Rick Santorum: Gay Marriage Will 'Disintegrate' American Family

[Twenty Three Triangles]

Besides, who said anything about Cameron anyway. I am merely talking about several I've known in our area and how half of them are in the spirit world now. Here it is 2012 and you cannot provide a valid link in this country proving me wrong.
I wonder why!

[Jerald]

Twenty Three Triangles wrote:

Besides, who said anything about Cameron anyway. I am merely talking about several I've known in our area and how half of them are in the spirit world now. Here it is 2012 and you cannot provide a valid link in this country proving me wrong.
I wonder why!

Any source that claims that gay people on average don't live to 50 is based on Cameron's fraudulent work. Intelligent people know that, which pretty much excludes you.

But since you made the affirmative claim, it's up to YOU to provide the positive evidence, not anyone denying that the evidence is nonexistent. And you've failed to do so. Lying about a couple of people you claim to know isn't providing evidence. Quoting directly from and linking to a reputable peer-reviewed source is.

[Jerald]

Should read: "But since you made the affirmative claim, it's up to YOU to provide the positive evidence, not anyone saying that the evidence is nonexistent."

[dances with weebles]

Junior E wrote:

<quoted text>
Then I am even more surprised that your opinion of marriage is "it's only sex".

don't try to act witty and twist what i'm saying, you fraud. marriage is marriage... sex outside of that marriage is only sex and, in the secular world, has nothing to do with that marriage. now if you want to get all biblical, every time you have sex with anyone at all, you are married to that person or persons in god's eyes. that's the way it works.

even according to the bible when a man has sex it's only sex... for a woman it's called 'adultery'. the reason being that, according to the bible, she's the man's property.

[dances with weebles]

Circular Cemetery wrote:

Thirty six years apart? I don't wanna know. It's all bs anyway.

is it? i have two kids by my first wife. they are ages 43 and 37. i now have two more children, ages 7 and 11 by my second wife. is that so difficult?

[dances with weebles]

Twenty Three Triangles wrote:

What a bunch of rationalizing morons. The smell is worse than a cow farm and to a gay man a cow farm smells pretty tasty.
MOOOOOO`O`O`O`O`O`O`O`!!!!
Right Sheep!!!

no... now you're talking about texans... it's the texans who screw cows, not gays.

[Rectal Wrecker]

Jerald wrote:

Should read: "But since you made the affirmative claim, it's up to YOU to provide the positive evidence, not anyone saying that the evidence is nonexistent."

I don't have to provide anything to a special kind of 1%er. It's not my fault that you were so small and insignificant to conduct a study on to begin with. Especially since the other ones suggest the color brown, hiv, death, and meth.

[Jerald]

Rectal Wrecker wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't have to provide anything...

Because you can't.

[Rose_NoHo]

Twenty Three Triangles wrote:

<quoted text>
Sure ya do sheep. Sure ya do. Illegally, and a lifespan less than 50.

You have a gay man's lifespan confused with your IQ.

[Mona Lott]

Twenty Three Triangles wrote:

<quoted text>
Says the special one born on Mt Sinai. You're a dog.

You're a retard and a liar.

I heard you sold your car for gas money.

[Mona Lott]

Rectal Wrecker wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't have to provide anything to a special kind of 1%er. It's not my fault that you were so small and insignificant to conduct a study on to begin with. Especially since the other ones suggest the color brown, hiv, death, and meth.

Typical of the GOP

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/10/13/cling...

[Mona Lott]

Twenty Three Triangles wrote:

Besides, who said anything about Cameron anyway. I am merely talking about several I've known in our area and how half of them are in the spirit world now. Here it is 2012 and you cannot provide a valid link in this country proving me wrong.
I wonder why!

I wonder why you think there would be evidence for something that isn't true. What kind of DUMBASS are you anyway?

[Quest]

Twenty Three Triangles wrote:

Besides, who said anything about Cameron anyway. I am merely talking about several I've known in our area and how half of them are in the spirit world now. Here it is 2012 and you cannot provide a valid link in this country proving me wrong.
I wonder why!

So, you don't have any links to peer-reviewed studies that prove your claim?

Just admit it's your unsupported opinion based on your personal bias and move on.

[Quest]

So far, no one on this thread has been able to prove that gay married couples and their kids are a threat to straight couples and THEIR kids.

Could that be because the idea is a lot of silly hogwash?

[dances with weebles]

Twenty Three Triangles wrote:

Besides, who said anything about Cameron anyway. I am merely talking about several I've known in our area and how half of them are in the spirit world now. Here it is 2012 and you cannot provide a valid link in this country proving me wrong.
I wonder why!

spirit world ooooooooooooooooooh

eenie meenie chili beenie, the spirits are about to speak.

are they friendly spirits

[Jane Dough]

snyper wrote:

<quoted text>
Why do you continue to assert that heteros are part of LGBT? You've never made that a workable point.

Its the same exact logic as procreation with marriage, and that argument doesn't work either.. does it?

do exceptions negate rules or not?

[Jane Dough]

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
You're a retard and a liar.
I heard you sold your car for gas money.

And you pretend you don't bully....
you are an angry LIAR.

[Jane Dough]

WeTheSheeple wrote:

<quoted text>
No, we take it as a sign of weakness that you need to continually cut & paste .

exactly, me supporting myself with legal reality is a weakness to you...

Ever notice even courts cut and paste other courts in to theri decision?
why do you think that is?

[Jane Dough]

Uve wrote:

<quoted text>
Thought we weren't speaking.... Hopefully a 'court' will do more than just cut and paste. Leave that to a lousy lawyer, who doesn't do some research. BTW Your assumption that transgendered are only attracted to the opposite sex is not true. I know this as fact..Just a tip - When you deal with human sexuality, nothing is a given even if it seems 'logical' to you.

Nope, i didnt say all, I only said SOME...
Are SOME transgenders attracted to the oposite sex?
Then being gay is not REQUIRED to be LGBT, and if its NOT REQUIRED, its not RELATED, RIGHT?

Again, I am only tracking your sides procreation argument. Apparently the existence of infertile married folks negates any link to procreation in marriage, so the existence of straight LGBT members must do the same to LGBT being about being gay, RIGHT?
Or maybe its just that exceptions don't negate the rule in BOTH CASES?

[Uve]

Jane Dough wrote:

<quoted text>
Nope, i didnt say all, I only said SOME...
Are SOME transgenders attracted to the oposite sex?
Then being gay is not REQUIRED to be LGBT, and if its NOT REQUIRED, its not RELATED, RIGHT?
Again, I am only tracking your sides procreation argument. Apparently the existence of infertile married folks negates any link to procreation in marriage, so the existence of straight LGBT members must do the same to LGBT being about being gay, RIGHT?
Or maybe its just that exceptions don't negate the rule in BOTH CASES?

I'm not sure I understand the point your trying to make here. But as far as straight people being in LGBT, yes I guess they could. LGBT people are NOT the ones trying to be exclusive but rather inclusive. But for a transgendered person to be considered straight, that would mean that YOU and your ilk, would have to accept their 'change', which you don't, otherwise they wouldn't be labeled transgendered, their sex would be a non issue.