate this article because it was Scalia who was stupid enough to open his mouth and reveal to the country, unquestionably, that he *PRE*-decides supreme court cases. It's absolutely grounds for dismissal on deciding *EVERY* one of those cases on their merits, if not for being removed from the bench. Unfortunately, it would take such a prolonged and vehement outcry to have him even considered for removal that it's not going to happen in the current United States.

Therefore, I will simply be sure to state here, publicly, why he's frighteningly uneducated, stupid and shortsighted.

Note this quotation from the article: Scalia told freshman Duncan Hosie that ďItís a form of argument that I thought you would have known, which is called the `reduction to the absurd.í If we cannot have moral feelings against homosexuality, can we have it against murder? Can we have it against other things?Ē Scalia then tried to say that he is not equating sodomy with murder, but only drawing a parallel between bans on both. Scalia then deadpannedly joked ďIím surprised you arenít persuaded.Ē

I'm surprised Scalia wasn't called an idiot by most of the people in the room: He is not talking about *moral feeling* but about ACTING IN LAW upon so-called "moral" full stop "feelings" full stop, and the man is claiming that there is "reason" for such "bans." He's not talking about one's feelings, which are perfectly fine; he's trying to conflate the two and claim there's a reason to *BAN* an inborn orientation, which will stop no one gay from getting together with someone else gay, it will only drive it underground LIKE ABORTION was; Christ.

STOP telling me this man is "educated" when what he says proceeds from *lack of scientific knowledge* and a complete failure to *grasp what orientation is* and how simple it is to realize that it's WITHIN the paradigm of sexuality, NOT outside it.

He *doesn't* have logic and he *doesn't* have reasoning; his words bleed and hemorrhage with the "belief" that it is "chosen." He will stop *nothing* and the supreme court and society and history and every last country on earth did *nothing* to stop gay people from being together; they simply hid it.

That's not an educated person talking. It's a scared, simple-minded moron. For god's sake, label the man correctly if you want me to listen to the bullshit coming out of his mouth. Once and for all.

I thank this site for this article; there should be many, many more like it, showing this so-called "justice" for what he truly is, and what he truly espouses. Period.

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Dec 11, 2012
 
Yet another embarrassment of office for America. Term limits for supreme court judges!
disgusted american

Philadelphia, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Dec 11, 2012
 

Judged:

2

hi hi wrote:
I appreciate this article because it was Scalia who was stupid enough to open his mouth and reveal to the country, unquestionably, that he *PRE*-decides supreme court cases. It's absolutely grounds for dismissal on deciding *EVERY* one of those cases on their merits, if not for being removed from the bench. Unfortunately, it would take such a prolonged and vehement outcry to have him even considered for removal that it's not going to happen in the current United States.
Therefore, I will simply be sure to state here, publicly, why he's frighteningly uneducated, stupid and shortsighted.
Note this quotation from the article: Scalia told freshman Duncan Hosie that ďItís a form of argument that I thought you would have known, which is called the `reduction to the absurd.í If we cannot have moral feelings against homosexuality, can we have it against murder? Can we have it against other things?Ē Scalia then tried to say that he is not equating sodomy with murder, but only drawing a parallel between bans on both. Scalia then deadpannedly joked ďIím surprised you arenít persuaded.Ē
I'm surprised Scalia wasn't called an idiot by most of the people in the room: He is not talking about *moral feeling* but about ACTING IN LAW upon so-called "moral" full stop "feelings" full stop, and the man is claiming that there is "reason" for such "bans." He's not talking about one's feelings, which are perfectly fine; he's trying to conflate the two and claim there's a reason to *BAN* an inborn orientation, which will stop no one gay from getting together with someone else gay, it will only drive it underground LIKE ABORTION was; Christ.
STOP telling me this man is "educated" when what he says proceeds from *lack of scientific knowledge* and a complete failure to *grasp what orientation is* and how simple it is to realize that it's WITHIN the paradigm of sexuality, NOT outside it.
He *doesn't* have logic and he *doesn't* have reasoning; his words bleed and hemorrhage with the "belief" that it is "chosen." He will stop *nothing* and the supreme court and society and history and every last country on earth did *nothing* to stop gay people from being together; they simply hid it.
That's not an educated person talking. It's a scared, simple-minded moron. For god's sake, label the man correctly if you want me to listen to the bullshit coming out of his mouth. Once and for all.
I thank this site for this article; there should be many, many more like it, showing this so-called "justice" for what he truly is, and what he truly espouses. Period.
1000% AGREE

Sei

Since: Nov 08

Rutland, VT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Dec 11, 2012
 
hi hi wrote:
I thank this site for this article; there should be many, many more like it, showing this so-called "justice" for what he truly is, and what he truly espouses. Period.
You are most welcome.
JrEsq

El Segundo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Dec 11, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

1

The fact that the homosexuals attack Justice Scalia like a pack of jackals clearly shows that Scalia is right on the mark.

Uve

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Dec 11, 2012
 

Judged:

4

2

1

JrEsq wrote:
The fact that the homosexuals attack Justice Scalia like a pack of jackals clearly shows that Scalia is right on the mark.
No it doesn't, it shows he bigoted and not fit to be a judge.

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Dec 11, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Actually his comments show that he is as stupidly bigoted as you.
JrEsq wrote:
The fact that the homosexuals attack Justice Scalia like a pack of jackals clearly shows that Scalia is right on the mark.

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Dec 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

JrEsq wrote:
The fact that the homosexuals attack Justice Scalia like a pack of jackals clearly shows that Scalia is right on the mark.
He's doing the attacking, tool. READ the article, you lazy slob, instead of just blathering opinions from the headline. In a way you are just like him, acting on your own prejudices, instead of actually FOLLOWING the SECULAR prepared Constitution.

He's trying to make this a theocracy like your role models in Iran. Would you like this country run that way?

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10
Dec 11, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NoQ wrote:
Smart man, that judge.
See post #9. Did you read the article? Scaly-iya is NOT following the founding father's rules, but making it up to match HIS wants. Do you also want a theocratic government?
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Dec 14, 2012
 
Curteese wrote:
<quoted text>He's doing the attacking, tool. READ the article, you lazy slob, instead of just blathering opinions from the headline. In a way you are just like him, acting on your own prejudices, instead of actually FOLLOWING the SECULAR prepared Constitution.
He's trying to make this a theocracy like your role models in Iran. Would you like this country run that way?
He's seriously, gravely out of bounds. I am seeing commentary *all over the internet* attacking the living shit out of him, calling him little better than a scumbag and a moron (no joke; look for yourself); WHOLE ARTICLES are now coming out about what he has said and how profoundly he is dishonoring the country and the constitution.

*shrug* He's getting what he deserves. He's a mouthy, quite *literally* stupid and fearful, and profoundly (and genuinely) disturbing idiot who should NOT be on the supreme court. He's literally worthless in his capacity as a "justice" on that court, and I now refuse wholesale and irrevocably to have or to show a micron of respect for him. Boy oh boy, is he getting what he deserves.

People are ripping him to shreds, and I'm deeply, deeply sastisfied and glad.
hi hi

Philadelphia, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Dec 14, 2012
 
Mr Magic wrote:
I think Scalia is the man for the job. Great man, no queer, rational thinker, fair in every way.
Interesting. One could compare his *philosophical* reasoning to that of a white supremacist.(See wording in court decisions of the last century, as well as general sentiment based in biblical "law" or "moral" reasoning. Dare ya.)

Show me 10 antigay people who would *openly, publicly* endorse segregation or slavery. How come if people like you talk like this, they *DON'T* endorse those things?
disgusted american

Philadelphia, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Dec 14, 2012
 
Mr Magic wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you a queer?? Or do you just hold the penis in your mouth for a while and wallow it around?? That would explain everything.
dont be jealous.......it takes a REAL man to hold a penis in his mouth...any nitwit could eat MUFF, been there done that.....stop being jealous

“Luke laughs at hypocrites!”

Since: Sep 10

Palm Springs, California

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Dec 14, 2012
 
Mr Magic wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you a queer?? Or do you just hold the penis in your mouth for a while and wallow it around?? That would explain everything.
Vivid imagination you got there, Cletus. JEALOUS? When's the last time some lucky lucky woman did the oral on YOU?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 13 of13
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••