Researcher says Regnerus editor James Wright is Guilty of “Gross Editorial Misconduct.”

Jul 18, 2013 | Posted by: Sei | Full story: lezgetreal.com

Researcher Dr. Eric Anderson has flatly stated that James Wright, the man who published the Regnerus 'Study' engaged in "gross editorial misconduct"

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 6 of6

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jul 18, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Keep hammering at this.

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jul 18, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Man, if ANY student who is working on their Master Thesis or Project had done something like this........it would not be a good thing......and yet, the hoax of a study is being used to harm Gay and Lesbian families......totally pathetic!!!

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Jul 19, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

The funniest part of it is that it's fundamental fallacy is called ... wait for it ... "The Texas Sharpshooter".

The name comes from a joke about a Texan who fires some shots at the side of a barn, then paints a target centered on the biggest cluster of hits and claims to be a sharpshooter.

“TAKIA AND TA TONKA”

Since: Aug 08

HAPPY TOGETHER!!!

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Jul 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

snyper wrote:
The funniest part of it is that it's fundamental fallacy is called ... wait for it ... "The Texas Sharpshooter".
The name comes from a joke about a Texan who fires some shots at the side of a barn, then paints a target centered on the biggest cluster of hits and claims to be a sharpshooter.
Interesting.......very interesting!!!!

“Marriage Equality”

Since: Dec 07

Lakeland, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Jul 19, 2013
 

Judged:

1

It makes me wonder if one could submit the video trailer for "Jurassic Park" as proof that humans and dinosaurs once co-existed and have THAT published.....

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Jul 19, 2013
 
NorCal Native wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting.......very interesting!!!!
lol.

Mostly it's problems aren't fallacies, per se. It's biases. Can you pick which ones?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitiv...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bias_ (statistics)

Have a gander at the "See Also" of both of the above.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 1 - 6 of6
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••