Obama urges Supreme Court to overturn...

Obama urges Supreme Court to overturn California same-sex marriage ban

There are 1525 comments on the The Washington Post story from Feb 28, 2013, titled Obama urges Supreme Court to overturn California same-sex marriage ban. In it, The Washington Post reports that:

The Obama administration told the Supreme Court on Thursday that California's ban on same-sex marriage violates the Constitution's guarantee of equal protection, a position that could also cast doubt on prohibitions in other states.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at The Washington Post.

Sparkle

United States

#1236 Mar 27, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course. The fact is 50% of all marriages end in divorce. Why should straight people be the only ones to have screwed up marriages?
Wonderful logic. Makes sense to me.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1237 Mar 27, 2013
Bluntforce wrote:
Aw, ain't that cute. You and barenuts can compare t- cell counts.
I'm not the one with a mouthful of my boyfriend's DNA, Blowforce.

You seem to already know what to look for.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1238 Mar 27, 2013
Sparkle wrote:
<quoted text>
Wonderful logic. Makes sense to me.
Statistics don't lie do they. Traditional marriage is a fallacy. The institution of marriage has changed over time and will continue to do so. I remember when divorce was unmentionable. Now it is commonplace.

“JESUS WOULD IMPEACH THE GOP!!!”

Since: May 09

Lake Success, N.Y.

#1239 Mar 27, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Statistics don't lie do they. Traditional marriage is a fallacy. The institution of marriage has changed over time and will continue to do so. I remember when divorce was unmentionable. Now it is commonplace.
Divorcxe is actualy higher - over 52%- can't defebnd a supposed institution that obviosly can't seem to stand on it's own merits, can they?
Sparkle

United States

#1240 Mar 27, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Statistics don't lie do they. Traditional marriage is a fallacy. The institution of marriage has changed over time and will continue to do so. I remember when divorce was unmentionable. Now it is commonplace.
yup. It's an everyday affair right next to abortions. It's gonna be great when gay people are finally free to do as they please like the rest of us.

Love Lilith .. the real one :)
Sparkle

United States

#1241 Mar 27, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not the one with a mouthful of my boyfriend's DNA, Blowforce.
You seem to already know what to look for.
Come out come out where ever you are.

Come on luv don't be so modest. You, Larry, Professor and me all have our mouths full and luvin it. mm mm

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1242 Mar 27, 2013
Sparkle wrote:
<quoted text>
yup. It's an everyday affair right next to abortions. It's gonna be great when gay people are finally free to do as they please like the rest of us.
Love Lilith .. the real one :)
Yea, especially if you practice family Law ;)
Sparkle

United States

#1243 Mar 27, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, especially if you practice family Law ;)
So basically you are not a true blue believer in the better life. You have ulterior motives for you support of same sex marriages.:o)

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1244 Mar 27, 2013
Sparkle wrote:
<quoted text>
So basically you are not a true blue believer in the better life. You have ulterior motives for you support of same sex marriages.:o)
I believe in fairness and equality. I believe in equal access to the 1,100 laws in effect about marriage contracts.
Sparkle

United States

#1245 Mar 27, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe in fairness and equality. I believe in equal access to the 1,100 laws in effect about marriage contracts.
Do you believe that it's fair that someone other than Sandra Fluke should be required to help support Sandra Flukes life style by paying for her birth control pills?

Do you believe it's fair that people who don't agree with same sex marriage should be required to help pay the increased costs because of same sex marriages?

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#1247 Mar 27, 2013
Sparkle wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you believe that it's fair that someone other than Sandra Fluke should be required to help support Sandra Flukes life style by paying for her birth control pills?
Do you believe it's fair that people who don't agree with same sex marriage should be required to help pay the increased costs because of same sex marriages?
Yes I do as long as those things are equally distributed. You haven't made your case yet about increased costs have you.
Battle of Bull

United States

#1248 Mar 27, 2013
Your post demonstrates precisely the type of idiotic logic/stupidity that all Leftwingers seem to share.
First they argue a case insisting that it's "unfair" to them because it costs them too much and then they turn around and expect someone else to make a case that proves there will NOT be any increase in cost .

If Sandra Fluke can't afford the extra $3,000 for her birth control pills then why would there NOT be an additional $3,000 expense to whomever had to pay it for her?

If the surviving spouse in a same sex marriage is entitled to SS benefits then obviously there would be an increase in cost just from that one factor alone.

People like you and Sandra Fluke are wasting peoples time and tying up the courts with pure idiocy.

The bible cautions the righteous to not be caught up in arguing with idiots. You and Sandra Fluke are simply a waste of time and void of reality.

Try to apply some logic across the board. Money being spent = money being spent. If one person isn't paying it then someone else is. That = an increase in cost to the person/people paying it. The person/people paying it = taxpayers.
Taxpayers paying more = increase in cost.
Battle of Bull

United States

#1249 Mar 27, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Statistics don't lie do they. Traditional marriage is a fallacy. The institution of marriage has changed over time and will continue to do so. I remember when divorce was unmentionable. Now it is commonplace.
Divorce being common place does not = a better society.
Same sex marriage does not = a better society.
Battle of Bull

United States

#1250 Mar 27, 2013
WasteWater wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes I do as long as those things are equally distributed. You haven't made your case yet about increased costs have you.
Your post demonstrates precisely the type of idiotic logic/stupidity that all Leftwingers seem to share.
First they argue a case insisting that it's unfair to them because it costs them too much and then they turn around and expect someone else to make a case that proves there will NOT be any increase in cost .

If Sandra Fluke can't afford the extra $3,000 for her birth control pills then why would there NOT be an additional $3,000 expense to whomever had to pay it for her?

If the surviving spouse in a same sex marriage is entitled to SS benefits then obviously there would be an increase in cost just from that one factor alone.

People like you and Sandra Fluke are wasting peoples time and tying up the courts with pure idiocy.

The bible cautions the righteous to not be caught up in arguing with idiots. You and Sandra Fluke are simply a waste of time and void of reality.

Try to apply some logic across the board. Money being spent = money being spent. If one person isn't paying it then someone else is. That = an increase in cost to the person/people paying it. The person/people paying it = taxpayers.

Taxpayers paying more = increase in cost.
Says It All

Santa Cruz, CA

#1251 Mar 28, 2013
Battle of Bull wrote:
<quoted text>
Divorce being common place does not = a better society.
Same sex marriage does not = a better society.
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?
WTF?
Oy
Oy
WTF?
WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WT F?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?WTF?
Some Never Came Home

Tempe, AZ

#1252 Mar 28, 2013
Battle of Bull wrote:
<quoted text>
Your post demonstrates precisely the type of idiotic logic/stupidity that all Leftwingers seem to share.
First they argue a case insisting that it's unfair to them because it costs them too much and then they turn around and expect someone else to make a case that proves there will NOT be any increase in cost .
If Sandra Fluke can't afford the extra $3,000 for her birth control pills then why would there NOT be an additional $3,000 expense to whomever had to pay it for her?
If the surviving spouse in a same sex marriage is entitled to SS benefits then obviously there would be an increase in cost just from that one factor alone.
People like you and Sandra Fluke are wasting peoples time and tying up the courts with pure idiocy.
The bible cautions the righteous to not be caught up in arguing with idiots. You and Sandra Fluke are simply a waste of time and void of reality.
Try to apply some logic across the board. Money being spent = money being spent. If one person isn't paying it then someone else is. That = an increase in cost to the person/people paying it. The person/people paying it = taxpayers.
Taxpayers paying more = increase in cost.
And all of your posts show that you think we live in a theocracy when in fact we live in a secular country governed by our Constitution and NOT your bible,Constitution trumps bible! YOU are simply a waste of time with every bigoted,hateful,ignorant post you crap out! Oh and by the way,gays are taxpaying citizens also oh great ignorant one and are in fact supplementing the costs and rights of marriage when not enjoying the very same rights that you seem to take for granted! So take that bible into the church of your choice and preach to the choir,we don't want to hear your bible babble and that is our right as per the constitution!

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1253 Mar 28, 2013
Battle of Bull wrote:
<quoted text>
Your post demonstrates precisely the type of idiotic logic/stupidity that all Leftwingers seem to share.
Happy to isolate stupidity to a specific case- yours- here.

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#1254 Mar 28, 2013
Battle of Bull wrote:
The bible cautions the righteous to not be caught up in arguing with idiots.
Funny how you insist others are idiots and you spend hours making trying to make that point.

The bible "says" many things.

You might start with reading John 8:7.
Lets Compromise

United States

#1255 Mar 28, 2013
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not the one with a mouthful of my boyfriend's DNA, Blowforce.
You seem to already know what to look for.
barefoot2626 wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how you insist others are idiots and you spend hours making trying to make that point.
The bible "says" many things.
You might start with reading John 8:7.
PRAISE THE LORD hahah Now barefoot has become a bible thumper. ROFLMAO
d pantz

Portage, MI

#1256 Mar 31, 2013
TonyT1961 wrote:
<quoted text>
Divorcxe is actualy higher - over 52%- can't defebnd a supposed institution that obviosly can't seem to stand on it's own merits, can they?
ok so if its such a failure then why drag other people into it? It has nothing to do with your sexual preference, I would say if a couple tries to get married and both have parents who were divorcxed, chances are they will be divorcxed too.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News What would Jesus say about same-sex marriage? (Jul '15) 11 min Get Real 13,036
News Birth-record fix for gays falls to lower court 14 min girlonfire 8
NE Jade is a Scumbag 19 min Frankie Rizzo 4
News Tanzania suspends NGO for 'promotion' of gay ma... 46 min Hilda 2
News Who would be a better president: Donald Trump o... 1 hr Frankie Rizzo 35
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr Freedomofexpression 57,589
Congratulations to President Robert Mugabe! 3 hr Herschel 1
News Supreme Court To Hear Arguments In Case Of Bake... 3 hr Get Real 338
More from around the web