Rick Santorum: Gay Marriage Will 'Disintegrate' American Family

Oct 11, 2012 Full story: On Top Magazine 2,277

Rick Santorum has claimed that the American family would be on the precipice of extinction if gay marriage where to become legal.

Full Story
Twenty Three Triangles

Pittsfield, MA

#163 Oct 14, 2012
Besides, who said anything about Cameron anyway. I am merely talking about several I've known in our area and how half of them are in the spirit world now. Here it is 2012 and you cannot provide a valid link in this country proving me wrong.
I wonder why!

“Post-religious”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#164 Oct 14, 2012
Twenty Three Triangles wrote:
Besides, who said anything about Cameron anyway. I am merely talking about several I've known in our area and how half of them are in the spirit world now. Here it is 2012 and you cannot provide a valid link in this country proving me wrong.
I wonder why!
Any source that claims that gay people on average don't live to 50 is based on Cameron's fraudulent work. Intelligent people know that, which pretty much excludes you.

But since you made the affirmative claim, it's up to YOU to provide the positive evidence, not anyone denying that the evidence is nonexistent. And you've failed to do so. Lying about a couple of people you claim to know isn't providing evidence. Quoting directly from and linking to a reputable peer-reviewed source is.

“Post-religious”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#165 Oct 14, 2012
Should read: "But since you made the affirmative claim, it's up to YOU to provide the positive evidence, not anyone saying that the evidence is nonexistent."

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#166 Oct 14, 2012
Junior E wrote:
<quoted text>
Then I am even more surprised that your opinion of marriage is "it's only sex".
don't try to act witty and twist what i'm saying, you fraud. marriage is marriage... sex outside of that marriage is only sex and, in the secular world, has nothing to do with that marriage. now if you want to get all biblical, every time you have sex with anyone at all, you are married to that person or persons in god's eyes. that's the way it works.

even according to the bible when a man has sex it's only sex... for a woman it's called 'adultery'. the reason being that, according to the bible, she's the man's property.

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#167 Oct 14, 2012
Circular Cemetery wrote:
Thirty six years apart? I don't wanna know. It's all bs anyway.
is it? i have two kids by my first wife. they are ages 43 and 37. i now have two more children, ages 7 and 11 by my second wife. is that so difficult?

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#168 Oct 14, 2012
Twenty Three Triangles wrote:
What a bunch of rationalizing morons. The smell is worse than a cow farm and to a gay man a cow farm smells pretty tasty.
MOOOOOO`O`O`O`O`O`O`O`!!!!
Right Sheep!!!
no... now you're talking about texans... it's the texans who screw cows, not gays.
Rectal Wrecker

Pittsfield, MA

#169 Oct 14, 2012
Jerald wrote:
Should read: "But since you made the affirmative claim, it's up to YOU to provide the positive evidence, not anyone saying that the evidence is nonexistent."
I don't have to provide anything to a special kind of 1%er. It's not my fault that you were so small and insignificant to conduct a study on to begin with. Especially since the other ones suggest the color brown, hiv, death, and meth.

“Post-religious”

Since: Apr 08

Location hidden

#170 Oct 14, 2012
Rectal Wrecker wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't have to provide anything...
Because you can't.

Since: Apr 11

Los Angeles, CA

#171 Oct 14, 2012
Twenty Three Triangles wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure ya do sheep. Sure ya do. Illegally, and a lifespan less than 50.
You have a gay man's lifespan confused with your IQ.
Mona Lott

Brooklyn, NY

#172 Oct 14, 2012
Twenty Three Triangles wrote:
<quoted text>
Says the special one born on Mt Sinai. You're a dog.
You're a retard and a liar.

I heard you sold your car for gas money.
Mona Lott

Brooklyn, NY

#173 Oct 14, 2012
Rectal Wrecker wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't have to provide anything to a special kind of 1%er. It's not my fault that you were so small and insignificant to conduct a study on to begin with. Especially since the other ones suggest the color brown, hiv, death, and meth.
Typical of the GOP

http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/10/13/cling...
Mona Lott

Brooklyn, NY

#174 Oct 14, 2012
Twenty Three Triangles wrote:
Besides, who said anything about Cameron anyway. I am merely talking about several I've known in our area and how half of them are in the spirit world now. Here it is 2012 and you cannot provide a valid link in this country proving me wrong.
I wonder why!
I wonder why you think there would be evidence for something that isn't true. What kind of DUMBASS are you anyway?

Since: Mar 07

United States

#175 Oct 15, 2012
Twenty Three Triangles wrote:
Besides, who said anything about Cameron anyway. I am merely talking about several I've known in our area and how half of them are in the spirit world now. Here it is 2012 and you cannot provide a valid link in this country proving me wrong.
I wonder why!
So, you don't have any links to peer-reviewed studies that prove your claim?

Just admit it's your unsupported opinion based on your personal bias and move on.

Since: Mar 07

United States

#176 Oct 15, 2012
So far, no one on this thread has been able to prove that gay married couples and their kids are a threat to straight couples and THEIR kids.

Could that be because the idea is a lot of silly hogwash?

“laugh until your belly hurts”

Since: Dec 06

Location hidden

#177 Oct 15, 2012
Twenty Three Triangles wrote:
Besides, who said anything about Cameron anyway. I am merely talking about several I've known in our area and how half of them are in the spirit world now. Here it is 2012 and you cannot provide a valid link in this country proving me wrong.
I wonder why!
spirit world ooooooooooooooooooh

eenie meenie chili beenie, the spirits are about to speak.

are they friendly spirits
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#178 Oct 15, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you continue to assert that heteros are part of LGBT? You've never made that a workable point.
Its the same exact logic as procreation with marriage, and that argument doesn't work either.. does it?

do exceptions negate rules or not?
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#179 Oct 15, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
You're a retard and a liar.
I heard you sold your car for gas money.
And you pretend you don't bully....
you are an angry LIAR.
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#180 Oct 15, 2012
WeTheSheeple wrote:
<quoted text>
No, we take it as a sign of weakness that you need to continually cut & paste .
exactly, me supporting myself with legal reality is a weakness to you...

Ever notice even courts cut and paste other courts in to theri decision?
why do you think that is?
Jane Dough

Montpelier, VT

#181 Oct 15, 2012
Uve wrote:
<quoted text>
Thought we weren't speaking.... Hopefully a 'court' will do more than just cut and paste. Leave that to a lousy lawyer, who doesn't do some research. BTW Your assumption that transgendered are only attracted to the opposite sex is not true. I know this as fact..Just a tip - When you deal with human sexuality, nothing is a given even if it seems 'logical' to you.
Nope, i didnt say all, I only said SOME...
Are SOME transgenders attracted to the oposite sex?
Then being gay is not REQUIRED to be LGBT, and if its NOT REQUIRED, its not RELATED, RIGHT?

Again, I am only tracking your sides procreation argument. Apparently the existence of infertile married folks negates any link to procreation in marriage, so the existence of straight LGBT members must do the same to LGBT being about being gay, RIGHT?
Or maybe its just that exceptions don't negate the rule in BOTH CASES?
Uve

Desert Hot Springs, CA

#182 Oct 15, 2012
Jane Dough wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, i didnt say all, I only said SOME...
Are SOME transgenders attracted to the oposite sex?
Then being gay is not REQUIRED to be LGBT, and if its NOT REQUIRED, its not RELATED, RIGHT?
Again, I am only tracking your sides procreation argument. Apparently the existence of infertile married folks negates any link to procreation in marriage, so the existence of straight LGBT members must do the same to LGBT being about being gay, RIGHT?
Or maybe its just that exceptions don't negate the rule in BOTH CASES?
I'm not sure I understand the point your trying to make here. But as far as straight people being in LGBT, yes I guess they could. LGBT people are NOT the ones trying to be exclusive but rather inclusive. But for a transgendered person to be considered straight, that would mean that YOU and your ilk, would have to accept their 'change', which you don't, otherwise they wouldn't be labeled transgendered, their sex would be a non issue.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Next gay marriage fight: religious exemptions 7 min KiMare 5,040
first lesbian crush 7 min haley 1
Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex ma... (Aug '10) 17 min KiMare 201,174
Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 22 min hal 26,768
Critics Claim Religious Freedom Act Legalizes B... 54 min scs2011 13
Supreme Court won't stop gay marriages in Florida 57 min NorCal Native 20
Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 59 min Respect71 5,658
The gay cafe for GLBT, friends and family (Oct '09) 1 hr Gunther 68,523
Anti-gay Tenn. billboard stirs religion debate 2 hr eyeful 2,878
More from around the web