Tell that to the gay couples who tried to marry in Hawaii. The Hawaii Constitution include Amendment 14 almost word for word.<quoted text>
We shall Rick because I feel confident this case will take many turns but you are only seeing the idea that the state has a just law in place that has not ever been defined by the federal government. State anti-discrimination protections are irrelevant on the federal level and you will need to see that first hand as these cases make there way through the court system. It is obvious you couldn't care less about the business owner however this case can clearly answer does the guaranteed right to public access mean the business owner's private right to exclude is violated?
Where do you think anti-discrimination protections laws originated from? Civil Rights clearly define discrimination as set forth by the federal government.
When it became clear after the SCoHA ruled that they has a right to marry, the anti gays CHANGED the State Constitution.
Good lord, you are making such a fool of yourself with Rick and the rest of us. Rick knows his stuff. You obviously are using Archie Bunker thinking to make your case.
Allow me to put this another way.
SCOTUS under the Windsor decision clearly showed that gays and lesbiansd are a protected class under the 14th Amendment's equal protection clause. So PLEASE LEASE PLEASE explain to us why Federal law isn't being observed on over 30 States when it comes to SSM!
As I said to someone else, you haven't figured out for yourself if you are a Federalist or a State's Rights advocate.