Lawmakers leave law forbidding homose...

Lawmakers leave law forbidding homosexuality on the books

There are 1007 comments on the WALB-TV Albany story from Mar 12, 2011, titled Lawmakers leave law forbidding homosexuality on the books. In it, WALB-TV Albany reports that:

Members of Kansas' gay community aren't happy as lawmakers in Topeka, KS, have decided to leave on the books laws banning homosexuality.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WALB-TV Albany.

Roddy

Mount Gambier, Australia

#320 Mar 20, 2011
StevenFL wrote:
<quoted text>
Tsk, tsk, tsk. You are so focused on the act of sex, that you can not see the forest for the trees.... The deal is, you have no clue what gay men do. Not a single clue. Some of us do not like anal sex. Recent studies provided showed that 35% of gay men did not like anal sex at all & have decided NOT to participate in it. I know it is extremely hard to wrap your little brain around it, but intimacy does not always include penetration, like you crazy heterosexuals like to engage in to pop out one brat after another.
Here is a kicker for you, I probably know 10 times more about heterosexual sexual activities, then you will ever know about what gay people do in bed and that is a sad reality that you will have to deal with, my dear.
Steve,you old thing you,

Why did you have Michael Kirby's last post taken down. Was it a bit too close to the bone?

“I am happy”

Since: Jul 08

St. Petersburg, FL

#321 Mar 20, 2011
Roddy wrote:
<quoted text>
Steve,you old thing you,
Why did you have Michael Kirby's last post taken down. Was it a bit too close to the bone?
I do not request anyone's posts to be removed. It is not my job to monitor opinion or delusions. However, others have the ability to read postings in here too and "report abuse"......... It is not my fault that his posts got removed. I am not a tattle tail and I do not narc on people. I can handle myself perfectly fine. Apparently, the poster in question, could not. So, here is a piece of advice, troll. If you want to engage me, then fine, do it, but don't you bitch to me when your postings get removed. I do not have report nothing to no one, but apparently someone took it upon themselves to do it.

Enough said.
Roddy

Brisbane, Australia

#323 Mar 20, 2011
StevenFL wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not request anyone's posts to be removed. It is not my job to monitor opinion or delusions. However, others have the ability to read postings in here too and "report abuse"......... It is not my fault that his posts got removed. I am not a tattle tail and I do not narc on people. I can handle myself perfectly fine. Apparently, the poster in question, could not. So, here is a piece of advice, troll. If you want to engage me, then fine, do it, but don't you bitch to me when your postings get removed. I do not have report nothing to no one, but apparently someone took it upon themselves to do it.
Enough said.
Michael Kirby's post contained the words "..(homosexuals) place their sex organ into their fellow homosexual's anus..."

Had Kirby's post contained the words.."hetrosexual males place their sex organ into their lover's vagina.." the chance of those words being removed from this site would be zero.

Does the removal of Kirby's statement of fact mean that certain individuals are ashamed of blunt, objectively true words being used to describe how they make love?

“Reality is better than truth.”

Since: Nov 09

Indianapolis

#324 Mar 20, 2011
First of all, homosexuals do NOT put their sex organs into others. I don't even know how you would get your testicles in there. Additionally, lesbians can't really put their sex organs into anyone else, and they are just as homosexual as I am. And to top it off, if we restrict the argument to just gay men and penises, about half of gay men have anal sex and half do not.

BTW--hetero men also put their penises in their lovers' ANUSES, too.
Roddy wrote:
<quoted text>
Michael Kirby's post contained the words "..(homosexuals) place their sex organ into their fellow homosexual's anus..."
Had Kirby's post contained the words.."hetrosexual males place their sex organ into their lover's vagina.." the chance of those words being removed from this site would be zero.
Does the removal of Kirby's statement of fact mean that certain individuals are ashamed of blunt, objectively true words being used to describe how they make love?

“I am happy”

Since: Jul 08

St. Petersburg, FL

#325 Mar 20, 2011
Roddy wrote:
<quoted text>
Michael Kirby's post contained the words "..(homosexuals) place their sex organ into their fellow homosexual's anus..."
Had Kirby's post contained the words.."hetrosexual males place their sex organ into their lover's vagina.." the chance of those words being removed from this site would be zero.
Does the removal of Kirby's statement of fact mean that certain individuals are ashamed of blunt, objectively true words being used to describe how they make love?
You know what, click on this link: http://www.topix.com/ext/feedback...

Ask them why the posting was removed. You act like I had some bit in the game of the posts being removed. Seriously, I have too much of a life to concern myself with things, then to go on some campaign about removing postings.

I could care less what statement was made. I do not critique posting style or motive. If that is what you do, then go ahead and do it, but I have NO interest in doing that.

I could care less whether he was talking about f*cking a vagina until it bleed out. I just do not care that much about it and nor do I care about the social politics behind what is removed and what is not removed, troll.
Mick Gallagher

Australia

#326 Mar 20, 2011
cpeter1313 wrote:
First of all, homosexuals do NOT put their sex organs into others. I don't even know how you would get your testicles in there. Additionally, lesbians can't really put their sex organs into anyone else, and they are just as homosexual as I am. And to top it off, if we restrict the argument to just gay men and penises, about half of gay men have anal sex and half do not.
BTW--hetero men also put their penises in their lovers' ANUSES, too.
<quoted text>
Ten - four, good buddy. We're getting a debate going here!!
And about time, too.
gaymarriedwithki ds

United States

#327 Mar 20, 2011
Roddy wrote:
<quoted text>
Michael Kirby's post contained the words "..(homosexuals) place their sex organ into their fellow homosexual's anus..."
Had Kirby's post contained the words.."hetrosexual males place their sex organ into their lover's vagina.." the chance of those words being removed from this site would be zero.
Does the removal of Kirby's statement of fact mean that certain individuals are ashamed of blunt, objectively true words being used to describe how they make love?
Yes. Alot Of people are embarrassed of blunt sexual descriptions
Franco Arena

Australia

#328 Mar 20, 2011
cpeter1313 wrote:
First of all, homosexuals do NOT put their sex organs into others. I don't even know how you would get your testicles in there. Additionally, lesbians can't really put their sex organs into anyone else, and they are just as homosexual as I am. And to top it off, if we restrict the argument to just gay men and penises, about half of gay men have anal sex and half do not.
BTW--hetero men also put their penises in their lovers' ANUSES, too.
<quoted text>
Well, what do they put in...? an order for ham and eggs?

“Choose wisely!”

Since: Jul 07

Los Angeles

#329 Mar 21, 2011
Roddy wrote:
<quoted text>
Michael Kirby's post contained the words "..(homosexuals) place their sex organ into their fellow homosexual's anus..."
Had Kirby's post contained the words.."hetrosexual males place their sex organ into their lover's vagina.." the chance of those words being removed from this site would be zero.
Does the removal of Kirby's statement of fact mean that certain individuals are ashamed of blunt, objectively true words being used to describe how they make love?
I'm certainly not ashamed of how I make love to my husband and I'm not afraid to honestly discuss it and I am most certainly, absolutely NOT afraid of you.

Yes, I'm a top that engages in anal intercourse with my husband. I'm HIV+ and he is and remains, after six years together, NOT infected, because we follow the rules for safer sex.

What we do, is a most beautiful expression of making love. It is an expression that we are bound for life to one another.

You, are a snivelling whiny coward trying to make hay out of nothing.

Eric
Hahahahah

Denver, CO

#331 Mar 21, 2011
[email protected] are phunny!
Michael Kirby

Woodville, Australia

#333 Mar 21, 2011
gemelk wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm certainly not ashamed of how I make love to my husband and I'm not afraid to honestly discuss it and I am most certainly, absolutely NOT afraid of you.
Yes, I'm a top that engages in anal intercourse with my husband. I'm HIV+ and he is and remains, after six years together, NOT infected, because we follow the rules for safer sex.
What we do, is a most beautiful expression of making love. It is an expression that we are bound for life to one another.
You, are a snivelling whiny coward trying to make hay out of nothing.
Eric
Your statement speaks for itself as regards the outcome of you actively practising your sexual orientation. HIV is found in hetrosexuals all too often but as you are clearly not hetro. the reason/cause why you are HIV+ is obvious.

Whether or not anal intercourse is beautiful is purely a matter of opinion.

No reasonable person could be condemned for thinking that using an anus as a tool to express one's love is an abnormality when compared to vaginal sexual intercourse. Clearly it is, given that only three percent of the community is gay and not even all of that number put it in.

People are entitled to think as they please about gay sex practices - if some find the act of anal intercourse offensive and repugnant to good health, so be it.
gaymarriedwithki ds

United States

#334 Mar 21, 2011
Michael Kirby wrote:
<quoted text>
Your statement speaks for itself as regards the outcome of you actively practising your sexual orientation. HIV is found in hetrosexuals all too often but as you are clearly not hetro. the reason/cause why you are HIV+ is obvious.
Whether or not anal intercourse is beautiful is purely a matter of opinion.
No reasonable person could be condemned for thinking that using an anus as a tool to express one's love is an abnormality when compared to vaginal sexual intercourse. Clearly it is, given that only three percent of the community is gay and not even all of that number put it in.
People are entitled to think as they please about gay sex practices - if some find the act of anal intercourse offensive and repugnant to good health, so be it.
Its ok if you think anal sex is gross. I think vaginas are gross. Let's agree not to outlaw eachothers sex lives... we will just avoid putting our respective parts in places we don't like. MMK? Problem solved. Oh one last thing... 3%? You're a little delusional there. Sorry. Im just stating the obvious. Only studies designed specifically by religous groups to underrepresent gays numbers have ever come up with less than 5%.
Mi ck Gallagher

Australia

#335 Mar 21, 2011
gaymarriedwithkids wrote:
<quoted text>
Its ok if you think anal sex is gross. I think vaginas are gross. Let's agree not to outlaw eachothers sex lives... we will just avoid putting our respective parts in places we don't like. MMK? Problem solved. Oh one last thing... 3%? You're a little delusional there. Sorry. Im just stating the obvious. Only studies designed specifically by religous groups to underrepresent gays numbers have ever come up with less than 5%.
If you're really "gay married with kids" how did the kids arive on the scene without a vagina being involved someplace? Like it or not, a vagina put you in the position for you to describe yourself as you do. Fact is that gays who want children have to reach out into the straight world to have it happen. That of itself demonstrates that being gay puts a person outside what is the norm in society. True it is that a lesbian can, and in some cases, does give birth vaginally. But that does not mean there is no difference between that type of individual and a hetrosexual woman who is fertilized in a hetro. act and gives birth via her vagina. It makes you wonder why gays want children when their orientation prevents them having them other than with assistance from straights.

“Darwin died for your sins”

Since: Aug 08

Nunya

#336 Mar 21, 2011
Michael Kirby wrote:
<quoted text>
Your statement speaks for itself as regards the outcome of you actively practising your sexual orientation. HIV is found in hetrosexuals all too often but as you are clearly not hetro. the reason/cause why you are HIV+ is obvious.
Whether or not anal intercourse is beautiful is purely a matter of opinion.
No reasonable person could be condemned for thinking that using an anus as a tool to express one's love is an abnormality when compared to vaginal sexual intercourse. Clearly it is, given that only three percent of the community is gay and not even all of that number put it in.
People are entitled to think as they please about gay sex practices - if some find the act of anal intercourse offensive and repugnant to good health, so be it.
How do you know he didn't get HIV from a blood transfusion?

“Emblem of the Brave and True”

Since: Sep 10

Los Angeles, CA

#337 Mar 21, 2011
Mi ck Gallagher wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're really "gay married with kids" how did the kids arive on the scene without a vagina being involved someplace? Like it or not, a vagina put you in the position for you to describe yourself as you do. Fact is that gays who want children have to reach out into the straight world to have it happen. That of itself demonstrates that being gay puts a person outside what is the norm in society. True it is that a lesbian can, and in some cases, does give birth vaginally. But that does not mean there is no difference between that type of individual and a hetrosexual woman who is fertilized in a hetro. act and gives birth via her vagina. It makes you wonder why gays want children when their orientation prevents them having them other than with assistance from straights.
Welcome to the biology of the 21st century, where conception can begin in a petri dish and society is no longer bound by archaic means of reproduction. See you in 300 years when you finally get here.

“Darwin died for your sins”

Since: Aug 08

Nunya

#338 Mar 21, 2011
Mi ck Gallagher wrote:
If you're really "gay married with kids" how did the kids arive on the scene without a vagina being involved someplace? Like it or not, a vagina put you in the position for you to describe yourself as you do.
So? What's your point?
Mi ck Gallagher wrote:
Fact is that gays who want children have to reach out into the straight world to have it happen. That of itself demonstrates that being gay puts a person outside what is the norm in society.
Yeh, they have to reach out and adopt children that heteros have discarded. Seems above and beyond normal to me.
Mi ck Gallagher wrote:
True it is that a lesbian can, and in some cases, does give birth vaginally. But that does not mean there is no difference between that type of individual and a hetrosexual woman who is fertilized in a hetro. act and gives birth via her vagina. It makes you wonder why gays want children when their orientation prevents them having them other than with assistance from straights.
I bet you're anti choice as well, aren't ya? Why do you feel it neccessary to interfere with anyone's right to be happy? Can't you just keep your busy little nose out of other's business?
Mona Lott

Jackson, NJ

#339 Mar 22, 2011
Mi ck Gallagher wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're really "gay married with kids" how did the kids arive on the scene without a vagina being involved someplace? Like it or not, a vagina put you in the position for you to describe yourself as you do. Fact is that gays who want children have to reach out into the straight world to have it happen. That of itself demonstrates that being gay puts a person outside what is the norm in society. True it is that a lesbian can, and in some cases, does give birth vaginally. But that does not mean there is no difference between that type of individual and a hetrosexual woman who is fertilized in a hetro. act and gives birth via her vagina. It makes you wonder why gays want children when their orientation prevents them having them other than with assistance from straights.
So..... the "straight world" is about producing unwanted children???? Isn't THAT special. Where do you think the children that gays adopt come from?

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#340 Mar 22, 2011
Mi ck Gallagher wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're really "gay married with kids" how did the kids arive on the scene without a vagina being involved someplace?.........
The same way children arrive for untold tens of thousands of straight couples in the US.

We either sire or give birth to them, or use a vast array of legal and safe methods, such as adoption.

Are you really so worried about adoption, that you would deny a marriage license to any straight couple who chooses that method to start a family?

Most folks would disagree with you.
Queens Land

Australia

#341 Mar 22, 2011
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
The same way children arrive for untold tens of thousands of straight couples in the US.
We either sire or give birth to them, or use a vast array of legal and safe methods, such as adoption.
Are you really so worried about adoption, that you would deny a marriage license to any straight couple who chooses that method to start a family?
Most folks would disagree with you.
Trust a red blooded Aussie to get Yankee gays running around like chooks with sticks up their arses.
Roddy

Australia

#342 Mar 22, 2011
madscot wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you know he didn't get HIV from a blood transfusion?
..and where do you think the contaminated blood came from..?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Gay/Lesbian Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Colo. gay discrimination alleged over wedding cake (Jun '13) 3 min River Tam 46,261
News 'Free Kim Davis': This is just what gay rights ... (Sep '15) 15 min carter county res... 25,228
Gay Porn 56 min drod113 23
News Doritos makes rainbow chips in support of gay r... (Sep '15) 1 hr guest 1,318
News Anxiety in America up since Donald Trump became... 1 hr Ryan is cryin 25
News First openly gay Texas A&M student president ho... 2 hr I DONT LIKE YOU 10
News Perry blasts election of 1st gay Texas A&M stud... 2 hr Ted Haggard s Gos... 2
News 'Reading a book can't turn you gay,' say author... 2 hr Normal Decent Hetero 15
News Man Beat 2 Transgender Women Who Tried to Enter... 2 hr Truth 36
More from around the web