Rick Santorum: Gay Marriage Will 'Disintegrate' American Family

[snyper]

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Get really good at something.

[Orangelion]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Stupid, you didn't deal with my question.
What if every single gay couple on earth got married? Yeah, none of the gay couples would spawn, but, tell us how that would destroy families. Many straight couples don't reproduce. They don't destroy families. Right? Would "gay rays" radiate from the gay couples, turning people into lemurs with heads like grasshoppers? Put up or shut up, b!tch.

Little girl, I already explained this, you may not understand it but, if all gays made up a family, the family structure would be a mess, and then mess up societies structure, making everything uncivilised and damaged, young one.

[Orangelion]

Just Think wrote:

<quoted text>
You know how to "right"?
LOL

I don't have dyselxia, so I don't know where I get this from, but I know how to "write" LOL.

[Orangelion]

Lacez wrote:

<quoted text>
You don't even understand what you're saying.
Why don't you go back to class, I'm sure you're failing English, math and anything resembling a humanities class.

Have you looked into it yet? I reckon your under 30. Go live with your mother till you've learned enough about life to be responsible. You sound to be only 23.

[Jane Dough]

Orangelion wrote:

<quoted text>
Have you looked into it yet? I reckon your under 30. Go live with your mother till you've learned enough about life to be responsible. You sound to be only 23.

actually he is 20 and lives with mom right now.

[Orangelion]

Jane Dough wrote:

<quoted text>
actually he is 20 and lives with mom right now.

LOL, Shows doesn't it! Maybe that is why she comes up with crap!

[Jane Dough]

Orangelion wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL, Shows doesn't it! Maybe that is why she comes up with crap!

I dont knof if its a boy or girl, don't care, but Lacez said as much the other week, and I took it as a sign to treat with a grain of salt...

[Orangelion]

Jane Dough wrote:

<quoted text>
I dont knof if its a boy or girl, don't care, but Lacez said as much the other week, and I took it as a sign to treat with a grain of salt...

Its hard to treat even as a grain of salt claims that haven't even been given evidence despite the evidence of the opposing claim.

[Curteese]

Orangelion wrote:

<quoted text>
I know how to right, I just forget to pay enough attention. You look pathetic, not intimidating.

I'm not sure if you're so great at knowing how to 'right', but you certainly are good at knowing how to 'WRONG'.

[dances with weebles]

disgusted wrote:

<quoted text>
i'm sure you would. by the way, there's no such word as idiocracy in the English dictionary.

sure there is... it's what the u.s. would have been living under if either palin or bachman had ever been elected... or romney for that fact. we'd have a country,'of the idiot, by the idiot and for the idiot'

[Jane Dough]

Curteese wrote:

<quoted text>I'm not sure if you're so great at knowing how to 'right', but you certainly are good at knowing how to 'WRONG'.

and you are great at playing the faux elitist bourgeoisie card to the max!

ideas bro, its about the ideas....

[Rose_NoHo]

Orangelion wrote:

<quoted text>
Little girl, I already explained this, you may not understand it but, if all gays made up a family,

Every single gay person in one family? That would be a big one, even if gays made only 1% of the population, as some people claim, that would be around 60,000,000 in one family. Yeah, that would be a mess.

[Orangelion]

dances with weebles wrote:

<quoted text>
sure there is... it's what the u.s. would have been living under if either palin or bachman had ever been elected... or romney for that fact. we'd have a country,'of the idiot, by the idiot and for the idiot'

Romney is supporting feminism, gay rights and paedophilia, investing tax, and allowing muslims into the country, look at his stupid mistake in libria for example.

[Orangelion]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Every single gay person in one family? That would be a big one, even if gays made only 1% of the population, as some people claim, that would be around 60,000,000 in one family. Yeah, that would be a mess.

It will spread with more gay converts idiot.

[Orangelion]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>
Every single gay person in one family? That would be a big one, even if gays made only 1% of the population, as some people claim, that would be around 60,000,000 in one family. Yeah, that would be a mess.

The families as a whole would be ruined, which in turn would wreck society dope.

[Orangelion]

Jane Dough wrote:

<quoted text>
and you are great at playing the faux elitist bourgeoisie card to the max!
ideas bro, its about the ideas....

Gays don't have a brain, so they have to revert to doing sick acts with their bodies.

[Rose_NoHo]

Orangelion wrote:

<quoted text>
It will spread with more gay converts idiot.

Gay converts? Really?
OK, tell us, what could someone tell you that would make you convert?
You folks remind me of this:
"'98 Homosexual-Recruitment Drive Nearing Goal"
http://www.theonion.com/articles/98-homosexua...

[Rose_NoHo]

Orangelion wrote:

<quoted text>
The families as a whole would be ruined, which in turn would wreck society dope.

You keep going in circles. HOW would families be ruined? WHAT exactly would happen?
Must suck to be as stupid as you are.

[Lacez]

Jane Dough wrote:

<quoted text>
I dont knof if its a boy or girl, don't care, but Lacez said as much the other week, and I took it as a sign to treat with a grain of salt...

You said you're a lawyer, yet you know very little of anything based in fact, and so we all know from experience that you are a liar and enjoy making baseless claims.

We know that everything you say is empty, from the fact that you obviously lied about being a lawyer.

[Lacez]

Orangelion wrote:

<quoted text>
Have you looked into it yet? I reckon your under 30. Go live with your mother till you've learned enough about life to be responsible. You sound to be only 23.

See, I can form comment with my grammar intact, I can form comments that make sense and not go on random tangents about Ratchet and Clank.
From what we see in your comments, you're probably a 12 year old. You obviously don't have an education, or you'd be able to spell properly and make points with something to back them up in order to make them valid claims.
You and Jane are the same.
You enjoy making wild claims without any sources to back you up.

At least when asked, I can provide a source, and I try to keep them as unbiased as possible.
If you think being a 20 year old saving up until financially set to move out is a bad thing, then you obviously don't know a good choice when you see one.