Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 8,016)

Showing posts 160,301 - 160,320 of199,084
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183629
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
How bout you fagg@t, want a d!ck up your a.ss?
Robert
Try rentboy dot com.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183630
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
But people who can only be attracted to the same gender are NOT new - only our knowledge of what that means and the terms used to describe it, are.
Are they? Is is it a matter of different concepts of sexuality today, than, say, for example in Ancient Rome and Greece, where terms such as "heterosexual", and "homosexual" did not exist? It seems that there is a significant sexual political identity element with same sex attraction today. Repeated use of "LGBT" (Why isn't that in alphabetical order?), various gay organizations, rainbow bumper stickers, flags, shirts, etc.

Despite the acceptance of same sex sexual behavior and/or orientation within various cultures in different times and place, it did not necessarily result in SSM, or other formally accepted relationships.
You would still need a valid state interest in denying equal protection under the law gay couples when it comes to marriage, though, regardless of how our knowledge has grown, or the changes in the terms we use.
Can you provide that?
As long as the gay couple is of the opposite sex, there is a valid state interest in that relationship, as there would be in other adult opposite sex relationships in regard to marriage. Remove one sex, replace it with a duplicate of the remaining sex, and the state interest is also removed.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183632
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
How bout you fagg@t, want a d!ck up your a.ss?
Robert
You are a very angry man, get some help! Let's hope a person like you never touches a gun.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183633
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey fagg@t, how bout a big d!ck up your a.ss?
Robert
Anything else on your mind?
Divorce

Sunnyvale, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183635
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Let Gay Divorce begin.

Finally you got to pay your share!!!

I've been discriminated against as a hetero. Get divorced and pay. Now older gay dudes with cash will give all away. Lose there house. Lose everything

You had it so good. Welcome to the club.

Get ready to lose everything in your gay divorce.

Welcome to equality.
Robsan5

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183636
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Anything else on your mind?
Yeah, wanta deep throat a big d!ck? You closet case.

Robert

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183637
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Same question.
If you don't know the cause how can you assert the result?
The epi-marker defect is all but proved. What does that say about the APA?
Snicker.
<quoted text>
You mean like the theory of evolution?
Snicker smile.
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
You trying to prove that being gay is genetic, and that this is a good reason to deny gay folks equality under the law?
So you are going to try again by another slimy shift?

Okay,

First, I'm not trying to prove anything. I don't have to, science already is.

Epigenetics has all but verified that epi-marker abnormalities cause homosexuality.

Second, I'm not denying equal relationships anything either. You are trying to impose an imposter relationship on marriage.

At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Not only do gay relationships fail and contradict that primary purpose, epi-marker defects validate that contradiction. A silly attempt to equate a natural diverse gender relationship with a duplicate defective relationship.

That's just a fact in the quest for truth.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183638
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
You are the gays only hope for existence?????
hahahahaha
ahahahahhahaha
ahahahahahahah
ahahhahahahaha
ahahahahahahah
Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183639
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
If it's been proven, why are the only mentions of it ANYWHERE on the Web, in your posts?
Isn't that odd?
You might want to check again;
Look up 'epigenetics/epi-marker/homose xuality'
Snicker.
guarantee paid

Covina, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183640
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Just flush yourselves down rthe nearests toilet.

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183641
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

http://healthland.time.com/2012/12/13/new-ins...

For an evolutionary biologist, homosexuality is something of a puzzle. Itís a common trait, found in up to 10% of the population. It appears to be run in families, suggesting that it is hereditary, at least in part. And yet it defies the very reason why traits are passed on from generation to generation. How could something that hinders childbearing be passed down so frequently from parents to children?

Researchers at the National Institute for Mathematical and Biological Synthesis (NIMBioS) think they may have an answer. Itís not in written in our DNA sequence itself, they suggest, which explains why scientists have failed so far to find ďgay genes,Ē despite intensive investigations. Instead, itís written in how our genes are expressed: that is, in certain modifications to how and when DNA is activated. These changes can have environmental roots, so are not normally permanent enough to be passed from parent to child. But occasionally, they are.

ďItís not genetics. Itís not DNA. Itís not pieces of DNA. Itís epigenetics,Ē says Sergey Gavrilets, a NIMBioS researcher and an author on the paper that outlines the new theory of homosexuality, published in The Quarterly Review of Biology.†ďThe hypothesis we put forward is based on epigenetic marks,Ē he says.

To be specific, the new theory suggests that homosexuality is caused by epigenetic marks, or ďepi-marks,Ē related to sensitivity to hormones in the womb. These are compounds that sit on DNA and regulate how active, or inactive certain genes are, and also control when during development these genes are most prolific. Gavrilets and his colleagues believe that gene expression may regulate how a fetus responds to testosterone, the all-important male sex hormone. They further argue that epi-marks may help to buffer a female fetus from high levels of testosterone by suppressing receptors that respond to testosterone, for example,(thus ensuring normal fetal development even in the presence of a lot of testosterone) or to buffer a male fetus from low levels of testosterone by upregulating receptors that bind to the hormone (ensuring normal fetal development even in the absence of high levels of testosterone). Normally, these epi-marks are erased after they are activated, but if those marks are passed down to the next generation, the same epi-marks that protected a man in utero may cause oversensitivity to testosterone among his daughters, and the epi-marks that protected a woman in utero may lead to undersensitivity to testosterone among her sons.

Since: Nov 12

Elk Grove, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183642
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Robsan5 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, wanta deep throat a big d!ck? You closet case.
Robert
Does it help to type your favorite thing to do? You sure are witty! lol.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183643
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

8

7

7

Kimare...

Firstly, I doubt that any scientist ever said, "...a stubborn epi-marker from a parent may stick around and get passed on to an opposite-sex child, instilling Mom's fashion sense in Raul or Dad's baritone in Suzi."

Secondly, neither you nor I know for certain that epigenetics create homosexuality. For the time being it is a theory.

Thirdly, even if epigenetics do somehow play a role in making a child gay, that DOES NOT mean that the epi-gene "malfunctioned" in some way. For all you know, it could be just as natural as any other process that goes into creating human beings.

Fourth, you bring up the negative historical and cultural responses to gays--how one day you guys may be vindicated once you believe a "cure" (I use quotations to indicate how ridiculous such a concept is) is found.
As I said earlier, you're the kind of person who wants everyone to be the same. You want purity and harmony. You ARE Hitler.
In your narrow little world, there isn't any room for diversity. If a gay person pops up, you want to stamp him into non-existence by way of a scientific or religious cure.
Slave owners and segregationists also wanted a cure. They wanted those pesky blacks to know their place--to embrace their positions in life.
They prayed for it. They beat blacks into submission. They strung them up by their necks to set examples.
You are no different than any of them.
I don't say these things to be unkind. Rather, I say them to get your attention!

Fifth; to say that normally people want grandchildren is one of the most egotistical and self-centered comments you have made. Who gives a damn about what you may want? Once your children have become adults, it's simply none of your business how they proceed in life.
A TRUE parent loves their child REGARDLESS of how they turn out. A TRUE parent wants what their child wants; not what the parent wants.

And finally, you DO NOT quote what the scientists say. You're the one who has coined the terms "epi-marker defect" and "epi-marker mistake". You are the one who is putting words into scientist's mouths by saying that this epi-genetic theory represents a "birth defect".
Just because something is "abnormal" does not make it a mistake. Being red headed is "abnormal". Being left-handed is "abnormal". Being 6'10" is "abnormal". But these are not "birth defects".
A defect is something that negatively impacts a person's life. Being gay does not do that. Gay people exist all around your and carry on day-to-day lives without any trouble at all (except when they run into the likes of you).
You and people like you are the ones who try to characterize certain behaviors with a negative connotation.

Do you REALLY think that you glorify God when you attempt to marginalize gays and stir up anti-gay sentiment?
You judge us, even though you are commanded not to do so. You make conclusions about our lives, even though that is not the true Christian way.

Leave us alone. We're not bothering you. You're fighting a battle inside your head. No one is trying to "gay marry" you. No one is trying to convert you to homosexuality. We are not bothering you. Just let us live our lives and we'll all be much happier.
Robsan5

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183644
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>Does it help to type your favorite thing to do? You sure are witty! lol.
It would help you if you would quit denying your true self and come on out of the closet.

Robert

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183645
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Same question.
If you don't know the cause how can you assert the result?
The epi-marker defect is all but proved. What does that say about the APA?
Snicker.
<quoted text>
You mean like the theory of evolution?
Snicker smile.
<quoted text>
So you are going to try again by another slimy shift?
Okay,
First, I'm not trying to prove anything. I don't have to, science already is.
Epigenetics has all but verified that epi-marker abnormalities cause homosexuality.
Second, I'm not denying equal relationships anything either. You are trying to impose an imposter relationship on marriage.
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Not only do gay relationships fail and contradict that primary purpose, epi-marker defects validate that contradiction. A silly attempt to equate a natural diverse gender relationship with a duplicate defective relationship.
That's just a fact in the quest for truth.
Smile.
There you go again... Trying to sound all scientific. And you always seem to fail.

When you look up the term "epi marker abnormalities" this is what you get on google "No results found for "epi marker abnormalities".

Please stick to what you know best. You have already proven multiple times that you're no scientist; that you don't know what you're talking about.

You so badly and unsuccessfully attempt to explain these THEORIES that you only end up repeatedly making a fool of yourself.

Since: Mar 07

The entire US of A

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183646
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

6

5

5

Divorce wrote:
Let Gay Divorce begin.
Finally you got to pay your share!!!
I've been discriminated against as a hetero. Get divorced and pay. Now older gay dudes with cash will give all away. Lose there house. Lose everything
You had it so good. Welcome to the club.
Get ready to lose everything in your gay divorce.
Welcome to equality.
Equal opportunity to screw up marriages, but also equal opportunity to be fulfilled in them.

You weren't happy, and that's sad, but many gay and straight folks have a better marriage than that.

Since: Jan 10

Lewis Center, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183647
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

7

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Same question.
If you don't know the cause how can you assert the result?
The epi-marker defect is all but proved. What does that say about the APA?
Snicker.
<quoted text>
You mean like the theory of evolution?
Snicker smile.
<quoted text>
So you are going to try again by another slimy shift?
Okay,
First, I'm not trying to prove anything. I don't have to, science already is.
Epigenetics has all but verified that epi-marker abnormalities cause homosexuality.
Second, I'm not denying equal relationships anything either. You are trying to impose an imposter relationship on marriage.
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.
Not only do gay relationships fail and contradict that primary purpose, epi-marker defects validate that contradiction. A silly attempt to equate a natural diverse gender relationship with a duplicate defective relationship.
That's just a fact in the quest for truth.
Smile.
Understanding why someone is Gay (which will not be understood for a very long time, if ever) and equal treatment of Gay Americans are two separate things. Your ignorance fuels your insistence that they are correlated. There is only scientific theory, I repeat theory, about what makes someone Gay and makes someone non-gay. Itís people like you that irresponsibly and repeatedly present scientific hypothesis as truth to justify your hate. Fact is youíre not smart enough or qualified to convert scientific theory in to truth.
gavin newsom

San Francisco, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183648
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Understanding why someone is Gay (which will not be understood for a very long time, if ever) and equal treatment of Gay Americans are two separate things. Your ignorance fuels your insistence that they are correlated. There is only scientific theory, I repeat theory, about what makes someone Gay and makes someone non-gay. Itís people like you that irresponsibly and repeatedly present scientific hypothesis as truth to justify your hate. Fact is youíre not smart enough or qualified to convert scientific theory in to truth.
..........barrack obama george bush jr and sr and tyhe clintons.....all donated money to san francisco over 400 million plus technlogy....for people to get sex changes for free.........us goverment estimated over 400 million people around the world and even san francisco were forced into sex changes.....some of the people have gotten false memory syndrome not remembering that they were the opposite sex ....so if two guys were forced into sex changes and do not know because of people lieing to them every day useing false photographs and memorys these two guys who now look like woman will still be attracted to woman......out of the 400 million forced into sex changes since 2006 99 percent do not have memorys of the sex change...as in drug you up knock you out you wont remember a thing
im gay

San Francisco, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183649
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

7

7

6

Marram wrote:
<quoted text>
Understanding why someone is Gay (which will not be understood for a very long time, if ever) and equal treatment of Gay Americans are two separate things. Your ignorance fuels your insistence that they are correlated. There is only scientific theory, I repeat theory, about what makes someone Gay and makes someone non-gay. Itís people like you that irresponsibly and repeatedly present scientific hypothesis as truth to justify your hate. Fact is youíre not smart enough or qualified to convert scientific theory in to truth.
..........barrack obama george bush jr and sr and tyhe clintons.....all donated money to san francisco over 400 million plus technlogy....for people to get sex changes for free.........us goverment estimated over 400 million people around the world and even san francisco were forced into sex changes.....some of the people have gotten false memory syndrome not remembering that they were the opposite sex ....so if two guys were forced into sex changes and do not know because of people lieing to them every day useing false photographs and memorys these two guys who now look like woman will still be attracted to woman......out of the 400 million forced into sex changes since 2006 99 percent do not have memorys of the sex change...as in drug you up knock you out you wont remember a thing..........none of his is true unless some one famous from tv says no one cares or will listen
Sparkie

San Dimas, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#183650
Mar 17, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Fire up Sparkie and test it on a Tea Party member firsdt.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 160,301 - 160,320 of199,084
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••