Rick Santorum: Gay Marriage Will 'Dis...

Rick Santorum: Gay Marriage Will 'Disintegrate' American Family

There are 2277 comments on the On Top Magazine story from Oct 11, 2012, titled Rick Santorum: Gay Marriage Will 'Disintegrate' American Family. In it, On Top Magazine reports that:

Rick Santorum has claimed that the American family would be on the precipice of extinction if gay marriage where to become legal.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at On Top Magazine.

“Equality for ALL”

Since: Jul 10

Massachusetts

#122 Oct 13, 2012
Mona Lott wrote:
<quoted text>
What State do you live in?
Delusion

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#123 Oct 13, 2012
Junior E wrote:
<quoted text>
.... and as they use non-monagamous relationships as rationalization for gay marriage, it would only exacerbate the divorce problem.
Please provide statistics that show that married gay couples are less likely to remain monogamous than straight couples.

And, list the states that ban marriage for all people in a group, based on the divorce rates in that group.

Thanks.

“Equality for ALL”

Since: Jul 10

Massachusetts

#124 Oct 13, 2012
Circular Cemetery wrote:
Liberal liars of Massachusetts and the slap on the wrists that they receive. Notice the probate officers name Mona? Are you familiar of what he pulled off this year with his daughter? You want liberal lies Mona. Got millions of them here in Beserkshire county and a newspaper to ignore it all. You people are insane!
Then why do you remain living in a state that you hate so much? MOVE AWAY!!

Move to a state that has enacted constitutional bans on same-sex marriage so you be with people like yourself.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#125 Oct 13, 2012
Circular Cemetery wrote:
One man and one woman only!
Not one man and many women.
Not one woman and many men.
Not a brother and a sister.
Not a brother and a brother.
Not a sister and a sister.
Not an adult with a teen.
Not an adult with a child.
Not a person with a dog.
Not a person with a donkey.
Or any other possible combination the kinky liberal can legitimize. Yet if you noticed among that list big govt provided special rights and sanctuary for only one of those vice outside of a man and a woman. You might as well sanction them all.
You ARE aware that a married gay couple is no different than a married straight couple, right? The ONLY difference is the plumbing.

Not the number of spouses.
Not incestuous spouses.
Not child marriage.
Not bestiality.

Really, the ONLY people we hear supporting such things are those who don't like the idea of single, adult, non-related humans marrying. You know, people like yourself.

Those things are foremost in YOUR mind, not in the minds of sane gay and straight married folks.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#126 Oct 13, 2012
Circular Cemetery wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee Dave please forgive me for misspeaking. You forgot to add one of the highest pedo rates too. Especially in Berkshire County. I guess the low pregnancy rate would be due to abortions and yes, homosexuals can't have children Dave. Gee Dave? Why would the population actually drop here in Mass. You're an idiot!
LOL!
Yes, straight males do have the highest rates for harming children, usually ones they know.

But we allow straight males to marry, anyway.

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#127 Oct 13, 2012
Circular Cemetery wrote:
Gee Jerald a typical liberal response when confronted with facts and that is totally dismiss them entirely and move onto the continual insanity you spew in hopes that the ignorant sheeps here will actually believe you and frightenly many do.
Your party has been destroying America since the hippie movement and expects others to pay for it. Do liberals even have the word responsibility or morals in their heads? I think Obama may have said so a couple times I'll give em that, but Clinton or the Kennedy's? LOL!
Anyone who can vilify half of the country for not sharing their political beliefs, regardless of the party they support, is just an idiot.

Half the country is destroying it? Half the country is immoral? Half the country spews insanity?

I suggest you move to another country.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#128 Oct 13, 2012
Circular Cemetery wrote:
<quoted text>
You conveniently forget what homosexual and heterosexual 'vice' have already had on our society through std's and pornography. People are already losing their jobs and their rights because they simply express their beliefs that homosexual acts are wrong. Which they are.
Good, they SHOULD lose their jobs.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#129 Oct 13, 2012
Junior E wrote:
<quoted text>
"I know MANY heteros who got married who NEVER had ANY intent of it being monogamous. Not suprisingly they're all divorced now and on their 2nd or 3rd non-monogamous marriage."
You certainly have a strange choice of friends.
But again, gays would be even less manogamous, and as they use non-monagamous relationships as rationalization for gay marriage, it would only exacerbate the divorce problem.
Still no evidence whatsoever, just more of your bigoted predictions.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#130 Oct 13, 2012
Circular Cemetery wrote:
One man and one woman only!
Not one man and many women.
Not one woman and many men.
Not a brother and a sister.
Not a brother and a brother.
Not a sister and a sister.
Not an adult with a teen.
Not an adult with a child.
Not a person with a dog.
Not a person with a donkey.
Or any other possible combination the kinky liberal can legitimize. Yet if you noticed among that list big govt provided special rights and sanctuary for only one of those vice outside of a man and a woman. You might as well sanction them all.
All your sexual fantasies aside, same-sex couples will have the same right to marry as opposite-sex couples. And we'll have the same legal rights & benefits as well.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#131 Oct 13, 2012
Junior E wrote:
<quoted text>
So when a straight loses his job for criticizing gays, he has no "rights". But when a gay loses his job, it's time to lawyer up.
Just like she's "lawyering up" now?

See, that's how equality actually works.

If she feels she was discriminated against, she can get a lawyer just like the rest of us.

The University has every right to fire her, and she has every right to sue them over it.

“Headed toward the cliff”

Since: Nov 07

Tawas City, Michigan

#132 Oct 13, 2012
Circular Cemetery wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee Dave please forgive me for misspeaking. You forgot to add one of the highest pedo rates too. Especially in Berkshire County. I guess the low pregnancy rate would be due to abortions and yes, homosexuals can't have children Dave. Gee Dave? Why would the population actually drop here in Mass. You're an idiot!
LOL!
The population in Massachusetts didn't drop. In fact it increased 3.1% from 2000 to 2010. It just didn't increase as fast as the other states, so you lost a House seat because of it.

The only state to actually lose population over that 10 year period was Michigan.

You really should get your facts straight just once.
Power Bait

Pittsfield, MA

#133 Oct 13, 2012
It's nice to see the whole gang here. The hourly rate must be astounding.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#134 Oct 13, 2012
Say NO to Homosex wrote:
Keep queers away from kids and eat at Chick fil a.
WOO HOO
Please. The sooner you idiots die off from eating that crap, the better.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#135 Oct 13, 2012
Jesus had two dads.
He turned out OK.

Since: Jan 12

Port Richey, FL

#136 Oct 13, 2012
Junior E wrote:
<quoted text>
My statement is not ridiculous. It is based on documented fact the majority of homosexual relationships are not monogamous.
you have no idea what you're talking about maybe of the 2-5% that is homosexual maybe 1/3 that do practice what we like to call a open relationship but you seem to want to make it something dirty, when its not. compared to the amount of hedrosexuals that call them self swingers if you would explain the difference i'd like to hear it. so I would say your statement is invalid. not to mention the people that are for the most part are couples in their late 30 and older looking for the security thet samesex marriage brings sex has little to do with it.
Moses

Pittsfield, MA

#137 Oct 13, 2012
disaster in the making wrote:
<quoted text>
you have no idea what you're talking about maybe of the 2-5% that is homosexual maybe 1/3 that do practice what we like to call a open relationship but you seem to want to make it something dirty, when its not. compared to the amount of hedrosexuals that call them self swingers if you would explain the difference i'd like to hear it. so I would say your statement is invalid. not to mention the people that are for the most part are couples in their late 30 and older looking for the security thet samesex marriage brings sex has little to do with it.
Again, homosexuals like to rationalize for the mistakes or frailties of hetero's. The normal hetero's are merely pointing out that both of you are wrong. When the hell are you people gonna get into your heads. Adultery in many states IS illegal and should be but it is not enforced and that is too bad, especially when children are involved. Adultery is illegal, polygamy is, incest, pedophilia, and so should homosexuality.
What a bunch of morons and what a cost unto society all the above have been!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#138 Oct 13, 2012
Junior E wrote:
<quoted text>
"I know MANY heteros who got married who NEVER had ANY intent of it being monogamous. Not suprisingly they're all divorced now and on their 2nd or 3rd non-monogamous marriage."
You certainly have a strange choice of friends.
But again, gays would be even less manogamous, and as they use non-monagamous relationships as rationalization for gay marriage, it would only exacerbate the divorce problem.
The problem with your position is that the Gay lib movement really grew during the Hetero "sexual revolution" of the '60s.

Remember, the main reason for non-promiscuity among heteros is that women don't want to be pregnant and rearing children all the time.

The natural state of male mammals is not monogamy. lol

“Take Topix Back From Trolls”

Since: Dec 08

El Paso, TX

#139 Oct 13, 2012
Far better we make stupid illegal. Folks like you could use some time in jail.
Moses wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, homosexuals like to rationalize for the mistakes or frailties of hetero's. The normal hetero's are merely pointing out that both of you are wrong. When the hell are you people gonna get into your heads. Adultery in many states IS illegal and should be but it is not enforced and that is too bad, especially when children are involved. Adultery is illegal, polygamy is, incest, pedophilia, and so should homosexuality.
What a bunch of morons and what a cost unto society all the above have been!
Junior E

United States

#140 Oct 13, 2012
snyper wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem with your position is that the Gay lib movement really grew during the Hetero "sexual revolution" of the '60s.
Remember, the main reason for non-promiscuity among heteros is that women don't want to be pregnant and rearing children all the time.
The natural state of male mammals is not monogamy. lol
"The natural state of male mammals is not monogamy."
Snyp, At least the blacks will agree with you.

Since: Apr 11

Panorama City, CA

#141 Oct 13, 2012
Moses wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, homosexuals like to rationalize for the mistakes or frailties of hetero's. The normal hetero's are merely pointing out that both of you are wrong. When the hell are you people gonna get into your heads. Adultery in many states IS illegal and should be but it is not enforced and that is too bad, especially when children are involved.
Because we all know nothing is better for kids than seeing their parents hauled off to jail...
Moses wrote:
Adultery is illegal, polygamy is, incest, pedophilia, and so should homosexuality.
Put men in jail to stop them from having sex with each other...
Hmmm..
Now there's a plan!
Moses wrote:
What a bunch of morons and what a cost unto society all the above have been!
If they ever outlaw stupid, you'd better run!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Washington court rules against florist in gay w... 8 min Amused 65
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 47 min Respect71 45,158
News Doritos makes rainbow chips in support of gay r... (Sep '15) 49 min guest 1,092
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 1 hr carter county res... 24,777
Looking for a girlfriend for a married bi-sexual (Aug '08) 7 hr Pleasures feminin... 55
News Singer Greg Gould: 'I was told not to be too gay' 8 hr Marco R s Secret ... 1
News Gay Pride just 'not black enough' 8 hr Marco R s Secret ... 1
More from around the web