Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

[Neil Andblowme]

Nay Nay wrote:

But it's completely acceptable to violate the constitution and mandate government healthcare.
I see how this works...

Government healthcare? What have you got against Medicare?

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Wow! Imagine if someone posted similar hate, ignorance and bigotry against gay marriage.

sorry wrong post I replied to

are you complaining about my hatred of Immoral religious child molesters?

Too bad

[WW they thinking]

A police officer has been demoted for sending sexually-explicit video to her boyfriend.

Lopez herself is now reportedly considering a lawsuit against the city.

Her lawyer explained that her case would be based on "constitutional issues over lawful off-duty behavior and violation of privacy."

[WWJD]

Smoke out

[WWJD]

Thank you Jesus

[Frankie Rizzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
sorry wrong post I replied to
are you complaining about my hatred of Immoral religious child molesters?
Too bad

No I am pointing out bigotry and ignorance in condemning a whole group due to the actions of a few.

There are some bad homosexuals too. Does that mean we should label all homosexuals bad? Of course not. But that is exactly what you are doing with polygamists.

Hope that helps.

[Frankie Rizzo]

Big D wrote:

<quoted text>
What hate...

This hate: "Immoral religious degenerates"

[Black momma OG]

Hey it is black history month so I get to slap a white peron first my cracker husband (smile) but he will just enjoy it Hey frank why is your cousin police officer Willie shooting up people(smile)

[Big D]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
This hate: "Immoral religious degenerates"

Yeah, people that force children to have sex with older men, the ones in the news you see all the time, and anyone that disagrees that they are Religious immoral degenerates is also an immoral degenerate.

[Jazybird58]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Gays can't love. I take it you've never been in love yourself considering you think they can and have, or confuse them for love.

You really are stupid

[Jazybird58]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Gay marriage disables people from reproduction. So the survival of the fittest wouldn't even work without it.

HEY stupid, reproduction is not a requirement in marriage.

[Jazybird58]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Really? People who marry tend to have kids, although many gays tend to accept their marriages without having kids, rather than having children. If gay marriage isn't allowed, they will be made to have sex with women to have children.

You really are stupid

[chance47]

Frankie Rizzo wrote:

<quoted text>
Too wordy.

Really?

[chance47]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
1. Only if you are dismissive of the unrefuted answers.
2. So defensive (and avoiding the issue...)! The difference is between asking "do you think" (a question) and stating "why do you think" (an assertion). You lied. Like I said, why are these childish word games necessary for a legitimate cause?
...

Huh? What is your question again?

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
...3. Of course lots of gays have procreated. That's not what I said and you know it. Another act of deception. I said gay couples.
Not one single gay couple in ALL of human history has ever procreated....

That is unture.

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
...The differences between marriage with/without kids and gay couples;
A apple tree bearing fruit.
A apple tree not bearing fruit for some reason.
A walnut tree who never bears apples wanting to be a apple tree.
A walnut tree hanging apples on it's branches pretending to be a apple tree.
Even funnier?
The claim that if the government doesn't 'require' apple trees to bear fruit, then it is discrimination not to call walnut trees apple trees too!....

Why do you contend marraige has anything to do with offspring? It doesn't. Having children and getting married are two independent events!

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
...
4. You make a simpleton blunder by confusing 'blunder' and 'defect' with 'mutation'. Evolution thrives on mutation. However, a mutation that cannot perpetuate itself is a blunder/defect.
Remember when I schooled you about the fundamental goal of evolution (VIST)?
I = Inheritance: Genetic traits are inherited from parents and are passed on to offspring.
S = Selection: Organisms with traits that are favorable to their survival get to live and pass on their genes to the next generation.
It seems to me your post picture should be a buff ego with no head...
Snicker.

Now tell me who's playing word games, really?

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
.... Snicker.

Of course your smile is gone now as it should be!

[Reality2013]

Once again we have activist judges making up their own absurd interpretation to ignore the will of the people. The ban did not violate anyone's right it just protected the ability of straight couples to differentiate their marriage from non-traditional unions. Marriage doesn't mean much anymore as it is.It was originally very religious and now is very legal. It used to be a contract you did not break for every little problem you have in a marriage. The Gay community can now be as unhappy and join the high divorce rate.

[Neil Andblowme]

Reality2013 wrote:

Once again we have activist judges making up their own absurd interpretation to ignore the will of the people. The ban did not violate anyone's right it just protected the ability of straight couples to differentiate their marriage from non-traditional unions. Marriage doesn't mean much anymore as it is.It was originally very religious and now is very legal. It used to be a contract you did not break for every little problem you have in a marriage. The Gay community can now be as unhappy and join the high divorce rate.

Um, hellooooooooooooooo.... Prop 8 took away the right that gay couples had to marry. How can you say it didn't violate anyone's rights?

Marriage was NOT originally very religious. It's always been a legal contract.

[chance47]

KiMare wrote:

1. Which makes the gay (pun intended) claim that not having access to marriage stops love.
...

Love is. Marriage is different.

KiMare wrote:

...2. Of course rights are innate. However, certain rights are unique to select people/groups. You avoid answering the assertion; Why discriminate with only gays relationships instead of all relationships?
...

Why indeed?! You must be confused. Denying the basic human right of marriage to gay couples is the DISCRIMIANTION (duh!) that shouldn't be there.

KiMare wrote:

...3. You don't need marriage to acquire any legitimate rights due a gay couple.
...

"Legitimate right" ...What is an IL-legitimate right by the way?

KiMare wrote:

...4. Another simpleton response... Using a classic analogy, Marriage is the union of Mars and Venus, Gay couples are the collision of Uranus and Uranus.
....

Well, not sure quite what to make of this....

KiMare wrote:

...
5. You are not just culturally insensitive, you are culturally stupid. All major religions hold marriage sacred. Calling gay couples married is a sacrilege.
Slavery and intellectual repression have been rejected over and over through history. Gay couples being designated married has never been accepted or legal in any culture from start to finish in all of human history. Simply because they are viewed as a defective distinct relationship.

Marriage liscenses are government issued and have nothing to do with religious choice or affiliation. So why does your or my or anyone else's religious thoughts matter even one iota?

[Big D]

chance47 wrote:

<quoted text>
Marriage liscenses are government issued and have nothing to do with religious choice or affiliation. So why does your or my or anyone else's religious thoughts matter even one iota?

Exactly!

[chance47]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
Was that a threat?
A wannabe tough guy on the internet, you name it, hahaha!

Likewise I'm sure.

[chance47]

Largelanguage wrote:

<quoted text>
People would accept getting married to same sex partners if gay marriage is allowed, and accept not having children "as a part of life" and will usually hook up to their same sex "spouse". If it is not allowed then they won't stick to their same sex partner.

How many married gay couples are you friends with? Have you offered this theory to them for their thoughts?