Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201863 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202689 Jul 15, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Because there are more people that at anytime in history.
The difference that you try and overlook is that before there were civil battles, it was legal. Slavery is currently not legal in any country. While you are right that it still occurs, and the numbers would vary depending upon how you classify it, the fact remains that it is NOT acceptable, where in the past it was.
<quoted text>
No kumquat, the REAL "IDIOT" distortion is that anything at all has been imposed on marriage. THAT is an idiotic statement. It holds absolutely no truth. Absolutely nothing has been IMPOSED on marriage.
Oh, and another REAL "IDIOTIC" distortion would be that anyone at all made a comparison between marriage and slavery.
As always, your comprehension skills suck, and your intentional deceitfulness has been presented.
Now please, do hurry along with some more of your ridiculous fundamentalist bumper sticker arguments. The sheeple just love them, you know, cause they are the only ones stupid enough to think there is any sense to them.
<quoted text>
You are an intentionally deceitful, agitative c*nt. Your god finds your actions despicable. The rest of us just recognize how pathetic you are.
"Your God, who by the way doesn't exist, finds your actions despicable."

Priceless!

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#202690 Jul 15, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Recycling exposed lies
You should make this the headline on your profile.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202691 Jul 15, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Because there are more people that at anytime in history.
(So, you also find fault with VV's words? Cool beans. Oh snap.)
The difference that you try and overlook is that before there were civil battles, it was legal. Slavery is currently not legal in any country. While you are right that it still occurs, and the numbers would vary depending upon how you classify it, the fact remains that it is NOT acceptable, where in the past it was.
(Unless you were one of the unfortunate ones, I doubt that ANY of them found it to be acceptable. However, we are not condoning slavery, we are examining the truthfulness of VV's words)
<quoted text>
No kumquat, the REAL "IDIOT" distortion is that anything at all has been imposed on marriage. THAT is an idiotic statement. It holds absolutely no truth. Absolutely nothing has been IMPOSED on marriage.
(Except, of course, for the tenets of societies.)
Oh, and another REAL "IDIOTIC" distortion would be that anyone at all made a comparison between marriage and slavery.
(Please don't back-pedal now, it's been "made" countless times already, every time one of you Crisco babies mentions Loving V Virginia)
As always, your comprehension skills suck, and your intentional deceitfulness has been presented.
(Hardly)
Now please, do hurry along with some more of your ridiculous fundamentalist bumper sticker arguments. The sheeple just love them, you know, cause they are the only ones stupid enough to think there is any sense to them.
(Are these the same Sheeple that D uses, when referring to the "polls"?)
<quoted text>
You are an intentionally deceitful, agitative c*nt. Your god finds your actions despicable. The rest of us just recognize how pathetic you are.
And you are worse than any that you rant about, laddie. And, while we're here, did his God tell you that, Himself?
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202692 Jul 15, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I know. Right?
And any opinions counter to theirs are insults. Of course you can't have an intelligent discussion with people who have that dumb attitude. But you know that. So what the hell, like you say, it's the Springer show! Might as well have some fun with these clowns. Carry on!
Except, here, the "Steve" is called the "Mod". A faceless entity.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#202693 Jul 15, 2013
Big D wrote:
<quoted text>
If we are in the business of deciding who is fit to be parents and who is not, then my vote would be to not allow you to raise children.
That level of hatred and bigotry would be a terrible home to be raised in.
Personally I don’t think it should be the governments place to decide, but that seems to be the way you want it…. then let’s take away your rights to raise them.
An ad homoan attack, stupidity followed by a lie.

No one was talking about the government deciding.

I simply and accurately noted that scientific proof has agreed with natures decision: A child is far better with their birth patents than any other.

Idiot
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202694 Jul 15, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
So, by denying your children the possibility of religion, you were actually doing them a favor? Saving them the troubles and tribulations of deciding for themselves? How enlightened of you...
I suspect Big D saved his children from ANY independent decisions.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202695 Jul 15, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Who gives a goddamn when it comes to kids in regards to marriage?...
Priceless. Just priceless.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202696 Jul 15, 2013
veryvermilion wrote:
<quoted text>
Who gives a goddamn when it comes to kids in regards to marriage?
As has been established throughout this entire conversation, married people are not required to have children. People who are unable to or who have no desire to have kids can and do marry.
If you're going to define marriage based on a couple's ability or desire to have children, then you need to halt all marriages between couples who will not have them.
Otherwise, STFU about kids and sterility, etc...
If you're going to argue this issue, you need to come up with a REAL reason for gays not to marry, vag man.
Ssnarky. Testy, one might say..
Pardon, your rage is showing...
And.. "Who gives a goddamn when it comes to kids in regards to ...."? I do, you poof! I care about the kids in everyrespect. Robbing them of basic needs is your's and D's game. Not the rest of us, we care a lot more than you, with your "Who gives a goddamn when it comes to kids in regards to ....." BS.Your true colors have just been unfurled. Hater. Throw another kid under the bus, so that you may have your YumYums. You DO deserve a beating.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202697 Jul 15, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
The troll threatens to report you! Priceless. That's why I like these silly jackasses.
Say, does that carry any penalties?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202698 Jul 15, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
...Damn you are a vile c*nt....
Likewise.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202699 Jul 15, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Better to survive without a brain then without a heart.
Smile c*nt.
Jonah1 said, brainlessly.

“Crusading Fundies r hilarious!”

Since: Feb 11

Location hidden

#202700 Jul 15, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
The facts disagree with you.
ANY default family falls significantly short of natural families
FACT: There's no such thing as a default family. If you wish to be taken seriously, you will have to stick with reality, not your fundie inspired dream world.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Kids lose when we weaken and destroy marriage and family.
Kids lose when they have bad parents, resulting in a poor family structure. Period. The gender make up of the parents is irrelevant to the success of failure of the family structure.

Save the "destruction" talk, and your fundie-twirling for the sheeple.
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
SS couples will only ever be a mutually sterile, duplicate gendered half of marriage. No law will ever change that.
The "sterility" of a ss couple is only important to you. No one else cares. And the "mutual sterility" of ss couples is irrelevant to child rearing.

There's still no such thing as a half marriage, and the law is still not interested in whether a couple mutually procreates or not, nor are any of the following interested in the gender make up of parents:

American Academy of Pediatrics
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
American Psychiatric Association
American Psychological Association
American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy
American Psychoanalytic Association
National Association of Social Workers
Child Welfare League of America
North American Council on Adoptable Children
Canadian Psychological Association

Now, you'll excuse the vast majority of the populace if they take the word of these esteemed organizations and institutions over that of a lonely, pissed off, busy body, internet trolling c*nt.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202701 Jul 15, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
...But don't let facts get in the way of you publically displaying your stupidity.
Poor advice. Doesn't work for you either but you still do it.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202702 Jul 15, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
When was abortion equated to marriage? By whom, and when? Abortion is a procedure, marriage is an institution. Who exactly has been doing this "equating".
The fact that you can't see the idiocy in your ridiculous propaganda is hilarious. You are a fool.
When were homosexuals equated to marriage? By whom, and when? Homosexuals are people, marriage is an institution. Who exactly has been doing this "equating"?
(Watch as KiMare fundie-twirls around this ridiculous rhetoric!!!)
Oh, and laws aren't motivated, they are ruled upon.
But I will offer up my condolences that you pridefully sit outside the norms of public opionion. I award you the very well deserved Hazel Massery Award of the day. You've earned it!!
<quoted text>
Damn you are a vile c*nt.
<quoted text>
When fundamentalists start holding funeral services for all the millions of miscarriages that occur each year, then we will let you call them babies. Until you treat those occurrences just as you do with those that were birthed, stfu about babies.
<quoted text>
In the case of sterility, the law isn't concerned. Why you are is beyond anyone's guess. Well, actually we all know why you are. Because you dislike gays, but you can't figure out any real reason to treat them differently. Bigotry at it's finest.
Oh, and there's no such thing as a half marriage. Honestly, if your cause is so just, why do you have to be such a liar and so deceitful? The ONLY thing equated to marriage dear, is other marriages. Your dislike of this FACT is completely and utterly irrelevant.
<quoted text>
Yes, and it was all over you and your ilk. You disgust her.
*INSERT SOUNDTRACK HERE*

Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202703 Jul 15, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Bumper sticker repetition. The argument of idiots.
Jonah1 said, idiotically.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202704 Jul 15, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
It was really profound advice and I still carry it with me. Bravery is not the absence of fear, it's the mastery of it.
(Nods solemnly while saying) Yes sir, that's right. Those without fear are not brave, they are stupid.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202705 Jul 15, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Bumper sticker repetition. The argument of idiots.
He said, repetitively...
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#202706 Jul 15, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
More sowing discord. Your god despises your actions. He finds you to be vile.
Proverbs 6:16-19
Enjoy hell. Smile.
Would that be the God that you insist doesn't exist?

Frankie 6:16-19 "Jonah1 is an angry dope." Chuckle.
Rocky Hudsony

Wooster, OH

#202707 Jul 15, 2013
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
More sowing discord. Your god despises your actions. He finds you to be vile.
Proverbs 6:16-19
Enjoy hell. Smile.
And, does He prefer Classical music or Disco?

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#202708 Jul 15, 2013
Rocky Hudsony wrote:
<quoted text>
1)-- No, we don't. But, the world has revolved around us, without whom, NONE of us would be here. Your pointing your "fault-finding" finger at us does nothing to validate your sect. It's not a game of "tag", so this tactic does nothing to exonerate your position. It does, however, look like a childish game.
2)-- I didn't ask you to change, and I know that you are incapable of it. Nice try, it would seem that "misdirection" and "misrepresentation" are still the standard tactics used by you and yours in a futile attempt to cloud the issue. A class you may be, but so are junkies. they, also, are not granted anything special to go along with the titles. Additionally, we don't do every single thing that you do. Noticing and commenting on this requires no nerve.
3)-- Do you mean "eaten" or "ate". Or are you bein' all country and using "et" in the hillbilly way? "Various times"? Are you for real? By societies that couldn't sustain themselves? Cause and effect. They all lost their moral compasses, and then they lost.....period. Polygamy allows, nay, requires both genders, or else it is a polygamous gay relationship, something that has had NO footholds in any society with any "staying power". If any that allowed it were still in existence, y'all (hillbilly vernacular) would have run off to that place, long ago...
4)-- "Paranoid"? Try cognizant. Rational. Lucid. Observant. Get the picture? They are not going to set up any shops that will have no willing patients or clientele. Would they?
5)-- You flatter yourself.(yet again) You're the ones with the "backup". You have free reign to say anything that you please, but it's us who get banned for using the same words that you use, so freely.
--Look, you're the one who attempted to rate heterosexuals as being superior to gays simply because you can procreate. I simply pointed out that you do, in fact, procreate; but to a point of overpopulation, starvation, and abortion of unwanted fetuses.
Being straight is no better than being gay. Actually, if you look at the fact that gays can have intercourse without bringing more babies into the world, you might find that homosexuality is helping to deal with the social problems that I listed.

--You don't want me to change, yet you claim that we had some hand in a global conspiracy to eliminate homosexuality from the lists of medical, biological, and psychiatric disorders.
So which is it? Are we disordered and therefore in need to being "cured" or are we, as you say, "incapable" of change?

--Yes, heterosexuals do everything that we do. They engage in oral and anal sex. They engage in mutual masturbation. They hang from the ceilings and engage in all sorts of debauchery. Not all gays engage in these things; just like not all straight people engage in these behaviors.

--"Eat up" is a part of the Southern vernacular. I was raised in the South and I currently live in the South. I will use such language from time to time in my posts.

--Show me proof that any society fell solely due to their acceptance of homosexuality. I'll be waiting on the veranda.

--I brought up the practice of polygamy because you keep saying all marriages involve "one man and one woman". Clearly you were incorrect.

--No, I'm pretty sure I meant paranoid. That you believe some huge conspiracy took place to remove homosexuality from the various lists of disorders.

--You guys get on here and "high five" one another for your ridiculous comments. That's what I mean by bringing back-up. Run and get Kimare, Pietro, or Frankie. You guys run in such a tight pack that if the one in front stops short, the ones behind you end up with their noses up your behind.

--TOPIX is an extremely conservative website. Read some of the articles they publish. I doubt that they're out to get you. If you got banned, it was probably something that you said that violated the TOS. Stop whining.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Sanders: Don't blame Islam for Orlando shooting 10 min Nopal 708
News Homosexuality and the Bible (Aug '11) 22 min toabhah 36,047
2016 NOM DC March for Marriage FAIL 23 min Mr Rogers 7
Who Is Your Favorite Gay? 25 min Mr Rogers 3
UPDATE: BIG 4th of JULY PARTY 29 min Ivan 37
News Pope says gay people deserve an apology 37 min Maggie 21
The gay cafe for GLBT, friends and family (Oct '09) 42 min NA JADE 68,796
News Obama: Notion that being armed would have saved... 51 min WasteWater 940
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 1 hr Rose 37,318
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 2 hr An NFL Fan 13,057
More from around the web